Indonesian Journal of Humanities and Social Sciences
Indonesian Journal of Humanities and Social Sciences The Indonesian Journal of Humanities and Social Sciences is open access and peer-reviewed journal. The journal is a peer-reviewed, international, and interdisciplinary journal publishing research articles and significant contributions to social sciences, humanities, and educational sciences. This includes Arts and Humanities (Multidisciplinary), Social Sciences (Multidisciplinary), Philosophy in general, Religious, philosophy of religion, Arabic studies, History, Cultural Studies, Sociology, Political, Law, Education, Geography (Multidisciplinary), Fine Arts (Multidisciplinary), Communication and media, English as a Foreign Language (TESOL, EFL, ESP), Linguistics and Language, Literature, Psychology, Urban Studies, Planning and Development, Sport sciences (Multidisciplinary), Management, Administration, Information systems, Accounting, Economics, Finance, Business, strategies, Hospitality, Tourism and so on. Published four times a year, namely March, June, September, and December.
Articles
362 Documents
Penggunaan Kode Tutur Pada Komunitas Burung Kenari “Konco Ngopi” Di Ciledug Tangerang
Al Ghofur, Shafi;
Hariyati, Farida;
Romadlan, Said
JOM Vol 7 No 1 (2026): Indonesian Journal of Humanities and Social Sciences , March
Publisher : Universitas Islam Tribakti Lirboyo Kediri
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
DOI: 10.33367/ijhass.v7i1.8989
This article analyzes how verbal language functions as a cultural practice in the Canary Bird Community "Konco Ngopi" in Ciledug, Tangerang, by examining the formation of distinctive terms, social functions, and interaction patterns both inside and outside the gantang arena. The novelty of this research lies in the integration of Speech Codes Theory and communication ethnography to interpret canary jargon not merely as a variation of language, but as a system of meaning that shapes identity, competition ethics, and social relations. Previous studies have generally been limited to descriptions of terms or different communities without linking speech codes to the competition space and communication network structure. Data was obtained through participant observation, in depth interviews, and documentation of cage bird activitiesand informal meetings (ngopi). Results indicate that terms influenced by Javanese, Sundanese, and Betawi languages function as internal codes for technical coordination, affirming membership boundaries, and strengthening solidarity. Community interactions are also supported by an egalitarian, (open channel) communication network pattern that facilitates continuous knowledge exchange.
Menafsir Ulang Persetujuan: Analisis Filosofis atas Syarat Substantif, Epistemis, dan Volisional Consent
Pratama, Mohammad Alvi
JOM Vol 6 No 4 (2025): Indonesian Journal of Humanities and Social Sciences , December
Publisher : Universitas Islam Tribakti Lirboyo Kediri
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
DOI: 10.33367/ijhass.v6i4.9058
Consent is a fundamental normative concept in moral and social life, yet its complexity is often overlooked in everyday understanding. This article aims to philosophically examine the nature of consent as a normative power capable of transforming actions that were previously impermissible into permissible ones, while also analyzing the conditions that must be fulfilled for consent to be considered valid. This study employs a conceptual analysis method based on a literature review, examining major works in contemporary moral philosophy that discuss theories of consent. The analysis demonstrates that consent cannot be understood merely as an expression of individual will; rather, it functions as a normative mechanism that transforms the moral status of an action. However, its validity depends on the fulfillment of several crucial conditions: substantive conditions related to the nature of the action being consented to; epistemic conditions requiring adequate knowledge and understanding; volitional conditions ensuring freedom from coercion; and contextual conditions that take into account power relations and the surrounding social structures. Based on these findings, the article argues that consent constitutes a limited normative power, since its validity can only be recognized when these four conditions are fulfilled simultaneously.