cover
Contact Name
Akbar Nasrum
Contact Email
pengelolajme@gmail.com
Phone
+6282293685122
Journal Mail Official
pengelolajme@gmail.com
Editorial Address
Jl. Pemuda No. 339 Kolaka, Sulawesi Tenggara
Location
,
INDONESIA
JME (Journal of Mathematics Education)
Published by USN Scientific Journal
ISSN : 25282468     EISSN : 25282026     DOI : https://doi.org/10.31327/jme
Core Subject : Education,
Menerima segala bentuk artikel dalam bidang pendidikan matematika Penelitian eksperimen, ekspost facto, penelitian korelasi, Penelitian pengembangan dan juga Systematic Literature Review.
Articles 9 Documents
Search results for , issue "Vol 9, No 2 (2024): JME" : 9 Documents clear
ANALYSIS OF STUDENT’ MISTAKES IN SOLVING PROBLEM ON PYTHAGORAS THEOREM AT SMP NEGERI PALU. Idris, Mustamin -
JME (Journal of Mathematics Education) Vol 9, No 2 (2024): JME
Publisher : Universitas Sembilanbelas November Kolaka

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31327/jme.v9i2.2059

Abstract

The purpose of this study is: to describe students' mistakes in solving Pythagorean Theorem problems at SMP Negeri 9 Palu. This type of research is descriptive research with a qualitative approach. The subjects of this study were 3 students who were taken from 26 students who had studied the Pythagorean theorem. The selection of research subjects took into account: (1) these students made more mistakes; (2) different errors; (3) represent mistakes made by other students; (4) students' ability to communicate well and (5) recommendations from math teachers. Data collection techniques used are assignments and interviews. The analysis in this study uses Gagne's theory. The results of this study indicate that some of the mistakes students experienced in solving Pythagorean theorem problems were: (1) Subjects EN and SF made mistakes in using the Pythagorean theorem formula (Concept Error); (2) Subjects EN and SF made mistakes in writing mathematical symbols (Fact Errors); (3) Subjects EN, MR and SF made mistakes in determining the hypotenuse of a right triangle (Principle Error); (4) Subjects EN, MR and SF made the mistake of not using the rank (Principle Error); (5) Subjects EN, MR and SF made mistakes in not writing down work procedures completely and accurately (Skills Errors) and (6) Subjects SF made mistakes in not doing calculations correctly (Skills Errors).
ANALYSIS OF THE CREATIVE THINKING ABILITY OF PGSD STUDENTS IN OPEN-ENDED PROBLEM-BASED GEOMETRY LEARNING Suastika, I Ketut; Puspasari, Yovita; Hariyani, Sri; Primasatya, Nurita
JME (Journal of Mathematics Education) Vol 9, No 2 (2024): JME
Publisher : Universitas Sembilanbelas November Kolaka

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31327/jme.v9i2.2282

Abstract

The ability to think creatively is an important skill in the world of education, especially for students of the Primary School Teacher Education Study Program (PGSD). In learning mathematics, especially geometry, this ability is crucial for understanding concepts in depth and solving problems innovatively. However, there are still many students who show limitations in generating creative ideas, especially in the aspects of originality and elaboration. Therefore, this research aims to analyze the creative thinking abilities of PGSD students in open problem-based geometry learning, which gives students the freedom to explore various solutions in solving geometric problems. This research uses descriptive qualitative methods with data obtained through interviews, observation and document analysis. Research informants include lecturers, PGSD students, heads of study programs, librarians, and the curriculum development team at STKIP PGRI Trenggalek. The research results show that the open problem-based learning method is effective in improving students' fluency and flexibility abilities. However, in the aspects of originality and elaboration, several obstacles were still found that required more intensive guidance and the use of supporting technology. With the right approach, this method can be a solution to optimize students' creative thinking abilities in learning geometry.
PROFILE OF CRITICAL THINKING SKILLS OF STUDENTS IN CLASS VII SMP ON FRACTION ADDITION MATERIAL IN TERMS OF GENDER Amelia, Reski; Alfisyahra, Alfisyahra; Idris, Mustamin; Lefrida, Rita
JME (Journal of Mathematics Education) Vol 9, No 2 (2024): JME
Publisher : Universitas Sembilanbelas November Kolaka

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31327/jme.v9i2.2067

Abstract

This study aims to obtain an overview of the critical thinking skills of male and female students in class VII A SMPN 9 Palu on fraction addition material. This research aims to: 1) to obtain a description of the critical thinking ability of male students on the addition and subtraction of fractions 2) to obtain a description of the critical thinking ability of female students on the addition and subtraction of fractions. This type of research is descriptive using a qualitative approach. The subjects of this research were 2 students taken from 31 students of class VII A SMPN 9 Palu consisting of 1 male student with high mathematics ability and 1 female student with high mathematics ability. The results of this study showed that male and female subjects with high mathematics ability were able to fulfill the indicators of critical thinking ability by Facione (2015), namely: (1) can interpret the problem by identifying the information known and asked appropriately and able to interpret and understand the symbols contained in the problem, (2) connect between statements, questions and concepts by making mathematical modeling appropriately (3) determine and use the right strategy in the calculation process so as to find the right final solution, (4) able to draw conclusions from what is asked in the problem, and (5) have the awareness to re-examine the solution of the problem given by identifying errors in determining the strategy or in the calculation process and then being able to believe the answer. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk memperoleh gambaran kemampuan berpikir kritis siswa laki-laki dan perempuan kelas VII A SMPN 9 Palu pada materi penjumlahan pecahan. Jenis penelitian ini adalah deskriptif dengan menggunakan pendekatan kualitatif. Subjek penelitian ini adalah 2 orang siswa yang diambil dari  31 siswa kelas VII A SMPN 9 Palu yang terdiri dari 1 orang siswa laki-laki berkemampuan matematika tinggi dan 1 orang siswa perempuan berkemampuan matematika tinggi. Hasil penelitian ini menunjukkan bahwa subjek laki-laki dan perempuan berkemampuan matematika tinggi mampu memenuhi indikator kemampuan berpikir kritis oleh Facione (2015), yaitu : (1) dapat menginterpretasi masalah dengan mengidentifikasi informasi yang diketahui dan ditanyakan dengan tepat serta mampu memaknai dan memahami simbol yang terdapat di soal, (2) menghubungkan antara pernyataan, pertanyaan dan konsep-konsep dengan membuat pemodelan matematika dengan tepat (3) menentukan dan menggunakan strategi yang tepat dalam proses perhitungan sehingga mampu menemukan solusi akhir yang tepat, (4) mampu menarik kesimpulan dari apa yang ditanyakan pada soal, dan (5) memiliki kesadaran untuk memeriksa kembali penyelesaian soal yang diberikan dengan mengidentifikasi kesalahan dalam menentukan strategi maupun pada proses perhitungan serta kemudian mampu meyakini jawabannya.
DEVELOPING OF E-LEARNING BASED MATHEMATICS LEARNING MODULES TO IMPROVE PROBLEM SOLVING SKILLS OF STUDENTS Riyanti, Vera; Budhiarti, Yuli; Istika, Iis
JME (Journal of Mathematics Education) Vol 9, No 2 (2024): JME
Publisher : Universitas Sembilanbelas November Kolaka

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31327/jme.v9i2.2288

Abstract

The availability of learning modules that are valid, practical, and easy for students to understand is essential for achieving educational objectives. Additionally, limited problem-solving skills in the fundamental concepts of ordinary differential equations pose a significant challenge in the learning process. This research aims to enhance students' problem-solving abilities in the topic of ordinary differential equations through the development of a mathematics learning e-module for students in the Mathematics Education Study Program. The research method employed is the ADDIE development model. Based on the research findings, the developed e-module was validated by subject matter experts, yielding a score of 3.61, categorized as very good, while validation by media experts resulted in a score of 3.42, also categorized as very good. The evaluation from students regarding the e-module received a score of 3.81, which falls into the very good category. Furthermore, based on the assessment of quiz responses within the e-module, the average score was 78.9, indicating an improvement in students' problem-solving abilities prior to using the e-module, which had an average score of 59.8. It can be concluded that the e-module on the concepts of ordinary differential equations is suitable for use in learning and can enhance students' problem-solving skills.
ANALYSIS OF STUDENT ERRORS IN SOLVING STUDENT MATHEMATICS UAS QUESTIONS ACCORDING TO CASTOLAN CRITERIA Idris, Mustamin; Lembang, Ulvina Tangke; Rizal, Muh.; Lefrida, Rita
JME (Journal of Mathematics Education) Vol 9, No 2 (2024): JME
Publisher : Universitas Sembilanbelas November Kolaka

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31327/jme.v9i2.2068

Abstract

This study aims to analyze the errors made by students in completing final semester exam (UAS) questions in the field of mathematics, namely linear programming, matrices and transformation geometry. The subjects of this study were students of class XI Nursing at SMK Kesehatan Indonesia Jaya Parigi. In determining the research subjects, purposive sampling technique was used . The data collection technique for this study used documentation of essay questions for the final semester exam and documentation of student answer sheets and interviews. The data analysis technique used according to Miles and Huberman is condensation of UAS and interview results data, presenting UAS and interview results data and drawing conclusions. The results of this study indicate that the errors made by students are conceptual errors, procedural errors and technical errors. Indicators of conceptual errors made by students are not being able to interpret problems/use terms, concepts, and principles, students are not able to choose formulas/properties correctly and students are not able to apply formulas/properties accurately. Indicators of procedural errors are inconsistencies in the solution steps with the questions asked and not being able to complete the questions until the final stage. Indicators of technical errors are errors in arithmetic operations and errors in moving numbers or arithmetic operations from one step to the next. Factors causing errors made by UAS participants are not understanding the questions well, lack of mastery of concepts in Matrix, Linear Programs and Transformation Geometry materials, rarely practicing reworking examples of questions, students only see and read examples of questions. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk menganalisis kesalahan yang dilakukan oleh siswa dalam menyelesaikan soal ujian akhir semester (UAS) pada bidang studi matematika yaitu materi program linear, matriks dan geometri transformasi. Subjek penelitian ini adalah siswa kelas XI Keperawatan SMK Kesehatan Indonesia Jaya Parigi. Dalam penentuan Subjek penelitian dilakukan dengan teknik purposive sampling. Teknik pengumpulan data penelitian ini menggunakan dokumentasi soal uraian (essay) ujian akhir semester dan dokumentasi lembar jawaban siswa serta wawancara. Teknik analisis data yang digunakan menurut Miles dan Huberman yaitu kondensasi data hasil UAS dan hasil wawancara, menyajikan data hasil UAS dan wawancara dan penarikan kesimpulan. Dari hasil analisis lembar jawaban siswa pada materi program linear persentase jawaban salah 52%, persentase jawaban slah pada materi matriks 76% dan persentase jawaban salah pada materi geometri transformasi 50%. Hasil penelitian ini menunjukkan kesalahan yang dilakukan oleh siswa yaitu kesalahan konsep, kesalahan prosedur dan kesalahan teknik. Indikator kesalahan konsep yang dilakukan siswa tidak dapat menginterpretasikan masalah/menggunakan istilah, konsep, dan prinsip, siswa tidak dapat memilih rumus/sifat dengan tepat dan siswa tidak dapat menerapkan rumus/sifat secara akurat. Indikator kesalahan prosedur adalah ketidaksesuaian langkah penyelesaian dengan soal yang ditanyakan dan tidak dapat menyelesaikan soal sampai tahap akhir. Indikator kesalahan teknik adalah kesalahan pada operasi hitung dan kesalahan dalam memindahkan angka atau operasi hitung dari satu langkah ke langkah berikutnya. Faktor penyebab kesalahan yang dilakukan peserta UAS adalah tidak memahami soal dengan baik, penguasaan konsep pada materi Matriks, Program Linear dan Geometri Transformasi yang masih kurang, jarang berlatih mengerjakan kembali contoh-contoh soal siswa hanya melihat dan membaca contoh soal. 
COLLECTIVE ARGUMENTATION AND PARTICIPATION IN SOLVING GEOMETRY PROBLEMS IN THE MATHEMATICS CLASSROOM wulandari, evi novita; Juniati, Dwi; Khabibah, Siti
JME (Journal of Mathematics Education) Vol 9, No 2 (2024): JME
Publisher : Universitas Sembilanbelas November Kolaka

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31327/jme.v9i2.2291

Abstract

Collective argumentation is a process in learning that can be used to train communication skills, collaboration, and understanding of mathematical concepts. In this process, both teachers and students play an active role, which is called participation. This study aims to describe the structure of collective argumentation and student participation in solving geometry problems in the classroom. This research method is a qualitative case study. The subjects in this study were a mathematics teacher with 11 years of teaching experience at the junior high school level and six 9th-grade students who had an interest in mathematics from two different classes. The structure of collective argumentation shows that this learning focuses on students while the teacher acts as a facilitator. It can be seen from the more significant number of actions taken by students than teachers. In terms of participation, teachers more often act as ghostee, while students participate more as spokesman. Overall, this study reveals the structure of argumentation in solving geometry problems at each stage of Polya. Questions and explanations given by the teacher influence students' collective argumentation. A teacher must have questioning and communication skills so that students can actively participate in learning in the classroom.
SELF-REGULATED LEARING DESIGN AS AN APPLICATION OF STUDENT'S SELF-ASSESSMENT IN MATHEMATICS LEARNING Ali, Nabila Nurhaliza
JME (Journal of Mathematics Education) Vol 9, No 2 (2024): JME
Publisher : Universitas Sembilanbelas November Kolaka

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31327/jme.v9i2.2097

Abstract

Self-regulated learning is one of the important factors in learning to control oneself in thinking and acting. The purpose of this research is to analyze how much students have achieved their independence in learning. Student learning independence includes all matters of student learning independently without the help of others, student learning motivation or things that affect student independence in learning, especially in learning mathematics. This analysis study will be continued as an effort to improve self-regulated learning. The scope of self-regulated learning was analyzed by descriptive quantitative method through data collection techniques in the form of questionnaires on the object of research taken from a population of 25 students. Data collection was carried out with a questionnaire consisting of 20 statements from indicators of students' self-regulated learning ability. In learning mathematics, students who have initiative and instrinsic learning motivation, apply learning targets, and set a learning schedule in the percentage of almost half of the students do according to these indicators of independence. Almost all students diagnose learning needs, view difficulties as challenges, utilize and seek relevant sources. However, a small proportion of students lack self-efficacy or confidence in their abilities and are still low in evaluating the learning process and results. So that as an educator this needs to be considered to be able to improve students' self-regulated learning abilities (learning independence) in order to improve student achievement.
ANALYSIS OF STUDENTS' ERRORS OF CLASS XI SMKN 2 PALU IN SOLVING MATRIX STORY PROBLEMS USING NEWMAN Ermayanti, Ni Luh; Sugita, Gandung; Alfisyahra, Alfisyahra; Murdiana, I Nyoman
JME (Journal of Mathematics Education) Vol 9, No 2 (2024): JME
Publisher : Universitas Sembilanbelas November Kolaka

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31327/jme.v9i2.1985

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to obtain a description of the mistakes made by class XI students of SMK Negeri 2 Palu in solving word problems on matrix material based on Newman's stages. The type of research used is qualitative research. The research design consists of planning, implementation and completion stages. The research subjects were 3 students of class XI at SMK Negeri 2 Palu. The results of this study indicate that DE subjects experienced errors at the stages of understanding the problem, the stage of transformation, the stage of processing skills, and the stage of writing the final answer. The HR subject experienced errors at the stage of transformation, stage of process skills and stage of writing the final answer. The RW subject experienced errors at the stages of understanding the problem, the transformation stage, the process skills stage, and the final answer writing stage. Therefore, it was concluded that all subjects did not experience errors in the question reading stage. Tujuan penelitian ini adalah untuk memperoleh deskripsi mengenai kesalahan siswa kelas XI SMK Negeri 2 Palu dalam menyelesaikan soal cerita pada materi matriks berdasarkan tahapan Newman. Jenis penelitian yang digunakan adalah penelitian kualitatif. Desain penelitian terdiri dari tahapan perencanaan, pelaksanaan dan penyelesaian. Subjek penelitian adalah 3 orang siswa kelas XI SMK Negeri 2 Palu dengan beberapa pertimbangan yaitu; siswa paling banyak melakukan kesalahan, memiliki kesalahan berbeda, kesalahan dapat mewakili kesalahan yang dilakukan oleh siswa lain, siswa tersebut mempunyai kemampuan komunikasi yang baik, kesedian siswa menjadi subjek, dan rekomendasi guru matematika SMK Negeri 2 Palu. Hasil penelitian ini menunjukkan bahwa subjek DE tidak mengalami kesalahan pada tahap membaca soal, akan tetapi subjek mengalami kesalahan pada tahap memahami masalah, tahap transformasi, tahap keterampilan proses, dan tahap penulisan jawaban akhir. Subjek HR tidak mengalami kesalahan pada tahap membaca soal dan tahap memahami masalah, akan tetapi subjek mengalami kesalahan pada tahap transformasi, tahap keterampilan proses, dan tahap penulisan jawaban akhir. Subjek RW tidak mengalami kesalahan pada tahap membaca soal, akan tetapi subjek mengalami kesalahan pada tahap memahami masalah, tahap transformasi, tahap keterampilan proses, dan tahap penulisan jawaban akhir.The purpose of this study was to obtain a description of the mistakes made by class XI students of SMK Negeri 2 Palu in solving word problems on matrix material based on Newman's stages. The type of research used is qualitative research. The research design consists of planning, implementation and completion stages. The research subjects were 3 students of class XI at SMK Negeri 2 Palu with several considerations namely; students make the most mistakes, have different mistakes, mistakes can represent mistakes made by other students, these students have good communication skills, the willingness of students to become subjects, and recommendations for mathematics teachers at SMK Negeri 2 Palu. The results of this study indicate that DE subjects did not experience errors at the stage of reading the questions, but subjects experienced errors at the stages of understanding the problem, the stage of transformation, the stage of processing skills, and the stage of writing the final answer. The HR subject did not experience errors at the stage of reading the questions and the stage of understanding the problem, but the subject experienced errors at the stage of transformation, stage of process skills and stage of writing the final answer. The RW subject did not experience errors at the stage of reading the questions, but the subject experienced errors at the stages of understanding the problem, the transformation stage, the process skills stage, and the final answer writing stage.
UNVEILING HIDDEN MISCONCEPTIONS: A NEW PERSPECTIVE ON FIRST-YEAR STUDENTS' ALGEBRAIC UNDERSTANDING Sari, Fadhila Kartika; Alifiani, Alifiani; Nursit, Isbadar; Jannah, Ukhti Raudhatul; Rahaju, Rahaju
JME (Journal of Mathematics Education) Vol 9, No 2 (2024): JME
Publisher : Universitas Sembilanbelas November Kolaka

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31327/jme.v9i2.2231

Abstract

This study aims to uncover and analyze hidden misconceptions in algebraic understanding among first-year students in the Mathematics Education Department at a private university in Malang. Conducted from January to March 2024, the research involves two first-year students as subjects. The first subject exhibits the misconception known as "illegal canceling," while the second subject demonstrates the "assumption of distributivity of exponents." Utilizing a qualitative research methodology, diagnostic interviews and problem-solving tasks were employed to identify and understand these misconceptions. Our findings indicate that these hidden misconceptions significantly hinder the students' ability to correctly solve algebraic problems and understand underlying concepts. For the first subject, the error in illegal canceling often led to incorrect simplifications, while the second subject's erroneous application of exponent rules resulted in fundamentally flawed solutions. By systematically categorizing these misconceptions, the study offers tailored instructional strategies to effectively address and correct them.This research highlights the critical need for early detection and targeted intervention in mathematical education. By providing a deeper insight into specific algebraic misunderstandings, the study suggests practical approaches for educators to enhance their teaching methodologies, ultimately improving students' overall algebra comprehension. The novelty of this research lies in its detailed focus on hidden misconceptions and the provision of actionable solutions, offering a fresh perspective on improving algebra education for first-year university students.

Page 1 of 1 | Total Record : 9