Kanun: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum
anun: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum (KJIH), the Indonesian Journal of Autonomy Law, is an international journal dedicated to the study of autonomy law within the framework of national and international legal systems. Published thrice annually (April, August, December), KJIH provides valuable insights for scholars, policy analysts, policymakers, and practitioners. Managed by the Faculty of Law at Syiah Kuala University in Banda Aceh, Indonesia, KJIH has been fostering legal scholarship since its establishment in June 1991, with the ISSN: 0854 – 5499 and e-ISSN (Online): 2527 – 8428. In 2020, it received national accreditation (SINTA 2) from the Ministry of Research and Technology of the Republic of Indonesia and the National Research and Innovation Agency. KJIH is actively pursuing indexing in prestigious databases like Scopus, Web of Science and other global indexes. We publish in English for accessibility, not as a political statement. The Editorial Board shall not be responsible for views expressed in every article.
Articles
487 Documents
<![CDATA[Penjaminan Kredit untuk Usaha Kecil Dilihat dari Sistem Hukum ]]>
<![CDATA[Teuku Ahmad Yani]]>
<![CDATA[ Kanun Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Vol 16, No 3 (2014): Vol. 16, No. 3, (Desember, 2014) ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[Universitas Syiah Kuala ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
<![CDATA[Credit insurance is an alternative way in ensuring banks to provide credit for a small enterprise. It is not only practiced in European Continental Legal System but also in Anglo Saxon Legal System and Islamic Legal System. In addition viewed from states applying it., it is also applying in Indonesia and Malaysia as developing country and in developed country such as Japan. This research aims to explore the insurance system based on such legal system. Credit Insurance for Small Business Viewed from Legal System]]>
<![CDATA[Gratifikasi sebagai Tindak Pidana Korupsi Terkait Adanya Laporan Penerima Gratifikasi ]]>
<![CDATA[Nur Mauliddar]]>;
<![CDATA[Mohd. Din]]>;
<![CDATA[Yanis Rinaldi]]>
<![CDATA[ Kanun Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Vol 19, No 1 (2017): Vol. 19, No. 1, (April, 2017) ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[Universitas Syiah Kuala ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
<![CDATA[ABSTRAK: Tindak pidana gratifikasi diatur dalam Pasal 12B Undang-Undang No. 20 Tahun 2001 tentang Perubahan atas Undang-Undang No. 31 Tahun 1999 tentang Pemberantasan Tindak Pidana Korupsi. Namun ketentuan ini hanya berlaku bagi penerima gratifikasi, sedangkan pemberi gratifikasi diatur dengan ketentuan Pasal 5. Sementara itu Pasal 12C menyatakan jika penerima gratifikasi melaporkan gratifikasi tersebut kepada KPK terhitung paling lambat 30 hari sejak gratifikasi tersebut diterima, maka ketentuan Pasal 12B ayat (1) tidak berlaku. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengetahui eksistensi pemberi gratifikasi dalam tindak pidana korupsi dan hilangnya sifat melawan hukum pemberi gratifikasi jika penerima gratifikasi melaporkan kepada KPK. Metode peneliti-an yang digunakan adalah penelitian yuridis normatif. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa kedudukan pemberi gratifikasi sebagaimana diatur dalam Pasal 5 Undang-Undang Pemberantasan Korupsi, setiap pemberian yang dilakukan kepada pegawai negeri/penyelenggara negara dengan harapan agar penerima gratifikasi melakukan sesuatu atau tidak melakukan sesuatu yang berlawanan dengan tugasnya, dan semata-mata untuk memenuhi keinginan pemberi gratifikasi. Hilangnya sifat melawan hukum pemberi gratifikasi dalam tindak pidana korupsi terkait adanya laporan penerima gratifikasi yaitu si pemberi tetap memiliki sifat melawan hukum atas perbuatan mem-berkan gratifikasi, sedangkan adanya laporan penerima gratifikasi bukan merupakan sebuah alasan peniadaan pidana. Akan tetapi alasan peniadaan pidana itu ditujukan terhadap penerima gratifikasi. Disarankan kepada pembentuk undang-undang agar memberikan pembatasan tentang makna dari gratifikasi dan merevisi ketentuan Pasal 12C sehingga terciptanya suatu keseimbangan antara penerima dan pemberi gratifikasi. The Gratification as Corruption in Regard With a Report from a Gratification Receiver ABSTRACT: A crime of gratification has been legislated in Article 12B of the Act Number 20, 2001 in regards with the Alteration of the Act Number 31, 1999 regarding the Corruption Suppression Act. However, it only applies for a gratification receiver, while a gratifier is ruled in Article 5. Article 12C has provided a possibility that if the receiver may report the KPK (Corruption Suppression Commission) within 30 days sine the acceptance, and Article 12B (1) is not applicable. It means that the act which is against the law of accepting it becoming void; nevertheless the gratifier violates the law. This research aims to explore the existence of gratifier in a corruption case and the absence of a breaching law element of the gratifier if the receiver of gratification reports the KPK (Corruption Suppression Commission). This is juridical normative research. The research shows that the existence of the gratifier of corruption is worded in Article 5 of the Corruption Suppression Act that every gift for a civil servant/official aiming at the gratification receiver commits a thing or omit to do a thing violating his/her duty in order to fulfill the need of the gratifier. The absence of an act violating the law of the gratifier in a corruption case in regard with the report from the gratification receiver is that the gratifier does still violate the law due to the commission, while by the report from the receiver, the act against the law is not avoid. However, the reason for abolishing the punishment is only for the gratification receiver. This recommended that the lawmakers should provide a limit on the meaning of gratification and should be revised hence of Article 12C there is a balance between the receiver and the gratifier.]]>
<![CDATA[Tantangan Peradilan Adat Laot di Aceh ]]>
<![CDATA[Teuku Muttaqin Mansur]]>
<![CDATA[ Kanun Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Vol 14, No 2 (2012): Vol. 14, No. 2, (Agustus, 2012) ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[Universitas Syiah Kuala ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
<![CDATA[ABSTRACT: The presence of the commander Laot Laot and customary law is recognized in national legal systems. One is owned by the authority to settle the dispute through traditional justice. So far, the customary judicial decision Laot followed. But viewed from the provisions of national law, customary judicial decision Laot does not have a strong legal basis. This research is descriptive analytical, normative juridical approach sociological and juridical. From the research note that the judiciary can enforce the law and all courts established by state law, not including the customary judicial Laot in it. This judicial decision can only provide a peaceful because the decision is relative or voluntary. Parties who are not satisfied, opened the opportunity to reopen the law through the state courts. The Challenge of Customary Justice of The Sea]]>
<![CDATA[The Study of Implementation Effectiveness in the Various Criminal Law Policies During the Covid-19 Pandemic ]]>
<![CDATA[Joko Sri Widodo]]>;
<![CDATA[Kristiawanto Kristiawanto]]>;
<![CDATA[Tofik Yanuar Chandra]]>
<![CDATA[ Kanun Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Vol 23, No 3 (2021): Vol. 23, No. 3, December 2021 ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[Universitas Syiah Kuala ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
DOI: 10.24815/kanun.v23i3.21912
<![CDATA[There are various pros and cons to the criminal law policies by the Indonesian government in the context of dealing with covid 19. So it is necessary to have a study related to the effectiveness of implementing these various policies. The author's background is to discuss the formulation of the problem in this article: What is the criminal law policy during the covid 19 pandemic? And how is the effectiveness in the implementation of these policies? This article uses a normative juridical research method that examines various positive laws from the applicable laws and regulations, and then it is analyzed in analytical descriptive. The Indonesian government has established various policies to prevent the covid 19 transmission. The guidelines consist of: the formation of various legal regulations related to the covid pandemic; a policy of criminal sanctions for violators of social policies during the covid 19 pandemic; prisoner assimilation policy; electronic trial of criminal cases during the covid 19 pandemic; corruption prevention policies; policies on workplaces in public areas. Regarding the effectiveness of implementing these policies, it can be said that the execution tends to be less optimal because the policies are contrary to one another. So this article provides suggestions to the government and the community should have mutual support for the implementation of criminal law policies during the COVID-19 pandemic can be effective.]]>
<![CDATA[Pemanfaatan Tanah Aset PT. Kereta Api oleh Pihak Ketiga ]]>
<![CDATA[Oky Nasrul]]>
<![CDATA[ Kanun Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Vol 20, No 3 (2018): Vol. 20, No. 3 (Desember 2018) ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[Universitas Syiah Kuala ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
DOI: 10.24815/kanun.v20i3.11438
<![CDATA[Penelitian ini ingin menjawab bagaimana pemanfaatan tanah aset PT. Kereta Api Indonesia oleh pihak ketiga. Pemanfaatan tanah aset bertujuan untuk pengembangan potensi dan penunjang kegiatan usaha PT. KAI. Namun terdapat pemanfaatan tanah aset untuk kegiatan diluar perkeretaapian. Penelitian ini merupakan penelitian hukum dengan metode yuridis empiris, dengan spesifikasi deskriptif analisis. Penelitian menemukan bahwa bentuk pemanfaatan tanah aset oleh pihak ketiga antara lain bangun guna serah, bangun serah guna, kerjasama operasi, kerjasama usaha, sewa, dan pinjam pakai. Pemanfaatan tanah aset yang dilaksanakan PT. KAI adalah dengan cara sewa dan pemberian hak guna bangunan di atas HPL. Alasan pemberian pemanfaatan tanah aset diluar penunjang kegiatan usaha untuk mengoptimalkan seluruh aset yang ada, agar PT. KAI mendapat manfaat dan pemasukan dari tanah-tanah tersebut. Hal ini bertentangan dengan Undang-Undang Pokok Agraria dan tidak sejalan dengan Peraturan Direksi PT. KAI. Implikasinya perbuatan tersebut bisa dianggap batal demi hukum atau dianggap tidak pernah ada. Land Assets Utilization of Indonesian Railway Company (PT KAI) by Third Party This study aims to answer how the use of land assets of Indonesian Railway Company (PT. KAI) by third party. The purpose use of land assets is to develop potential and to support business activities of PT. KAI. However, the use of land assets also for other activities outside the railway. This is legal research by applying empiric juridical method, with descriptive analysis specifications. The study found that the form of land assets utilization by third party included build operate and transfer (BOT), build transfer and operate (BTO), joint operations, business cooperation, leasing, and lend-use. Land assets utilization carried out by PT. KAI is by leasing and granting building rights title over management rights (HPL). Other reasons for granting land assets utilization are to support business activities and to optimize all existing assets so that PT. KAI gets benefits and income from these lands. This is contrary to the Agrarian Principle Law and not in line with the Directors' Regulations of PT. KAI. The implication of this action can be considered null and void or considered never existed.]]>
<![CDATA[Rekonsiliasi Berbasis Kearifan Lokal di Aceh ]]>
<![CDATA[Sulaiman Sulaiman]]>
<![CDATA[ Kanun Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Vol 18, No 3 (2016): Vol. 18, No. 3, (Desember, 2016) ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[Universitas Syiah Kuala ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
<![CDATA[ABSTRAK. Kearifan lokal bukanlah sesuatu yang baru dalam mengkonstruksi dan menjalankan hukum. Artikel ini ingin menawarkan konsep kearifan lokal dalam penyelesaian pelanggaran hak asasi manusia untuk menemukan keadilan. Kasus hak asasi manusia yang pernah terjadi di Aceh memiliki peluang bagi penyelesaiannya. Namun ada satu hal yang penting untuk diingat, bahwa usaha penyelesaian pelanggaran HAM masa lalu di Aceh tidak sekadar merupakan persoalan hukum, melainkan termasuk hak asasi manusia, politik, dan kebijakan. Pilihan atas pembentukan komite/badan khusus dengan kebijakan Presiden, dapat dilakukan dalam konteks membuka ruang pengungkapan kebenaran, atau proses mempercepat penyelesaian pelanggaran hak asasi manusia. Dalam pengalaman sejumlah negara, pengungkapan kebenaran tidak jarang dilakukan berlandaskan pada kebijakan kepresidenan. Reconciliation Based Local Wisdom in Aceh ABSTRACT. Local wisdom is not something new to construct and execute the law. This article would like to offer the concept of local wisdom in the settlement of human rights violations to find justice. Cases of human rights that have occurred in Aceh has a chance for its completion. But there is one important thing to keep in mind, that the business settlement of past human rights violations in Aceh is not just a legal issue, but also human rights, politics, and policy. The choice of the establishment of committees/ special body with the president's policies, can be done in the context of the open space of the truth, or the process of speeding up the settlement of human rights violations. In the experience of some countries, disclosure of the truth is not infrequently done based on the policy of the presidency.]]>
<![CDATA[Penyelesaian Sengketa melalui Pendekatan Adat ]]>
<![CDATA[Abdurrahman Abdurrahman]]>
<![CDATA[ Kanun Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Vol 12, No 1 (2010): Vol. 12, No. 1, (April, 2010) ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[Universitas Syiah Kuala ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
<![CDATA[ABSTRACT: There are available some alternative dispute settlement method in the community life, it is commonly through formal way (litigation) and also can be used through informal way (non litigation). One of informal dispute settlement is through customary approach which is undertaken by adat institution. The dispute settlement through adat approach has the main purpose that is to keep harmonisation and relationship among the community, not only providing the legal certainty but also the justice. In the life of Aceh’ people, the customary dispute settlement was done by adat institution at Gampong (village) and Mukim level. And for this, it has been promulgated already under several Qanun (regional law) of Aceh. The application of customary dispute settlement in Aceh is supported by any general principles that can provide protection for the rights of disputed parties. Dispute Stelement Through Customary Approach]]>
<![CDATA[Formulasi Hukum Penanggulangan Malpraktik Kedokteran ]]>
<![CDATA[Priharto Adi]]>
<![CDATA[ Kanun Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Vol 15, No 2 (2013): Vol. 15, No. 2, (Agustus, 2013) ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[Universitas Syiah Kuala ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
<![CDATA[ABSTRACT: Indonesia legal system has a component of legal substance, namely criminal law, civil, and administrative laws does not recognized malpractice. The main rule is on the Act Number 23, 1992. This paper would like to explore (1) the policy formula of criminal law nowadays in suppressing medical malpractice. (2) the policy formula of criminal law in the future in overcoming such crime. The method applies is juridical comparative that is by exploring or analyzing secondary data gathered from secondary sources. This is descriptive analytical research. The data are then described and constructed the statement in document and in the act. The research reveals that punishment on corporation is limited to the violation of practice license by a doctor. In KUHP, the Act Number 36, 2009 regarding Health, the Act Number 29, 2004 regarding Doctor Practice after the decision of Constitutional Court is not regulated specially or the terms of malpractice is not recognized. Upcoming formula policy should be regulated regarding corporate liability in terms of medical practicing bringing loss for patients as the conduct of malpractice by doctors. Legal Formula on Suppressing Medical Malpractice]]>
<![CDATA[MONOPOLISTIC PORT BUSINESS ACTIVITIES POST-DEMONOPOLIZATION OF PT.PELINDO (PERSERO) BASE ON BUSINESS COMPETITION LAW ]]>
<![CDATA[Putu Samawati Saleh]]>
<![CDATA[ Kanun Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Vol 24, No 3 (2022): Vol. 24, No. 3, December 2022 ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[Universitas Syiah Kuala ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
DOI: 10.24815/kanun.v24i3.24230
<![CDATA[Since the implementation demonopolization of port business activities in 2008, the condition of Indonesian port business competition still dominates of PT.Pelindo (Persero) with market share od 84%. Even though the state has imposed a demonopolization policy with the aim of opening up opportunities for private port business entities to become competitors for PT.Pelindo (Persero). The monopolistic condition of PT Pelindo (Persero) is the reason to discuss in this paper. Finding mind problem in normative construction to get some solution are also be a purpose of this article. A normative juridical research and a statutory approach was carried out to find legally what was wrong in the port management mechanism. The expected results are in the form of normative improvement efforts that can be made in an effort to increase competition in port services, particularly in regards to restoring the role of port authorities and affirming the regulation of the separation of roles between port authorities and port business entities. This improvement is necessary, given the important role of ports as connectivity and mobility in Indonesia.]]>
<![CDATA[Pergeseran Rezim Sistem Pemilihan Kepala Daerah di Indonesia ]]>
<![CDATA[Ahmad Mirza Safwandy]]>;
<![CDATA[Husni Jalil]]>;
<![CDATA[Moh Nur Rasyid]]>
<![CDATA[ Kanun Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Vol 21, No 3 (2019): Vol. 21, No. 3 (Desember 2019) ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[Universitas Syiah Kuala ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
DOI: 10.24815/kanun.v21i3.12231
<![CDATA[Penelitian ini bertujuan menguraikan pergeseran sistem pemilihan kepala daerah dari rezim pemilihan umum ke rezim Pemerintahan Daerah. Pergeseran ini berdampak kepada peralihan kewenangan penyelesaian sengketa dari Mahkamah Konstitusi ke Mahkamah Agung sebagai konsekuensi Putusan MK Nomor 97/PUU–XI/2013. Putusan MK berimpilikasi kepada sistem pemilihan kepala daerah (Pilkada) yang berada di rezim pemilihan umum beralih ke rezim pemerintahan daerah, setelah putusan tersebut undang-undang mengamanatkan pembentukan peradilan khusus Pilkada yang berada di bawah kekuasaan Mahkamah Agung. Penelitian ini menggunakan pendekatan yuridis normatif dengan bertumpu pada studi dokumen berupa bahan hukum. Penelitian menyimpulkan bahwa meski tidak lagi menjadi kewenangan MK untuk mengadili perkara Pilkada, MK masih mengadili sengketa Pilkada hingga peradilan khusus Pilkada terbentuk. Peradilan khusus Pilkada selain mengadili sengketa hasil dapat mengadili sengketa proses, terkait sengketa administrasi Pilkada, sengketa Pidana Pilkada termasuk mengadili perihal election fraud dan corrupt campaign practice. Sistem penyelesaian sengketa Pilkada dilakukan melalui satu atap, sehingga tidak terjadi tumpang tindih putusan seperti yang terjadi selama ini. Shifting of Regime on Regional Election System in Indonesia This study aims to describe the shift of the regional election system from the general election regime to the regional district regime. The shift has an impact on the tranfer of authority to resolve disputes from Constitutional Court to Supreme Court as a consequence of the Constitutional Court Decision Number 97/PUU-XI/2013. The decision implied to the regional election system (Pilkada) which was in the electoral regime moved to the regional government regime, after the ruling mandated the establishment of a special election court under the authority of the Supreme Court. This research uses a normative juridical approach by analyzing law documents. The research concluded that although adjudicating of regional election disputes was no longer under the jurisdiction of the Constitutional Court, but the Court still adjudicate election disputes until a special court was formed. In addition to adjudicating disputes over results, the Election Special Court can also adjudicate election disputes related to process, administrative, criminal disputes including hearing about election fraud and corrupt campaign practice. Pilkada dispute resolution system is done through one roof, so there is no overlapping of decisions as has happened so far. ]]>
