cover
Article Per Year (5 Year)
All
Home Page
OAI Link
Editorial Team
Contact
Reviewer
Google Scholar
Contact Name
Putu Aryastana
Contact Email
aryastanaputu@warmadewa.ac.id
Phone
+6281222788222
Journal Mail Official
paduraksa.sipil@gmail.com
Editorial Address
Jl. Terompong 24 Tanjung Bungkak Denpasar Bali, Indonesia
Location
Kota denpasar,
Bali
INDONESIA
Paduraksa : Jurnal Teknik Sipil Universitas Warmadewa
Published by Universitas Warmadewa
ISSN : 23032693     EISSN : 25812939     DOI : https://doi.org/10.22225/pd.6.2.482.108-122
Core Subject : Social, Engineering,
Civil Engineering, Building, Construction & Architecture Environmental Science
PADURAKSA: Jurnal Teknik Sipil Universitas Warmadewa, 2303-2693 (Print ISSN), 2581-2939 (Electronic ISSN) is a journal of civil engineering provides a forum for publishing research articles or review articles which published by Warmadewa University Press jointly with Progam Studi Teknik Sipil, Fakultas Teknik dan Perencanaan, Universitas Warmadewa. This journal is also dedicated to provide an intellectual space of scholarly discussion how journal of civil engineering able to create the new global formation of civil engineering and similar issues. This journal has been distributed by Progam Studi Teknik Sipil, Fakultas Teknik dan Perencanaan, Universitas Warmadewa started from Volume 1 Number 1 Year 2012 for Print and Oline from Volume 3 Number 1 Year 2014 to present. This journal encompasses original research articles, review articles, and short communications, including: Civil Engineering; Water Resources; Construction Management; Transportation; Structure; Geotechnics; Environment; Others Engineering
Arjuna Subject : Teknik (semua kategori) - Teknik Sipil dan Struktur
Articles 273 Documents
 24   25   26   27   28 
Analisis faktor penyebab keterlambatan proyek pembangunan gedung berdasarkan perspektif penyedia jasa konstruksi pada Proyek Pembangunan RS PKU Muhammadiyah UNIMUDA Sorong Alysia Wahyu Amalya; Athiah Safari; Intan Java Turis Repmi Tamsih
PADURAKSA: Jurnal Teknik Sipil Universitas Warmadewa Vol. 15 No. 1 (2026)
Publisher : Program Studi Teknik Sipil, Fakultas Teknik dan Perencanaan, Universitas Warmadewa

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.22225/pd.15.1.15146.146-158

Abstract

Delay is one of the most common problems in construction projects and can lead to cost overruns, reduced work quality, and failure to meet the planned project completion schedule. This study aims to identify the factors causing delays and determine the most dominant factor affecting the Construction Project of PKU Muhammadiyah UNIMUDA Sorong Hospital. A descriptive quantitative method was employed, with data collected through questionnaires distributed to experts and professional employees from the contractor and consultant teams involved in the project. Out of a population of 40 individuals, 33 respondents met the criteria for analysis. The data were tested using the Kaiser-Meyer-Olkin (KMO) and Bartlett’s Test of Sphericity for validity, as well as Cronbach’s Alpha for reliability, and were subsequently analyzed using the Relative Importance Index (RII) method. The results identified nine factors with 31 valid and reliable criteria influencing construction project delays. Environmental/weather factors were found to be the most dominant, with an Adjusted RII value of 87.63%, followed by labor factors at 83.08% and material factors at 81.82%. These findings indicate that environmental and weather conditions pose the greatest risk to achieving project schedule targets, particularly because weather conditions and site characteristics can hinder resource mobilization and fieldwork activities. This study provides empirical evidence showing that environmental/weather factors are the most dominant cause of delays in building construction projects in the Southwest Papua region and can serve as a basis for developing delay risk mitigation strategies for projects with similar characteristics.
Studi komparatif nilai kondisi perkerasan lentur di Ruas Jalan Sekargadung–Sidomulyo berdasarkan metode PCI dan SDI Dafin Farianto; Sugeng Dwi Hartantyo; Romadhon
PADURAKSA: Jurnal Teknik Sipil Universitas Warmadewa Vol. 15 No. 1 (2026)
Publisher : Program Studi Teknik Sipil, Fakultas Teknik dan Perencanaan, Universitas Warmadewa

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.22225/pd.15.1.15187.127-135

Abstract

Public mobility and regional economic growth are heavily dependent on the quality of road infrastructure. However, high and repetitive traffic loads frequently trigger premature failure in flexible pavements. This study aims to identify the types and severity levels of distress, assess pavement conditions, and formulate maintenance recommendations for the Sekargadung-Sidomulyo road section in Gresik, East Java. Pavement condition assessment was conducted using the Pavement Condition Index (PCI) and Surface Distress Index (SDI) methods. The distresses identified in the field include depressions, rutting, patching, alligator cracking, bleeding, shoving, longitudinal cracking, potholes, raveling, block cracking, joint reflection cracking, and bumps. The results indicate an average PCI value of 69.3 and an SDI value of 49.5, both consistently classifying the road condition as "Good." Nonetheless, PCI proved to be superior in providing a comprehensive evaluation, as it accounts for detailed distress types, severity levels, and affected areas. The primary contribution of this research is providing a comparative model between the PCI and SDI methods that validates the accuracy of field data. Ultimately, the output of this study serves as a practical decision-making tool for relevant authorities in determining efficient road maintenance priorities.
Studi perilaku slit link pada sistem eccentrically braced frame (EBF) untuk kategori link pendek Gokma Ferdinanta Sihombing; Jusuf Wilson Meynerd Rafael; Budi Suswanto
PADURAKSA: Jurnal Teknik Sipil Universitas Warmadewa Vol. 15 No. 1 (2026)
Publisher : Program Studi Teknik Sipil, Fakultas Teknik dan Perencanaan, Universitas Warmadewa

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.22225/pd.15.1.15188.21-35

Abstract

Link beams in Eccentrically Braced Frame (EBF) systems are designed to act as energy dissipation components by undergoing controlled plastic deformation during seismic events. However, conventional links often experience high stress concentrations that may reduce their seismic performance. This study evaluates the influence of slit geometry on stress distribution, hysteretic response, deformation capacity, and ductility of short-link beams in EBF systems. Six slit-link models based on a WF 588×300×12×20 section were numerically investigated using the finite element method in Abaqus, consisting of three block-slit models (SL-B1, SL-B2, and SL-B3) and three parabolic-slit models (SL-P1, SL-P2, and SL-P3). Cyclic loading was applied following the AISC 341-22 loading protocol, while monotonic loading was used to generate backbone curves and ductility parameters. The results indicate that increasing slit spacing improves both ultimate strength and initial stiffness for all models. The ultimate capacity increased from 188.49 kN in model SL-B1 to 391.03 kN in model SL-B3 and from 201.39 kN in model SL-P1 to 456.45 kN in model SL-P3. Stress distribution analysis revealed that parabolic slits provide a more uniform stress distribution and lower stress concentration than block slits. Model SL-P3 exhibited the best overall performance with an ultimate capacity of 456.45 kN, a ductility factor of 2.94, and a Relative Energy Dissipation Factor (REDF) of 3.20. Failure mechanisms were concentrated within the slit region without significant yielding in the flange or end-plate components. The findings demonstrate that parabolic slit configurations can significantly enhance the strength, ductility, and energy dissipation capacity of short-link elements in EBF systems compared with conventional block-slit configurations.

Page 28 of 28 | Total Record : 273

 24   25   26   27   28 

Filter by Year

2014 2026


Reset
Filter By Issues
All Issue Vol. 15 No. 1 (2026) Vol. 14 No. 2 (2025) Vol. 14 No. 1 (2025) Vol. 13 No. 2 (2024) Vol. 13 No. 1 (2024) Vol. 12 No. 2 (2023) Vol. 12 No. 1 (2023) Vol. 11 No. 2 (2022) Vol. 11 No. 1 (2022) Vol. 10 No. 2 (2021) Vol. 10 No. 1 (2021) Vol. 9 No. 2 (2020) Vol. 9 No. 1 (2020) Vol. 8 No. 2 (2019) Vol. 8 No. 1 (2019) Vol. 7 No. 2 (2018) Vol. 7 No. 1 (2018) Vol. 6 No. 2 (2017) Vol. 6 No. 1 (2017) Vol. 5 No. 2 (2016) Vol. 5 No. 1 (2016) Vol. 4 No. 2 (2015) Vol. 4 No. 1 (2015) Vol. 3 No. 2 (2014) Vol. 3 No. 1 (2014) More Issue