Jurnal Riset Rumpun Ilmu Sosial, Politik dan Humaniora (JURRISH)
Jurnal Riset Rumpun Ilmu Sosial, Politik dan Humaniora adalah jurnal yang ditujukan untuk publikasi artikel ilmiah yang diterbitkan oleh Pusat riset dan Inovasi Nasional, Lembaga Penelitian dan Pengabdian Masyarakat Universitas Sains dan Teknologi Komputer. Jurnal ini adalah jurnal Riset Rumpun Ilmu Sosial, Politik dan Humaniora yang bersifat peer-review dan terbuka. Bidang kajian dalam jurnal ini termasuk sub rumpun Ilmu Sosial, Politik dan Humaniora. Jurnal ini menerima artikel dalam bahasa Inggris dan bahasa Indonesia dan diterbitkan 2 kali setahun: Januari dan Juli.
Articles
523 Documents
<![CDATA[Pertanggungjawaban Pidana terhadap Kurir Barang yang Diduga Melakukan Tindak Pidana Narkotika ]]>
<![CDATA[Denisa Julita Pratiwi]]>;
<![CDATA[Riska Andi Fitriono]]>
<![CDATA[ Jurnal Riset Rumpun Ilmu Sosial, Politik dan Humaniora Vol. 3 No. 3 (2024): Oktober : JURRISH: Jurnal Riset Rumpun Ilmu Sosial, Politik dan Humaniora ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[Pusat Riset dan Inovasi Nasional ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
DOI: 10.55606/jurrish.v3i3.8122
<![CDATA[This study is motivated by the issue of criminalizing drug couriers, who in judicial practice are often equated with the main perpetrators, even though in reality they occupy a subordinate position in the drug distribution network. The lack of clarity in the differentiation of roles in Law No. 35 of 2009 on Narcotics has led to the application of criminal liability that tends to be formalistic and has the potential to disregard substantive justice. This study aims to analyze the form of criminal liability of Class I drug couriers and assess whether the Pekanbaru District Court Decision Number 119/Pid.Sus/2025/PN Pbr has reflected justice in the imposition of criminal penalties. The research method used is normative juridical with a legislative approach, case approach, and conceptual approach. The results of the study show that the criminal liability imposed on couriers in the verdict is direct as the main perpetrator, without considering the theory of the perpetrator's role, degree of fault, and the defendant's capacity to be held responsible. The judge emphasized the fulfillment of the elements of the act as formulated in Article 114 of Law Number 35 of 2009 concerning Narcotics, without adequate analysis of the mens rea and the factual contribution of the courier in the structure of the crime. Justice in this study is understood as substantive justice, which requires consistency between the punishment, role, and degree of fault of the perpetrator. Proportional punishment is interpreted as the imposition of sanctions that clearly distinguish between couriers as subordinate actors and the main actors who control the narcotics network. This study concludes that the criminal liability of narcotics couriers must be based on individualization of punishment and proportionality so that law enforcement not only fulfills legal certainty but also reflects substantive justice. ]]>
<![CDATA[Peran Lembaga Swadaya Masyarakat dalam Jejaring Kebijakan Publik di Kabupaten Garut ]]>
<![CDATA[Rizky Ilhami]]>
<![CDATA[ Jurnal Riset Rumpun Ilmu Sosial, Politik dan Humaniora Vol. 4 No. 4 (2025): JURRISH: Jurnal Riset Rumpun Ilmu Sosial, Politik dan Humaniora ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[Pusat Riset dan Inovasi Nasional ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
DOI: 10.55606/jurrish.v4i4.6665
<![CDATA[Non-governmental organizations (NGOs) play an important role in public policy networks as representatives of community interests, government partners, and advocacy actors. This study aims to analyze the role of NGOs in public policy networks in Garut Regency, as well as the challenges faced in increasing their contribution to policy formulation and implementation. The study uses a qualitative approach with descriptive-analytical methods. Data were collected through in-depth interviews, observations, and documentation studies of actors involved in the policy network. The results show that NGO involvement is still symbolic, power relations between actors are not yet equal, NGO institutional capacity is limited, and coordination within the policy network is less than optimal. The lack of regulatory support also weakens the position of NGOs in the public policy process. This study concludes that strengthening the role of NGOs through institutionalizing their involvement, developing regulations, increasing capacity, and establishing equal partnership patterns are important steps to improve the effectiveness of public policy networks in Garut Regency.]]>
<![CDATA[Penerapan Hukum Acara dalam Penyelesaian Sengketa di Pengadilan: : (Studi Kasus Tindak Pidana Narkotika di Pengadilan Negeri Binjai) ]]>
<![CDATA[Siti Zahra Siagian]]>;
<![CDATA[Parlaungan G. Siahaan]]>;
<![CDATA[Dewi Pika L. Batu]]>;
<![CDATA[Alissa Putri Simbolon]]>;
<![CDATA[Devi Permata Br. Bangun]]>;
<![CDATA[Seevaira Chyta Simanullang]]>
<![CDATA[ Jurnal Riset Rumpun Ilmu Sosial, Politik dan Humaniora Vol. 5 No. 2 (2026): JURRISH: Jurnal Riset Rumpun Ilmu Sosial, Politik dan Humaniora ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[Pusat Riset dan Inovasi Nasional ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
DOI: 10.55606/jurrish.v5i2.7020
<![CDATA[This study aims to analyze the application of criminal procedural law in resolving narcotics crime cases at the Binjai District Court, focusing on compliance with the due process of law principle and the protection of the defendant’s rights. The research employs an empirical juridical approach through direct observation (field research) of case Number 200/Pid.Sus/2025/PN Bnj involving the defendant Novri Syahputra, who was charged as an intermediary in the sale and purchase of Class I narcotics (methamphetamine) weighing 40.81 grams net. Data were collected through direct observation of the trial proceedings and examination of relevant legal documents, including the Criminal Procedure Code (KUHAP) and Law No. 35 of 2009 on Narcotics. The findings indicate that the implementation of procedural law at the Binjai District Court was consistent with the provisions of KUHAP, covering all stages from the reading of the indictment, witness examination, evidence presentation, to the final judgment. The panel of judges demonstrated professionalism and independence while considering both aggravating and mitigating factors. However, rehabilitative and humanistic approaches have not been fully incorporated into the court’s consideration, as the sentencing remains predominantly deterrent-oriented. The study concludes that, while the formal procedural aspects of criminal procedural law have been effectively implemented, there remains a substantive need to strengthen restorative and rehabilitative justice values in future narcotics case policies.]]>
<![CDATA[Analisis Pertimbangan Hakim dalam Putusan Tindak Pidana Pencurian dengan Pemberatan di Pengadilan Negeri Medan ]]>
<![CDATA[Mantasia Hasibuan]]>;
<![CDATA[Parlaungan Gabriel Siahaan]]>;
<![CDATA[Dewi Pika Lbn Batu]]>;
<![CDATA[Ida Nurjana Tamba]]>;
<![CDATA[Fariz Aditya]]>;
<![CDATA[Florensia Silaban]]>
<![CDATA[ Jurnal Riset Rumpun Ilmu Sosial, Politik dan Humaniora Vol. 5 No. 2 (2026): JURRISH: Jurnal Riset Rumpun Ilmu Sosial, Politik dan Humaniora ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[Pusat Riset dan Inovasi Nasional ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
DOI: 10.55606/jurrish.v5i2.7031
<![CDATA[This study aims to examine the judge's considerations in rendering decisions in aggravated theft cases at the Medan District Court, with an emphasis on the balance between legal and non-legal aspects in realizing substantive justice. The issue of disparate sentencing that frequently arises is the main background of this study. The methods used are an integrated normative legal approach and an empirical legal approach. The normative approach is used to examine the provisions of Article 363 of the Criminal Code (KUHP) and the legal principles that govern the judge's considerations, while the empirical approach is carried out through direct observation of the trial process and analysis of the judge's decision. The results of the study indicate that the judge in case Number 1110/Pid. B/2025/PN Medan not only complied with legal aspects such as fulfilling the elements of the crime, evidence, and the application of the principle of legality, but also considered non-legal aspects such as the socio-economic conditions, age, and motives of the defendant. These considerations demonstrate the application of the principles of criminal individualization and proportional justice. In addition, the judge also considered moral values and social benefits in his decision, which is in line with Gustav Radbruch's theory of three basic legal values: justice, legal certainty, and utility. This study concludes that the thinking patterns of judges at the Medan District Court reflect a shift toward substantive and restorative justice paradigms. It is recommended that the Supreme Court strengthen integrated sentencing guidelines to avoid disparities in sentencing and encourage the adoption of a rehabilitative approach for offenders with low economic motivations.]]>
<![CDATA[Tradisi Upacara Adat Tiwah bagi Masyarakat Adat Dayak Ngaju: Studi Kasus di Desa Pujon Provinsi Kalimantan Tengah ]]>
<![CDATA[Yuni Mariati]]>;
<![CDATA[Yandi Saputera]]>;
<![CDATA[Muhammad Mahendra]]>;
<![CDATA[Fakhruddin Razy]]>
<![CDATA[ Jurnal Riset Rumpun Ilmu Sosial, Politik dan Humaniora Vol. 5 No. 2 (2026): JURRISH: Jurnal Riset Rumpun Ilmu Sosial, Politik dan Humaniora ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[Pusat Riset dan Inovasi Nasional ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
DOI: 10.55606/jurrish.v5i2.7039
<![CDATA[This study aims to identify and analyze customary and criminal sanctions imposed on individuals who violate Hinting Pali during the Tiwah ceremony, as well as the legal and customary consequences for those engaged in gambling within the ritual process. The research employs an empirical approach with a qualitative descriptive method through interviews, observations, and document analysis. The focus of this study is the implementation of Dayak Ngaju customary law in addressing violations that occur during the Tiwah ceremony. The findings reveal that Dayak Ngaju customary law plays a crucial role in maintaining social and spiritual harmony by enforcing moral, social, and symbolic sanctions. Furthermore, there is a point of convergence between customary law and national criminal law in promoting justice and social order. This study is expected to contribute academically to the development of customary law in Indonesia and serve as a valuable reference for communities, scholars, and policymakers in preserving cultural values and ensuring fair law enforcement within the framework of local wisdom.]]>
<![CDATA[Implementasi Pasal 480 KUHP terhadap Peran Pembeli Barang Hasil Kejahatan Sebuah Tinjauan dari Praktik Persidangan ]]>
<![CDATA[Ulfa Fatimah]]>;
<![CDATA[Alex Prayoga Sidabutar]]>;
<![CDATA[Jihan Aisyah Ramahdania]]>;
<![CDATA[Dorlince O Hutapea]]>;
<![CDATA[Parlaungan G Siahaan]]>;
<![CDATA[Dewi Pika Lbn Batu]]>
<![CDATA[ Jurnal Riset Rumpun Ilmu Sosial, Politik dan Humaniora Vol. 5 No. 2 (2026): JURRISH: Jurnal Riset Rumpun Ilmu Sosial, Politik dan Humaniora ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[Pusat Riset dan Inovasi Nasional ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
DOI: 10.55606/jurrish.v5i2.7068
<![CDATA[The crime of receiving stolen goods, as regulated in Article 480 of the Criminal Code (KUHP), is an offence that plays a crucial role in the continuation of the principal crime, particularly theft. Receivers provide a market for stolen goods, thereby indirectly encouraging perpetrators to continue their actions. This article aims to analyse the implementation of Article 480 of the KUHP in judicial practice, with a focus on proving the element of ‘knowing or reasonably suspecting’ that the goods purchased were obtained through criminal activity. This study uses a qualitative method with a case study approach through direct observation of a trial at the M. District Court. The observations show that the panel of judges successfully proved the defendant's guilt as a fence through a series of trial facts, such as the unreasonable purchase price, consistent testimony from the perpetrator of the theft, and the defendant's own admission that he had been suspicious. The judge's decision, which was lighter than the prosecutor's demands, also reflected considerations of substantive justice and humanity in addition to legal certainty. This study concludes that the effective enforcement of Article 480 of the Criminal Code in court plays an important role in breaking the chain of crime and providing a deterrent effect not only for the main perpetrators but also for those who participate in enjoying the proceeds of crime.]]>
<![CDATA[Implementasi Pasal 480 KUHP terhadap Peran Pembeli Barang Hasil Kejahatan Sebuah Tinjauan dari Praktik Persidangan ]]>
<![CDATA[Ulfa Fatimah]]>;
<![CDATA[Alex Prayoga Sidabutar]]>;
<![CDATA[Jihan Aisyah Ramahdania]]>;
<![CDATA[Dorlince O Hutapea]]>;
<![CDATA[Parlaungan G Siahaan]]>;
<![CDATA[Dewi Pika Lbn Batu]]>
<![CDATA[ Jurnal Riset Rumpun Ilmu Sosial, Politik dan Humaniora Vol. 5 No. 1 (2026): JURRISH: Jurnal Riset Rumpun Ilmu Sosial, Politik dan Humaniora ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[Pusat Riset dan Inovasi Nasional ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
DOI: 10.55606/jurrish.v5i1.7073
<![CDATA[The crime of receiving stolen goods, as regulated in Article 480 of the Criminal Code (KUHP), is an offence that plays a crucial role in the continuation of the principal crime, particularly theft. Receivers provide a market for stolen goods, thereby indirectly encouraging perpetrators to continue their actions. This paper investigates how Article 480 of the KUHP in judicial practice, with a focus on proving the element of ‘knowing or reasonably suspecting’ that the goods purchased were obtained through criminal activity. This study uses a qualitative method with a case study approach through direct observation of a trial at the M. District Court. The observations show that the panel of judges successfully proved the defendant's guilt as a fence through a series of trial facts, such as the unreasonable purchase price, consistent testimony from the perpetrator of the theft, and the defendant's own admission that he had been suspicious. The judge's decision, which was lighter than the prosecutor's demands, also reflected considerations of substantive justice and humanity in addition to legal certainty. This study concludes that the effective enforcement of Article 480 of the Criminal Code in court plays an important role in breaking the chain of crime and providing a deterrent effect not only for the main perpetrators but also for those who participate in enjoying the proceeds of crime. ]]>
<![CDATA[Analisis Yuridis Permohonan Perwalian oleh Orang Tua dalam Pengurusan Izin Penjualan Tanah Harta Waris Anak di Bawah Umur: Studi Putusan Nomor 199/Pdt.P/2025/PN Blt ]]>
<![CDATA[Alex Suhartanto]]>;
<![CDATA[Weppy Susetiyo]]>;
<![CDATA[M. Taufan Perdana Putra]]>
<![CDATA[ Jurnal Riset Rumpun Ilmu Sosial, Politik dan Humaniora Vol. 5 No. 2 (2026): JURRISH: Jurnal Riset Rumpun Ilmu Sosial, Politik dan Humaniora ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[Pusat Riset dan Inovasi Nasional ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
DOI: 10.55606/jurrish.v5i2.7083
<![CDATA[This study examines the juridical aspects of guardianship applications by parents to obtain permission to sell a minor’s inherited land and analyzes the judicial considerations in Decision Number 199/Pdt.P/2025/PN Blt. The research employs an empirical juridical method with a sociological legal approach. Primary data were collected through interviews and case documents at the Blitar District Court, while secondary data consist of statutes, doctrine, and related literature. Qualitative-descriptive analysis was applied to interpret the findings. The study reveals that the guardianship application process involves both administrative and judicial stages. Judges scrutinize material evidence and the probity of sale objectives, weighing important principles such as utility, legal certainty, fairness, and justice. Guardians are granted limited authority to sell a minor’s property only if it can be proven to be in the child's best interest and legal protections are assured. Recommendations include strengthening post-decision monitoring, enhancing legal outreach, improving procedural transparency, and ensuring comprehensive implementation.]]>
<![CDATA[Pertimbangan Hakim Dalam Memberikan Izin Poligami Terhadap Suami Yang Melakukan Perzinahan dalam Putusan Pengadilan Agama Tanjung Karang Nomor: 737/Pdt.G/2024/PA.Tnk ]]>
<![CDATA[Siti Rani Dania]]>;
<![CDATA[Kasmawati Kasmawati]]>;
<![CDATA[Elly Nurlaili]]>;
<![CDATA[Nunung Rodliyah]]>;
<![CDATA[Sayyidah Sekar Kulsum]]>
<![CDATA[ Jurnal Riset Rumpun Ilmu Sosial, Politik dan Humaniora Vol. 5 No. 2 (2026): JURRISH: Jurnal Riset Rumpun Ilmu Sosial, Politik dan Humaniora ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[Pusat Riset dan Inovasi Nasional ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
DOI: 10.55606/jurrish.v5i2.7087
<![CDATA[This study discusses the judge’s considerations in granting permission for polygamy to a husband who had committed adultery, as stated in the Religious Court Decision of Tanjung Karang Number: 737/Pdt.G/2024/PA.Tnk. Generally, Law No. 1 of 1974 in conjunction with Law No. 16 of 2019 on Marriage upholds the principle of monogamy but allows polygamy under certain conditions with court approval. This case is particularly interesting because the court granted permission for polygamy to a husband who was proven to have engaged in an affair and committed adultery resulting in a child born out of wedlock. The study aims to identify the legal considerations of the judge and the legal implications regarding the marriage and joint property. The research employs an applied normative legal method with a qualitative approach, using primary data from interviews and secondary data from legislation and legal literature. The results show that the judge considered granting permission for polygamy as a means of legalizing the existing relationship to maintain public morality and prevent continuous sinful behavior, although it conflicts with moral values. Legally, the second wife has no rights over the joint property acquired before the polygamous marriage, as stipulated in Article 65 paragraph (1) letter b of the Marriage Law]]>
<![CDATA[Pertimbangan Hakim yang memberikan Hak Asuh Anak yang Belum Mumayyiz kepada Ayah Kandung dalam Putusan Pengadilan Agama Tanjung Karang Nomor: 1379/Pdt.G/2024/PA.Tnk ]]>
<![CDATA[Cynara Alya Zhafirah]]>;
<![CDATA[Nunung Rodliyah]]>;
<![CDATA[Kasmawati Kasmawati]]>;
<![CDATA[Elly Nurlaili]]>;
<![CDATA[Sayyidah Sekar Dewi Kulsum]]>
<![CDATA[ Jurnal Riset Rumpun Ilmu Sosial, Politik dan Humaniora Vol. 5 No. 2 (2026): JURRISH: Jurnal Riset Rumpun Ilmu Sosial, Politik dan Humaniora ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[Pusat Riset dan Inovasi Nasional ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
DOI: 10.55606/jurrish.v5i2.7089
<![CDATA[This study discusses the judge’s considerations in granting child custody of a non-mumayyiz (underage) child to the biological father in the Religious Court Decision of Tanjung Karang Number: 1379/Pdt.G/2024/PA.Tnk. Generally, according to Islamic law and the Compilation of Islamic Law (KHI), custody of a non-mumayyiz child is granted to the biological mother. However, in this case, the panel of judges decided to grant custody to the biological father. The purpose of this research is to identify the legal reasoning behind the judge’s decision and the legal implications of such a ruling. The study employs a normative juridical method with a descriptive-analytical approach, supported by primary data obtained through interviews and secondary data from legislation and legal literature. The results show that the judge’s consideration was based on the best interest of the child principle, as the mother had remarried a non-Muslim man and converted to another religion, which made her ineligible to be the custodian under Islamic law. The legal implication of this decision reinforces the authority of judges to interpret hadhanah provisions contextually, ensuring the protection of the child’s rights and supporting their growth in accordance with religious teachings and prevailing social norms.]]>
