cover
Article Per Year (5 Year)
All
Home Page
OAI Link
Editorial Team
Contact
Reviewer
Google Scholar
Contact Name
Andi Akram
Contact Email
sekretariatjurnalkumdil@gmail.com
Phone
+6221-29079286
Journal Mail Official
jurnalhukumperadilan@mahkamahagung.go.id
Editorial Address
Jl. Jend. A. Yani Kav. 58 Lt. 10 Cempaka Putih Jakarta Pusat
Location
Kota bogor,
Jawa barat
INDONESIA
Jurnal Hukum dan Peradilan
Published by Pusat Penelitian dan Pengembangan Hukum dan Peradilan MA RI
ISSN : 23033274     EISSN : 25281100     DOI : https://doi.org/10.25216/jhp
Core Subject : Economy, Social,
Economics, Econometrics & Finance Environmental Science Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice
Jurnal Hukum dan Peradilan (JHP) is published by the Research Center for Law and Judiciary of the Supreme Court of the Republic of Indonesia. JHP aimed to be a peer-reviewed platform and an authoritative source of information on legal and judiciary studies. The scope of JHP is analytical, objective, empirical, and contributive literature on the dynamics and development of legal studies, specifically in Indonesia. JHP welcomes scientific papers on a range of topics from research studies, judicial decisions, theoretical studies, literature reviews, philosophical and critical consultations that are analytical, objective, and systematic. However, from a wide range of topics that researchers can choose from, JHP puts more attention to the papers focusing on the sociology of law, living law, legal philosophy, history of national law, customary law, literature studies, international law, interdisciplinary, and empirical studies. Jurnal Hukum dan Peradilan (JHP) is a media dedicated to judicial personnel, academician, practitioners, and law expertise in actualizing the idea of research, development, and analysis of law and judiciary. Jurnal Hukum dan Peradilan comes out three times a year in March, July, and November.
Arjuna Subject : Ilmu Sosial - Hukum
Articles 653 Documents
 59   60   61   62   63 
ITSBAT ON WIDOW'S MARRIAGE DURING IDDAH: OVERVIEW ON THEORY OF NORM HIERARCHY (Study of Stipulation Number 137/Pdt.P/2018/PA.Bm) Tobroni, Faiq
Jurnal Hukum dan Peradilan Vol 11 No 2 (2022)
Publisher : Pusat Strategi Kebijakan Hukum dan Peradilan Mahkamah Agung RI

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.25216/jhp.11.2.2022.313-342

Abstract

The presence of legal norm hierarchy theory can be used to describe legal events that cannot be resolved only by concrete legal norms. This paper will elaborate on this theory and its implementation to explain the legal considerations behind the acceptance of istbat of widow marriages during the iddah period as occurred in Stipulation Number 137/Pdt.P/2018/PA.Bm. By using qualitative methods and secondary data, this article concludes that the legal consideration of judges for accepting this case is the nescience, child protection, and absence of bad willing. The construction of legal considerations in this case represents the movement of selecting norms from al-ahkam al-far`iyyah to al-usul al-kulli and al-qiyam al-asasi.
CONSTRUCTION OF LEGAL CULTURE MODEL FOR CORRUPTION PREVENTION THROUGH SOCIAL MEDIA IN INDONESIA Riwanto, Agus
Jurnal Hukum dan Peradilan Vol 11 No 3 (2022)
Publisher : Pusat Strategi Kebijakan Hukum dan Peradilan Mahkamah Agung RI

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.25216/jhp.11.3.2022.385-404

Abstract

Fighting corruption is done not only repressively but also preventively through a legal culture approach. This article examines and explores the construction of a legal culture model to prevent corruption through social media. Because the rampant corruption in Indonesia is also caused by cultural factors, including the weak culture of religiosity, strong kinship culture, and paternalistic culture. The research method used is non-doctrinal or social-legal with a conceptual approach. This study found that preventing corruption from the aspect of legal culture can be done by utilizing internet-based culture in the new age in various social media, such as Facebook, Twitter, WhatsApp, Instagram, and blogs, as a tool for social movements to prevent corruption. Because philosophically, the media functions for surveillance, interpretation, linkage, and the transmission of values and entertainment simultaneously. The urgency of the role of the media as a tool for the anti-corruption community movement or civil society is because, in the tradition of internet-based democracy or e-democracy, social media is placed as the fourth pillar of democracy or the fourth estate democracy for a balancer in the supervision of democratic governance. Several construction models of the legal culture of the anti-corruption watchdog social movement are needed through social media, namely, the model for forming a non-profit social media organization. Second, the model creates an anti-corruption icon on social media. Third, a model for the legal protection of the anti-corruption movement on social media.
THE SUPREME COURT'S AUTHORITY AS AN IMPLEMENTER OF INDEPENDENT JUDICIAL POWER IN THE RECRUITMENT OF JUDGES Teguh, Pri Pambudi; Bachmid, Fahri; Rumadhan, Ismail
Jurnal Hukum dan Peradilan Vol 11 No 2 (2022)
Publisher : Pusat Strategi Kebijakan Hukum dan Peradilan Mahkamah Agung RI

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.25216/jhp.11.2.2022.343-364

Abstract

The primary issue addressed in this study is how the Supreme Court's authority is autonomous in hiring judges with the status of state officials for judicial organizations within its jurisdiction. Because the legislation was the primary source of information, this study took a normative juridical approach. The study's findings indicate that the current legal framework is not yet fully capable of accurately regulating, thoroughly implementing, and enforcing the judicial system and pattern and judges' status as state officials. The current system and pattern of judicial recruitment continue to demonstrate the lack of transparency and uncertainty regarding the legal rules governing the recruitment pattern of judges with state official status. The existing rules retain a tenuous legitimacy because they are not governed by the Constitution, which establishes an independent Judicial Authority charged with enforcing law and justice. As a result, it will be required to enact new rules and regulations governing the system and pattern of recruitment of judges in accordance with the characteristics of judges' positions as state officials in the future to ensure the implementation and accountability of judicial responsibilities.
URGENCE AND CHALLENGES OF REGULATION OF AMICUS CURIAE IN THE JUDICIAL SYSTEM Suntoro, Agus
Jurnal Hukum dan Peradilan Vol 11 No 3 (2022)
Publisher : Pusat Strategi Kebijakan Hukum dan Peradilan Mahkamah Agung RI

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.25216/jhp.11.3.2022.523-544

Abstract

The judicial system in Indonesia is dynamic and adaptive to the development of science and law, not least within the scope of the Supreme Court of the Republic of Indonesia, one of which relates to the amicus curiae (friends of the judiciary). In practice, amicus curiae are generally presented in cases or trials that get public attention and the livelihoods of many people, such as the environment, land, labor, and so on. Nevertheless, there is no regulation or Supreme Court Regulation on the application of amicus curiae in the trial, but various practices have occurred within the court. This paper will discuss: (a) how the concept of amicus curiae is in the justice system in several countries, (b) the practice and application of amicus curiae in the judiciary in Indonesia, and (c) the opportunity for the Supreme Court to issue regulations or circulars that seek to regulate the implementation of the amicus curiae as part of legal developments in Indonesia. This writing uses a qualitative method with a normative juridical approach. The results of this paper conclude that amicus curiae have become a good practice in the judicial system in Indonesia, especially in public cases, and the Supreme Court has the authority to make arrangements through PERMA as a foundation and procedure guide for all judicial personnel and society in Indonesia.
The Potential Of Judicial Review As An Incremental Business Strategy (The Emergence Of Sharing Economy And One-Stop Services Application In Indonesia) Kusuma, Febrian Indar Surya; Hermawan, Sapto; Soares, Ardyllis Alves
Jurnal Hukum dan Peradilan Vol 12 No 1 (2023)
Publisher : Pusat Strategi Kebijakan Hukum dan Peradilan Mahkamah Agung RI

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.25216/jhp.12.1.2023.159-188

Abstract

The digital economic system has changed the pattern of relationships between service providers and consumers in conducting transactions. Starting from the opportunity given by the Supreme Court to online taxi service providers as part of Micro, Small, and Medium Enterprises (from now on MSMEs), application services such as Go-Jek and Grab are now becoming new spaces for national economic growth. This study will specifically answer how the judicial review process becomes a form of incremental policy, which is very important for business continuity in the industrial era 4.0. This paper can fill the research gap regarding policy alternatives response in supporting the development of the digital economy in Indonesia. This paper will be portrayed using doctrinal research methods and statutory approaches in descriptive and prescriptive styles. As a result, this paper demonstrates that the Supreme Court, as the judiciary institution, plays a central role in responding to changing societal needs. The rationality of business actors in the theory of economic analysis of law has led them to step up and look for responsive policy alternatives. This condition is proven by the judicial review decision on Case Number 37 P/HUM/2017, which was then able to save MSME actors during the COVID-19 pandemic. The development of an incremental policy model is a form of government response to support national economic growth in the digital era, which demands rapid change.
THE SECOND REVIEW REQUESTING CONTROVERS IN CRIMINAL CASES Huda, Chairul
Jurnal Hukum dan Peradilan Vol 11 No 2 (2022)
Publisher : Pusat Strategi Kebijakan Hukum dan Peradilan Mahkamah Agung RI

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.25216/jhp.11.2.2022.365-384

Abstract

Formally, the review can be carried out more than once, based on the Decision of the Constitutional Court (MK) No. 34/PUU-XI/2013, which states that Article 268 paragraph (3) of the Criminal Procedure Code is contrary to the 1945 Constitution of the Republic of Indonesia and therefore has no binding force as law. This paper intends to discuss the second review's philosophical, juridical, and sociological aspects. The Supreme Court, through SEMA No. 10 of 2009 as strengthened by SEMA No. 7 of 2014, confirms that a review of more than one time is only possible if there is an object of the case there are 2 (two) or more judicial review decisions that conflict one another. The restriction on review from being submitted only once is intended to provide justice to the victim, the community, and the state. The extraordinary effort remains within a measurable corridor and does not limit access to justice for the convict.
LIMITATION OF MEANINGFUL PARTICIPATION REQUIREMENTS IN THE INDONESIAN LAW-MAKING PROCESS Prastyo, Angga
Jurnal Hukum dan Peradilan Vol 11 No 3 (2022)
Publisher : Pusat Strategi Kebijakan Hukum dan Peradilan Mahkamah Agung RI

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.25216/jhp.11.3.2022.405-436

Abstract

The Indonesian Constitutional Court through Decision Number 91/PUU-XVIII/2020, in the consideration section, shows how public participation in the formation of laws should be implemented, that is based on formal legal regulations and carried out in a “meaningful participation”. Participation is said to be meaningful if the right to be heard, the right to be considered, and the right to be explained or answered to the opinions and inputs given are fulfilled by the legislators. Who the subjects of meaningful participation are, what the limitations of the material or substance of meaningful participation are, where the appropriate space or media for meaningful participation is, and how to consider and answer to meaningful participation is given, will be the problems discussed in this conceptual study. This study needs to be carried out to clarify the limits of meaningful participation so that the concept or theory as the basis can be applied and accommodated in laws and regulations. The main idea of the result of this study is the findings regarding the limits of meaningful participation in the formation of laws, that is the provision of opinions and inputs carried out by parties affected directly or indirectly and have concern to it. In addition, indicators for assessing the substance of participation and receiving opinions and inputs are “the purpose” of the regulation that will be formed. The participation media as well as participation explanations and answers are delivered conventionally and virtually with certain intelligence adjustments to the information technology used.
DISPUTE ON LEASE FINANCING AGREEMENT: IS IT SUBJECT TO CONSUMER PROTECTION OR CIVIL LAW? Hakim Manurung, Jefferson
Jurnal Hukum dan Peradilan Vol 11 No 2 (2022)
Publisher : Pusat Strategi Kebijakan Hukum dan Peradilan Mahkamah Agung RI

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.25216/jhp.11.2.2022.257-280

Abstract

Disputes arising between the financing company and the debtor in connection with the implementation of the lease financing agreement often occur as the debtor is negligent in completing the installments as contained therein. Consequently, the financing company withdraws the object of financing that is encumbered with security, generally with a fiduciary, from the possession of the debtor. Upon this action, the debtor filed a lawsuit against the financing company to the BPSK since the debtor considered themselves as consumers in the lease financing agreement, so that in some cases BPSK won the debtor's lawsuit. However, both the district court and the Supreme Court of the Republic of Indonesia in their decisions emphasized that this is not a consumer dispute, but a civil dispute in the form of breach of contract. The research in this article will answer whether the dispute between the financing company and the debtor in regard to lease financing agreement will be subject to the consumer protection law or civil law and which judicial bodies has the authority to settle this issue. The research method used in this research is normative juridical with analytical descriptive research specifications. The data used in this study are secondary data and tertiary data that have been prepared and analyzed according to the topic of discussion in this article. The main finding in this study is the agreement in the financing agreement because there is a breach of contract that is subject to civil law and the court that adjudicates it is the district court and not the BPSK.Perselisihan yang timbul antara perusahaan pembiayaan dengan debitur sehubungan dengan pelaksanaan perjanjian pembiayaan seringkali diakibatkan karena debitur lalai dalam menyelesaikan angsuran sebagaimana diperjanjikan dalam perjanjian tersebut. Oleh karena itu, perusahaan pembiayaan menarik objek pembiayaan yang dibebankan jaminan kebendaan, umumnya dengan fidusia, dari penguasaan debitur. Atas tindakan tersebut, debitur mengajukan gugatan kepada BPSK karena debitur menganggap bahwa mereka adalah konsumen dalam perjanjian pembiayaan sehingga dalam beberapa kasus BPSK memenangkan gugatan debitur. Namun, pengadilan negeri maupun Mahkamah Agung dalam putusannya menegaskan bahwa perselisihan ini bukan merupakan sengketa konsumen, melainkan sengketa keperdataan berupa cidera janji.  Penelitian dalam artikel ini akan menjawab mengenai apakah perselisihan antara perusahaan pembiayaan dan debitur dalam perjanjian pembiayaan tunduk pada hukum perlindungan konsumen atau hukum perdata serta badan peradilan mana yang berwenang menyelesaikan perselisihan ini. Metode penelitian yang digunakan dalam penelitian ini adalah yuridis normative dengan spesifikasi penelitian deskriptis analitis. Data yang digunakan dalam penelitian ini merupakan data sekunder dan data tersier yang telah disiapkan dan dianalisis sesuai dengan topik diskusi dalam artikel ini. Temuan utama dalam penelitian ini adalah perselisihan dalam perjanjian pembiayaan dikarenakan adanya peristiwa cidera janji tunduk pada hukum perdata serta badan peradilan  yang berwenang mengadiliinya adalan pengadilan negeri dan bukan BPSK. 
UNCERTAINTY ON THE BANKRUPT PROCESS AS A LEGAL MEANS FOR SHARIA ECONOMIC DISPUTE SETTLEMENT (Case Study of BMT Fisabilillah) Rejeki, Niniek Mumpuni Sri
Jurnal Hukum dan Peradilan Vol 11 No 3 (2022)
Publisher : Pusat Strategi Kebijakan Hukum dan Peradilan Mahkamah Agung RI

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.25216/jhp.11.3.2022.453-476

Abstract

Law No. 1 of 2013 on Microfinance Institutions (MFIs) has provided a legal basis for the operational activities of MFIs. The development of  Sharia Microfinance Institutions/Baitul Maal wat Tamwil must be followed up with dispute resolution based on sharia principles. The intersection that occurs in the settlement of sharia economic disputes in bankruptcy cases is the mixing of conventional and sharia legal principles, which will cause legal uncertainty, the Court has absolute authority to handle sharia economic law cases. The bankruptcy decision by the Semarang Commercial Court in the BMT Fisabilillah case proves that at the empirical level, sharia economic disputes are decided by the Commercial Court which is formed in the general court environment. This article will analyze the position of BMT after the issuance of the MFI Law, the fall of the bankruptcy decision on BMT Fisabilillah. The research method is normative law by reviewing legal materials related to MFIs, Cooperatives, Bankruptcy and PKPU. The legal vacuum in bankruptcy law for sharia actors should be followed up by complying with the laws and decisions of the Constitutional Court so that bankruptcy disputes for LKMS become the domain of the Religious Courts, this is the main difference between bankruptcy based on positive law in Indonesia and Islamic law. This review of the bankruptcy case of BMT Fisabilillah is to understand that there is a blending in the substance of sharia economic law in the realm of general justice. This situation weakens the absolute authority of the established Religious Courts.
LEGAL IMPLICATIONS OF THE CONSTITUTIONAL COURT DECISION ON THE APPLICATION OF RESTORATIVE JUSTICE CONCEPT IN INDONESIA Hayatuddin, Khalisah; Suharyono, Suharyono; Sobandi, Sobandi; Is, Muhamad Sadi
Jurnal Hukum dan Peradilan Vol 11 No 2 (2022)
Publisher : Pusat Strategi Kebijakan Hukum dan Peradilan Mahkamah Agung RI

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.25216/jhp.11.2.2022.281-312

Abstract

The decision of the Constitutional Court Number 68/PUU-XV/2017 cancels Articles 96, Articles 100, and Article 101 of Law Number 11 of 2012 on the Juvenile Criminal Justice System. With this decision, the concept of restorative justice in Indonesia evolves even a stronger legal basis. In this paper, the research method that the researcher uses is a normative juridical legal method that is prescriptive means practical or applicable. This research aims to solve the problems of the research. The results of this study explain that after this decision of the Constitutional Court has been set, it implicates the law,  which is the development of the ideal concept of restorative justice in Indonesia, that is regulated clearly and firmly in the Criminal Code, the Prosecutor's Law, and the Police Act, which can provide legal certainty regarding restorative justice so that it can realize the concept of restorative justice which conducting deliberation process by listening to and reassuring the aggrieved parties based on the philosophical values of the Indonesian nation that can provide social justice for all Indonesian people.

Page 61 of 66 | Total Record : 653

 59   60   61   62   63 

Filter by Year

2012 2025


Reset
Filter By Issues
All Issue Vol 14 No 3 (2025) Vol 14 No 2 (2025) Vol 14 No 1 (2025) Vol 13 No 3 (2024) Vol 13, No 3 (2024) Vol 13 No 2 (2024) Vol 13, No 2 (2024) Vol 13, No 1 (2024) Vol 13 No 1 (2024) Vol 12 No 3 (2023) Vol 12, No 3 (2023) Vol 12, No 2 (2023) Vol 12 No 2 (2023) Vol 12 No 1 (2023) Vol 12, No 1 (2023) Vol 11 No 3 (2022) Vol 11, No 3 (2022) Vol 11 No 2 (2022) Vol 11, No 2 (2022) Vol 11, No 1 (2022) Vol 11 No 1 (2022) Vol 10 No 3 (2021) Vol 10, No 3 (2021) Vol 10 No 2 (2021) Vol 10, No 2 (2021) Vol 10, No 1 (2021) Vol 10 No 1 (2021) Vol 9, No 3 (2020) Vol 9 No 3 (2020) Vol 9, No 2 (2020) Vol 9 No 2 (2020) Vol 9, No 1 (2020) Vol 9 No 1 (2020) Vol 8 No 3 (2019) Vol 8, No 3 (2019) Vol 8 No 2 (2019) Vol 8, No 2 (2019) Vol 8 No 1 (2019) Vol 8, No 1 (2019) Vol 7 No 3 (2018) Vol 7, No 3 (2018) Vol 7 No 2 (2018) Vol 7, No 2 (2018) Vol 7, No 1 (2018) Vol 7 No 1 (2018) Vol 6 No 3 (2017) Vol 6, No 3 (2017) Vol 6 No 2 (2017) Vol 6, No 2 (2017) Vol 6, No 1 (2017) Vol 6 No 1 (2017) Vol 5, No 3 (2016) Vol 5 No 3 (2016) Vol 5 No 2 (2016) Vol 5, No 2 (2016) Vol 5, No 1 (2016) Vol 5 No 1 (2016) Vol 4 No 3 (2015) Vol 4, No 3 (2015) Vol 4 No 2 (2015) Vol 4, No 2 (2015) Vol 4, No 1 (2015) Vol 4 No 1 (2015) Vol 3, No 3 (2014) Vol 3 No 3 (2014) Vol 3, No 2 (2014) Vol 3 No 2 (2014) Vol 3 No 1 (2014) Vol 3, No 1 (2014) Vol 2 No 3 (2013) Vol 2, No 3 (2013) Vol 2, No 2 (2013) Vol 2 No 2 (2013) Vol 2 No 1 (2013) Vol 2, No 1 (2013) Vol 1 No 3 (2012) Vol 1, No 3 (2012) Vol 1, No 2 (2012) Vol 1 No 2 (2012) Vol 1 No 1 (2012) Vol 1, No 1 (2012) More Issue