cover
Article Per Year (5 Year)
All
Home Page
OAI Link
Editorial Team
Contact
Reviewer
Google Scholar
Contact Name
-
Contact Email
gung.wibisana1122@gmail.com
Phone
+6281338824881
Journal Mail Official
gung.wibisana1122@gmail.com
Editorial Address
Fakultas Hukum Universitas Warmadewa, Denpasar, Bali, Indonesia
Location
Kota denpasar,
Bali
INDONESIA
Jurnal Analogi Hukum
Published by Universitas Warmadewa
ISSN : 27162672     EISSN : 27162680     DOI : 10.22225/jah
Core Subject : Social,
Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice
Welcome to the official Jurnal Analogi Hukum website. As a part of the spirit of disseminating legal science to the wider community, Jurnal Analogi Hukum Journal website provides journal articles for free download. Jurnal Analogi Hukum is a journal for Law Science that published by Warmadewa University Press. Jurnal Analogi Hukum Journal has the content of research results and reviews in the field of selected studies covering various branches of jurisprudence both from within and outside the country, as well as in the Jurnal Analogi Hukum also contains the field of study related to the Law in a broad sense. This journal is published 3 times within a year of May, August and September submitted and ready-to-publish scripts will be published online gradually and the printed version will be released at the end of the publishing period. Language used in this journal is Indonesia.
Arjuna Subject : Ilmu Sosial - Hukum
Articles 4 Documents
 1 
Search results for , issue "28-33" : 4 Documents clear
Fungsi Asas-Asas Umum Pemerintahan yang Baik dalam Menyelesaikan Sengketa Hukum Acara Tata Usaha Negara Gunawan, Andy; Arthanaya, I Wayan; suryani, Luh Putu
Jurnal Analogi Hukum 28-33
Publisher : Fakultas Hukum Universitas Warmadewa

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.22225/ah.1.1.2019.28-33

Abstract

Abstract General Principles Good governance can be a claim in the State Administrative Court even though the existence of AAUPB can be said to be juridical and not formal as described in Article 53 Paragraph 2 of Act Number 51 of 2009 concerning State Administrative Courts. In the life of the AAUPB community can be used as a basis for seeking justice, where if the community feels aggrieved by a State Administrative Decree that does not at all refer to the AAUPB and burdensome the community in making decisions or regulations applied in community life. The problems studied are: Application and how the functions that should be played by AAUPB in the decision and form of legal logic from the side of PTUN judges. If you look at the concept of a Dutch country that implements good governance, in Indonesia the entry into force of AAUPB by looking at the theoretical basis applied in the AAUPB, State Administrative Courts, and Article 53 Paragraph 2 of Law Number 51 of 2009. Results of the study: 1) In the research 06 / G / 2017 / PTUN.DPS the role of AAUPB can be seen in the principle of accuracy, the principle of legal certainty and the principle of professionalism in which officials who are authorized to make decisions regardless of the prevailing historical value. Because in terms of the principle of legal certainty, the principle of professionalism, and the principle of accuracy the decisions issued are burdensome, in this case the community is given the decision issued by the competent authority, 2) in the implementation of the AAUPB to decide a case or dispute that occurs in the Administrative Court The AAUPB country acts as a test tool used by PTUN judges to decide on a case. Conclusions from this study: 1) In the decision No. 06 / G / 2017 / PTUN.DPS implementation or AAUPB function has been running to see from the logic of the panel of judges in implementing AAUPB to decide on a dispute, 2) The judge has acted actively in searching for causes and what which becomes a case by applying AAUPB in a consideration to decide on disputes that occur, without forgetting Emersonfraise that can be used by the government in making a decision that applies to the community. Suggestions from researchers: 1) AAUPB that is used or as a basis for testing instruments for PTUN judges in deciding a case should always be accompanied by regulations that apply in accordance with legislation, 2) the panel of judges must clearly use the legal logic by applying AAUPB as Test equipment decides on a dispute that occurs in the realm of the State Administrative Court. Keywords: Article 53 paragraph (2) law number 51 of 2009; disputes; general principles of good governance; PTUN Abstrak Asas-Asas Umum Pemerintahan yang baik dapat menjadi suatu gugatan dalam Pengadilan Tata Usaha Negara meskipun keberadaan AAUPB dapat dikatakan masih secara yuridis dan belum bersifat formal seperti apa yang dijelaskan dalam Pasal 53 Ayat 2 Undang-Undang Nomor 51 Tahun 2009 tentang Peradilan Tata Usaha Negara. Dalam kehidupan masyarakat AAUPB dapat dijadikan dasar untuk mencari keadilan, dimana jika masyarakat merasa dirugikan dengan Keputusan Tata Usaha Negara yang tidak Sama sekali mengacu pada AAUPB dan memberatkan masyarakat dalam membuat keputusan atau peraturan yang diterapkan dalam kehidupan bermasyarakat. Permasalahan yang dikaji yaitu: Penerapan dan bagaimana fungsi yang seharusnya diperankan AAUPB dalam putusan dan bentuk logika hukum dari sisi hakim PTUN. Jika melihat dari konsep negara belanda yang menerapkan good governance, di Indonesia berlakunya AAUPB dengan melihat landasan teori yang diterapkan dalam AAUPB, Peradilan Tata Usaha Negara, Pasal 53 Ayat 2 Undang-Undang Nomor 51 Tahun 2009. Hasil penelitian: 1) Dalam penelitian Putusan Nomor 06/G/2017/PTUN.DPS peran AAUPB dapat terlihat di dalam asas kecermatan, asas kepastian hukum dan asas profesionalitas yang dimana pejabat yang berwenang membuat keputusan tanpa melihat nilai historis yang berlaku. Karena ditinjau dari asas kepastian hukum, asas profesionalitas, dan asas kecermatan putusan yang dikeluarkan memberatkan, dalam hal ini masyarakatlah yang diberatkan oleh putusan yang dikeluarkan oleh pejabat yang berwenang, 2) dalam penerapan AAUPB untuk memutus suatu perkara atau sengketa yang terjadi di Peradilan Tata Usaha Negara AAUPB berperan sebagai alat uji yang digunakan oleh hakim PTUN untuk memutus seuatu perkara. Simpulan dari penelitian ini: 1) Dalam putusan No 06/G/2017/PTUN.DPS penerpan atau fungsi AAUPB sudah berjalan melihat dari sisi logika majelis hakim dalam menerapkan AAUPB untuk memutus suatu sengketa, 2) Hakim sudah bertindak aktif dalam mencari sebab dan apa yang menjadi perkara dengan menerapkan AAUPB dalam suatu pertimbangan untuk memutus sengketa yang terjadi, tanpa melupakan freies emerssen yang dapat digunakan oleh pemerintah dalam membuat suatu keputusan yang berlaku bagi masyarakat. Saran dari peneliti: 1) AAUPB yang dijadikan atau sebagai dasar alat uji bagi majelis hakim PTUN dalam memutus suatu perkara harusnya selalu didampingi dengan peraturan yang berlaku sesuai dengan perundang-undangan, 2) majelis hakim harus secara jelas dalam menggunakan logika hukum dengan menerapkan AAUPB sebagai alat uji memutus suatu sengketa yang terjadi di ranah Peradilan Tata Usaha Negara. Kata Kunci: Pasal 53 ayat (2) undang-undang nomor 51 tahun 2009; sengketa; asas-asas umum pemerintahan yang baik; PTUN,
Penegakan Hukum Terhadap Pelaku Pelanggaran Membuang Sampah Tidak Sesuai Jadwal Berdasarkan Perda Kabupaten Karangasem Nomor 20 Tahun 2012 Wiryawan, I Kadek Arya; Dewi, Anak Agung Sagung Laksmi; Suryani, Luh Putu
Jurnal Analogi Hukum 328-337
Publisher : Fakultas Hukum Universitas Warmadewa

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.22225/ah.3.3.2021.328-337

Abstract

Environmental protection and management is a systematic and integrated effort carried out to preserve environmental functions and prevent environmental pollution and/or damage which includes planning, utilization, control, maintenance, supervision and law enforcement. The formulation of the problem in this study are: How is law enforcement against perpetrators of violations of waste disposal not according to schedule based on Regional Regulation of Karangasem Regency Number 20 of 2012 concerning Waste Management and How are the obstacles and efforts made by the Government of Karangasem Regency against perpetrators of violations of inappropriate waste disposal timetable. The results of this study include: Law enforcement against perpetrators of violations of waste disposal not according to schedule based on Regional Regulation of Karangasem Regency Number 20 of 2012 concerning Waste Management, among others: Starting with the findings of the task force in the field of violations of disposing of waste not according to schedule. Violators of disposing of waste not according to schedule are subject to administrative sanctions in the form of: making a statement that they will not repeat their actions, being given warnings and warnings, being subject to forced fees, up to a recommendation to revoke the cancellation of their activities and business permits. Karangasem against perpetrators of violations of waste disposal that are not according to schedule, the obstacles faced include: The condition of infrastructure is still inadequate, causing vehicle operations to be less effective. Preventive efforts are carried out by conducting socialization, making a schedule for garbage collection. The repressive efforts are carried out, namely if there are people who violate the provisions, such as throwing garbage out of place, they will be subject to administrative sanctions by making a statement that they will not repeat their actions again.
Pengaturan Penguasaan Tanah Bekas Hak Guna Usaha Dalam Pembaharuan Agraria Adhipermana, I Gusti Agung Ngurah Klaustra; Wijaya, Ketut Kasta Arya; Suryani, Luh Putu
Jurnal Analogi Hukum 328-332
Publisher : Fakultas Hukum Universitas Warmadewa

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.22225/ah.4.3.2022.328-332

Abstract

Land plays a very useful role for living things, so there must be national assistance to control and manage land well, evenly, and for the public interest. The question of this research is how the management of land use rights can be regulated in land reform and what are the legal implications of managing land use rights by the community. This type of investigation uses a normative legal investigation. The types and income of the data are carried out with two primary and secondary component data. The process of obtaining data employs investigations and the preparation of reviews related to the legal issues being investigated. The juridical data analysis process applied is descriptive analysis. Sources of an investigation indicate that the previous land ownership arrangements were in line with Article five of Presidential Decree No. 32, 1979. After fulfilling the requirements and relating to the interests of the people, the people are prioritized. The legal consequence of the previous owner of land rights and the law on land ownership is that if they do not extend the term of land ownership, the land itself becomes national land.
Pengaturan Hukum Badan Usaha Bandar Udara Terhadap Penumpang Dan Barang Bawaan Ni Putu Erni Novayanti Putri; I Nyoman Putu Budiartha; I Made Aditya Mantara Putra
Jurnal Analogi Hukum 28-33
Publisher : Fakultas Hukum Universitas Warmadewa

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.22225/ah.5.1.2023.28-33

Abstract

Transportasi digunakan untuk memudahkan manusia dalam melakukan aktivitasnya sehari-hari. Menyadari hal tersebut Penyelenggara Bandar Udara harus melindungi Bandar Udara dari segala bentuk tindakan melawan hukum. Peningkatan jumlah penumpang menuntut pihak pengelola bandara untuk menjamin keamanan penerbangan. Pengelola bandara harus melakukan pemeriksaan terhadap semua penumpang dan barang bawaannya yang akan memasuki daerah terbatas bandara. Dengan ini pemerintah Indonesia menerbitkan beberapa aturan untuk penegakan hukum mengenai tanggung jawab Badan usaha Bandar Udara terhadap keamanan dan keselamatan penumpang yang diatur dalam Undang-Undang Nomor 1 Tahun 2009 tentang Penerbangan. Adapun rumusan masalah yang diangkat yakni bagaimana pengaturan hukum Badan Usaha Bandar Udara dan perihal sanksi hukum terhadap badan usaha bandar udara dalam hal standar keamanan dan keselamatan penerbangan yang tidak sesuai dengan aturan yang. Metode penelitian yang digunakan penelitian hukum normatif serta jenis pendekatan perUndang-Undangan dan pendekatan Konseptual. Hasil penelitian ini menunjukan bahwa akibat suatu Badan Usaha Bandar Udara melakukan tata cara pemeriksaan yang berbeda dan agar masyarakat mengetahui pentingnya budaya keamanan diterapkan. Kemudian mengenai sanksi yang akan dijatuhkan kepada pelaku atau suatu Badan Usaha Bandar Udara yang tidak memenuhi standar pemeriksaan yang berlaku.

Page 1 of 1 | Total Record : 4

 1 

Filter by Year

0000


Reset
Filter By Issues
All Issue 411-416 406-410 405-410 404-408 401-405 399-403 398-404 396-400 393-398 393-397 390-395 388-392 384-389 383-387 382-388 382-387 382-386 378-382 377-383 376-381 375-381 372-377 372-376 370-375 369-375 368-374 366-371 364-369 363-369 363-368 361-367 361-365 360-365 358-362 356-363 356-360 355-362 354-360 354-359 353-357 351-355 350-355 350-354 347-353 347-352 346-353 346-350 344-349 341-346 341-345 338-345 338-343 336-343 336-340 335-340 331-337 331-335 330-335 329-334 328-337 328-332 326-330 324-330 324-329 323-329 323-328 322-327 320-325 318-323 317-323 317-322 317-321 316-321 315-319 312-316 311-317 311-316 311-315 310-316 310-314 306-310 305-311 305-310 305-309 304-310 304-309 300-305 300-304 299-304 299-303 298-304 296-303 294-299 293-298 293-297 289-295 289-293 288-293 288-292 287-292 283-287 282-288 282-287 281-286 279-286 278-282 277-282 277-281 276-281 276-280 273-278 272-276 271-276 270-277 269-275 267-272 266-271 266-270 265-270 264-269 262-268 261-266 261-265 260-265 259-264 258-263 256-262 256-261 256-260 254-259 254-258 252-257 251-255 250-255 249-255 249-253 246-251 245-250 244-248 243-249 243-248 242-248 240-245 240-244 239-244 239-243 238-242 236-242 235-241 235-239 234-239 233-238 232-237 230-234 229-235 229-234 228-233 228-232 227-232 226-231 225-229 224-228 223-228 223-227 221-227 221-224 220-226 220-225 219-223 218-222 217-222 215-220 215-219 214-219 213-217 212-218 210-216 210-214 209-214 207-213 207-212 206-211 206-209 204-208 203-209 203-208 202-206 201-206 201-205 199-205 198-203 197-202 197-201 196-200 195-200 193-198 193-197 192-196 191-196 190-195 188-194 187-192 187-191 185-190 184-189 183-187 182-186 181-186 179-184 179-183 177-182 177-181 176-181 175-180 172-178 172-176 170-176 170-175 169-174 168-174 167-171 166-171 165-169 163-168 162-167 162-166 161-164 160-165 160-164 158-162 156-161 156-160 155-159 154-159 153-157 152-155 151-155 150-155 148-154 148-153 148-152 147-151 146-150 144-149 143-149 143-147 142-147 142-146 141-145 138-143 137-142 136-141 136-140 135-141 132-137 131-136 130-136 130-135 129-135 129-134 128-135 126-131 125-129 124-130 124-128 122-128 121-127 120-125 120-124 119-124 119-123 118-123 116-121 114-119 114-118 112-117 111-120 111-115 110-113 109-113 106-113 106-111 106-110 105-110 104-109 104-108 103-108 101-105 100-105 99-104 99-103 98-103 98-102 96-100 94-99 93-99 93-98 93-97 92-98 90-95 89-93 88-92 87-91 86-92 84-89 83-88 83-87 82-87 81-85 79-86 79-83 78-82 77-82 77-81 76-81 74-80 74-78 73-77 72-78 71-76 71-75 68-73 68-72 67-70 66-70 65-71 64-70 63-67 62-67 62-66 61-66 60-65 59-64 59-62 58-63 57-61 55-60 55-59 54-57 53-58 52-56 51-58 50-54 48-54 48-53 47-52 47-51 46-51 44-50 44-49 42-47 42-46 41-47 40-45 39-43 37-43 37-41 36-41 34-40 34-39 33-38 32-36 31-36 30-35 28-33 28-32 27-31 26-30 23-29 22-27 22-26 21-27 20-25 17-21 16-21 14-20 13-22 12-19 12-16 11-16 11-15 8-13 8-12 7-13 7-11 6-11 6-10 1-7 1-6 1-5 More Issue