cover
Article Per Year (5 Year)
All
Home Page
OAI Link
Editorial Team
Contact
Reviewer
Google Scholar
Contact Name
Danang
Contact Email
lpkdgeneration2022@gmail.com
Phone
+6285726173515
Journal Mail Official
danang@stekom.ac.id
Editorial Address
Jl. Majapahit No.605, Pedurungan Kidul, Kec. Pedurungan, Semarang, Provinsi Jawa Tengah
Location
Kota semarang,
Jawa tengah
INDONESIA
Jurnal Riset Rumpun Ilmu Sosial, Politik dan Humaniora (JURRISH)
Published by Pusat Riset dan Inovasi Nasional
ISSN : 28287630     EISSN : 28287622     DOI : https://doi.org/10.55606/jurrish.v1i1
Core Subject : Social,
Environmental Science Social Sciences
Jurnal Riset Rumpun Ilmu Sosial, Politik dan Humaniora adalah jurnal yang ditujukan untuk publikasi artikel ilmiah yang diterbitkan oleh Pusat riset dan Inovasi Nasional, Lembaga Penelitian dan Pengabdian Masyarakat Universitas Sains dan Teknologi Komputer. Jurnal ini adalah jurnal Riset Rumpun Ilmu Sosial, Politik dan Humaniora yang bersifat peer-review dan terbuka. Bidang kajian dalam jurnal ini termasuk sub rumpun Ilmu Sosial, Politik dan Humaniora. Jurnal ini menerima artikel dalam bahasa Inggris dan bahasa Indonesia dan diterbitkan 2 kali setahun: Januari dan Juli.
Arjuna Subject : Ilmu Sosial - Ilmu Sosial (Lain-Lain)
Articles 597 Documents
 43   44   45   46   47 
Optimalisasi Komunikasi Pemerintah Daerah oleh BPBD dalam Penanganan Risiko Banjir di Kabupaten Tulungagung
Jurnal Riset Rumpun Ilmu Sosial, Politik dan Humaniora Vol. 5 No. 3 (2026): Juli: JURRISH: Jurnal Riset Rumpun Ilmu Sosial, Politik dan Humaniora
Publisher : Pusat Riset dan Inovasi Nasional

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.55606/jurrish.v5i3.8121

Abstract

Flood disasters are recurring hydrometeorological hazards that significantly impact social, economic, and environmental conditions in Tulungagung Regency. This study aims to analyze the flood disaster mitigation communication strategies implemented by the Regional Disaster Management Agency (BPBD) of Tulungagung Regency and to identify the roles, challenges, and implications of both internal and external communication in flood disaster management. The research employed a qualitative approach using a descriptive method. Data were collected through in-depth interviews with the Secretary of BPBD Tulungagung Regency, the Head of the Emergency and Logistics Division, the Head of the Prevention and Preparedness Division, and members of flood-affected communities. The findings reveal that BPBD Tulungagung Regency has attempted to optimize disaster communication during the pre-disaster, emergency response, and post-disaster phases. The effectiveness of these communication efforts remains limited due to several challenges, including inadequate communication infrastructure, varying levels of disaster literacy among community members, diverse geographical conditions, and insufficient coordination in internal and external communication. Pre-disaster communication plays an essential role in improving community preparedness, communication during emergency response supports timely and accurate decision-making, and post-disaster communication contributes to recovery processes and the strengthening of community resilience. This study concludes that optimizing disaster communication requires integrated information systems, improved human resource capacity within BPBD, and active community participation through community-based communication approaches to sustainably enhance resilience to flood risks.
Pertanggungjawaban Pidana terhadap Kurir Barang yang Diduga Melakukan Tindak Pidana Narkotika Denisa Julita Pratiwi; Riska Andi Fitriono
Jurnal Riset Rumpun Ilmu Sosial, Politik dan Humaniora Vol. 3 No. 3 (2024): Oktober : JURRISH: Jurnal Riset Rumpun Ilmu Sosial, Politik dan Humaniora
Publisher : Pusat Riset dan Inovasi Nasional

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.55606/jurrish.v3i3.8122

Abstract

This study is motivated by the issue of criminalizing drug couriers, who in judicial practice are often equated with the main perpetrators, even though in reality they occupy a subordinate position in the drug distribution network. The lack of clarity in the differentiation of roles in Law No. 35 of 2009 on Narcotics has led to the application of criminal liability that tends to be formalistic and has the potential to disregard substantive justice. This study aims to analyze the form of criminal liability of Class I drug couriers and assess whether the Pekanbaru District Court Decision Number 119/Pid.Sus/2025/PN Pbr has reflected justice in the imposition of criminal penalties. The research method used is normative juridical with a legislative approach, case approach, and conceptual approach. The results of the study show that the criminal liability imposed on couriers in the verdict is direct as the main perpetrator, without considering the theory of the perpetrator's role, degree of fault, and the defendant's capacity to be held responsible. The judge emphasized the fulfillment of the elements of the act as formulated in Article 114 of Law Number 35 of 2009 concerning Narcotics, without adequate analysis of the mens rea and the factual contribution of the courier in the structure of the crime. Justice in this study is understood as substantive justice, which requires consistency between the punishment, role, and degree of fault of the perpetrator. Proportional punishment is interpreted as the imposition of sanctions that clearly distinguish between couriers as subordinate actors and the main actors who control the narcotics network. This study concludes that the criminal liability of narcotics couriers must be based on individualization of punishment and proportionality so that law enforcement not only fulfills legal certainty but also reflects substantive justice.  
Peran Lembaga Swadaya Masyarakat dalam Jejaring Kebijakan Publik di Kabupaten Garut Rizky Ilhami
Jurnal Riset Rumpun Ilmu Sosial, Politik dan Humaniora Vol. 4 No. 4 (2025): JURRISH: Jurnal Riset Rumpun Ilmu Sosial, Politik dan Humaniora
Publisher : Pusat Riset dan Inovasi Nasional

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.55606/jurrish.v4i4.6665

Abstract

Non-governmental organizations (NGOs) play an important role in public policy networks as representatives of community interests, government partners, and advocacy actors. This study aims to analyze the role of NGOs in public policy networks in Garut Regency, as well as the challenges faced in increasing their contribution to policy formulation and implementation. The study uses a qualitative approach with descriptive-analytical methods. Data were collected through in-depth interviews, observations, and documentation studies of actors involved in the policy network. The results show that NGO involvement is still symbolic, power relations between actors are not yet equal, NGO institutional capacity is limited, and coordination within the policy network is less than optimal. The lack of regulatory support also weakens the position of NGOs in the public policy process. This study concludes that strengthening the role of NGOs through institutionalizing their involvement, developing regulations, increasing capacity, and establishing equal partnership patterns are important steps to improve the effectiveness of public policy networks in Garut Regency.
Penerapan Hukum Acara dalam Penyelesaian Sengketa di Pengadilan: : (Studi Kasus Tindak Pidana Narkotika di Pengadilan Negeri Binjai) Siti Zahra Siagian; Parlaungan G. Siahaan; Dewi Pika L. Batu; Alissa Putri Simbolon; Devi Permata Br. Bangun; Seevaira Chyta Simanullang
Jurnal Riset Rumpun Ilmu Sosial, Politik dan Humaniora Vol. 5 No. 2 (2026): JURRISH: Jurnal Riset Rumpun Ilmu Sosial, Politik dan Humaniora
Publisher : Pusat Riset dan Inovasi Nasional

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.55606/jurrish.v5i2.7020

Abstract

This study aims to analyze the application of criminal procedural law in resolving narcotics crime cases at the Binjai District Court, focusing on compliance with the due process of law principle and the protection of the defendant’s rights. The research employs an empirical juridical approach through direct observation (field research) of case Number 200/Pid.Sus/2025/PN Bnj involving the defendant Novri Syahputra, who was charged as an intermediary in the sale and purchase of Class I narcotics (methamphetamine) weighing 40.81 grams net. Data were collected through direct observation of the trial proceedings and examination of relevant legal documents, including the Criminal Procedure Code (KUHAP) and Law No. 35 of 2009 on Narcotics. The findings indicate that the implementation of procedural law at the Binjai District Court was consistent with the provisions of KUHAP, covering all stages from the reading of the indictment, witness examination, evidence presentation, to the final judgment. The panel of judges demonstrated professionalism and independence while considering both aggravating and mitigating factors. However, rehabilitative and humanistic approaches have not been fully incorporated into the court’s consideration, as the sentencing remains predominantly deterrent-oriented. The study concludes that, while the formal procedural aspects of criminal procedural law have been effectively implemented, there remains a substantive need to strengthen restorative and rehabilitative justice values in future narcotics case policies.
Analisis Pertimbangan Hakim dalam Putusan Tindak Pidana Pencurian dengan Pemberatan di Pengadilan Negeri Medan Mantasia Hasibuan; Parlaungan Gabriel Siahaan; Dewi Pika Lbn Batu; Ida Nurjana Tamba; Fariz Aditya; Florensia Silaban
Jurnal Riset Rumpun Ilmu Sosial, Politik dan Humaniora Vol. 5 No. 2 (2026): JURRISH: Jurnal Riset Rumpun Ilmu Sosial, Politik dan Humaniora
Publisher : Pusat Riset dan Inovasi Nasional

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.55606/jurrish.v5i2.7031

Abstract

This study aims to examine the judge's considerations in rendering decisions in aggravated theft cases at the Medan District Court, with an emphasis on the balance between legal and non-legal aspects in realizing substantive justice. The issue of disparate sentencing that frequently arises is the main background of this study. The methods used are an integrated normative legal approach and an empirical legal approach. The normative approach is used to examine the provisions of Article 363 of the Criminal Code (KUHP) and the legal principles that govern the judge's considerations, while the empirical approach is carried out through direct observation of the trial process and analysis of the judge's decision. The results of the study indicate that the judge in case Number 1110/Pid. B/2025/PN Medan not only complied with legal aspects such as fulfilling the elements of the crime, evidence, and the application of the principle of legality, but also considered non-legal aspects such as the socio-economic conditions, age, and motives of the defendant. These considerations demonstrate the application of the principles of criminal individualization and proportional justice. In addition, the judge also considered moral values ​​and social benefits in his decision, which is in line with Gustav Radbruch's theory of three basic legal values: justice, legal certainty, and utility. This study concludes that the thinking patterns of judges at the Medan District Court reflect a shift toward substantive and restorative justice paradigms. It is recommended that the Supreme Court strengthen integrated sentencing guidelines to avoid disparities in sentencing and encourage the adoption of a rehabilitative approach for offenders with low economic motivations.
Tradisi Upacara Adat Tiwah bagi Masyarakat Adat Dayak Ngaju: Studi Kasus di Desa Pujon Provinsi Kalimantan Tengah Yuni Mariati; Yandi Saputera; Muhammad Mahendra; Fakhruddin Razy
Jurnal Riset Rumpun Ilmu Sosial, Politik dan Humaniora Vol. 5 No. 2 (2026): JURRISH: Jurnal Riset Rumpun Ilmu Sosial, Politik dan Humaniora
Publisher : Pusat Riset dan Inovasi Nasional

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.55606/jurrish.v5i2.7039

Abstract

This study aims to identify and analyze customary and criminal sanctions imposed on individuals who violate Hinting Pali during the Tiwah ceremony, as well as the legal and customary consequences for those engaged in gambling within the ritual process. The research employs an empirical approach with a qualitative descriptive method through interviews, observations, and document analysis. The focus of this study is the implementation of Dayak Ngaju customary law in addressing violations that occur during the Tiwah ceremony. The findings reveal that Dayak Ngaju customary law plays a crucial role in maintaining social and spiritual harmony by enforcing moral, social, and symbolic sanctions. Furthermore, there is a point of convergence between customary law and national criminal law in promoting justice and social order. This study is expected to contribute academically to the development of customary law in Indonesia and serve as a valuable reference for communities, scholars, and policymakers in preserving cultural values and ensuring fair law enforcement within the framework of local wisdom.
Implementasi Pasal 480 KUHP terhadap Peran Pembeli Barang Hasil Kejahatan Sebuah Tinjauan dari Praktik Persidangan Ulfa Fatimah; Alex Prayoga Sidabutar; Jihan Aisyah Ramahdania; Dorlince O Hutapea; Parlaungan G Siahaan; Dewi Pika Lbn Batu
Jurnal Riset Rumpun Ilmu Sosial, Politik dan Humaniora Vol. 5 No. 2 (2026): JURRISH: Jurnal Riset Rumpun Ilmu Sosial, Politik dan Humaniora
Publisher : Pusat Riset dan Inovasi Nasional

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.55606/jurrish.v5i2.7068

Abstract

The crime of receiving stolen goods, as regulated in Article 480 of the Criminal Code (KUHP), is an offence that plays a crucial role in the continuation of the principal crime, particularly theft. Receivers provide a market for stolen goods, thereby indirectly encouraging perpetrators to continue their actions. This article aims to analyse the implementation of Article 480 of the KUHP in judicial practice, with a focus on proving the element of ‘knowing or reasonably suspecting’ that the goods purchased were obtained through criminal activity. This study uses a qualitative method with a case study approach through direct observation of a trial at the M. District Court. The observations show that the panel of judges successfully proved the defendant's guilt as a fence through a series of trial facts, such as the unreasonable purchase price, consistent testimony from the perpetrator of the theft, and the defendant's own admission that he had been suspicious. The judge's decision, which was lighter than the prosecutor's demands, also reflected considerations of substantive justice and humanity in addition to legal certainty. This study concludes that the effective enforcement of Article 480 of the Criminal Code in court plays an important role in breaking the chain of crime and providing a deterrent effect not only for the main perpetrators but also for those who participate in enjoying the proceeds of crime.
Implementasi Pasal 480 KUHP terhadap Peran Pembeli Barang Hasil Kejahatan Sebuah Tinjauan dari Praktik Persidangan Ulfa Fatimah; Alex Prayoga Sidabutar; Jihan Aisyah Ramahdania; Dorlince O Hutapea; Parlaungan G Siahaan; Dewi Pika Lbn Batu
Jurnal Riset Rumpun Ilmu Sosial, Politik dan Humaniora Vol. 5 No. 1 (2026): JURRISH: Jurnal Riset Rumpun Ilmu Sosial, Politik dan Humaniora
Publisher : Pusat Riset dan Inovasi Nasional

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.55606/jurrish.v5i1.7073

Abstract

The crime of receiving stolen goods, as regulated in Article 480 of the Criminal Code (KUHP), is an offence that plays a crucial role in the continuation of the principal crime, particularly theft. Receivers provide a market for stolen goods, thereby indirectly encouraging perpetrators to continue their actions. This paper investigates how Article 480 of the KUHP in judicial practice, with a focus on proving the element of ‘knowing or reasonably suspecting’ that the goods purchased were obtained through criminal activity. This study uses a qualitative method with a case study approach through direct observation of a trial at the M. District Court. The observations show that the panel of judges successfully proved the defendant's guilt as a fence through a series of trial facts, such as the unreasonable purchase price, consistent testimony from the perpetrator of the theft, and the defendant's own admission that he had been suspicious. The judge's decision, which was lighter than the prosecutor's demands, also reflected considerations of substantive justice and humanity in addition to legal certainty. This study concludes that the effective enforcement of Article 480 of the Criminal Code in court plays an important role in breaking the chain of crime and providing a deterrent effect not only for the main perpetrators but also for those who participate in enjoying the proceeds of crime.  
Analisis Yuridis Permohonan Perwalian oleh Orang Tua dalam Pengurusan Izin Penjualan Tanah Harta Waris Anak di Bawah Umur: Studi Putusan Nomor 199/Pdt.P/2025/PN Blt Alex Suhartanto; Weppy Susetiyo; M. Taufan Perdana Putra
Jurnal Riset Rumpun Ilmu Sosial, Politik dan Humaniora Vol. 5 No. 2 (2026): JURRISH: Jurnal Riset Rumpun Ilmu Sosial, Politik dan Humaniora
Publisher : Pusat Riset dan Inovasi Nasional

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.55606/jurrish.v5i2.7083

Abstract

This study examines the juridical aspects of guardianship applications by parents to obtain permission to sell a minor’s inherited land and analyzes the judicial considerations in Decision Number 199/Pdt.P/2025/PN Blt. The research employs an empirical juridical method with a sociological legal approach. Primary data were collected through interviews and case documents at the Blitar District Court, while secondary data consist of statutes, doctrine, and related literature. Qualitative-descriptive analysis was applied to interpret the findings. The study reveals that the guardianship application process involves both administrative and judicial stages. Judges scrutinize material evidence and the probity of sale objectives, weighing important principles such as utility, legal certainty, fairness, and justice. Guardians are granted limited authority to sell a minor’s property only if it can be proven to be in the child's best interest and legal protections are assured. Recommendations include strengthening post-decision monitoring, enhancing legal outreach, improving procedural transparency, and ensuring comprehensive implementation.
Pertimbangan Hakim Dalam Memberikan Izin Poligami Terhadap Suami Yang Melakukan Perzinahan dalam Putusan Pengadilan Agama Tanjung Karang Nomor: 737/Pdt.G/2024/PA.Tnk Siti Rani Dania; Kasmawati Kasmawati; Elly Nurlaili; Nunung Rodliyah; Sayyidah Sekar Kulsum
Jurnal Riset Rumpun Ilmu Sosial, Politik dan Humaniora Vol. 5 No. 2 (2026): JURRISH: Jurnal Riset Rumpun Ilmu Sosial, Politik dan Humaniora
Publisher : Pusat Riset dan Inovasi Nasional

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.55606/jurrish.v5i2.7087

Abstract

This study discusses the judge’s considerations in granting permission for polygamy to a husband who had committed adultery, as stated in the Religious Court Decision of Tanjung Karang Number: 737/Pdt.G/2024/PA.Tnk. Generally, Law No. 1 of 1974 in conjunction with Law No. 16 of 2019 on Marriage upholds the principle of monogamy but allows polygamy under certain conditions with court approval. This case is particularly interesting because the court granted permission for polygamy to a husband who was proven to have engaged in an affair and committed adultery resulting in a child born out of wedlock. The study aims to identify the legal considerations of the judge and the legal implications regarding the marriage and joint property. The research employs an applied normative legal method with a qualitative approach, using primary data from interviews and secondary data from legislation and legal literature. The results show that the judge considered granting permission for polygamy as a means of legalizing the existing relationship to maintain public morality and prevent continuous sinful behavior, although it conflicts with moral values. Legally, the second wife has no rights over the joint property acquired before the polygamous marriage, as stipulated in Article 65 paragraph (1) letter b of the Marriage Law

Page 45 of 60 | Total Record : 597

 43   44   45   46   47 

Filter by Year

2022 2026


Reset
Filter By Issues
All Issue Vol. 5 No. 3 (2026): Juli: JURRISH: Jurnal Riset Rumpun Ilmu Sosial, Politik dan Humaniora Vol. 5 No. 2 (2026): JURRISH: Jurnal Riset Rumpun Ilmu Sosial, Politik dan Humaniora Vol. 5 No. 1 (2026): JURRISH: Jurnal Riset Rumpun Ilmu Sosial, Politik dan Humaniora Vol. 4 No. 4 (2025): JURRISH: Jurnal Riset Rumpun Ilmu Sosial, Politik dan Humaniora Vol. 4 No. 3 (2025): JURRISH: Jurnal Riset Rumpun Ilmu Sosial, Politik dan Humaniora Vol. 4 No. 2 (2025): Jurnal Riset Rumpun Ilmu Sosial, Politik dan Humaniora Vol. 4 No. 1 (2025): Jurnal Riset Rumpun Ilmu Sosial, Politik dan Humaniora Vol. 3 No. 3 (2024): Oktober : JURRISH: Jurnal Riset Rumpun Ilmu Sosial, Politik dan Humaniora Vol. 3 No. 2 (2024): Juli : JURRISH: Jurnal Riset Rumpun Ilmu Sosial, Politik dan Humaniora Vol. 3 No. 1 (2024): Januari : Jurnal Riset Rumpun Ilmu Sosial, Politik dan Humaniora Vol. 2 No. 2 (2023): Juli: Jurnal Riset Rumpun Ilmu Sosial, Politik dan Humaniora Vol. 2 No. 1 (2023): Januari: Jurnal Riset Rumpun Ilmu Sosial, Politik dan Humaniora Vol. 1 No. 2 (2022): Juli : Jurnal Riset Rumpun Ilmu Sosial, Politik dan Humaniora Vol. 1 No. 1 (2022): Januari: Jurnal Riset Rumpun Ilmu Sosial, Politik dan Humaniora More Issue