cover
Article Per Year (5 Year)
All
Home Page
OAI Link
Editorial Team
Contact
Reviewer
Google Scholar
Contact Name
Ramadiva Muhammad Akhyar
Contact Email
ramadiva.m.akhyar@gmail.com
Phone
+6285389513457
Journal Mail Official
jurnal.lentera@uinsi.ac.id
Editorial Address
Fakultas Ushuluddin, Adab dan Dakwah, Universitas Islam Negeri Sultan Aji Muhammad Idris Samarinda, Jl. H. A. M. Rifaddin, Harapan Baru, Kec. Loa Janan Ilir, Kota Samarinda, Kalimantan Timur 75251
Location
Kota samarinda,
Kalimantan timur
INDONESIA
Lentera: Jurnal Ilmu Dakwah dan Komunikasi
Published by Universitas Islam Negeri Sultan Aji Muhammad Idris Samarinda
ISSN : 25497391     EISSN : 2549578X     DOI : 10.21093/lentera
Core Subject : Religion, Humanities, Art, Social,
Religion Arts Humanities Social Sciences
Lentera: Jurnal Ilmu Dakwah dan Komunikasi [p-ISSN: 2549-7391, e-ISSN: 2549-578X] is a scholarly periodical journal published by the Faculty of Ushuluddin, Adab, dan Dakwah, Universitas Islam Negeri Sultan Aji Muhammad Idris Samarinda. This scholarly periodical specialized in the study of dakwah and communication and seek to present the various result of the latest research The journal is published twice a year on June and December.
Arjuna Subject : Seni dan Humaniora - Studi Agama
Articles 93 Documents
 6   7   8   9   10 
Expanding The Boundaries of Tolerance in Indonesia Setyo, Bono; Sultan, M. Iqbal; Rahmadiva, Lelita Azaria; Syarkawi, Muhammad
Lentera: Jurnal Ilmu Dakwah dan Komunikasi VOL 9, No.02 (2025): LENTERA
Publisher : Fakultas Ushuluddin, Adab dan Dakwah, Universitas Islam Negeri Sultan Aji Muhammad Idris Samarinda

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.21093/lentera.v9i02.11664

Abstract

Conflict originates from differences that develop in society. These differences include gender, ethnicity, nationality, culture, social and economic strata, politics, religion, and beliefs, including religious sects. This study aims to determine the resolution of conflicts arising from differences in khilafah between Sunni and Wahhabi schools in East Lombok, Indonesia. This research uses a qualitative approach. Researchers obtain both primary and secondary data related to the problem by going directly to the research object (field research). Data collection techniques included observation, interviews, and documentation for qualitative data analysis in this study, using the flow model proposed by Miles and Huberman. The study's results show differences between the Sunni and Wahhabi schools of thought that developed in the village of Bebidas, Wanasaba, East Lombok, where adherents of each school hold that their respective religions' teachings and practices are authentic. This difference in understanding and practice of religion is the source of conflict. Conflict resolution is necessary to identify solutions that prevent or minimise disputes, thereby avoiding escalation to physical violence. Among other things, disputes are handled through negotiation, mediation, arbitration, and by the local village government. Additionally, efforts were made to resolve the conflict by raising the tolerance threshold between the parties. This finding also has implications for conflicts originating from other differences that develop in society. Researchers also emphasise the importance of conducting research from multiple scientific perspectives.
The Influence of Public Perception and Implementation of the MBG Program on the Image of Prabowo–Gibran Government Yarnis, Yarnis; Sinaga, Astriana Baiti; Muksin, Nani Nurani; Patrianti, Tria
Lentera: Jurnal Ilmu Dakwah dan Komunikasi VOL 10, No. 01 (2026): LENTERA
Publisher : Fakultas Ushuluddin, Adab dan Dakwah, Universitas Islam Negeri Sultan Aji Muhammad Idris Samarinda

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.21093/lentera.v10i01.11661

Abstract

This study measures the influence of public perception and the Free Nutritious Meals Program (MBG) on the image of the Prabowo–Gibran administration in Berau Regency. In political communication, the MBG program is viewed not only in terms of its implementation but also in how it is perceived by the public and communicated by the government. This study is motivated by the existence of both pros and cons regarding the new leadership and the challenges faced by the new government's image, particularly in programs that have not yet been fully realized, especially in areas such as Berau Regency, which is geographically quite distant from the centre of government. The objective of this study is to measure the influence of public perception and the implementation of the MBG program on the government's image. The method used is quantitative, with a survey method. The sample consists of 100 respondents selected through stratified random sampling in Berau Regency. The results indicate that public perception does not have a significant influence on the government's image. Conversely, the MBG program partially has a strong influence. However, when tested simultaneously, both contribute significantly to forming a positive image of the government. These findings indicate that narratives and strategic communication regarding programs that have not yet been fully implemented can still influence the government's image. In Political PR, these results highlight the importance of effective political communication and make theoretical and practical contributions to the development of political communication strategies.
Religious Moderation in Yogyakarta Madrasahs: An Evaluation Study Duraesa, M. Abzar; Dinihari, Anggie Nadia
Lentera: Jurnal Ilmu Dakwah dan Komunikasi VOL 9, No.02 (2025): LENTERA
Publisher : Fakultas Ushuluddin, Adab dan Dakwah, Universitas Islam Negeri Sultan Aji Muhammad Idris Samarinda

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.21093/lentera.v9i02.12621

Abstract

Discrimination and extremism undermine social cohesion, emphasizing the need for character education especially religious moderation in madrasah curricula. However, Society 5.0's learning needs necessitate higher-order thinking teaching methods like Computational Thinking. To address Society 5.0 challenges, this study evaluates a religious moderation program integrated into Islamic education materials using computational thinking (CT). This qualitative descriptive study focused on context, transactions, and outcomes using Stake's Countenance evaluation paradigm. 112 professors and 1,276 students were interviewed at Yogyakarta Special Region madrasahs. To keep the trustworthiness, we interviewed and coded and checked the data again. The earlier review shows that program preparation and requirements met Ministry of Religious Affairs objectives, including teacher aid to internalize religious moderation through CT-oriented instruction. Classroom learning and school culture activities like Islamic education recitals and Rohis demonstrate the program's implementation, according to the transaction evaluation. The outcome review shows that coaching, workshops, and training sessions on religious moderation and critical thinking continue throughout school hours, disrupting learning. Criticism as a digital-era competency and a comprehensive educational framework for religious moderation in Islamic education improves academic discourse. It adapts Stake's Countenance concept to madrasah values education. It provides empirical evidence from a large participant cohort on policy criteria translation into everyday learning. It finds a real-world governance gap—training scheduling—that can reduce program effectiveness even in ready contexts. Program managers can use it to link character education goals to instructional time. It also proposes evaluating other places that desire to combine CT with religious moderation. Finally, it links cognitive talents to social and ethical resilience in schooling to boost Society 5.0 discussions.

Page 10 of 10 | Total Record : 93

 6   7   8   9   10 

Filter by Year

2017 2026


Reset
Filter By Issues
All Issue VOL 10, No. 01 (2026): LENTERA VOL 9, No.02 (2025): LENTERA VOL 9, No.01 (2025): LENTERA VOL 8, No 02 (2024): LENTERA VOL 8, No 01 (2024): LENTERA VOL 7, No 02 (2023): LENTERA VOL 7, No 01 (2023): LENTERA VOL 6, No 02 (2022): LENTERA VOL 6, No 01 (2022): LENTERA VOL 5, No 02 (2021): LENTERA VOL 5, No 01 (2021): LENTERA VOL 4, No 02 (2020): LENTERA VOL 4, No 01 (2020): LENTERA VOL 3, No 02 (2019): LENTERA VOL 3, No 01 (2019): LENTERA VOL 2, No 02 (2018): LENTERA VOL 2, No 01 (2018): LENTERA Vol 1, No 02 (2017): LENTERA Vol 1 No 01 (2017): LENTERA More Issue