cover
Article Per Year (5 Year)
All
Home Page
OAI Link
Editorial Team
Contact
Reviewer
Google Scholar
Contact Name
Admin PBN
Contact Email
pbnsby87@gmail.com
Phone
+6285101486780
Journal Mail Official
pbnsby87@gmail.com
Editorial Address
Perumahan Gunung Anyar Emas Blok AA No.26 Lt.2 RT 01/RW.08 Surabaya Jawa Timur
Location
Kota surabaya,
Jawa timur
INDONESIA
jurnal penelitian multidisiplin
Published by Pustaka Bersama Nusantara
ISSN : 29640466     EISSN : 29640466     DOI : -
Core Subject : Economy, Health, Education, Engineering,
Civil Engineering, Building, Construction & Architecture Economics, Econometrics & Finance Education Languange, Linguistic, Communication & Media Public Health
Jurnal yang menerbitkan artikel penelitian yang mencangkup multidisiplin, yang meliputi : Humaniora dan ilmu sosial, ilmu politik kontemporer, ilmu pendidikan, ilmu agama dan filsafat, ilmu teknik, bisnis dan ekonomi, Koperasi, teknologi, ilmu kesehatan, ilmu kedokteran, pengembangan SDM, ilmu seni desain dan media.
Arjuna Subject : Umum - Umum
Articles 91 Documents
 3   4   5   6   7 
Penyelesaian Sengketa Informasi Publik Perspektif Di Peradilan Tata Usaha Negara Di Indonesia: Komisi Informasi, Pengadilan Tata Usaha Negara, Penyelesaian Sengketa Informasi Sinkronisasi Nilam Kurnia; Arif Wibowo
Jurnal Penelitian Multidisiplin Vol 2 No 1 (2023): Jurnal Penelitian Multidisiplin
Publisher : Jurnal Penelitian Multidisiplin

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.58705/jpm.v2i1.96

Abstract

Regarding the existence of a state administrative court, we must look at the country next to us such as France, a country which historically was the pioneer of the birth of this kind of institution for the first time. The role of the French state is still felt today. the state acts as a leader in the "Association Internationale des Houtes Administrative Jurisdiction".
PERPANJANGAN KEWENANGAN MAHKAMAH KONSTITUSI DALAM PEMBUBARAN PARTAI POLITIK YANG KORUPSI DI INDONESIA: Mahkamah Konstitusi, Pembubaran Partai Politik, Koruptor Partai Leona Putri Sari; Arif Wibowo
Jurnal Penelitian Multidisiplin Vol 2 No 1 (2023): Jurnal Penelitian Multidisiplin
Publisher : Jurnal Penelitian Multidisiplin

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.58705/jpm.v2i1.97

Abstract

After the amendment of the Constitution of the Unitary State of the Republic of Indonesia in 1945 changed the constitutional system in Indonesia, since the birth of the Constitutional Court of the Republic of Indonesia which was authorized to adjudicate the dissolution of political parties up to now has never been done by the Constitutional Court, the debate over the dissolution of political parties is also seen as a violation of the rights of political parties. Human rights as the right to assemble and associate, the state administration thought continues to develop about the dissolution of corrupt political parties by giving authority to the Constitutional Court.This research was conducted with normative legal research whose data is sourced from secondary data and since this research data is secondary data, it is included in the type of normative legal research. The nature of this research is descriptive, which aims to provide an overview of social phenomena about the expansion of the authority of the Constitutional Court in the Disbanding of a Corrupt Political Party. Sources of research data in the form of primary legal materials, secondary legal materials and tertiary legal materials. The method of data collection is done using document study techniques, which are analyzed using qualitative analysis techniques.
Menekuni Kedudukan Pengadilan Tata Usaha Negara Di Indonesia: Pursue, State Administrative Court Ahmad Shodiqin; Arif Wibowo
Jurnal Penelitian Multidisiplin Vol 2 No 1 (2023): Jurnal Penelitian Multidisiplin
Publisher : Jurnal Penelitian Multidisiplin

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.58705/jpm.v2i1.98

Abstract

Indonesia is a constitutional state, which means that almost every action taken in it is regulated in accordance with applicable legal provisions. The State Administrative Court is one form of implementing the rule of law. This state administrative court is regulated in Law no. 5 of 1986 concerning the State Administrative Court which is the realization of the provisions of Article 24 of the 1945 Constitution and Article of Law No. 14 of 1970 which was amended by Law no. 35 of 1999 concerning Main Provisions of Judicial Power, whose authority is to inspect to protect and develop and maintain state administration that is appropriate according to law or according to law or is appropriate effectively or functions efficiently. Today if we analyze the existing laws in Indonesia socially, there are still many people who are less concerned about the concepts and objectives of the laws issued by the government. therefore, from this journal, the author intends to provide legal education related to the position of state administrative justice in Indonesia.
Pelaksanaan Putusan Peradilan Tata Usaha Negara (PTUN): Pengadilan tata usaha negara, Hukum, Indonesia, Putusan pengadilan Leona Putri Sari; Arif Wibowo
Jurnal Penelitian Multidisiplin Vol 2 No 1 (2023): Jurnal Penelitian Multidisiplin
Publisher : Jurnal Penelitian Multidisiplin

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.58705/jpm.v2i1.99

Abstract

Execution of the decision (executie) is the method and conditions that used by the tools of state power to help interested parties to carry out the judge's decision if the losing party is not willing to comply with the substance of the decision within the allotted time.limiting court decisions that have permanent legal force that are relevant to implementation, namely a decision that has been accepted by the parties or has not been submitted again legal action (appeal or cassation). Court decisions that have not yet obtained force the law still does not have the power of execution or in other words a court decision who still have legal remedies. State business as a manifestation of the implementation of the judicial function to control its course. The executive function in the form of testing a form of state administration decision issued by State Administrative Officials that the decision was in accordance with the provision legislation and general principles of proper government administration in accordance with Article 115 of Law Number 5 of 1986 concerning Administrative Court A state that states that only decisions have gained legal force fixed that can be implemented.
Mengenal Pengadilan Tata Usaha Negara Untuk Mewujudkan Pemerintahan Yang Baik (selayar pandang PTUN): State Administrative Court, Policy, Authority Melani Safitri; Arif Wibowo
Jurnal Penelitian Multidisiplin Vol 2 No 1 (2023): Jurnal Penelitian Multidisiplin
Publisher : Jurnal Penelitian Multidisiplin

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.58705/jpm.v2i1.100

Abstract

The rule of law requires that every action or action taken by public authorities or the government has a clear law or legality based on both written and unwritten laws. The government must be neutral and impartial, before all groups in society, and serve the public interest. But in practice, the terms "in the public interest", "development of the whole society", "the state must not harm its citizens" and similar phrases appear repeatedly. political statements by state officials or high-ranking officials, used as a justification for using state power to force a person or group of citizens to comply with the wishes of the government. In order to realize a just and prosperous national and state life order, the government must have a legal system to resolve disputes within society and between the people themselves, the people and the government and government agencies. The State Administrative Court is one of the courts formed by the government to resolve state administrative disputes. The State Administrative Court has the role of adjudicating or settling disputes between the State or State Administration in the State Administrative Court of State Administrative Court officials which was ratified in 1986 by Law Number 51 of 2009 which states that State Administration is a State Administration which has roles and duties in resolving state administrative issues both at the central and regional levels, receiving, investigating, adjudicating and resolving state administrative disputes, so that PTUN has new competencies or tasks in resolving disputes, namely. disputes, diverted in the general election procedure. The problems in this study are First, what are the roles and responsibilities of the State Administrative Court (PTUN) in resolving election disputes in PTUN procedural law? Second, what is the view of siyasa qadhaiyyah regarding the role and function of the State Administrative Court in resolving election disputes? The purpose of this study is to determine the role and duties of the State Administrative Court (PTUN) in resolving election disputes from a procedural viewpoint of the State Administrative Court and to study the opinions of the siyasa qadhaiyyah regarding these roles and tasks. . from the government. to the state administrative court in the settlement of election disputes. The type of research used in this research is field research using various literature, the data analysis method used in this research is data analysis using qualitative inductive and deductive reasoning methods. Based on the research results, researchers can draw the following conclusions: First, the role and function of constitutional law in resolving disputes or differences of opinion in the election process is relatively the same as state administrative disputes in general, namely. investigate, adjudicate and resolve state administrative disputes through individual, final and binding decisions whose decisions are made. have civil consequences. Second, the views of siyasa qadhaiyyah (judiciary) on the role and function of the Administrative Court in resolving election disputes come to monitor/control the authorities and investigate the tyranny of the rulers against their people, including election procedural policies that can harm the people or the people. voters and administrative courts as well as their decisions will commit crimes, and there is no tyranny over people's rights.
INDEPENDENSI KEKUASAAN KEHAKIMAN HUKUM ACARA MAHKAMAH KONSTITUSI: Independensi, Kekuasaan Kehakiman, Mahkamah Konstitusi Nur Indra Socawibawa; Arif Wibowo
Jurnal Penelitian Multidisiplin Vol 2 No 1 (2023): Jurnal Penelitian Multidisiplin
Publisher : Jurnal Penelitian Multidisiplin

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.58705/jpm.v2i1.103

Abstract

One important factor in the amendment to the 1945 Constitution of the Republic of Indonesia is the existence of the Constitutional Court as a state institution whose function is to settle a number of cases in the field of constitutional law. country. The constitution must be implemented responsibly, in accordance with the will of the people and the ideals of democracy. The constitutional authority of the Constitutional Court is to carry out the principle of checks and balances which places all state institutions in the same position to have a balance in the administration of the state. The existence of the Constitutional Court is a real step forward in the joint regulation of the functioning of federal agencies. The Constitutional Court in administering its judiciary to consider, adjudicate and decide cases, always refers to the principle of administering justice, which is carried out simply and quickly.
ADMINISTRASI PERKARA DAN PERSIDANGAN DI PERADILAN TATA USAHA NEGARA SECARA ELEKTRONIK : Penyelesaian Perkara, Persidangan Elektronik, Peradilan Tata Usaha Negara Umi Qalsum; Arif Wibowo
Jurnal Penelitian Multidisiplin Vol 2 No 1 (2023): Jurnal Penelitian Multidisiplin
Publisher : Jurnal Penelitian Multidisiplin

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.58705/jpm.v2i1.104

Abstract

Dalam  mewujudkan  amanat  konstitusi  untuk menegakkan hukum dan keadilan, Peradilan harus  dilakukan  dengan  sederhana,  cepat  dan  biaya  ringansebagaimana  dinyatakan  oleh  Undang-Undang  Nomor  48  Tahun  2009  Dalam upaya mewujudkan Peradilan sederhana,  cepat  dan biaya  ringan   sesuai dengan  tuntutan  perkembangan teknologi informasi  tersebut, perlu  diterapkan penyelesaian   perkara  secara  daring  (online)   Persidangan  elektronik  (e-court) telah  diatur  oleh  Mahkamah  Agung  jauh  sebelum  terjadinya  pandemi  Covid-19 dengan diterbitkannya  PERMA No  3  Tahun  2018  dan  diperbaharui  dengan PERMA  No 1  Tahun  2019   Persidangan elektronik  ini sejalan dan  mendukung penerapan  asas-asas   umum   peradilan  yang  baik,   sehingga   dapat   mencegah perilaku   maladministrasi  dan  koruptif   Penerapan  Peradilan  Elektronik  sangat membantu   terwujudnya   Visi  Mahkamah   Agung   menjadi   Badan Peradilan Indonesia  Yang  Agung,  yang  pada  point  ke-10  perwujudan  Visi   Mahkamah Agung  dalam  cetak  biru  Pembaruan  Peradilan  2010-2035  adalah mewujudkan Badan    Peradilan   Modern   dengan berbasis Teknologi   Informasi   terpadu  Dalam  konteks  peradilan   elektronik   di lingkungan Peradilan   Tata   Usaha Negara,  tidak    ada   asas-asas   umum peradilan    yang    baik yang   tidak Sesuai   dengan, Peradilan   Elektronik  Sebaliknya,  Peradilan  Elektronik   sangat mendukung  terwujudnya asas-asas umum peradilan yang baik dalam pelaksanaan tugas peradilan
Peranan Mahkamah Konstitusi Di Negara Indonesia (Mengenal Mahkamah Konstitusi): Constitutional Court, Verdict Melani Safitri; Arif Wibowo
Jurnal Penelitian Multidisiplin Vol 2 No 1 (2023): Jurnal Penelitian Multidisiplin
Publisher : Jurnal Penelitian Multidisiplin

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.58705/jpm.v2i1.106

Abstract

Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi, yang mencerminkan nilai keadilan konstitusional, baik menjamin pengujian UUD 1945 maupun seringkali menimbulkan situasi yang berlawanan dalam sengketa hasil pemilu yang seharusnya diselesaikan oleh semua pihak yang terlibat dalam putusan tersebut. Mahkamah Konstitusi berwenang untuk mengambil keputusan tingkat pertama dan terakhir, yang keputusannya bersifat final dalam mengubah undang-undang yang terkait dengan UUD 1945. Keberadaan undang-undang untuk meratifikasi perjanjian internasional merupakan subjek khusus dalam sistem pelaksanaan konstitusi Indonesia. Komitmen pemerintah terhadap perjanjian internasional diwujudkan berdasarkan pengesahan undang-undang oleh DPR dan Presiden. Lisensi khusus ini terdiri dari peraturan hukum. Sebagai undang-undang, menjadi pertanyaan tersendiri apakah undang-undang pengesahan ini dapat digolongkan sebagai ketentuan hukum yang berjenjang di bawah UU No. 12 Tahun 2011 yang berimplikasi pada uji materil oleh Mahkamah Konstitusi.
Peran Mahkamah Konstitusi Indonesia Untuk Ajudikasi Hak-Hak Ekonomi, Sosial Dan Budaya Yang Efektif: Hak-hak yang dapat dibenarkan, Hak-hak konstitusional, Mandat konstitusional, Hak-hak ekosob Umi Qalsum; Arif Wibowo
Jurnal Penelitian Multidisiplin Vol 2 No 1 (2023): Jurnal Penelitian Multidisiplin
Publisher : Jurnal Penelitian Multidisiplin

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.58705/jpm.v2i1.107

Abstract

Mahkamah Konstitusi Indonesia telah memainkan peran dan fungsi penting untuk melindungi dan memenuhi hak asasi manusia dalam sistem hukum Indonesia termasuk hak-hak ekonomi, sosial, dan budaya melalui kekuasaan hukum peninjauan kembali (judicial review). Hal ini menegaskan bahwa hak-hak ekosob adalah hak-hak yang dapat dibenarkan secara hukum dan merupakan bagian dari mandat konstitusi. Ini berarti bahwa keputusan peninjauan yudisial mengharuskan Negara untuk berperilaku sesuai dengan ambang batas hukum yang diputuskan oleh Pengadilan. Tidak diragukan lagi, kepatuhan terhadap putusan tersebut akan mengungkapkan fakta-fakta yang tidak terbantahkan bagi pemenuhan perilaku negara. Namun, tampaknya masih banyak pertimbangan, penekanan, dan alasan untuk mengurangi atau mengabaikan ambang batas penerapan keputusan Pengadilan. Kompleksitas aktor, institusi, otoritas, tingkat implementasi, dan orientasi kebijakan, program, tindakan, dan dana tertentu mengurangi ambang batas.
KEDUDUKAN DAN WEWENANG MAHKAMAH KONSTITUSI DALAM SISTEM KETATANEGARAAN REPUBLIK INDONESIA : Wewenang, Mahkamah Konstitusi, Sistem Ketatanegaraan Republik Indonesia Masrufah; Arif Wibowo
Jurnal Penelitian Multidisiplin Vol 2 No 1 (2023): Jurnal Penelitian Multidisiplin
Publisher : Jurnal Penelitian Multidisiplin

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.58705/jpm.v2i1.108

Abstract

Institutionally or in the organizational system, the existence of the Constitutional Court as one of the judicial bodies that is not under the Supreme Court, like other judicial bodies and this means that there are two highest judicial bodies in judicial power, namely the Supreme Court and the Constitutional Court. The problem that already exists is how the function and position of the Constitutional Court is in the constitutional system of the Republic of Indonesia. The position of the Constitutional Court as an independent State institution in the judicial sector and has implications for the Supreme Court, if previously the position of the Supreme Court was the highest Judicial Body which oversees all Courts in the Republic of Indonesia, now there is a judicial body which is not under, even its position is equal to The Supreme Court, namely the Constitutional Court and even the Constitutional Court through its constitutional authority to review the constitutionality of laws, can postpone the exercise of the Supreme Court's authority in examining laws and regulations whose level is below the law against laws.

Page 5 of 10 | Total Record : 91

 3   4   5   6   7 

Filter by Year

2022 2025


Reset
Filter By Issues
All Issue Vol 4 No 5 (2025): jURNAL PENELITIAN mULTIDISIPLIN Vol 4 No 4 (2025): jURNAL PENELITIAN mULTIDISIPLIN Vol 4 No 3 (2025): jURNAL PENELITIAN mULTIDISIPLIN Vol 4 No 1 (2025): jURNAL PENELITIAN mULTIDISIPLIN Vol 3 No 6 (2024): jURNAL PENELITIAN mULTIDISIPLIN Vol 3 No 3 (2024): jURNAL PENELITIAN mULTIDISIPLIN Vol 3 No 2 (2024): jURNAL PENELITIAN mULTIDISIPLIN Vol 3 No 1 (2024): JURNAL PENELITIAN mULTIDISIPLIN Vol 2 No 6 (2023): JURNAL PENELITIAN mULTIDISIPLIN Vol 2 No 5 (2023): jURNAL PENELITIAN mULTIDISIPLIN Vol 2 No 4 (2023): Jurnal Penelitian Multidisiplin Vol 2 No 3 (2023): Jurnal Penelitian Multidisiplin Vol 2 No 2 (2023): Jurnal Penelitian Multidisiplin Vol 2 No 1 (2023): Jurnal Penelitian Multidisiplin Vol 1 No 2 (2022): Jurnal Penelitian Multidisiplin Vol 1 No 1 (2022): Jurnal Penelitian Multidisiplin Vol. 1 No. 1 (2022): Jurnal Penelitian Multidisiplin More Issue