cover
Article Per Year (5 Year)
All
Home Page
OAI Link
Editorial Team
Contact
Reviewer
Google Scholar
Contact Name
Ebit Bimas Saputra
Contact Email
dinasti.info@gmail.com
Phone
+628117404455
Journal Mail Official
editor@dinastires.org
Editorial Address
Case Amira Prive Jl. H. Risin No. 64 D, Pondok Jagung Timur, Serpong Utara - Tangerang Selatan
Location
Kota tangerang selatan,
Banten
INDONESIA
Journal of Law, Poliitic and Humanities
Published by Dinasti Research
ISSN : 27471985     EISSN : 29622816     DOI : https://doi.org/10.38035/jlph
Core Subject : Humanities, Social,
Humanities Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Social Sciences
Journal of Law, Poliitic and Humanities is a research journal in Law, Humanities and Politics published since 2020 by the Dinasti Research. This journal aims to disseminate research results to academics, practitioners, students, and other parties who are interested in the fields of Law, Humanities and Politics which includes Curriculum Management, Graduate Management, Learning Process Management, Facilities and Infrastructure Management, Education Management, Funding Management, Management of Assessment, Management of Educators and Education Personnel, etc.
Arjuna Subject : Ilmu Sosial - Ilmu Sosial (Lain-Lain)
Articles 1,264 Documents
 123   124   125   126   127 
The Juridical Review of Oral Land Sale and Purchase Agreements in the Community According to Customary Law in Central Kalimantan Amini, Cahaya Rusellia; Yestati , Ariani; Januardy, Ivans
Journal of Law, Politic and Humanities Vol. 5 No. 5 (2025): (JLPH) Journal of Law, Politic and Humanities
Publisher : Dinasti Research

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.38035/jlph.v5i5.2033

Abstract

This research examines the juridical review of the practice of oral land sale and purchase agreements in indigenous communities in Central Kalimantan. Indigenous people still maintain oral-based sale and purchase mechanisms that are considered valid according to local customary law, as long as they are witnessed by traditional leaders and fulfill elements of trust and mutual agreement. Although recognized by custom, this kind of agreement has the potential to cause agrarian conflicts because it does not have sufficient evidentiary power before national law. This research uses a normative juridical approach, by reviewing legislation and interviews with indigenous community leaders. The results show that customary law and national law have common ground in the recognition of land rights, but there needs to be synchronization so that indigenous peoples do not lose their rights due to the lack of written evidence. This research emphasizes the importance of legal protection of local practices through formal recognition and recording mechanisms in accordance with local customary values
Application of the Principles of Legality and Due Process of Law in the Indonesian National Police Personnel Dispute: A Legal Analysis of the Jakarta Administrative Court Decision Number 50/G/2020/PTUN.JKT Cordelia, Anastasia; Matulandi, Sabina Abigail; Lawira, William; Nugraha, Dwi Putra
Journal of Law, Politic and Humanities Vol. 6 No. 4 (2026): (JLPH) Journal of Law, Politic and Humanities
Publisher : Dinasti Research

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.38035/jlph.v6i4.3224

Abstract

Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk menganalisis apakahpenerbitan keputusan tersebut telah memenuhi asas legalitasdalam hukum administrasi negara serta apakah proses pemeriksaan dan penerbitannya telah mencerminkan prinsipdue process of law dan memberikan perlindungan hukum yang adil bagi pihak yang bersangkutan. Metode yang digunakanadalah penelitian hukum normatif dengan pendekatanperaturan perundang-undangan, pendekatan kasus, dan pendekatan konseptual melalui analisis putusan pengadilan, peraturan perundang-undangan, dan literatur hukumadministrasi negara. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwasecara kewenangan formal keputusan tersebut telah memilikidasar hukum yang sah, namun terdapat indikasi kelemahanpada aspek prosedural dan substansial yang berpengaruhterhadap penerapan asas legalitas secara utuh. Selain itu, proses pemeriksaan dinilai belum sepenuhnya mencerminkanprinsip due process of law karena terdapat kekurangan dalampemenuhan hak untuk didengar, transparansi, sertaobjektivitas pemeriksaan. Kesimpulan penelitian inimenegaskan bahwa penerapan asas legalitas dan due process of law dalam perkara PTDH tersebut belum sepenuhnyaterpenuhi secara optimal dalam praktik administrasikepolisian. The study aims to analyze whether the issuance of the decision complies with the principle of legality in administrative law and whether the examination and decision-making process reflects due process of law and provides fair legal protection for the concerned individual. This research uses a normative legal method with statutory, case, and conceptual approaches by analyzing court decisions, relevant legislation, and legal literature in administrative law. The findings indicate that while the decision has a valid formal legal basis in terms of authority, there are indications of deficiencies in procedural and substantive aspects affecting the full application of the principle of legality. In addition, the examination process does not fully reflect due process of law due to shortcomings in the right to be heard, transparency, and objectivity of the proceedings. The study concludes that the implementation of both the principle of legality and due process of law in this dismissal case has not been optimally fulfilled in police administrative practice.
Digital Evidence And Its Challenges In Indonesian Civil Law Sunardi, Heru; Jamaludin, Jamaludin; Moh. Asyiq Amrulloh; Dewi Hikmayatun Ulya
Journal of Law, Politic and Humanities Vol. 6 No. 4 (2026): (JLPH) Journal of Law, Politic and Humanities
Publisher : Dinasti Research

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.38035/jlph.v6i4.3232

Abstract

Abstract This research was conducted with the aim of finding out the legal basis, challenges and legal solutions faced in digital evidence in electronic contract disputes in Indonesia. The type of research used in this research is normative legal research using statutory and conceptual approaches. The results of this research show that: 1) The legal basis for digital proof of electronic contract disputes is regulated in the ITE Law and the Civil Code. The ITE Law is regulated in Article 1 paragraph (17) and Article 5 paragraph (1). Meanwhile, the Civil Code is regulated in Article 1320, Article 1338 and Article 1866 of the Civil Code. 2) The challenges of digital proof of electronic contract disputes include three aspects, namely: The judicial aspect (judges are still hesitant in considering authentic electronic documents as valid evidence), the technical aspect (it is difficult to guarantee the authenticity of data without special expertise), and the legal aspect (there are no formal rules in civil procedural law regarding procedures for electronic proof). The solutions that can be implemented are by strengthening the capacity and technical guidelines for law enforcement officials, strategic efforts are needed to ensure the authentication, integrity and reliability of electronic evidence presented at trial, as well as reformulating civil procedural law and harmonizing other regulations relating to electronic evidence.
The Role Of Visum Et Repertum In Domestic Violence Cases: A Case Study Of Decision Number 310/Pid.Sus/2025/Pn Ckr Eliagita, Choralisa; Eryke, Herlita
Journal of Law, Politic and Humanities Vol. 6 No. 4 (2026): (JLPH) Journal of Law, Politic and Humanities
Publisher : Dinasti Research

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.38035/jlph.v6i4.3236

Abstract

Domestic violence in Indonesia poses serious evidentiary challenges due to minimal independent witnesses and its occurrence within private family spaces. Visum et Repertum (VeR), as a medico-legal document, plays a strategic role in the criminal evidence system by providing objective proof of physical violence. This study analyzes VeR’s role in proving domestic violence cases, identifies implementation obstacles, and examines judicial considerations based on Decision Number 310/Pid.Sus/2025/PN Ckr. A normative juridical approach with case study method was employed, analyzing secondary legal materials through prescriptive-analytical qualitative analysis. The findings reveal that VeR performs essential functions in objectively documenting injuries, connecting wound characteristics with instruments of violence, strengthening victim testimonies, and serving as a primary judicial consideration in establishing the elements of Article 44 paragraph (1) of the Domestic Violence Elimination Law. In this case, VeR formed a coherent evidentiary construction with witness testimonies and physical evidence, resulting in an eight-month imprisonment sentence for the perpetrator.

Page 127 of 127 | Total Record : 1264

 123   124   125   126   127 

Filter by Year

2020 2026


Reset
Filter By Issues
All Issue Vol. 6 No. 4 (2026): (JLPH) Journal of Law, Politic and Humanities Vol. 6 No. 3 (2026): (JLPH) Journal of Law, Politic and Humanities Vol. 6 No. 2 (2025): (JLPH) Journal of Law, Politic and Humanities Vol. 6 No. 1 (2025): (JLPH) Journal of Law, Politic and Humanities Vol. 5 No. 6 (2025): (JLPH) Journal of Law, Politic and Humanities Vol. 5 No. 5 (2025): (JLPH) Journal of Law, Politic and Humanities Vol. 5 No. 4 (2025): (JLPH) Journal of Law, Politic and Humanities Vol. 5 No. 3 (2025): (JLPH) Journal of Law, Politic and Humanities Vol. 5 No. 2 (2025): (JLPH) Journal of Law, Politic and Humanities Vol. 4 No. 6 (2024): (JLPH) Journal of Law, Politic and Humanities (September-October 2024) Vol. 4 No. 5 (2024): (JLPH) Journal of Law, Politic and Humanities (July-August 2024) Vol. 4 No. 4 (2024): (JLPH) Journal of Law, Politic and Humanities (May-June 2024) Vol. 4 No. 3 (2024): (JLPH) Journal of Law, Politic and Humanities (March - April 2024) Vol. 4 No. 2 (2024): (JLPH) Journal of Law, Politic and Humanities (January - February 2024) Vol. 5 No. 2 (2024): (JLPH) Journal of Law, Politic and Humanities Vol. 5 No. 1 (2024): (JLPH) Journal of Law, Politic and Humanities Vol. 4 No. 1 (2023): (JLPH) Journal of Law, Politic and Humanities (November - December 2023) Vol. 3 No. 4 (2023): (JLPH) Journal of Law, Politic and Humanities (August 2023) Vol. 3 No. 3 (2023): (JLPH) Journal of Law, Politic and Humanities (May 2023) Vol. 3 No. 2 (2023): (JLPH) Journal of Law, Politic and Humanities (February 2023) Vol. 3 No. 1 (2022): (JLPH) Journal of Law, Politic and Humanities (November 2022) Vol. 2 No. 4 (2022): (JLPH) Journal of Law, Politic and Humanities (August 2022) Vol. 2 No. 3 (2022): (JLPH) Journal of Law, Politic and Humanities (May 2022) Vol. 2 No. 2 (2022): (JLPH) Journal of Law, Politic and Humanities (February 2022) Vol. 2 No. 1 (2021): (JLPH) Journal of Law, Politic and Humanities (November 2021) Vol. 1 No. 4 (2021): (JLPH) Journal of Law, Politic and Humanities (August 2021) Vol. 1 No. 3 (2021): (JLPH) Journal of Law, Politic and Humanities (May 2021) Vol. 1 No. 2 (2021): (JLPH) Journal of Law, Politic and Humanities (February 2021) Vol. 1 No. 1 (2020): (JLPH) Journal of Law, Politic and Humanities (November 2020) More Issue