cover
Contact Name
Zaenal Arifin
Contact Email
zaenal@usm.ac.id
Phone
-
Journal Mail Official
jurnaljouridisch@usm.ac.id
Editorial Address
https://journals.usm.ac.id/index.php/jj/about/editorialTeam
Location
Kota semarang,
Jawa tengah
INDONESIA
Journal Juridisch
Published by Universitas Semarang
ISSN : -     EISSN : 29876559     DOI : https://doi.org/10.26623/
Core Subject : Social,
The aim of this journal is to provide a venue for academicians, researchers, and practitioners for publishing original research articles or review articles. The scope of the articles published in this journal deal with a broad range of topics, including: Criminal Law, Civil Law, Constitutional Law, International Law, Administrative Law, Islamic Law, Business Law, Medical Law, Environmental Law, Legal Philosophy
Arjuna Subject : Ilmu Sosial - Hukum
Articles 7 Documents
Search results for , issue "Vol. 3 No. 2 (2025): JULY" : 7 Documents clear
Wanprestasi Developer dalam Jual Beli Kavling: Hilangnya Kepastian Hukum bagi Konsumen: Developer’s Default in Land Lot Sales: The Loss of Legal Certainty for Consumers Ade Irawan; Choirihi, Muchammad; Kukuh Sudarmanto; Zaenal Arifin
Journal Juridisch Vol. 3 No. 2 (2025): JULY
Publisher : Universitas Semarang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.26623/jj.v3i2.11504

Abstract

This study aims to analyze the forms of legal liability that developers must fulfill toward buyers of land lots situated on legally problematic land and examine the legal protection measures available to buyers in addressing such issues. The research is motivated by developers' growing practice of land lot sales that often lack guarantees of legal certainty, particularly when the land object is subject to administrative or legal disputes. This study uses a normative and sociological approach to explore the relationship between developers’ legal obligations and consumer protection in property transactions. The findings indicate that developers are legally required to fulfill contractual performance and provide restitution or compensation in breach cases, as stipulated in the Civil Code and the Consumer Protection Law. On the other hand, buyers are entitled to seek remedies through litigation and non-litigation channels, including the Consumer Dispute Settlement Board (BPSK). Developers’ liability is repressive and preventive, emphasizing the need to ensure the legality and dispute-free status of the land object before marketing. The implications of this study highlight the importance of strengthening regulatory frameworks, enhancing government oversight, and promoting consumer legal literacy to achieve legal certainty and fairness in property transactions.   Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk menganalisis bentuk pertanggungjawaban hukum yang harus dipenuhi oleh developer terhadap pembeli kavling tanah pada objek yang bermasalah secara hukum, serta menelaah upaya perlindungan hukum yang dapat diberikan kepada pembeli dalam menghadapi permasalahan tersebut. Latar belakang penelitian ini didasarkan pada meningkatnya praktik jual beli kavling tanah oleh developer tanpa jaminan kepastian hukum, terutama ketika objek tanah masih berstatus sengketa administratif maupun yuridis. Penelitian menggunakan pendekatan normatif dan sosiologis untuk mengidentifikasi hubungan antara kewajiban hukum developer dan perlindungan hak-hak konsumen. Temuan menunjukkan bahwa developer berkewajiban memenuhi prestasi sesuai perjanjian pengikatan jual beli serta memberikan restitusi dan kompensasi apabila terjadi wanprestasi, sebagaimana diatur dalam Kitab Undang-Undang Hukum Perdata dan Undang-Undang Perlindungan Konsumen. Pembeli berhak menempuh upaya hukum melalui jalur litigasi maupun non-litigasi, termasuk Badan Penyelesaian Sengketa Konsumen (BPSK). Pertanggungjawaban hukum developer bersifat tidak hanya represif tetapi juga preventif, dengan memastikan legalitas dan bebas sengketa atas objek tanah sebelum dipasarkan. Implikasi penelitian ini menegaskan pentingnya penguatan regulasi, peningkatan pengawasan pemerintah, dan pemberdayaan konsumen melalui literasi hukum guna mewujudkan kepastian hukum serta keadilan dalam transaksi properti.
Collaborative Governance in Urban Flood Management: A Legal Perspective from Semarang City Suhartono, Suhartono; Muhammad Junaidi; Syafran Sofyan
Journal Juridisch Vol. 3 No. 2 (2025): JULY
Publisher : Universitas Semarang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.26623/jj.v3i2.11652

Abstract

Indonesia is highly prone to disasters, particularly floods that cause extensive socio-economic losses. Semarang City ranks among the most vulnerable urban areas due to its low-lying topography, rapid urbanization, and diminishing water catchment capacity. This study addresses the gap between the increasing frequency of floods and the limited effectiveness of mitigation strategies, focusing mainly on physical infrastructure. Using an empirical juridical approach, this research examines flood mitigation strategies in Semarang City in accordance with Law No. 24 of 2007 by evaluating structural and non-structural measures and their implementation challenges. Primary data were obtained through interviews, complemented by secondary legal literature, and analyzed qualitatively. The results indicate that effective mitigation requires strengthened infrastructure, such as embankments, retention ponds, and pumps, and active community involvement through education, evacuation simulations, and social media outreach by the Regional Disaster Management Agency (BPBD). The study contributes a cross-sectoral collaboration model integrating government, communities, private actors, and modern technology. It recommends sustainable spatial planning, digital-based early warning systems, long-term financing mechanisms, and institutionalized community participation to build urban flood resilience.
Restorative Justice dalam Hukum Ketenagakerjaan: Jalan Baru Perlindungan bagi Pekerja Harian: Restorative Justice in Labor Law: A New Path of Protection for Daily Workers Mahendra Hakim; Aisyah Nurhalizah; Endah Pujiastuti; Zaenal Arifin
Journal Juridisch Vol. 3 No. 2 (2025): JULY
Publisher : Universitas Semarang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.26623/jj.v3i2.12122

Abstract

This study examines the legal protection afforded to workers under Daily Work Agreements (Perjanjian Kerja Harian or PKH) in relation to compensation entitlement. The research is grounded in the growing vulnerability of PKH workers, who frequently lose their normative rights due to regulatory ambiguities exploited by employers. The urgency of this issue lies in the necessity to reinterpret labor law norms to achieve justice and fairness for daily workers. Employing a normative juridical method with statutory, conceptual, and comparative approaches supported by literature analysis, this study explores the alignment between legal doctrine and labor practices. The findings reveal that PKH workers continuously employed are de facto entitled to compensation equivalent to that of fixed-term contract workers (PKWT), yet many employers intentionally disregard this obligation. The novelty of this research lies in introducing restorative justice into labor law discourse, positioning compensation not merely as an administrative requirement but as a mechanism to restore workers’ rights and rebalance unequal industrial relations. The study concludes that progressive reinterpretation of labor regulations is essential, supported by the assertiveness of industrial relations judges in enforcing substantive justice. Strengthening labor inspection mechanisms, ensuring transparent PKH documentation, and enhancing workers’ legal literacy are crucial to achieving equitable and sustainable labor protection.   Penelitian ini mengkaji bentuk perlindungan hukum bagi pekerja dengan Perjanjian Kerja Harian (PKH) terkait hak atas kompensasi. Latar belakang penelitian ini berangkat dari meningkatnya kerentanan pekerja PKH yang kerap kehilangan hak normatifnya akibat celah regulasi yang dimanfaatkan oleh pemberi kerja. Urgensi penelitian terletak pada perlunya penafsiran ulang terhadap norma hukum ketenagakerjaan untuk mewujudkan keadilan dan keseimbangan bagi pekerja harian. Metode penelitian menggunakan pendekatan yuridis normatif dengan tinjauan peraturan perundang-undangan, konseptual, dan komparatif yang didukung oleh studi kepustakaan. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa pekerja PKH yang dipekerjakan secara terus-menerus pada hakikatnya (de facto) berhak atas kompensasi yang setara dengan pekerja Perjanjian Kerja Waktu Tertentu (PKWT), namun banyak pemberi kerja yang dengan sengaja mengabaikan kewajiban tersebut. Kebaruan penelitian ini terletak pada penerapan konsep restorative justice dalam hukum ketenagakerjaan, yang menempatkan kompensasi bukan semata sebagai kewajiban administratif, melainkan sebagai instrumen pemulihan hak dan penyeimbang relasi industrial yang timpang. Penelitian ini menyimpulkan bahwa reinterpretasi progresif terhadap regulasi ketenagakerjaan perlu dilakukan, disertai keberanian hakim hubungan industrial dalam menegakkan keadilan substantif. Penguatan mekanisme pengawasan ketenagakerjaan, transparansi dokumentasi PKH, serta peningkatan literasi hukum pekerja menjadi langkah penting untuk mewujudkan perlindungan ketenagakerjaan yang berkeadilan dan berkelanjutan.
Koperasi sebagai Pilar Pengadaan Makanan Bergizi Gratis: Cooperatives as the Pillar of Free Nutritious Food Procurement Titis Putri Pinasti; Lalu Mariawan Alfarizi
Journal Juridisch Vol. 3 No. 2 (2025): JULY
Publisher : Universitas Semarang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.26623/jj.v3i2.12285

Abstract

This study aims to analyze the actual conditions of consumer cooperatives’ participation in the Free Nutritious Meal (MBG) Program in Semarang City and to identify the inhibiting and supporting factors influencing the optimization of their role within the program. The research is motivated by the limited engagement of cooperatives in the MBG initiative, despite their substantial potential as community-based economic institutions. The urgency of this study lies in the necessity to develop strategies that empower cooperatives as strategic partners in providing nutritious food, particularly in addressing challenges of child nutrition and unequal access to healthy meals. Employing a normative method combined with a qualitative approach based on secondary data and legal framework analysis, the study examines both regulatory and practical dimensions. The findings indicate that among the 15 cooperatives analyzed, only 26.7% had ever participated in school meal provision, and such involvement remained incidental and unsystematic. The novelty of this research underscores the redefinition of cooperatives’ roles—not merely as economic actors but as integral pillars in fostering sustainable school-based food security. The study concludes by emphasizing the need for affirmative policies, improved technical capacity, greater access to flexible financing, and stronger collaboration among government institutions, schools, and cooperatives to establish an inclusive and resilient ecosystem for nutritious food provision.   Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk menganalisis kondisi aktual keterlibatan koperasi konsumen dalam Program Makan Bergizi Gratis (MBG) di Kota Semarang serta mengidentifikasi faktor penghambat dan pendukung dalam optimalisasi peran koperasi pada program tersebut. Latar belakang penelitian ini didasarkan pada masih terbatasnya partisipasi koperasi dalam program MBG, meskipun koperasi memiliki potensi besar sebagai lembaga ekonomi kerakyatan. Urgensi penelitian terletak pada perlunya strategi penguatan koperasi agar mampu berperan sebagai mitra strategis dalam penyediaan makanan bergizi, khususnya di tengah tantangan gizi anak dan ketimpangan akses terhadap pangan sehat. Metode penelitian menggunakan pendekatan yuridis normatif dengan analisis kualitatif berbasis data sekunder dan kajian kerangka hukum untuk menelaah aspek regulatif dan praktik pelaksanaannya. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa dari 15 koperasi yang dikaji, hanya 26,7% yang pernah terlibat dalam penyediaan makanan bagi sekolah, dan keterlibatan tersebut masih bersifat insidental serta belum terstruktur. Kebaruan penelitian ini menekankan perlunya redefinisi peran koperasi, bukan hanya sebagai entitas ekonomi, tetapi juga sebagai pilar penting dalam pembangunan ketahanan pangan sekolah yang berkelanjutan. Penelitian ini menyimpulkan pentingnya kebijakan afirmatif, peningkatan kapasitas teknis koperasi, perluasan akses pembiayaan yang fleksibel, serta penguatan sinergi antara pemerintah, sekolah, dan koperasi guna membangun ekosistem penyediaan pangan bergizi yang inklusif dan berdaya tahan.
Paradoks Hukum Perdagangan Indonesia: Antara Green Economy dan Ekspor Sumber Daya Alam yang Eksploitatif: The Legal Paradox of Indonesia’s Trade: Between Green Economy and Exploitative Natural Resource Exports Vikri Pramana Putra; Januardo Sulung Partogi Sihombing
Journal Juridisch Vol. 3 No. 2 (2025): JULY
Publisher : Universitas Semarang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.26623/jj.v3i2.12350

Abstract

This study aims to analyze and formulate legal strategies that reconcile Indonesia’s natural resource (NR) export interests with its commitment to sustainable development as outlined in the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs). The research is driven by the escalating tension between short-term economic growth fueled by raw commodity exports and the global imperatives of environmental sustainability and green economy transition. Employing a normative juridical method combined with qualitative analysis, this study critically examines the substance and implementation of the Job Creation Law, the Mining Law, and the Plantation Law, assessing their coherence with principles of ecological justice, environmental governance, and green trade. The findings reveal that Indonesia’s current regulatory framework remains sectoral and predominantly economistic, lacking substantive integration of sustainability principles and resulting in regulatory fragmentation across sectors. The novelty of this research lies in its conceptual synthesis of international trade law, environmental law, and SDGs into a unified legal development framework, supported by a transformative reform model aimed at embedding sustainability into national legal systems. This study concludes that ecological mainstreaming, institutional harmonization, adoption of green-certified export instruments, and the incorporation of Islamic legal values and local wisdom in resource governance are essential to achieving ecological justice and intergenerational equity in Indonesia’s natural resource management.   Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk menganalisis dan merumuskan strategi hukum yang mampu menyeimbangkan kepentingan ekspor sumber daya alam (SDA) Indonesia dengan komitmen terhadap pembangunan berkelanjutan sebagaimana diamanatkan dalam Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs). Urgensi penelitian ini dilatarbelakangi oleh meningkatnya ketegangan antara pertumbuhan ekonomi jangka pendek yang didorong oleh ekspor komoditas mentah dan tuntutan global terhadap keberlanjutan lingkungan serta transisi menuju ekonomi hijau. Metode penelitian menggunakan pendekatan yuridis normatif yang dipadukan dengan analisis kualitatif untuk mengkaji substansi dan implementasi tiga regulasi utama Undang-Undang Cipta Kerja, Undang-Undang Minerba, dan Undang-Undang Perkebunan serta menilai kesesuaiannya dengan prinsip keadilan ekologis, tata kelola lingkungan, dan standar perdagangan hijau. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa rezim regulasi nasional masih bersifat sektoral dan ekonomistik, belum sepenuhnya mengintegrasikan prinsip keberlanjutan secara substantif, dan menimbulkan konflik pengaturan lintas sektor. Kebaruan penelitian ini terletak pada sintesis konseptual antara hukum perdagangan internasional, hukum lingkungan, dan SDGs dalam satu kerangka pembangunan hukum yang terpadu, disertai model reformasi hukum transformatif untuk mengarusutamakan keberlanjutan dalam sistem hukum nasional. Penelitian ini menyimpulkan bahwa pengarusutamaan ekologi, harmonisasi kelembagaan lintas sektor, penerapan instrumen ekspor bersertifikat hijau, serta pengintegrasian nilai-nilai hukum Islam dan kearifan lokal dalam tata kelola sumber daya alam merupakan langkah strategis menuju keadilan ekologis dan tanggung jawab antargenerasi dalam pengelolaan SDA Indonesia.
Pertimbangan Putusan Hakim Pra Peradilan Mengenai Sah Tidaknya Penetapan Tersangka: Considerations of Pretrial Judges’ Decisions Regarding The Validity of Suspect Determinations Khaerul Umam; Alwan Hadiyanto; Wijayono Hadi Sukrisno
Journal Juridisch Vol. 3 No. 2 (2025): JULY
Publisher : Universitas Semarang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.26623/jj.v3i2.12865

Abstract

This study examines the scope of judicial authority in adjudicating pretrial motions, the underlying judicial reasoning concerning the validity of suspect determinations, and the ensuing legal implications, with a specific focus on Decision No. 1/Pid.Pra/2024/PN Unr. The urgency of this inquiry emerges from the imperative to safeguard human rights and prevent the misuse of state power in law enforcement, particularly after Constitutional Court Decision No. 21/PUU-XII/2014 broadened the jurisdiction of pretrial mechanisms. Employing a normative juridical method combined with statutory and case approaches, the analysis adopts a qualitative lens to assess judicial interpretations and practices. The findings reveal that the pretrial judge upheld the legality of the suspect determination on the basis of adequate preliminary evidence and the circumstance of being caught in flagrante delicto. The study underscores that judicial reasoning in such cases remains predominantly formalistic, often neglecting substantive justice and thereby generating inconsistencies in legal standards. Within this context, pretrial proceedings are positioned as a vital judicial safeguard against investigative arbitrariness, yet they continue to face the complex task of reconciling legal certainty with equitable justice. By engaging Hans Kelsen’s theory of legal certainty and Gustav Radbruch’s concept of justice, this research offers a critical reflection on the philosophical underpinnings of pretrial review. It calls for the establishment of standardized judicial guidelines, clearer jurisprudential direction from the Supreme Court, and enhanced integrity among law enforcement agencies to ensure that pretrial institutions genuinely function as instruments of justice and human rights protection.   Penelitian ini mengkaji kewenangan hakim dalam memeriksa permohonan praperadilan, pertimbangan yuridis terhadap keabsahan penetapan tersangka, serta akibat hukum dari putusan tersebut, dengan studi kasus pada Putusan Nomor 1/Pid.Pra/2024/PN Unr. Urgensi penelitian ini berangkat dari pentingnya perlindungan hak asasi manusia dan pencegahan penyalahgunaan kewenangan aparat penegak hukum, terutama pasca Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Nomor 21/PUU-XII/2014 yang memperluas ruang lingkup kewenangan praperadilan. Metode yang digunakan adalah yuridis normatif dengan pendekatan perundang-undangan dan kasus, serta analisis kualitatif terhadap pertimbangan hukum hakim. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa hakim praperadilan menyatakan penetapan tersangka sah dengan alasan adanya bukti permulaan yang cukup serta kondisi tertangkap tangan (in flagrante delicto). Meskipun demikian, pertimbangan hakim masih cenderung bersifat formalistik dan belum sepenuhnya mencerminkan keadilan substantif, sehingga menimbulkan ketidakkonsistenan dalam standar objektif penilaian. Dalam konteks ini, praperadilan memiliki posisi strategis sebagai mekanisme kontrol yudisial terhadap tindakan penyidikan, namun tetap menghadapi tantangan dalam menyeimbangkan kepastian hukum dengan keadilan yang substansial. Dengan merujuk pada teori kepastian hukum Hans Kelsen dan teori keadilan Gustav Radbruch, penelitian ini memberikan refleksi kritis atas fondasi filosofis praperadilan di Indonesia. Ditekankan perlunya pedoman peradilan yang terstandardisasi, penguatan arah yurisprudensi oleh Mahkamah Agung, serta peningkatan integritas aparat penegak hukum agar lembaga praperadilan benar-benar berfungsi sebagai instrumen keadilan dan perlindungan hak asasi manusia.
Penegakan Tanggung Jawab Hukum Polres RembangDalam Rekayasa Lalu Lintas di Jalur Pantura: Enforcement of Legal Responsibility by Rembang Police Department In Traffic Engineering on the Pantura Route Sugito, Sugito; Mangaraja Manurung
Journal Juridisch Vol. 3 No. 2 (2025): JULY
Publisher : Universitas Semarang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.26623/jj.v3i2.12866

Abstract

This study aims to analyze the legal responsibility of the Rembang Police in implementing traffic engineering on the Pantura Highway and to identify the challenges encountered in its enforcement. The research is motivated by the increasing traffic complexity along the Pantura route, which significantly impacts logistics distribution, road safety, and public trust in law enforcement institutions. The urgency of this study lies in assessing the extent to which the police fulfill their mandate under Article 13 paragraph (1) of Law No. 22 of 2009, not merely as an administrative duty but as a reflection of public legal accountability. Using a normative juridical method combined with a qualitative approach, this study draws on secondary data from legislation, academic literature, and official police reports. The findings reveal that while the Rembang Police have implemented several traffic engineering strategies, these efforts remain constrained by limited human resources, weak inter-agency coordination, and inadequate infrastructure. The novelty of this research lies in its exploration of the institutional accountability dimension of the police in traffic engineering, a perspective often overlooked in studies that predominantly address technical and operational aspects. The study concludes that strengthening institutional capacity within the police is crucial, encompassing short-term measures such as human resource and infrastructure improvements, as well as long-term strategies including integrated data systems, institutional reform, and enhanced public participation to ensure effective, equitable, and sustainable traffic management along the Pantura Highway.   Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk menganalisis pertanggungjawaban hukum Kepolisian Resor Rembang dalam pelaksanaan rekayasa lalu lintas di Jalan Pantura serta mengidentifikasi berbagai tantangan yang dihadapi dalam penegakannya. Kompleksitas lalu lintas di jalur Pantura yang secara langsung memengaruhi kelancaran distribusi logistik, keselamatan pengguna jalan, dan tingkat kepercayaan publik terhadap institusi kepolisian. Urgensi penelitian ini terletak pada upaya menilai sejauh mana kepolisian memenuhi mandatnya sebagaimana diatur dalam Pasal 13 ayat (1) Undang-Undang Nomor 22 Tahun 2009, bukan semata sebagai kewajiban administratif, melainkan sebagai bentuk pertanggungjawaban hukum kepada publik. Metode penelitian menggunakan pendekatan yuridis normatif yang dipadukan dengan pendekatan kualitatif, dengan memanfaatkan data sekunder yang berasal dari peraturan perundang-undangan, literatur, serta laporan resmi kepolisian. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa Kepolisian Resor Rembang telah menerapkan berbagai strategi rekayasa lalu lintas, namun implementasinya masih terkendala oleh keterbatasan sumber daya manusia, lemahnya koordinasi antarinstansi, serta kurang memadai­nya infrastruktur pendukung. Kebaruan penelitian ini terletak pada penekanan terhadap dimensi akuntabilitas kelembagaan kepolisian dalam rekayasa lalu lintas, yang jarang dibahas dalam penelitian sebelumnya yang lebih berfokus pada aspek teknis dan operasional. Penelitian ini menyimpulkan bahwa penguatan kapasitas kelembagaan kepolisian menjadi hal yang mendesak, baik melalui langkah jangka pendek berupa peningkatan kualitas sumber daya manusia dan infrastruktur, maupun langkah jangka panjang berupa integrasi data, reformasi kelembagaan, serta pelibatan masyarakat untuk mewujudkan sistem rekayasa lalu lintas di Pantura yang efektif, adil, dan berkelanjutan.

Page 1 of 1 | Total Record : 7