Garuda - Garba Rujukan Digital

Article Per Year (5 Year)

All

Syiah Kuala Law Journal

SKLJ
Website

Published by Universitas Syiah Kuala

ISSN : 25491742 EISSN : 25809059 DOI : 10.24815/sklj.v5i3.23030

Core Subject : Humanities, Social,

Humanities Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice

We are interested in topics relating to domestic and international legal issues. it accepts articles relating to Civil Law, Criminal Law, Civil Procedural Law, Criminal Justice Process, Commercial Law, Constitutional Law, International Law, State Administrative Law, Adat Law, Islamic Law, Agrarian Law, Environmental Law and Constitutional Procedural Law.

Arjuna Subject : Ilmu Sosial - Hukum

Articles 185 Documents

8 9 10 11 12

Tanggung Jawab Notaris Yang Tidak Mendaftarkan dan Melaporkan Akta Wasiat Ke Daftar Pusat Wasiat Annisa Annisa; Yanis Rinaldi; Teuku Abdurahman
Syiah Kuala Law Journal Vol 3, No 1: April 2019
Publisher : Magister Ilmu Hukum Fakultas Hukum Universitas Syiah Kuala

Salah satu kewenangan Notaris adalah membuat akta wasiat yang juga harus diiringi dengan tanggung jawab untuk mendaftarkan dan melaporkan ke Daftar Pusat Wasiat. Notaris yang tidak membuat akta wasiat juga harus melaporkan laporan nihil pada waktu 5 (lima) hari pada minggu pertama setiap bulan berikutnya. Namun pada kenyataannya, masih banyak Notaris yang tidak menjalankan kewajibannya tersebut. Data tersebut berdasarkan laporan bulanan yang masuk ke dalam online sistem Pusat Wasiat Subdirektorat Harta Peninggalan Direktorat Perdata (2015) terdapat sekitar 4.000 (empat ribu) Notaris yang secara rutin melakukan laporan bulanan, padahal jumlah Notaris di seluruh Indonesia pada saat itu mencapai sekitar 15.000 (lima belas ribu). Penelitian ini menganalisis tanggung jawab Notaris yang tidak mendaftarkan dan melaporkan akta wasiat ke Daftar Pusat Wasiat. Metode Penelitian yang digunakan adalah penelitian hukum normatif atau yuridis.A job duty of a Notary public is to notarize a will. Notarial Acts of Notarizing a will should include registering and reporting the will to the Central Register of Wills. Even though a Notary public legalizes no will in a month, she or he still has to make a nil report in the first five days of the next month. However, in fact there were still Notaries who did not perform the duties. Based on the data of monthly reports in the online system of Central Register of Wills (2015), only 4000 out of 15000 Notaries in Indonesia regularly submitted their monthly reports. The objective of this research was to identify the liability of any notary who did not register and report the will. This normative legal research was conducted by means of a statute approach.

Actions Against The Law Caused on The Action of Cancellation of The Grants : Study of Decision No. 156/Pdt.G/2017/PN. Tjk Andika Pramudita; R. Ismala Dewi
Syiah Kuala Law Journal Vol 5, No 3: Desember 2021
Publisher : Magister Ilmu Hukum Fakultas Hukum Universitas Syiah Kuala

A grant is a free agreement in the form of giving part of the property to another person which cannot be withdrawn. Irrevocability is not an absolute provision because Article 1688 of the Civil Code regulates the conditions for withdrawing grants. However, the fact is that the withdrawal of the grant was given without heeding the provisions of the article. As a result, the withdrawal of grants that does not heed Article 1688 of the Civil Code will result in losses for the grantee and fall into the category of unlawful acts. The purpose of this study was to examine the cancellation of the grant granted by the judge in the decision no. 156/Pdt.G/2017/PN.Tjk with the Civil Code and analyze unlawful acts originating from the cancellation of grants that harm the grantee. To achieve this goal, the author uses a juridical-normative research method based on secondary data. Based on the research results the authors conclude that the cancellation of the grant in decision no. 156/Pdt.G/2017/PN.Tjk did not heed the provisions of Article 1688 of the Civil Code and as a result of the cancellation of the grant which harmed the grantee as compensation for fulfilling elements of an unlawful act in Article 1365 of the Civil Code.

JURIDICAL ANALYSIS OF HOLDING STATE-OWNED ENTERPRISES IN THE VIEW OF CORPORATE LAW AND COMPETITION LAW Selia Putri
Syiah Kuala Law Journal Vol 6, No 1: April 2022
Publisher : Magister Ilmu Hukum Fakultas Hukum Universitas Syiah Kuala

This research aims to analyse the status and Position of subsidiaries company of Holding State-Owned Enterprises and to find out regulate of Holding State-owned Enterprises in the view of Corporate Law and Competition Law. The result showed that Subsidiaries of Holding Stateowned Enterprises have a different status from State-owned Enterprises and have the same position as SOEs in certain aspects. This is based on Article 2A paragraph (7) of Government Regulation No. 72 of 2016, which states that SOEs Holding Subsidiaries are treated the same as SOEs in terms of (1) obtaining government assignments or performing public services; and/or (2) obtaining special State and/or Government policies, including in the management of Natural Resources, with special treatment certain conditions as applied to SOEs. The regulation of SOE holdings, Government Regulation No. 72 of 2016, does not comply with Article 51 Prohibition of Monopolistic Practice and Unfair Competition Law No. 5 of 1999. This is based on the implementation guidelines of Article 51 of Act No. 5 of 1999 State concentration of activities or monopolies cannot be regulated by government regulations, but shall be regulated by law.

Penanggulangan Tindak Pidana Kepemilikan Dan Penggunaan Senjata Api Tanpa Izin Dalam Sistem Peradilan Pidana Evan Munandar; Suhaimi Suhaimi; Muhammad Adli
Syiah Kuala Law Journal Vol 2, No 3: Desember 2018
Publisher : Magister Ilmu Hukum Fakultas Hukum Universitas Syiah Kuala

Pasal 1 ayat (1) dan ayat (2) Undang-Undang Darurat Nomor 12 Tahun 1951, menyatakan bahwa “Barang siapa, yang tanpa hak memasukkan ke Indonesia membuat, menerima, mencoba memperoleh, menyerahkan atau mencoba menyerahkan, menguasai, membawa, mempunyai persediaan padanya atau mempunyai dalam miliknya, menyimpan, mengangkut, menyembunyikan, mempergunakan, atau mengeluarkan dari Indonesia sesuatu senjata api, amunisi atau sesuatu bahan peledak, dihukum dengan hukuman mati atau hukuman penjara seumur hidup atau hukuman penjara sementara setinggi-tingginya dua puluh tahun. Namun pada kenyataannya di Wilayah Hukum Pengadilan Negeri Jantho masih terjadi tindak pidana penggunaan senjata api tanpa izin. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk menganalisis faktor penyebab terjadinya tindak pidana kepemilikan dan penggunaan senjata api tanpa izin, upaya penanggulangan dan hambatan dalam penanggulangan tindak pidana tersebut. Jenis penelitian hukum dan pendekatan yuridis empiris, dengan teknik pengumpulan data melalui penelitian kepustakaan untuk memperoleh data sekunder dan penelitian lapangan untuk memperoleh data primer. Analisis data dengan metode kualitatif. Berdasarkan hasil penelitian diketahui bahwa faktor penyebab terjadinya tindak pidana kepemilikan dan penggunaan senjata api tanpa izin di wilayah hukum Pengadilan Negeri Jantho karena tujuan membela diri, alat untuk mencari nafkah, melaksanakan tugas sebagai anggota GAM. Upaya penanggulangan dilakukan secara preventif dan represif. Hambatan yang dihadapi kurangnya pengawasan oleh kepolisian maksimal.On the paragraph 1 article 1 and 2 of the emergency legislation no 12 of 1951, it was mentioned that “whoever, without permission producing, accepting, trying to attain, giving, trying to give, controlling, carrying, having, keeping, taking, hiding, using, or taking out the firearm, ammunition, or dynamite in Indonesia will be punished capital punishment, life imprisonment, or twenty years imprisoned punishment”. However, in the reality, in Jantho Jurisdiction region, there are still many of criminal act related to the unauthorized use of firearms. It was caused of the security factor in the living area and the lack of knowledge factor on unauthorized ownership of the firearms. This research aims to describe and analyze the causal factor of the criminal act on the unauthorized firearms in the jurisdiction region of Jantho and the effort made to overcome the criminal act of unauthorized ownership and use of firearm. This research is a type of law research, empirical juridical research, or sociology law research, with the technique of data collection conducted through library research to attain the secondary research and field research to attain the primary data. The technique of data analysis used in this research is qualitative. This method is used to easily to understand the causes observed and to connect the problem discussed. Based on the research result, it was revealed that the causal factor of the criminal act on the unauthorized gun ownership in the law area of Jantho court are: self-defense factor, earning money, the responsibility as an Aceh Free Movement member, the preparation to did other criminal act. The effort made to overcome the criminal act of unauthorized gun use by regularly giving the law and police raid. The repressive efforts made are by investigating, sue the perpetrators of criminal act on unauthorized gun use to the court based on the legislation, and deciding the criminal decision to the perpetrators by the judge.

Analytical Approach on the Law Regarding Sexual Violence between Indonesia and the United Kingdom Irvanaries Irvanaries; David Tan
Syiah Kuala Law Journal Vol 5, No 2: Agustus 2021
Publisher : Magister Ilmu Hukum Fakultas Hukum Universitas Syiah Kuala

Criminal deeds bring disaster to the life of the people in general, and rights of many are to be stripped of from them without their consent which is then becomes the urgency on why criminal law needs to be enacted and applied. In its provisions, criminal law regulates about sexual violences. It has a potential to caused harm both physically and mentally towards its victim. However, the problem with the system is that at some point, the ideal justice is not met in its enforcement. Indonesian constitution is yet to enact a regulation to restrain or to impose more assertive measures on sexual violences. One of the examples is how rape is recognized only if the victim is a woman who is not the wife of the perpetrator. This idea does not fully protect the right of others who becomes a victim of sexual assault which doesn’t fulfil the ideal justice within the constitution. Comparing to how the United Kingdom sentenced Reinhard Sinaga to prison for life as the consequences of his deed, the authors want to create a comparison on the criminal law in both countries based on Rome Statute of ICC and to discover in what way can Indonesia’s criminal law improve.

Upaya Terpadu Pencegahan dan Pemberantasan Penyalahgunaan Peredaran Gelap Narkotika di Lapas Klas II A Banda Aceh dan Rutan Klas II B Sigli Risa Andika Sari; Suhaimi Suhaimi; Muazzin Muazzin
Syiah Kuala Law Journal Vol 2, No 1: April 2018
Publisher : Magister Ilmu Hukum Fakultas Hukum Universitas Syiah Kuala

Pasal 46 UU No 12 Tahun 1995 tentang Pemasyarakatan menyatakan Kepala Lapas bertanggungjawab atas keamanan dan ketertiban di Lapas yang dipimpinnya. Pasal 4 Angka 7 Permenkumham No 6 Tahun 2013 tentang Tata Tertib Lapas dan Rutan menyatakan setiap Narapidana/Tahanan dilarang menyimpan, membuat, membawa, mengedarkan, dan/atau mengkonsumsi narkotika. Terdapat MoU antara Kemenkumham dan BNN serta Kemenkumham dan Kepolisian tentang pencegahan dan pemberantasan narkotika di Lapas. Namun kenyataannya, peredaran gelap narkotika masih terjadi sebagaimana di Lapas Klas IIA Banda Aceh dan Rutan Klas IIB Sigli. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengetahui pelaksanaan upaya terpadu pencegahan dan pemberantasan penyalahgunaan peredaran gelap narkotika di Lapas dan Rutan serta hambatan dalam pelaksanaan upaya terpadu tersebut. Penelitian ini menggunakan metode penelitian yuridis empiris. Pelaksanaan upaya terpadu pencegahan dan pemberantasan penyalahgunaan peredaran gelap narkotika belum berjalan maksimal dikarenakan tidak adanya hubungan yang sinergis antar instansi terkait. Hambatan yakni kebocoran informasi, keterlibatan oknum petugas Lapas, protap Lapas, keterbatasan anggaran dan sarana prasarana. Disarankan kepada Lapas, Kepolisian dan BNN untuk menindaklanjuti MoU yang ada dengan perjanjian yang memuat substansi dan sanksi yang tegas, sehingga aturan yang ada mempunyai kekuatan hukum mengikat. Kepada Pemerintah, untuk mengalokasikan anggaran serta pengadaan sarana prasarana yang memadai dan merevisi aturan pasal 17 ayat (5) UU No 12 Tahun 1995 tentang Pemasyarakatan.Article 46 of the Act Number 12, 1995 concerning the Correctional Centre states that the Head of a correctional service center is responsible for security and order in the center, which he is in charge. Article 4 of Point 7 of the Regulation of the Minister of Law and Human Rights Number 6, 2013 on the Correctional Centre and Detention also states that every prisoner or detainee is prohibited from storing, making, carrying, distributing and/or consuming narcotics and/or narcotics precursors and other dangerous drugs. In addition, there is a MoU between the Ministry and BNN and MoU between the Ministry of Law and Human Rights and Police on the prevention and eradication of narcotics in prisons. However, illicit drug trafficking still occur in Class II A Correctional Centre of Banda Aceh and Class II B Sigli. This research aims to know and explain integrated prevention and suppression efforts of drug abuses at correction center and obstacles faced in integrated prevention and suppression efforts of drug abuses at correction center. The research shows that integrated prevention and suppression efforts of drug abuses at correction center have not been working maximal, as there is no synergic relationship between related institutions. The obstacles is, namely information leakage, the involvement of officers, criminal procedures, lack of budget and infrastructure. It is recommended that the Centre, the police and the BNN to follow up existing MoUs with agreements containing substance and strict sanctions, so that existing rules have binding legal force. The government should allocate sufficient budget and the provision of adequate infrastructure facilities and revise the Article 17 point (5) of the Act Number 12, 1995 concerning the Correctional Centre.

Analisis Yuridis Pembatalan Akta Perjanjian Pengikatan Jual Beli (PPJB) Hak Atas Tanah Siti Afrah Afifah
Syiah Kuala Law Journal Vol 4, No 2: Agustus 2020
Publisher : Magister Ilmu Hukum Fakultas Hukum Universitas Syiah Kuala

Tulisan ini membahas peralihan hak yang menggunakan akta perjanjian pengikatan jual beli (PPJB) terkadang dapat terjadi pembatalan, baik atas permintaan para pihak sendiri untuk akta tertentu, atau dengan menggugat pihak lainnya ke Pengadilan Umum untuk membatalkan isi akta agar tidak mengikat lagi. Dari beberapa Putusan Mahkamah Agung yang dianalisis, pembatalan akta PPJB terjadi karena wanprestasi dengan alasan-alasan tertentu serta karena perbuatan melawan hukum, sedangkan maksud dibuatkan akta PPJB sebagai perjanjian yang mendahului proses peralihan hak untuk memberikan perlindungan hukum dan kepastian hukum bagi para pihak yang membuatnya. Metode penelitian yang digunakan adalah penelitian yuridis normatif, dan penelitian ini bersifat deskriptif analisis. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan Pembatalan akta perjanjian pengikatan jual beli oleh Mahkamah Agung sudah sesuai dengan syarat kebatalan sebuah akta menurut peraturan peraturan perundang-undangan yang berlaku yang mengacu pada Pasal 1265, Pasal 1266, Pasal 1267, Pasal 1320, dan Pasal 1238 KUHPerdata. Perlindungan hukum kepada para pihak yang dirugikan dengan menyatakan akta batal demi hukum, dinyatakan batal, dengan konsekuensi uang muka menjadi hapus, meskipun pada Putusan Mahkamah Agung Nomor 1650 K/Pdt/2015 tidak diberikan karena tidak terdapat klausul mengenai syarat batalnya perjanjian dan seharusnya akta PPJB dinyatakan melanggar syarat objektif karena dibuat ketika terjadi tumpang tindih, perlindungan hukum kepada Notaris dengan tidak dapat mengajukan ganti kerugian kepadanya. Masing-masing Hakim Mahkamah Agung dalam memberikan putusannya mengikuti putusan Hakim yang terdahulu dimana pada pertimbangannya masing-masing Putusan Pengadilan Tinggi dianggap tidak bertetangan dengan hukum dan/atau Undang-Undang.

Penyelesaian Kredit Kupedes Bermasalah Terhadap Pelaku Usaha Mikro Pada PT. BRI (Persero) Tbk Dedy Yuliansyah; Dahlan Dahlan; Sri Walny Rahayu
Syiah Kuala Law Journal Vol 1, No 1: April 2017 (Print Version)
Publisher : Magister Ilmu Hukum Fakultas Hukum Universitas Syiah Kuala

Dalam rangka membangun demokrasi ekonomi, Usaha Mikro perlu diberdayakan sebagai bagian integral ekonomi rakyat yang mempunyai kedudukan, peran, dan potensi strategis untuk mewujudkan struktur perekonomian nasional yang makin seimbang, berkembang dan berkeadilan. Oleh karenanya, pembiayaan atau pemberian pinjaman dalam bentuk perjanjian kredit terhadap usaha mikro perlu diatur dengan baik. Bank BRI melalui produk kredit Kupedes melayani para pelaku Usaha Mikro dengan baik. Namun, dalam praktinya, banyak terjadi permasalahan seperti timbulnya tunggakan kredit oleh pelaku Usaha Mikro.In order to build economic democracy, Micro, they need to be empowered as an integral part of the people's economy that have position, role, and strategic potential to provide a more balanced, developed and justice. Therefore, financing or lending in the form of credit agreements to Micro need to be properly regulated. However, in practice, there are many problems such as the arising of credit attempted by the agent of Micro.

Livelihood Issues as a Cause Of Divorce in The Perspective of Islamic Family Law Sri Hariati
Syiah Kuala Law Journal Vol 5, No 1: April 2021
Publisher : Magister Ilmu Hukum Fakultas Hukum Universitas Syiah Kuala

This study aims to analyze the livelihood issues that cause divorce from the perspective of Islamic Family Law, and to analyze the legal consequences of divorce due to subsistence factors with the study of Mataram Religious Court Decision No: 0492 / Pdt.G / 2016 / PA.Mtr. The research method used is empirical normative legal research, with a case approach method, a statutory approach, and a sociological approach. The results of the research and discussion conclude that the issue of livelihood can be one of the causes of divorce in terms of Islamic family law due to 3 things, namely, Nyusyus 'husband, Nyusyus' wife, and syiqaq. Based on the facts in decision No: 0429 / Pdt.G / 2016 / PA.Mtr due to the legal consequences of divorce due to financial factors and other reasons, the court obliges the ex-husband to provide living expenses and / or determine an obligation for the ex-wife. Before the marriage between a husband and a wife candidate should be more solidified in terms of physical and spiritual preparation and to officials at the Religious Courts, so that they can decide cases related to this factor of living more carefully and quickly so as not to cause harm to either party.

Penahanan Dalam Sistem Peradilan Pidana Terhadap Tersangka Tindak Pidana Penyalahgunaan Narkotika Rizqi Nurul Fadhilah; Dahlan Dahlan; Mujibussalim Mujibussalim
Syiah Kuala Law Journal Vol 2, No 1: April 2018
Publisher : Magister Ilmu Hukum Fakultas Hukum Universitas Syiah Kuala

Penahanan yang dilakukan terhadap tersangka penyalahgunaan narkotika Golongan I bagi diri sendiri tidak memenuhi syarat boleh dilakukannya penahanan, sehingga secara yuridis tidak dapat dilakukan penahanan. Namun pada kenyataanya terhadap tersangka penyalahgunaan narkotika tersebut adanya dilakukan penahanan dan tidak dilakukan penahanan. Sehingga hal tersebut menjadi permasalahan dalam penegakan hukum pidana adalah masalah penahanan terhadap pelaku, yang terjadi tidak sejalannya syarat subjektif dan keadaan serta hambatan terkait dengan pentingnya dilakukan penahanan terhadap tersangka penyalahgunaan narkotika. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk menjelaskan dan mengkaji pelaksanaan penahanan pelaku tindak pidana narkotika yang melanggar Pasal 127 ayat (1) huruf a UU No. 35 Tahun 2009 Tentang Narkotika dan hambatan terhadap penahanan tindak pidana narkotika dalam Pasal 127 ayat (1) huruf a UU No. 35 Tahun 2009 Tentang Narkotika. Metode penelitian yang digunakan adalah metode penelitian yuridis empiris dengan pendekatan kualitatif dan menggunakan sumber data sekunder berupa data yang diperoleh melalui bahan kepustakaan dan sumber data primer berupa sumber data lapangan. Dari penelitian telah terjadi disharmonisasi hukum dalam melakukan penahanan antara Pasal 21 KUHAP dengan Pasal 127 ayat (1) huruf a UU No. 35 Tahun 2009 tentang Narkotika. Penerapan kedua pasal tersebut menghambat penegakan hukum dalam hal penanganan tersangka pada tahap penyelidikan dan penyidikan, sehingga terdapat perkara yang harus dihentikan karena tidak dilakukannya penahanan oleh jaksa yang menyidik, dan telah ditemukan juga hambatan yang terjadi meliputi hambatan yuridis, tidak adanya sarana dan prasarana yakni berupa laboratorium pemeriksaan narkotika, dan luasnya wilayah hukum yang tidak sesuai dengan jumlah personil lembaga Kejaksaan Negeri Jantho.The detention act against first degree self-use drug abuser does not qualify for detention, so that juridical detention can not be made. In fact, some of drug abusers will face detention and for some of those will not. So it becomes a problem in criminal law enforcement regarding the issue of detention, inconsistent subjective requirements and circumstances and obstacles related to the importance of detention of suspected narcotics abuser. This study aims to explain and examine the implementation of detention of perpetrators of narcotic abuse against the Article 127 paragraph (1) letter a UU no.35 Year 2009 about Narcotics and the barriers to the detention of narcotics crimes in Article 127 paragraph (1) letter a UU No.35 Year 2009 about narcotics. The research method used is empirical juridical method with qualitative approach and for secondary data sources was obtained through library materials, while primary data was collected in the form of field data sources. The research shows that it has been legal disharmony in the detention between Article 21 KUHAP with Article 127 paragraph (1) letter a UU No. 35 Year 2009 on Narcotics. The implementation of those two articles impedes law enforcement in the term of handling suspects during the investigation and investigative stages which led to the suspended /stalled cases because the detention was not conducted by the prosecutor who investigated, and the research has also found some obstacles that includes the juridical obstacles, the absence of facilities and infrastructure that is in the form of laboratory examination of narcotics, and the extent of jurisdiction area which is inconsistent with the number of personnel of the Jantho State Prosecution Service.

Page 10 of 19 | Total Record : 185

8 9 10 11 12

Filter by Year

2017 2023

Filter By Issues

All Issue Vol 7, No 2: Agustus 2023 Vol 7, No 1: April 2023 Vol 6, No 3: Desember 2022 Vol 6, No 1: April 2022 Vol 5, No 3: Desember 2021 Vol 5, No 2: Agustus 2021 Vol 5, No 1: April 2021 Vol 4, No 3: Desember 2020 Vol 4, No 2: Agustus 2020 Vol 4, No 1: April 2020 Vol 3, No 3: Desember 2019 Vol 3, No 2: Agustus 2019 Vol 3, No 1: April 2019 Vol 2, No 3: Desember 2018 Vol 2, No 2: Agustus 2018 Vol 2, No 1: April 2018 Vol 1, No 3: Desember 2017 Vol 1, No 2: Agustus 2017 Vol 1, No 1: April 2017 (Print Version) More Issue

Home Page

OAI Link

Editorial Team

Contact

Reviewer

Google Scholar

Contact Name
Rizanizarli

Contact Email
rizanizarli@unsyiah.ac.id

Phone
+62651-7410147

Journal Mail Official
sklj@unsyiah.ac.id

Editorial Address
Jln. Putroe Phang Street No.1. Darussalam, Provinsi Aceh, 23111

Location
Kab. aceh besar,

Aceh

INDONESIA

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Home Page

OAI Link

Editorial Team

Contact

Reviewer

Google Scholar

Contact Name Rizanizarli

Contact Email rizanizarli@unsyiah.ac.id

Phone +62651-7410147

Journal Mail Official sklj@unsyiah.ac.id

Editorial Address Jln. Putroe Phang Street No.1. Darussalam, Provinsi Aceh, 23111

Location Kab. aceh besar, Aceh INDONESIA

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Contact Name
Rizanizarli

Contact Email
rizanizarli@unsyiah.ac.id

Phone
+62651-7410147

Journal Mail Official
sklj@unsyiah.ac.id

Editorial Address
Jln. Putroe Phang Street No.1. Darussalam, Provinsi Aceh, 23111

Location
Kab. aceh besar,

Aceh

INDONESIA