cover
Article Per Year (5 Year)
All
Home Page
OAI Link
Editorial Team
Contact
Reviewer
Google Scholar
Contact Name
Andri Putra Kesmawa
Contact Email
andriputrakesmawan@gmail.com
Phone
+6281990251989
Journal Mail Official
journal@idpublishing.org
Editorial Address
Perumahan Sidorejo, Jl. Sidorejo Gg. Sadewa No.D3, Sonopakis Kidul, Ngestiharjo, Kapanewon, Kasihan, Kabupaten Bantul, Daerah Istimewa Yogyakarta 55184
Location
Kab. bantul,
Daerah istimewa yogyakarta
INDONESIA
Journal of Contemporary Law Studies
Published by Indonesian Journal Publisher
ISSN : -     EISSN : 30308097     DOI : 10.47134/lawstudies
Core Subject : Social,
Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice
Journal of Contemporary Law Studies ISSN 3030-8097 is a comprehensive and systematic scholarly platform dedicated to advancing research and discourse in the field of contemporary law. This journal serves as a critical resource for legal scholars, practitioners, and policymakers, fostering a deeper understanding of evolving legal landscapes in the contemporary world. Legal Theory and Philosophy, International Law, Comparative Law, Human Rights and Social Justice, Environmental Law, Technology and Cyber Law, Corporate and Commercial Law, Criminal Law and Justice, Constitutional Law and Health Law and Ethics. Research Methodologies and Interdisciplinary Approaches: Encourages diverse research methodologies and interdisciplinary approaches to enhance the depth and breadth of legal scholarship. Submission Guidelines and Peer Review Process: The journal maintains rigorous submission guidelines and follows a robust peer-review process to ensure the quality and academic rigor of published articles. The Journal of Contemporary Law Studies is committed to contributing to the intellectual discourse surrounding contemporary legal issues and fostering a community of scholars dedicated to advancing legal knowledge.
Arjuna Subject : Umum - Umum
Articles 73 Documents
 4   5   6   7   8 
Penerapan Nilai Etik, Norma, dan Disiplin Kesehatan dalam Praktik Pelayanan Kesehatan dengan Penyelesaian Sengketa Etik Maryanto, Maryanto; Triadi, Irwan
Journal of Contemporary Law Studies Vol. 2 No. 4 (2025): Agustus
Publisher : Indonesian Journal Publisher

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.47134/lawstudies.v2i4.4520

Abstract

This study aims to analyze the application of ethical values, norms, and professional discipline in healthcare practice, with particular emphasis on ethical dispute resolution mechanisms. Using a qualitative approach, this research combines normative legal analysis with case studies by reviewing laws and regulations, professional codes of ethics, guidelines, and documented cases of ethical disputes resolved through mediation and ethics committees. The study highlights the central role of ethical principles such as respect for patient autonomy, beneficence, non-maleficence, and justice in ensuring the protection of patient rights and maintaining the integrity of healthcare professionals. The findings reveal that the healthcare sector often faces complex ethical dilemmas arising from conflicts of interest, resource limitations, and professional accountability. Non-litigation mechanisms, particularly mediation reinforced by Article 310 of Law Number 17 of 2023 on Health, have proven effective in resolving conflicts fairly, transparently, and constructively. These mechanisms not only provide immediate solutions but also contribute to rebuilding trust between healthcare providers and patients while promoting restorative justice. The study concludes that integrating ethical principles with effective dispute resolution and fostering an institutional culture of ethics are crucial to strengthening professionalism, accountability, and public trust. Continuous ethical education, leadership commitment, and institutional support are key to building a sustainable healthcare system oriented toward patient welfare and social justice.
Penerapan Unsur Kesengajaan Pasal 2 UU TPPO Terhadap Perekrut Sebagai Dasar Pertanggunjawaban Pidana Retnowati Boong, Vicariya; Mugiono, Mariana
Journal of Contemporary Law Studies Vol. 2 No. 4 (2025): Agustus
Publisher : Indonesian Journal Publisher

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.47134/lawstudies.v2i4.4811

Abstract

This study aims to analyze the application of the element of intent under Article 2 of Law Number 21 of 2007 concerning the Eradication of the Crime of Trafficking in Person, specifically as it relates to recruiters and their criminal liability. The focus is on determining whether a recruiter can be held liable when they claim to act solely as an intermediary without explicit knowledge of exploitation. This study employs a normative juridical method, employing both statutory and conceptual approaches. Legal norms and principles relevant to the concept of intent in criminal law are examined, along with an analysis of applicable laws and doctrinal interpretations in the context of human trafficking cases. The findings of this study reveal that intent under Article 2 of the Law on Trafficking in Persons encompasses both direct and indirect forms. Direct intent refers to situations where the perpetrator explicitly knows and aims to carry out exploitation. In conclusion, Article 2 of the Law on Trafficking in Persons is not limited to demonstrable knowledge of exploitation. It can also encompass situations where the recruiter should have had reasonable suspicion of potential exploitation but ignored warning signs. Therefore, recruiters can be held criminally liable as principal perpetrators when it is proven that their actions contributed to the trafficking chain, and they knew or should have known of the risks of exploitation involved.
Legalitas Perlindungan Hukum Haji Furoda: Studi Kasus Haji Tahun 2025 Muntafi, Ahmad Zaki
Journal of Contemporary Law Studies Vol. 2 No. 4 (2025): Agustus
Publisher : Indonesian Journal Publisher

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.47134/lawstudies.v2i4.3875

Abstract

This study examines the legal protection of Furoda Hajj pilgrims in 2025, particularly in light of the failure to issue the mujamalah visa, which is a prerequisite for the implementation of this non-quota pilgrimage program. The Furoda Hajj, carried out through official invitations from the Saudi Arabian government, operates outside Indonesia’s regular quota, creating a unique legal position for the pilgrims involved. The purpose of this research is to analyze the extent of legal protection available to pilgrims who fail to depart and to assess the government’s responsibility in safeguarding their rights. Employing a normative juridical approach, this study relies on statutory and conceptual analysis of laws, regulations, and governance practices related to Hajj administration. The findings reveal that although the Furoda Hajj is legally acknowledged, its legal protection remains uncertain, as statutory responsibility is limited to the regular Hajj quota. This gap has significant implications, particularly regarding the supervision, transparency, and accountability of organizers, as well as the refund of funds paid by pilgrims. In conclusion, the non-issuance of mujamalah visas in 2025 highlights the urgent need for regulatory reforms and stronger state involvement to ensure that Furoda Hajj pilgrims receive fair legal protection, security, and justice in line with public expectations.

Page 8 of 8 | Total Record : 73

 4   5   6   7   8 

Filter by Year

2023 2025


Reset
Filter By Issues
All Issue Vol. 2 No. 4 (2025): Agustus Vol. 2 No. 3 (2025): Mei Vol. 2 No. 2 (2025): Februari Vol. 2 No. 1 (2024): November Vol. 1 No. 4 (2024): Agustus Vol. 1 No. 3 (2024): Mei Vol. 1 No. 2 (2024): Februari Vol. 1 No. 1 (2023): November