cover
Contact Name
Dermiyati
Contact Email
dermiyati.1963@fp.unila.ac.id
Phone
+62721781822
Journal Mail Official
j.tnhtrop@gmail.com
Editorial Address
Faculty of Agriculture, University of Lampung, Jl. Sumantri Brojonegoro No. 1, Bandarlampung 35145, Indonesia
Location
Kota bandar lampung,
Lampung
INDONESIA
Journal of Tropical Soils
Published by Universitas Lampung
ISSN : 0852257X     EISSN : 20866682     DOI : http://dx.doi.org/10.5400/jts.v25i1
Core Subject : Agriculture, Social,
Journal of Tropical Soils (JTS) publishes all aspects in the original research of soil science (soil physic and soil conservation, soil mineralogy, soil chemistry and soil fertility, soil biology and soil biochemical, soil genesis and classification, land survey and land evaluation, land development and management environmental), and related subjects in which using soil from tropical areas.
Articles 817 Documents
Isolation, Characterization, and Molecular Identification of Phosphate Solubilizing Bacteria from Several Tropical Soils Hazra, Fahrizal; Pratiwi, Etty
JOURNAL OF TROPICAL SOILS Vol. 18 No. 1: January 2013
Publisher : UNIVERSITY OF LAMPUNG

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.5400/jts.2013.v18i1.67-74

Abstract

The objectives of the research were: (i)  to isolate and characterize of phosphate solubilizing bacteria (PSB) and (ii) to identify PSB based on molecular amplification of 16S rRNA gene.  Soil samples were collected from rhizosphere in Bogor, West Nusa Tenggara, and East Nusa Tenggara.  Several stages in this research were: (i) isolation PSB in Pikovskaya agar, (ii) morphological and biochemical characterization of PSB, (iii) measurement of  phosphatase enzymes, and (iv) measurement of secreting indole acetic acid phytohormone.   As many as 29 isolates of PSB have been collected and three isolates of them, namely: P 3.5 (East Nusa Tenggara), P 6.2 (West Nusa Tenggara), and P 10.1 (Citeureup, West Java) were chosen for further study.  There were many characteristics of isolate P 10.1: (i) it had capable to solubilize P with the value of highest solubilization index (1.80), (ii) it had the highest phosphatase enzyme (120.40 mg kg-1), and (iii) it had the highest pH decrease at each observation for six days.  Isolates P 3.5 and P 10.1 were the Gram-negative bacteria with coccus shapes and isolate P 6.2 was a Gram-negative bacteria with bacillus shape.  Deoxiribonucleat Acid (DNA) amplification of these bacteria employing 16S rRNA primers generated the 1,300bp-PCR product.  The results of the analysis of 16S rRNA gene sequences showed that isolates P 3.5 and P 10.1 has 98% similarity with Gluconacetobacter sp. strains Rg1-MS-CO and isolate P 6.2 has 97% similarity with Enterobacter sp. pp9c strains.Keywords: 16S rRNA, indole acetic acid, isolation, phosphatase enzymes, phosphate solubilizing bacteria[How to Cite : Hazra F and E Pratiwi. 2013. Isolation, Characterization, and Molecular Identification of Phosphate Solubilizing Bacteria from Several Tropical Soils. J Trop Soils, 18 (1): 67-74. doi: 10.5400/jts.2013.18.1.67][Permalink/DOI: www.dx.doi.org/10.5400/jts.2013.18.1.67]
Inoculation Effect of N2-Fixer and P-Solubilizer into a Mixture of Fresh Manure and Phosphate Rock Formulated as Organonitrofos Fertilizer on Bacterial and Fungal Populations Nugroho, Sutopo Ghani; Dermiyati, .; Lumbanraja, Jamalam; Triyono, Sugeng; Ismono, Hanung
JOURNAL OF TROPICAL SOILS Vol. 18 No. 1: January 2013
Publisher : UNIVERSITY OF LAMPUNG

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.5400/jts.2013.v18i1.75-80

Abstract

Microbial N2-fixer and P-solubilizer were innoculated in a mixture of fresh manure and phosphate rock formulated as an Organonitrophos fertilizer. The population dynamics of bacteria and fungi growing during the composting process were observed. The inoculation treatments consisted of: K = mixture of 20% phosphate rock and 80% of fresh manure + decomposers (control), N = mixture of 20% phosphate rock and 80% of fresh manure + decomposers + N2-fixer (Azotobacter and Azospirillum sp.) , P = mixture of 20% phosphate rock and 80% of fresh manure + decomposers + P-solubilizer (A. niger and P. fluorescens), and NP = mixture of 20% phosphate rock and 80% of fresh manure + decomposers + N2-fixer + P-solubilizer. The results showed that inoculation of microbial N2-fixer and combination inoculation of N2-fixer and P-solubilizer increased the total bacterial population compared to that of the control as well as the only inoculation of microbial P-solubilizer on the 14th day of observation in which the bacteria reached the highest population. On all the observation days, the population of fungi in the inoculation of microbial P-solubilizer treatment increased significantly compared to that of the control. However, there was no difference between the populations of fungi in the inoculation of N2-fixer and combination inoculation of N2-fixer and Psolubilizer. The genus of fungy identified in the compost of the mixture of fresh manure and phosphate rock were Chytridium sp., Aspergillus sp., Rhizopus sp., and Fusarium sp.[How to Cite : Nugroho SG, Dermiyati, J Lumbanraja, S Triyono, H Ismono. 2013. Inoculation Effect of N2-Fixer and P-Solubilizer into a Mixture of Fresh Manure and Phosphate Rock Formulated as Organonitrofos Fertilizer on Bacterial and Fungal Populations. J Trop Soils, 18 (1): 75-80. doi: 10.5400/jts.2013.18.1.75][Permalink/DOI: www.dx.doi.org/10.5400/jts.2013.18.1.75]
Assessment Erosion 3D Hazard with USLE and Surfer Tool: A Case Study of Sumani Watershed in West Sumatra Indonesia Aflizar, .; Afrizal, Roni; Masunaga, Tsugiyuki
JOURNAL OF TROPICAL SOILS Vol. 18 No. 1: January 2013
Publisher : UNIVERSITY OF LAMPUNG

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.5400/jts.2013.v18i1.81-92

Abstract

Quantitative evaluation of soil erosion rate is an important basic to investigate and improve land use system, which has not been sufficiently conducted in Indonesia.  The Universal Soil Loss Equation (USLE) and Erosion Three Dimension (E3D) in Surfer were used to identify characteristic of dominant erosion factors in Sumani Watershed in West Sumatra, Indonesia using data soil survey and monitoring sediment yield in outlet watershed.  Climatology data from three stations were used to calculate Rainfall erosivity (R) factor. As many as101 sampling sites were used to investigate soil erodibility (K-factor) with physico-chemical laboratory analysis. Digital elevation model (DEM) of Sumani Watershed was used to calculate slope length and Steepness (LS-factor). Landsat TM imagery and field survey were used to determine crop management (C-factor) and conservation practices (P-factor). Calculating soil loss and map of USLE factor were determined by Kriging method in Surfer 9. Sumani Watershed had erosion hazard in criteria as: severe to extreme severe (26.23%), moderate (24.59%) and very low to low (49.18%).  Annual average soil loss for Sumani watershed was 76.70 Mg ha-1 y-1 in 2011. Upland area was designated as having a severe to extreme severe erosion hazard compared to lowland which was designated  as having very less to moderate.  On the other land, soil eroded from upland were deposited in lowland. These results were verified by comparing one year’s sediment yield observation on the outlet of the watershed. Land use (C-factor), rainfall erosivity (R- factor), soil erodibility (K-factor), slope length and steepness (LS-factor) were dominant factors that affected soil erosion. Traditional soil conservation practices were applied by farmer for a long time such as terrace in Sawah.  The USLE model in Surfer was used to identify specific regions susceptible to soil erosion by water and was also applied to identify suitable sites to conduct soil conservation planning in Sumani Watershed.[How to Cite : Aflizar, R Afrizal, T Masunaga. 2013. Assessment Erosion 3D Hazard with USLE and Surfer Tool: A Case Study of Sumani Watershed in West Sumatra Indonesia. J Trop Soils, 18 (1): 81-92. doi: 10.5400/jts.2013.18.1.81][Permalink/DOI: www.dx.doi.org/10.5400/jts.2013.18.1.81]
Micronutrient Assessment of Cocoa, Kola, Cashew and Coffee Plantations for Sustainable Production at Uhonmora, Edo State, Nigeria Ogeh, Joseph Sunday; Ipinmoroti, Rotimi Rofus
JOURNAL OF TROPICAL SOILS Vol. 18 No. 2: May 2013
Publisher : UNIVERSITY OF LAMPUNG

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.5400/jts.2013.v18i2.93-97

Abstract

The micronutrient status of the soils and leaf of cocoa, kola, cashew and coffee plantations to study the soil-plant micronutrient content relationship in the plantation soils for proper management towards optimum production of the crops was investigated at Uhonmora, Edo State, Nigeria. Soil and leaf samples were collected from these plantations and analyzed according to standard laboratory procedures. The soil samples were analyzed for the micronutrients (Cu, Mn, Zn and Fe) and in addition pH, organic carbon, sand, silt and clay contents, while the leaves were analyzed for only the micronutrient contents. Results indicated that the soils were sandy loam, acidic, low in organic carbon, deficient in Cu and Mn but very high in Fe and Zn contents. This probably resulted in nutrient imbalance in the soils and the deficiency of the nutrients in the crops. The plantations therefore require application of organic manures and micronutrient fertilizers to rectify the inadequate soil organic matter and to supply sufficient amount of Cu and Mn in the soils, to obtain quality fruit yield at optimum level from the plantations.Keywords: Cashew, cocoa, coffee, kola, micronutrients, sustainable production [How to Cite: Ogeh JS and RR Ipinmoroti. 2013. Micronutrient Assessment of Cocoa, Kola, Cashew and Coffee  Plantations for Sustainable Production at Uhonmora, Edo State, Nigeria. J Trop Soils 18 (2): 93-97. Doi: 10.5400/jts.2013.18.2.93] [Permalink/DOI: www.dx.doi.org/10.5400/jts.2013.18.2.93]  REFERENCESAdebiyi S, EO Uwagbue, EA Agbongiarhuoyi, I Ndagi and EO Aigbekaen. 2011.  Assessment of agronomic practices among kola farmers in Osun State, Nigeria. World J Agric Sci 7: 400-403.Afolabi CA and NE Egbe. 1984.  Yield response of kola to N, P and K fertilizer application:  A case study of preliminary trial. Cafe Cacao The 28: 13-16. AOAC [Association of Official Analytical Chemists]. 1990.  Official Methods of Analysis, 15th Edition. Washington DC: 774-784.Ayanlaja SA. 1983.  Rehabilitation of cocoa (Theobroma cacao L.) in Nigeria: Major problem and possible solution. Plant Soil  73: 403-409.CBN [Central Bank of Nigeria]. 2010.  Annual Report and Statement of Accounts for the year. Abuja, Nigeria. 182 p.Chude VO and GO Obigbesan. 1983.  Safe and toxic application rates of boron for cocoa seedlings. Plant Soil 74: 145-147.Egbe NE, EA Ayodele and CR Obatolu. 1989.  Soils and nutrition of cocoa, coffee, kola  cashew and tea. Prog Tree Crop Res 2: 28-38.Falade JA. 1978.  Cashew growing soil in Nigeria. East Afr Agric J 43: 100-105. FAO [Food and Agriculture Organization]. 2010.  Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations.  http://faostat.fao.org/site/567/DesktopDefault.aspx? PageID=567#ancor. Accessed on 21 January 2010.Ibiremo OS and O Fagbola. 2008. Effect of phosphorus fertilizer and arbuscular mycorhizal  fungi inoculation on the growth of cashew seedlings in two soils in Nigeria. Nigerian J Soil Sci 18: 138-146.Ipinmoroti RR, OSO Akanbi, MA Daniel, LA Adebowale, GA Adewoye, EA Makinde and CO Kayode. 2011.  Potentials of NPK and organic fertilizers on growth performance of cashew (Anacardium occidentale L.) seedlings on degraded typic alfisol soils in Ibadan, Nigeria. J Agric Sci Tech 1: 876-881.Ipinmoroti RR, P Aikpokpodion and OSO Akanbi.  2009.  Nutritional assessment of cocoa plots for soil fertility management on some cocoa farms in Nigeria. Proceedings of 16th International Cocoa Research Conference Held at Grand Hyatt  Hotel, Nusa Dua, Bali, Indonesia, pp 1481-1485.Iremiren GO and  AM Ekhomun. 2005.  Effects of N fertilizer rates on the performance of maize-okra mixture in an acid sand soil of the Nigerian forest zone. Nigerian J Appl Sci 23: 11-14. McKenzie RH.  2001.  Micronutrient requirements of crops. Alberta Agriculture and Rural development   http://www1.agric.gov.ab.ca/$department/deptdocs.nsf/all/agdex713. Acessed on 21 July 2011.Nelson DW and LE Sommers. 1982.  Organic carbon and soil extracts In: D L Sparks (ed).  Methods of soil Analysis. Part 2- Chemical and microbiological properties. Agronomy Monograph No.9, 2nd Edition. American Society of Agronomy, Soil Science Society of America, Madison, WI, USA, pp. 539-579.Ogunlade MO, OS Ibiremo, RR Ipinmoroti, CI Iloyanomon and PE Aikpokpodion. 2011.  Determination of phosphorus and potassium fixation capacities and fertilizer fctors in soils of three cocoa growing areas of Nigeria. J Soil Nat 5: 11-16.Ogunmoyela OA and CR Obatolu. 1984.  Nutrient studies and fertilizer requirements of Nigeria tea. Cafe Cacao The 28: 179-184.Ogunwale JA, JO Olaniyan and MO Aduloju. 2002.  Morphological, physico-chemical and clay mineralogical properties of soils overlaying basement complex rocks in Ilorin East, Nigeria. Moor J Agric Res 3: 147-154.Ojeniyi SO. 1980. Nutrient studies of NPK treated coffee plots. Plant Soil 56: 175-179.Omotoso TI. 1974.  The effect of fertilizer and irrigation on the leaf macronutrient composition of Coffea canephora during a year. Turrialba 24: 315-318.Opeke LK. 1987. Tropical tree crops. Spectrum Books Limited, Ibadan, Nigeria, p 247.Wood GAR and RA Lass. 1985.  Cocoa, 4th ed. London: Longman, pp. 620-632.  
Changes of Soil Chemical Properties during Rice Straw Decomposition in Different Types of Acid Sulphate Soils Hairani, Anna; Susilawati, Ani
JOURNAL OF TROPICAL SOILS Vol. 18 No. 2: May 2013
Publisher : UNIVERSITY OF LAMPUNG

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.5400/jts.2013.v18i2.99-103

Abstract

Organic residues often exhibit different physico-chemical properties and affect the soil ecosystem in different ways. Hence, the study of their impact on soil is essential to benefit from their potential as amendments and to avoid adverse environmental effects. It is required to study the role of rice straw in the changes of soil properties during decomposition processes in the rice field. The research was conducted on potential acid sulphate soil (PASS) and actual acid sulphate soil (AASS) in the glass house. Soil pH, Fe2+, organic-Fe, total N and available P were observed at 2, 4, 6 and 8 weeks after planting (WAP). The result showed that rice straw application : (1) decreased soil pH of PASS and increase soil pH of AASS; (2) tended to increase Fe2+ both in PASS and AASS; (3) stimulated the organic-Fe concentration in AASS was higher than organic-Fe concentration in PASS; (4) had no different effect in total N and decreased P concentration in the both of soil during observation. P concentration on PASS was lower than on AASS.Keywords: Decomposition, rice straw, soil chemical properties, soil type[How to Cite: Hairani A and A Susilawati. 2013.Changes of Soil Chemical Properties during Rice Straw Decomposition in Different Types of Acid Sulphate Soils. J Trop Soils 18 (2): 99-103. Doi: 10.5400/jts.2013.18.2.99]REFERENCESBalai Penelitian Tanah. 2005. Analisis Kimia Tanah, Tanaman, Air dan Pupuk.  Badan Penelitian dan Pengembangan Pertanian. Departemen Pertanian.  Bogor. p: 136 (in Indonesian).Banach AM, K Banach, RCJH Peters,  RHM Jansen, EJW Visser, Z Stepniewska, JGM Roelofs and LPM Lamers.  2009.  Effects of long-term flooding on biogeochemistry and vegetation development in floodplains; a mesocosm experiment to study interacting effects of land use and water quality.  Biogeosciences  6: 1325-1339. doi:10.5194/bg-6-1325-2009.Bonneville S.  2005.  Kinetics of Microbial Fe (III) Oxyhydroxide Reduction : The Role of Mineral Properties.  [Dissertation].  Department of Earth Sciences-Geochemistry, Faculty of Geosciences, Utrecht University. The Netherlands. 117 p.Cayuela ML, T Sinicco and C Mondini.  2009.  Mineralization dynamics and biochemical properties during initial decomposition of plant and animal residues in soil. App Soil Ecol  41: 118 -127.De-Campos AB, AL Mamedov and C Huang. 2009. Short-term reducing conditions decrease soil aggregation. Soil Sci Soc Am J  73: 550-559.Dent D. 1986. Acid Sulphate Soils: A Baseline for Research and Development. International Land Reclamation Institute Pub. 39. Wageningen, The Netherlands. 204 p.Dobermann A and T Fairhurst.  2000.  Rice: Nutrient Disorders and Nutrient Management.  International Rice Research Institute.  Makati city, The Fhillipines.  191 p. Fahmi A, B Radjagukguk and BH Purwanto.  2009.  Kelarutan posfat dan ferro pada tanah sulfat masam yang diberi bahan organik jerami padi.  J Tanah Trop 14: 119 -125 (in Indonesian).Fahmi A. 2010.  Pengaruh pemberian jerami padi terhadap pertumbuhan tanaman padi (Oryza sativa ) di tanah sulfat masam.  J Berita Biol 10:  7-14 (in Indonesian). Havlin JL, JD Beaton, SL Tisdale and WL Nelson. 2005. Soil Fertility and Fertilizers, an introduction to nutrient management. 7th edition. Prentice Hall. 515 p.Indrayati L and A  Jumberi. 2002.  Pengelolaan jerami padi pada pertanaman padi di lahan pasang surut sulfat masam.  In: Pengelolaan Tanaman Pangan Lahan Rawa.  Badan Penelitian dan Pengembangan Pertanian, Puslitbang Tanaman Pangan, Bogor. Kirk G.  2004.  The Biogeochemistry of Submerged Soils. John Willey and Sons. Chicester, England.  291 p.Kongchum M.  2005.  Effect of  Plant Residue and Water Management Practices on Soil Redox Chemistry, Methane Emission and Rice Productivity.   [Dissertation].  Graduate Faculty of the Louisiana State University.  USA.  201 pKyuma K.  2004.  Paddy Soil Science.  Kyoto University Press dan Trans Pacific Press.  Melbourne.  Australia. 279 p.Liang X, J Liu, Y Chen, H Li, Y Ye, Z Nie, M Su and Z Xu.  2010.  Effect of pH on the release of soil colloidal phosphorus.  J Soils Sediments 10: 1548-1556.Lindsay WL. 1979.  Chemical Equilibria in Soils. John Willey & Sons. New York. 449 p.Liu C, M Chen and F Li. 2010. Fe(III) reduction in soils from South China. In: RJ Gilkes and N Prakongkep (eds). Soil Solutions for a Changing World. Soil minerals and contaminants, 19th World Congress of Soil Science. Brisbane, Australia, pp.70-73.McIntyre RES, MA Adams, DJ Ford and PF Grierson.  2009.  Rewetting and litter addition influence mineralization and microbial communities in soils from a semi-arid intermittent stream.  Soil Biol Biochem 41: 92-101.Morris AJ. 2011. Phosphate Binding to Fe and Al in Organic Matter as Affected by Redox Potential and pH. [Dissertation]. Soil Science, North Carolina  State University, Raleigh, North Carolina, USA. 229 p.Olomu MO, GJ Racz and CM Cho.  1973.  Effect of flooding on the Eh, pH, and concentrations of Fe and Mn in several manitoba soils.  Soil Sci Soc Am J  37: 220 -224.Ponnamperuma FN. 1984.  Effects of flooding on soils.  In: T Kozlawski (ed).  Flooding and Plant Growth: Physical Ecology. A Series Monographs, Text and Treatises.  Academic Press Inc.  Harcourt Brace Javanovich Publisher, USA, pp. 10-45. Reddy KR and RD Delaune.  2008. The Biogeochemistry of Wetland; Science and Application. CRC Press.  New York.Rukhsana F, C Butterly, J Baldock and C Tang.  2010. Model carbon compounds differ in their effects on pH change of soils with different initial pH. In: RJ Gilkes and N Prakongkep (eds). 19th World Congress of Soil Science, Soil Solutions for a Changing World, 1 – 6 August 2010, Brisbane, Australia,  pp. 160-163.Syahrawat KL.  2006.  Organic matter and mineralizable nitrogen relationships in wetland rice soils.  Commun Soil Sci Plant Anal 37: 787-796. Wagai R and LM Mayer.  2007.  Sorptive stabilization of organik matter in soils by hydrous iron oxides.  Geochim Cosmochim Act 71: 25-35.Watanabe I.  1984.  Anaerobic decomposition of organic matter in flooded rice soils. In: Organic Matter and Rice. Intenational Rice Research Institute.  Los Banos Laguna, Philippines,  pp. 237-258.Wickham TH and VP Singh. 1978.  Water movement through wet soils. Soil and Rice.  International Rice Research Institute. Los Baños, Philippines, pp. 337- 358.
Soil Structure and Carbon Pools in Response to Common Tropical Agroecosystems Handayani, Iin Purwati; Prawito, Priyono
JOURNAL OF TROPICAL SOILS Vol. 18 No. 2: May 2013
Publisher : UNIVERSITY OF LAMPUNG

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.5400/jts.2013.v18i2.105-113

Abstract

Maintaining soil physical properties and organic C is the goal for sustainable use of soil resources in agroecosystems. The objectives of this research were to evaluate the changes in soil structure and C pools and to quantify the availability of labile C pools. The study site was in Bengkulu Province Sumatra, Indonesia. Four common agroecosystems were used to determine soil physical properties including bulk density, porosity, and soil aggregates. Labile soil C pools examined were particulate organic C (POC), microbial biomass C (MBC) and C mineralization (C min). Farming practices significantly affected the bulk density, macro-porosity, micro-porosity, aggregate stability(AS), mean weight diameter (MWD) and aggregation ratio (AR). However, the responses from treatments depend upon the soil depth. In general, agroforestry and fallow fields provided lower bulk density, higher porosity, AS, MWD and AR compared to rubber tree plantation and grain cropping. As a general trend, the values of POC, MBC and C min decreased in the order of agroforestry > fallow field > rubber tree plantation > grain cropping. The order of labile C pools in all fields were POC > MBC > C min. Significant increases (32 – 62%, p<0.05) in the soil organic C content was observed in agroforestry and fallow fields compared to rubber tree plantation and grain cropping systems at the depth of 0 – 20 cm. The highest available POC (43 to 82%) and MBC (2 to 5%) were found in agroforestry and fallow field. Mineralized C was about 2% in all fields indicating similar amount of active C from soil organic matter. In conclusion, improvement in soil structure properties, TOC, POC and MBC in agroforestry andfallow fields indicates better soil C sequestration and soil quality in these agroecosystems.Keywords: Aggregation, carbon mineralization, microbial biomass carbon, particulate organic carbon,  rubber plantation[How to Cite: Handayani IP and P Prawito. 2013. Soil Structure and Carbon Pools in Response to Common Tropical Agroecosystems. J Trop Soils 18 (2): 105-113. Doi: 10.5400/jts.2013.18.2.105][Permalink/DOI: www.dx.doi.org/10.5400/jts.2013.18.2.99]REFERENCESAhn MY, AR Zimmerman, NB Comerford, JO  Sickman and S Grunwald.  2009.  Carbon mineralization and labile organic carbon labile pools in the sandy soils of north Florida watershed. Ecosystems 12: 672-685.  Anderson JPE. 1982.  Soil Respiration. In: AL Page, RH Miller and DR Keeney(eds).  Methods of Soil Analysis part 2, chemical and microbiological properties, 2nd ed. American Society of Agronomy and Soil Science Society of America.  Madison, WI, pp. 831-872.Anderson TH and KH Domsch.  1990.  Application of ecophysiological quotients (qCO2 and qD) on microbial biomass from soils of different cropping histories.  Soil Biol Biochem 22: 251-255.Baker BJ, NR Fausey and KR Islam.  2004.  Comparison of soil physical properties under two different water table management regimes.  Soil Sci Soc Am 68: 1973-1981.Balesdent  J, C Chenu and M Balabane.  2000.  Relationship of soil organic matter dynamics of physical protection on tillage.  Soil Till Res 53: 215-230.Batjes NH.  1996.  Total C and N in soils of the world.  Eur J Soil Sci 47: 151-163.Bauhus J, D Pare and I Cote.  1998.  Effect of tree species, stand age and soil type on soil microbial biomass and its activity in a southern boreal forest.  Soil Biol Biochem 30: 1077-1089.Bayer C, L Martin-Neto, CN Pillon and L Saugoi.  2001.  Changes in Soil Organic Matter Fractions under Subtropical No-Till Cropping Systems.  Soil Sci Soc Am J 65: 1473-1478.Bowen GD and AD Rovira.  1991.  The rhizosphere.  The hidden half of the hidden half.  In: Y Waisal, ,A  Eshel and U Kafkafi  (eds). Plant Roots: the Hidden Half.  Marcel Dekker, New York, pp. 641-669.Cambardella  CA and ET  Elliot.  1992.  Particulate soil organic-matter changes across a grassland cultivation sequence.  Soil Sci Soc Am J 56: 777-783.Castro H,  CA  Cambardella  and ET  Elliot.  2010.  Carbon and nitrogen distribution in aggregates from cultivated and native grassland soil.  Soil Sci Soc Am J  57: 1071-1076.Eynard A, TE Schumacher, RA Kohl and DD Malo.  2006. Soil wettability relationships with soil organic carbon and aggregate stability. Proceedings of the 18th World Congress of Soil Science, Philadelphia, July 9-15, Pennyslavia, USA.Franzluebbers  AJ.  2002.  Soil organic matter stratification ratio as indicator of soil quality.  Soil Till Res 66: 95-106. Gajda AM.  2008.  Effect of different tillage systems in some microbiological properties of soils under wheat.  Int Agrophysics 22:  201-208.Gregorich  EG, MR Carter, DA Angers, CM  Monreal and BH Ellert. 1994.  Towards a minimum data set to assess soil organic matter quality in agricultural soils.  Can J Soil Sci 74: 367-385. Handayani  IP.  2004.  Soil quality changes following forest clearance in Bengkulu Sumatra.  Biotropia 22: 15-28.Handayani IP, MS  Coyne, CD Barton and S Workman.  2008.  Soil Carbon Pools and Aggregation Following Stream Restoration in A Riparian Corridor: Bernheim Forest, Kentucky.  J Environ Monitor Restor 4: 11-28.Handayani IP, P Prawito and M Ihsan.  2012.  Soil changes associated with Imperata cylindrica grassland conversion in Indonesia.  Int J Soil Sci 7: 61-70.Handayani IP, MS Coyne, and T Phillips. 2011. Soil organic carbon fractions differ in two contrasting tall fescue systems. Plant and Soil 338: 43-50.  doi: 10.1007/s11104-0100352-z.Houghton  RA and CL  Goodale.  2004.  Effect of land use change on the carbon balance of terrestrial ecosystems.  Ecosystems and Land Use Change, Geographical Monograph Series 153: 85-98.Huang  X, EL Skidmore and GL Tibke.  2002.  Soil quality of two Kansas soils as influenced by the Conservation Reserve Program.  J Soil Water Conserv 57: 344-350.  Jenkinson  DS and JN Ladd.  1981.  Microbial biomass in soil:measurement and turnover.  In: EA Paul and JN Ladd (eds). Soil Biochemistry Vol. 5. Marcel Dekker, NY, pp. 415-471. Jinbo  Z, S Changchun and Y  Wenyan.  2007.  Effects of cultivation on soil microbial properties in a freshwater march soil in Northeast China.  Soil Till Res 93: 231-235.Klute A.  1986.  Methods of soil analysis- Part 1.  Physical and Mineralogical Methods. 2nd. American Society of Agronomy and Soil Science Society of America.  Agronomy Series 9.  Madison, WI, 1188 p.Kosmas  C, St Gerontidis and M Marathianou.  2000.  The effect of land use change on soils and vegetation over various lithological formations on Lesvos (Greece).  Catena 40: 51-68. Li XG, PL  Zhang, P Yin, YK  Li, QF  Ma, RJ  Long and FM  Li.  2009.  Soil organic  carbon and nitrogen fractions and water-stable aggregation as affected by cropping and grassland reclamation in an arid sub-alpine soil.  Land Degrad Dev 20: 176-186.Li Y and BW Mathew.  2010.  Effect of conversion of sugarcane plantation to forest and pasture on soil carbon in Hawaii.  Plant Soil 335: 245-253.Lopez-Bermudez  F, A  Romero-Diaz, J  Martinez-Fernandez and J  Martinez-Fernandez. 1996.  The El Ardal field site:soil and vegetation cover. In: CJ Brandt and JB Thornes (eds).  Mediterranean Desertification and Land Use.  John Wiley and Sons, Chichester, pp. 169-188.Luxmoore  RJ.  1981.  Micro-, meso-, and macroporosity of soil.  Soil Sci Soc Am J 45: 671-672.Mazzarino  MJ, L Szott and M Jimenez.  1993.  Dynamics of soil total C and N, microbial biomass and water soluble C in tropical agro ecosystems.  Soil Biol Biochem 25: 205-214.McLauhan  KK, SE Hobbie and WM Post.  2006.  Conversion from agriculture to grassland builds soil organic matter on decadal timescales.  Ecol Appl 16: 143-153.  Mohammadi  K.  2011.  Soil microbial activity and biomass as influenced by tillage and fertilization in wheat production.  Am-Euras J Agric Environ Sci 10: 330-337.Paul  EA and FE  Clark.  1996.  Soil Microbiology and Biochemistry.  Academic, San Diego, CA.Preger AC, R Kosters, CC  Du Preez, S  Brodowski and W  Amelung.  2010.  Carbon sequestration in secondary pasture soils: a chronosequence study in the south African Highveld.  Eur J Soil Sci 61: 551-562.Puget  P, C  Chenu and J Balesdent.  2000.  Dynamics of soil organic matter associated with particle-size fractions of water-stable aggregates.  Eur J Soil Sci 51: 595-605.SAS Institute.  2007.  SAS User’s Guide: Statistics.  SAS Inst., Cary, NC. Saviozzi  A, P  Bufalino, R Revi-Minzi and R  Riffaldi. 2002. Biochemical activities in a degraded soil restored by two amendments: a laboratory study. Biol Fertil Soils 35: 96-101.Sharrow  SH and S Ismail.  2004.  Carbon and nitrogen storage in western Oregon agroforests, forests, and pastures.  Agroforest Syst 60: 123-130. Shrestha  BM, BR  Singh, BK Sitaula, R  Lal and RM  Bajracharya.  2007.  Soil aggregate- and particle- associated organic carbon under different land uses in Nepal.  Soil Sci Soc Am J  71: 1194-1203.Six  J, RT Conant, EA  Paul and K Paustian.  2002.  Stabilization mechanisms of soil organic matter: implications for C-saturation of soils.  Plant Soil 241: 155-176.Skidmore  EL, WA  Carstenson and EE  Banbury.  1975.  Soil changes resulting from cropping.  Soil Sci Soc Am J 39: 964-967.Sparling  GP.  1992.  Ratio of microbial biomass carbon to soil organic carbon is sensitive indicator changes in soil organic matter.  Aust J Soil Res 30: 195-207.Staben  ML, DF  Bezdicek, MF Fauzi and  JL Smith. 1997.  Assessment of soil quality in conservation reserve program and wheat-fallow soils.  Soil Sci Soc Am J 61: 124-130.Su YZ, WJ  Liu, R Yang and XX  Chang.  2009.  Changes in soil aggregate, carbon, nitrogen following the conversion of cropland to alfalfa forage land in the marginal Oasis of Northwest China.  Environ Manage 43: 1061-1070.Templer  PH, PM Groffman and AS  Flecker.  2005.  Land use change and soil nutrient transformations in the Los Haitises region of the Dominican Republic.  Soil Biol Biochem 37: 215-225.Wander   MM and GM Bidart.  2000.  Tillage practice influences on the physical protection, bioavailability and composition of particulate organic matter.  Biol Fertil Soils 32: 360-367.Wang  B, GB Liu, S  Xue and B Zhu.  2011.  Changes in soil physic-chemical and microbiological properties during natural succession on abandoned farmland in the Loess Plateau.  Environ Earth Sci 62: 915-925.Yadav RS, BL Yadav and BR Chhipa.  2008.  Litter dynamics and soil properties under different tree species in a semi-arid region of Rajasthan, India.  Agroforest Syst 73: 1-12.Zhang K, H Dang, S Tan, Z Wang and Q Zhang.  2010.  Vegetation community and soil characteristics of abandoned agricultural land and pine plantation in the Qinling Mountains china.  For Ecol Manage 259: 2036-2047.Zhu B, Z  Li, P Li, G Xu and S  Xue.  2010.  Soil erodibility, microbial biomass, and physical-chemical property changes during long-term natural vegetation restoration: a case study in the Loess Plateau China.  Ecol Res 25: 531-541. 
Spatial Variability of Soil Inherent Fertility Status at Irrigation Rice Field in Waeapo Plain, Buru Regency Susanto, Andriko Noto
JOURNAL OF TROPICAL SOILS Vol. 18 No. 2: May 2013
Publisher : UNIVERSITY OF LAMPUNG

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.5400/jts.2013.v18i2.115-124

Abstract

Analysis and interpretation of spatial variability soils properties are a basis in site-specific nutrients management. Evaluation inherent potentiality (IP) of soil fertility status is the method to know variability of soil fertility and spatial distribution at the area. Evaluation of IP was conducted by mathematical calculation to eleven soil properties namely total C, total N, N-NH4+, total P, P-Bray 1, P (extract HCl 25%), [Ca+Mg]-exch., K-exch., CEC, available Si, and sand content. Result of IP evaluation in Waeapo plain indicated that from the total rice field area of 25,848.83 ha, 75.64% or 19,552.44 ha showed very low IP class, and the rest for the width of 6,296.39 ha or 24.36% had low IP class. Content of C-total, N-total, N-NH4+, P2O5 total, P2O5 extracted by HCl 25%, available P2O5 and Si was not limited IP, because they were all classified as moderate class. Limiting factor of very low and low IP was a combination of three elements of [Ca+Mg]-exch., K-exch, and CEC. Increasing CEC and availability of K with addition of ameliorant such as organic materials, calcite, zeolite and dolomite would improve IP status class.Keywords: Buru Island, inherent potentiality of soil fertility, rice, Waeapo Plain[How to Cite: Susanto AN and BH Sunarminto. 2013.Spatial Variability of Soil Inherent Fertility Status at Irrigation Rice Field in Waeapo Plain, Buru Regency. J Trop Soils 18 (2): 115-124. Doi: 10.5400/jts.2013.18.2.115][Permalink/DOI: www.dx.doi.org/10.5400/jts.2013.18.2.115] REFERENCESAl-Jabri M. 2008. Kajian metode penetapan kapasitas tukar kation zeolit sebagai pembenah tanah untuk lahan pertanian terdegradasi. J Standardisasi 10: 56-63  (in Indonesian). Davatgar N, Neishabouri MR, Sepaskhah AR. 2012. Delineation of site specific nutrient management zones for a paddy cultivated area based on soil fertility using fuzzy clustering. Geoderma 173: 111-118.Doberman A and T Fairhurst. 2000.  Rice: Nutrient disorders and nutrient management. International Rice Research Institute (IRRI).  Philippines. 191p. Dobermann A, C Witt, S Abdulrachman, HC Gines, R Nagarajan, TT Son, PS Tan, GH Wang, NV Chien, VTK Thoa, CV Phung, P Stalin, P Muthukrishnan, V Ravi, M Babu, GC Simbahan and MAA Adviento. 2003. Soil fertility and indigenous nutrient supply in irrigated rice domains of asia.  Agron J 95: 913-923.Esington ME. 2003. Soil and Water Chemistry. An Integrative Approach. CRC Press. Boca Raton - Florida. 523p.Fairhurst T,  A Dobermann, AG Quijano and V Balasubramanian. 2007. Kahat dan Keracunan Mineral dalam  Padi: Panduan Praktis Pengelolaan Hara, In : Fairhurst, C. Witt, RJ. Buresh, and A. Dobermann (Eds.). International Rice Research Institute (IRRI), International Plant Nutrition Institute (IPNI), and International Potash Institute (IPI). Diterjemahkan oleh Adi Wiyono. Badan Litbang Pertanian. Jakarta. 91p + A-46p  (in Indonesian).Haefele SM and MCS Wopereis. 2005. Spatial variability of indigenous supplies for N, P and K and its impact on fertilizer strategies for irrigated rice in West Africa. Plant  Soil 270: 57-72.Haefele SM, DE Johnson, S Diallo, MCS Wopereis and I Janin. 2000.  Improved soil fertility and weed management is profitable for irrigated rice farmers in the Sahel. Field Crops Res 66: 101-113.Hanudin E. 2000. Pedoman Analisis Kimia Tanah. Jurusan Tanah. Fakultas Pertanian. Universitas Gadjah Mada. Yogyakarta (in Indonesian).Hazelton P and B Murphy. 2007. Interpreting Soil Test Results. What Do All The Numbers Mean?. CSIRO Publishing.  Australia. 152p.Kyuma K. 2004. Paddy Soil Science. Kyoto University Press and Trans Pacific Press. 290p.  Mc Bratney AB and MJ Pringle. 1997. Spatial variability in soil-implication for precision agriculture. In: JV Stafford (ed.) Precision Agriculture ‘97. Vol. I. Bioss Scientific Publ. Ltd., Oxford, United Kingdom, pp.3-31.Meunier A.  2005. Clays. Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg. Germany. 467p.N Davatgar, MR Neishabouri and AR Sepaskhah. 2012.  Delineation of site specific nutrient management zones for a paddy cultivated area based on soil fertility using fuzzy clustering. Geoderma 173-174: 111-118.Nguyen BV, DC Olk and KG Cassman. 2004.  Characterization of Humic Acid Fractions Improves Estimates of Nitrogen Mineralization Kinetics for Lowland Rice. Soils. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J. 68: 1266-1277.Poerwadi AD and A Masduqi. 2004. Penurunan Kadar Besi oleh Media Zeolit Alam Ponorogo Secara Kontinyu. JPurifikasi 5: 169-174  (in Indonesian).Prasetyo BH and RJ Gilkes. 1997. Properties of Kaolinit from Oxisol and Alfisols in West Java.  Agrivita  20: 220 - 227.Sirappa MP, AN Susanto, AJ Rieuwpassa, ED Waas and S Bustaman. 2005. Karakteristik, Jenis Tanah dan Penyebarannya Pada Wilayah Dataran Waeapo,  Pulau Buru. Agriplus  15(1): 20-32 (in Indonesian).Sulaeman, Suprapto dan Eviati. 2005. Analisis Kimia Tanah, Tanaman, Air  dan Pupuk. Edisi Pertama. Balai Penelitian Tanah. Bogor. 136p (in Indonesian).Syam T. 2010. Spatial Variability of Soil Nutrients Content Related to Rice Yield. J. Trop Soils  15: 153-157.Tan KH. 2003. Humic Matter in Soil and The Environment. Principles and Controversies. Marcel Dekker, Inc. New York. 370p.Tan KH. 1993.  Principles of Soil Chemistry, 2nd ed. Marcel Deckker Inc., New York. 376p. Tesfahunegn GB, L Tamene and PLG Vlek. 2011.  Catchment-scale spatial variability of soil properties and implications on site-specific soil management in northern Ethiopia. Soil Till Res 117: 124-139.WEI, Yi-chang, You-lu BAI, Ji-yun JIN, Fang ZHANG, Li-ping ZHANG, Xiao-qiang LIU. 2009.  Spatial Variability of Soil Chemical Properties in the Reclaiming Marine Foreland to Yellow Sea of China.  Agric Sci China  8: 1103-1111.Witt C,  BT Yen, VM Quyet, TM Thu, JM Pasuquin, RJ Buresh and A Dobermann. 2007. Spatially Variable Soil Fertility in Intensive Cropping Areas of North Vietnam and Its Implications for Fertilizer Needs. Better Crops 91: 28-31.Yesrebi J, M Saffari, H Fathi, N Karimian, M Moazallahi and R Gazni. 2009. Evaluation and Comparison of Ordinary Kriging and Inverse Distance Weighting Methods for Prediction of Spatial Variability of Some Soil Chemical Parameters. Res  J Biol Sci 4:  93-102. Yoshida S. 1981. Fundamentals of  Rice Crop Science. IRRI. Los Banos, Philippines. 269p.
Relationship between Distance Sampling and Carbon Dioxide Emission under Oil Palm Plantation Dariah, Ai; Agus, Fahmuddin; Susanti, Erni; Jubaedah, .
JOURNAL OF TROPICAL SOILS Vol. 18 No. 2: May 2013
Publisher : UNIVERSITY OF LAMPUNG

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.5400/jts.2013.v18i2.125-130

Abstract

Carbon dioxide emission on peatland under oil palm plantation were highly varied probably due to many factors involved.  The objectives of the research were to evaluate the effect of distance sampling from center of oil palm tree on Carbon dioxide flux, and  to study the factors that cause variability of carbon dioxide flux on peatland under oil palm plantation.  The study was conducted on peatland at Arang-Arang Village, Kumpek Ulu Sub-District, Muaro Jambi District, Jambi Province, on six year old oil palm plantation.  The study was conducted in the form of observational exploratory.  Emission measurements performed on 5 selected oil palm trees at points within 100, 150, 200, 250, 300, 350, and 400 cm from the center of trunk.  Carbon dioxide flux was measured using (IRGA), Li-COR 820.  The results showed that there is significant correlation between the distance of sampling from center of oil palm tree and Carbon dioxide flux.  The farther distance from the tree, Carbon dioxide flux more decreased. Before applying fertilizer, variability of soil fertility was not significantly correlated with the flux of Carbon dioxide, so the difference of Carbon dioxide flux based on distance sampling can be caused by root distribution factor.  After fertilizer application, variability of Carbon dioxide flux under the oil palm tree were beside affected by differences in root distribution, was also greatly influenced by fertilization.Keywords: Carbon dioxide flux, distance sampling, oil palm, peat, root-related respiration [How to Cite: Dariah A, F Agus, E Susanti and Jubaedah. 2013.Relationship between Sampling Distance and Carbon Dioxide Emission under Oil Palm Plantation. J Trop Soils 18 (2): 125-130. Doi: 10.5400/jts.2013.18.2.125][Permalink/DOI: www.dx.doi.org/10.5400/jts.2013.18.2.125] REFERENCESAgus F, E Handayani, van M Noordwijk, K Idris and S Sabiham.  2010 Root respiration interferes with peat CO2 emission measurement. 19th World Congress of Soil Science, Soil Solutions for a Changing World. 1 - 6 August 2010, Brisbane, Australia. Published on DVD.Amador JA and RD Jones.  1993.  Nutrient limitation on microbial respiration in peat soil with diffrent total phosphorus content.  Soil Biol Biochem  25: 793-801.Franklin O, P Hoogberg, A Ekbled and GI Agren.  2003.  Pine forest floor carbon accumulation in response to N and PK addition: Bomb C-14 modeling and respiration studies.  Ecosystem 6: 644-658.  Freeman C, N Ostle and H Kang.  2001.  An Enzymic ‘latch’ on global carbon store-a shortage of oxigen locks up carbon in peatlands by restraining a single enzyme.  Nature 409: 149-149.Hanson PJ, NT Edwards, CT Garten and JA Andrew.  2000.  Separating root and soil microbial contributions to soil respiration: A review of methods and observations.  Biogeochemistry 48: 115-146.Henson IE, and SH Chai.  1997.  Analysis of oil palm productivity.  II. Biomass, distribution, productivity and turnover of the root system.  Elaeis 9: 78-92.Hergoualc’h K and LV Verchot. 2011.  Stocks and fluxes of carbon associated with land use change in Southeast Asian tropical peatlands: A review. Glob Biogeochem Cycl 25. doi:10.1029/2009GB003718.Howarth RW and SG Fisher.  1976.  Carbon, nitrogen, phosporus dynamic during leaf decay in nutrient-enriched stream microecosystems.  Freshwater Biol 6: 221-228.Husen E and F Agus.  2011.  Microbial activities as affected by peat dryness ans ameliorant.  Am J Environ Sci 7: 348-353.Jauhiainen J, A Hooijer and SE Page.  2012.  Carbon dioxide emissions from an Acacia plantation on peatland in Sumatra, Indonesia. Biogeosciences 9: 617–630. DOI:10.5194/bg-9-617-2012.Khalid H, ZZ Zin and JM Anderson.  1999.  Quantification of oil palm biomass and nutrient value in mature planttation.  II Below-ground biomass.  J Oil Palm Res 11: 63-71.Knorr KH, MR Oosterwoud and C Blodau. 2008. Experimental drought alters rates of soil respiration and methanogenesis but not carbon exchange in soil of a temperate fen. Soil Biol Biochem 40: 1781-1791.Law BE, FM Kelliher, DD Baldocchi, PM Anthoni, J. Irvine, D. Moore and SV Tuyl.  2001.  Spatial and temporal variation in respiration in  a young ponderosa pine forest during a summer drought.  Agric Forest Meteorol 110: 27-43.Laiho R, J Laine, CC Trettin and L Finner.  2004.  Scot pine litter decomposition along drainage succession and soil nutrient gradient in peat land forest, and the effect of inter-annual weather variation.  Soil Biol Biochem 36: 1095-1109.Madsen R, L Xu, B Claassen and D McDermit.  2009.  Surface monitoring method for carbon capture and storage projects. Energy Procedia 1: 2161-2168Martoyo K.  1992.  Kajian Sifat Fisik Tanah Podsolik untuk Tanaman Kelapa Sawit (Elaeis gueneensis Jacq) di Sumatera Utara.  Tesis Program Pasca Sarjana,  Universitas Gajah Mada.  Yogyakarta (in Indonesian).Melling L, R Hatano and KJ Goh. 2007. Nitrous oxide emissions from three ecosystem in tropical peatlands of Sarawak, Malaysia. Soil Sci Plant Nutr 53: 792-805.Minkkinen K, J Laine, NJ Shurpali, P Makiranta, J Alm and T Pentilla.  2007.  Heterotropic soil respiration in forestry-drained peatland.  Boreal Environ Res  12: 115-126. Murdiyarso D, K Hergoualc’h K and LV Verchot. 2010 Opportunities for reducing greenhouse gas emissions in tropical peatlands. PNAS 107:  19655-19660.Olsen R, S Linden, R Giesler, and P Hogberg.  2005.  Fertilization of boreal forest reduce of both autrotrophic dan heterotrophic soil respiration .  Glob  Change  Biol  11: 1745-1753.Silvola J, J Valijoki and H Aaltonen.  1985.  Effect of draining and fertilization on soil respiration at three ameliorated peatland site.  Acta For Fem 191: 1-32.Silvola J, J Alm, U Aklholm, H Nykanen and PJ Martikainen.  1996a. Carbon dioxide fluxes from peat in boreal mires under varying temperature and moisture condition.  J Ecol 84: 219-228.Silvola J, J Alm, U. Ahlholm, H Nykanen, and PJ Martikainen.  1996b.  The contribution of plant roots to carbon dioxide fluxes from organic soils.  Biol  Fertil Soils 23: 126-131.Wang W, K Ohseb and J Liuc. 2005.  Contribution of root respiration to soil respiration in a C3/C4 mixed grassland. J Bioscience 30: 507-514. 
Long-term Tillage and Nitrogen Fertilization Effects on Soil Properties and Crop Yields Utomo, Muhajir; Banuwa, Irwan Sukri; Buchari, Henrie; Anggraini, Yunita; Berthiria, .
JOURNAL OF TROPICAL SOILS Vol. 18 No. 2: May 2013
Publisher : UNIVERSITY OF LAMPUNG

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.5400/jts.2013.v18i2.131-139

Abstract

The impact of agricultural intensification on soil degradation now is occurring in tropical countries. The objective of this study was to determine the effect of long-term tillage and N fertilization on soil properties and crop yields in corn-soybean rotation. This long-term study which initiated since 1987 was carried out on a Typic Fragiudult soil at Politeknik Negeri Lampung, Sumatra (105o13’45.5"-105o13’48.0"E, 05o21’19.6"-05o21’19.7"S) in 2010 and 2011. A factorial experiment was arranged in a randomized block design with four replications. The first factor was tillage system namely intensive tillage (IT) and conservation tillage (CT) which consist of minimum tillage (MT) and no-tillage (NT); while the second factor was N fertilization with rates of 0, 100 and 200 kg N ha-1 applied for corn, and 0, 25, and 50 kg N ha-1 for soybean. The results showed that  bulk density and soil strength at upper layer after 24 years of cropping were similar among treatments, but the soil strength under IT at 50-60 cm depth was 28.2% higher (p<0.05) than NT. Soil moisture and temperature under CT at 0-5 cm depth were respectively 38.1% and 4.5%  higher (p<0.05) than IT. High N rate decreased soil pH at 0-20 cm depth as much as 10%,  but increased total soil N at 0-5 cm depth as much as 19% (p<0.05).  At 0-10 cm depth, MT with no N had highest exchangeable K, while IT with medium N rate had the lowest (p<0.05). At 0-5 cm depth, MT with no N had highest exchangeable Ca, but it had the lowest (p<0.05) if combined with higher N rate. Microbial biomass C throughout   the growing season for NT was consistently highest and it was 14.4% higher (p<0.05) than IT. Compared to IT, Ap horizon of CT after 24 years of cropping was deeper, with larger soil structure and more abundance macro pores. Soybean and corn yields for long-term CT were 64.3% and 31.8% higher (p<0.05) than IT, respectively. Corn yield for long-term N with rate of 100 kg N ha-1 was 36.4% higher (p<0.05) than with no N.Keywords: Conservation tillage, crop yields, N fertilization, soil properties[How to Cite: Utomo M, IS Banuwa, H Buchari, Y Anggraini  and  Berthiria. 2013.Long-term Tillage and Nitrogen Fertilization Effects on Soil Properties and Crop Yields. J Trop Soils 18 (2): 131-139. Doi: 10.5400/jts.2013.18.2.131][Permalink/DOI: www.dx.doi.org/10.5400/jts.2013.18.2.131] REFERENCESAl-Kaisi and X Yin. 2005. Tillage and crop residue effects on soil carbon dioxide emission in corn-   soybean rotation. J Environ Qual 34: 437-445. Pub Med. Barak P, BO Jobe, AR Krueger, LA Peterson and DA Laird. 1997. Effects of long-term soilacidification due to nitrogen inputs in Wisconsin. Plant Soil 197: 61-69.Blake GR and KH  Hartge. 1986.  Bulk density. In: A Klute (ed). Methods of Soil Analysis. ASA and SSSA.  Madison, Wisconsin, USA, pp. 363-375.Blanco-Canqui H and R Lal. 2008. No-till and soil-profile carbon sequestration: an on farm assessment. Soil Sci Soc Am J  72: 693-701.  Blanco-Canqui H, LR  Stone and PW Stahlman.  2010. Soil response to long-term cropping systems on an Argiustoll in the Central Great Plains. Soil Sci Soc Am J 74: 602-611.Blevins RL, MS Smith, GW Thomas and WW Frye. 1983. Influence of conservation tillage on soil properties.  J Soil Water Conserv 38: 301-305.Blevins RL, GW Thomas and PL Cornelius. 1977 Influence of no-tillage and nitrogen  fertilization on certain soil properties after 5 years of continuous corn. Agron J 69: 383-386.Blevins, RL and WF Frye, 1993. Conservation tillage: an ecological approach to soil management. Adv Agron 51: 34-77.Brady NC and RR Weil. 2008. The nature and properties of soils. Pearson Prentice Hall. Fourteenth Edition. New Jersey, 965 p.Brito-Vega, H, D Espinosa-Victoria, C Fragoso, D Mendoza, N De la Cruz Landaro and A Aldares-Chavez. 2009. Soil organic particle and presence of earthworm under different tillage systems. J Biol Sci  9: 180-183.Derpch, R 1998. Historical review of no-tilage cultivation of crops. JIRCAS Working Rep. JAPAN Int  Res Ctr for Agric Sciences, Ibaraki, Japan 13: 1-18.  Diaz-Zorita, M., JH Grove, L Murdock, J Herbeck and E Perfect. 2004. Soil structural disturbance effects on crop yields and soil properties in a no-till production system. Agron J 96: 1651-1659.Dickey EC, PJ Jasa and RD Grisso. 1994. Long-term tillage effect on grain yield and soil properties in a soybean/grain sorghum Rotation. J Prod Agric 7: 465 - 470.Edwards WM, LD, Norton, CE, Redmond. 1988. Characterizing macro pores that affect infiltration into non tilled soil. Soil Sci  Soc  Am  J 52: 483-487.Fernandez RO, PG Fernandez, JVG Cervera and  FP Torres. 2007 Soil properties and crop yields after 21 years of direct drilling trials in southern Spain. Soil Till Res 94: 47-54.Fengyun Z, W Pute, Z Xining and C Xuefeng. 2011. The effects of no-tillage practice on soil physical properties. Afr J Biotech 10: 17645-17650. Havlin, JL, JD Beaton, SM Tisdale and WL Nelson. 2005. Soil Fertility and Fertilizer: an Introduction to Nutrient Management. Pearson Prantice Hall. Sevent Edition. Upper Saddle River, New Jersey, 515 p.Karlen DL, NC Wollenhaupt, DC Erbach,  EC Berry, JB Swan, NS Eash and JL Jordahl. 1994. Crop  residue effects on soil quality following 10-years of no-till corn. Soil Till Res 31: 149-167.Kumar  A and DS Yadav. 2005. Effect of zero and minimum tillage in conjunction with nitrogen management in wheat (Triticum aestivum ) after rice (Oryza sativa.). Indian J Agron 50 (1): 54-57.Lal R. 1989. Conservation tillage for sustainable agriculture: tropics versus temper­ate environment. Adv Agron 42: 85-197.Lal R. 1997. Residue management, conservation tillage and soil restoration for mitigating greenhouse effect by CO2 enrichment. Soil Till Res 43: 81-107.Lal R. 2007.  Soil science in a changing climate. CSA New 52: 1-9.Mallory J J, RH  Mohtar, GC Heathman, DG Schulze and E Braudeau. 2011. Evaluating the effect of tillage on soil structural properties using the pedostructure concept. Geoderma 163: 141-149. doi:10.1016/ j.geoderma. 2011.01.018. 9p.Paustian K,  HP Collins and EA Paul. 1997. Management control on soil carbon. In: EA Paul, ET Elliot, K Paustian and CV Cole  (eds). Soil Organic Matter in Temperate Agro-ecosystems: Long-term Experiment in North America. CRC Press, pp. 15-50.Rasmussen, KJ. 1999. Impact of ploughless soil tillage on yield and soil quality: A Scandinavian review. Soil Till Res 53: 3-14.Quintero M. 2009. Effects of conservation tillage in soil carbon sequestration and net revenues of potato-based rotations in the Colombian Andes. [Thesis], University of Florida, USA. SAS [Statistical Analysis System] Institute. 2003. The SAS system for windows. Release 9.1. SASInst Inc, Cary, NC.Singh A and J Kaur. 2012. Impact of conservation tillage on soil properties in rice-wheat cropping system. Agric Sci Res J 2: 30-41.Six, J, SD Frey, RK Thiet and KM Batten. 2006. Bacterial and fungal contributions to carbon sequestration in agroecosystems. Soil Sci Soc Am J 70: 555-569.Smith JL and HP Collins. 2007. Management of organisms and their processes in soils. In: EA Paul (ed). Soil Microbiology, Ecology and Biochemistry. Third Edition. Academic Press, Burlington, USA, 532 p.Stockfisch N, T  Forstreuter, W Ehlers. 1999. Ploughing effects on soil organic matter after twenty years of conservation tillage in Lower Saxony, Germany. Soil Till Res 52: 91-101.Tarkalson, DD, GW Hergertb and KG Cassmanc. 2006. Long-term effects of tillage on soil chemical properties and grain yields of a dryland winter wheat-sorghum/corn-fallow  rotation in the great plains. Agron J 26: 26-33.                Thomas GA, RC Dalal, J Standley. 2007. No-till effect on organic matter, pH, cation exchange  capacity and nutrient distribution in a Luvisol in the semi-arid subtropics. Soil Till Res 94: 295-304.Utomo M, H Suprapto and Sunyoto. 1989. Influence of tillage and nitrogen fertilization on soil nitrogen, decomposition of alang-alang (Imperata cylindrica) and corn production of alang-alang land.  In: J van der Heide (ed.). Nutrient management for food crop production in  tropical farming systems. Institute for Soil Fertility (IB), pp. 367-373.Utomo M. 2004. Olah tanah konservasi untuk budidaya jagung berkelanjutan. Prosiding Seminar Nasional IX Budidaya Pertanian Olah Tanah Konservasi. Gorontalo, 6-7 Oktober, 2004, pp. 18-35 (in Indonesian).Utomo M,  A Niswati, Dermiyati, M R Wati, AF Raguan and S Syarif. 2010. Earthworm and soil carbon sequestration after twenty one years of continuous no-tillage corn-legume rotation in Indonesia. JIFS  7: 51-58.Utomo M, H Buchari, IS Banuwa, LK Fernando and R Saleh. 2012. Carbon storage and carbon dioxide emission as influenced by long-term conservation tillage and nitrogen fertilization in corn-soybean rotation. J Trop Soil 17: 75-84.Wang W,  RC Dalal and PW Moody. 2001. Evaluation of the microwave irradiation method for measuring soil microbial biomass. Soil Sci  Soc Am J 65: 1696-1703.Wright AL and FM Hons.  2004. Soil aggregation and carbon and nitrogen storage under soybean cropping sequences. Soil Sci Soc Am J 68: 507-513. Zibilske LM, JM Bradford and JR Smart. 2002. Conservation tillage induced change in organic carbon, total nitrogen and available phosphorus in a semi-arid alkaline subtropical soil. Soil Till Res 66: 153-163.
Soil Erosion Prediction Using GIS and Remote Sensing on Manjunto Watershed Bengkulu, Indonesia Gunawan, Gusta; Sutjiningsih, Dwita; Soeryantono, Herr; Widjanarko, Soelistiyoweni
JOURNAL OF TROPICAL SOILS Vol. 18 No. 2: May 2013
Publisher : UNIVERSITY OF LAMPUNG

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.5400/jts.2013.v18i2.141-148

Abstract

The study aims to assess the rate of erosion that occurred in Manjunto Watershed and financial loss using Geographic Information System and Remote Sensing. Model used to determine the erosion is E30 models. The basis for the development of this model is to integrate with the slope of the slope between NDVI. The value of NDVI obtained from satellite imagery. Slope factor obtained through the DEM processing. To determine the amount of economic losses caused by erosion used the shadow prices. The amount of nutrients lost converted to fertilizer price. The results showed that the eroded catchment area has increased significantly. The rate of average annual erosion in the watershed Manjunto in 2000 amounted to 3 Mg ha-1 yr-1. The average erosion rate in the watershed Manjunto annual increase to 27 Mg ha-1 yr-1 in the year 2009. Economic losses due to erosion in 2009 was Rp200,000,- for one hectare. Total losses due to erosion for the total watershed area is Rp15,918,213,133, -. The main factor causing the high rate of erosion is high rainfall, slope and how to grow crops that do not pay attention to the rules of conservation.Keywords: Soil erosion, digital elevation model, GIS, remote sensing, valuation erosion[How to Cite: Gunawan G, D Sutjiningsih, H Soeryantono and S Widjanarko. 2013.Soil Erosion Prediction Using GIS and Remote Sensing on Manjunto Watershed Bengkulu-Indonesia. J Trop Soils 18 (2): 141-148. Doi: 10.5400/jts.2013.18.2.141][Permalink/DOI: www.dx.doi.org/10.5400/jts.2013.18.2.141]REFERENCESAksoy E, G Ozsoy and MS Dirim. 2009. Soil mapping approach in GIS using Landsat satellite imagery and DEM data. Afr J Agric Res 4: 1295-1302.Ananda J and G Herath. 2003. Soil erosion in developing countries: a socio-economic appraisal. J Environ Manage 68: 343-353.Ananda J, G Herath and A Chisholm. 2001. Determination of yield and Erosion Damage Functions Using Subjectivly Elicited Data: application to Smallholder Tea in Sri Lanka. Aust J Agric Resour Ec 45: 275-289.Ande OT, Y Alaga and GA Oluwatosin. 2009. Soil erosion prediction using MMF model on highly dissected hilly terrain of Ekiti environs in southwestern Nigeria. Int J Phys Sci 4: 053-057.Arnold JG, BA Engel and R Srinivasan. 1998. A continuous time grid cell watershed model. Proc. of application of Advanced Technology for management of Natural Resources.Arsyad S.  2010. Konservasi Tanah dan Air. IPB Press. Bogor-Indonesia (in Indonesian).Asdak C.1995. Hydrology and Watershed Management. Gadjah Mada University Press, Yogyakarta.Barlin RD and ID Moore. 1994. Role of buffer strips in management of waterway pollution: a review. Environ Manage 18: 543-58.Brough PA.1986. Principle of Geographical Information Systems For Land Resources Assessment. Oxford University Press, 194p.Clark B and J Wallace. 2003. Global connections: Canadian and world issues. Toronto, Canada: Pearson Education Canada, Inc.Cochrane T A and DC Flanagan. 1999. Assessing water erosion in small watershed using WEPP with GIS and digital elevation models. J Soil Water Conserv 54: 678 685.Dames TWg. 1955. The Soils of East Central Java; with a Soil Map 1:250,000. Balai Besar Penjelidikan Pertanian, Bogor, Indonesia.Dixon JA, LF Scura, RA Carpenter and PB Sherman. 2004. Economic Analysis of Environmental Impacts 2nd ed. Eartscans Publication Ltd., London.Fistikoglu O and NB Harmancioglu. 2002. Integration of GIS with USLE in Assessment of Soil Erosion. Water Resour Manage 16: 447-467.Green K. 1992. Spatial imagery and GIS: integrated data for natural resource management. J Forest 90: 32-36.Hazarika MK and H Honda. 2001. Estimation of Soil Erosion Using Remote Sensing and GIS, Its Valuation & Economic Implications on Agricultural Productions. The 10th International Soil Conservation Organization Meeting at Purdue University and the USDA-ARS Soil Erosion Research Laboratory.Hazarika S, R Parkinson, R Bol, L Dixon, P Russell, S Donovan and D Allen. 2009. Effect of tillage system and straw management on organic matter dynamics. Agron Sustain Develop 29: 525-533. doi: 10.1051/agro/2009024. Honda KL, A Samarakoon, Y Ishibashi, Mabuchi and S Miyajima.1996. Remote Sensing and GIS technologies for denudation estimation in Siwalik watershed of Nepal,p. B21-B26. Proc. 17th Asian Conference on Remote Sensing, Colombo, Sri lanka.Kefi M and K Yoshino. 2010. Evaluation of The Economic Effects of Soil Erosion Risk on Agricultural Productivity Using Remote Sensing: Case of Watershed in Tunisia. International Archives of the Photogrammetry, Remote Sensing and Spatial Information Science, Volume XXXVIII, Part 8, Kyoto Japan.Kefi M, K Yoshino, K Zayani and H Isoda. 2009. Estimation of soil loss by using combination of Erosion Model and GIS: case of study watersheds in Tunisia. J Arid Land Stud 19: 287-290.Lal R. 1998. Soil erosion impact on agronomic productivity and environment quality: Critical Review. Plant Sci 17: 319-464.Lal. 2001. Soil Degradation by Erosion. Land Degrad Develop12: 519-539.Lanya I. 1996. Evaluasi Kualitas lahan dan Produktivitas Lahan Kering Terdegradasi di Daerah Transmigrasi WPP VII Rengat Kabupaten Indragiri Hulu, Riau. [Disertasi Doktor]. Program Pasca Sarjana IPB, Bogor (in Indonesian).Mermut AR and H Eswaran. 2001. Some major developments in soil science since the mid 1960s. Geoderma 100: 403-426.Mongkolsawat C, P Thurangoon and Sriwongsa.1994. Soil erosion mapping with USLE and GIS. Proc. Asian Conf. Rem. Sens., C-1-1 to C-1-6.Morgan RPC, Morgan DDV and Finney HJ. 1984. A predictive model for the assessment of erosion risk. J Agric Eng Res 30: 245-253.Morgan RPC. 2005. Soil Erosion and Conservation. 3rd ed. Malden, MA: Blackwell Publishing Co.Panuju DR,  F Heidina, BH Trisasongko, B Tjahjono, A Kasno, AHA Syafril. 2009. Variasi nilai indeks vegetasi MODIS pada siklus pertumbuhan padi. J.Ilmiah Geomat. 15, 9-16 (in Indonesian).Pimentel D, C Harvey, P Resosudarmo, K. Sinclair, D Kurz, M Mc Nair, S Christ, L Shpritz, L Fitton, R Saffouri and R Balir. 1995. Environmental and Economic Costs of Soil Erosion and Conservation Benefits. Science 267: 1117-1123.Saha SK and LM Pande. 1993. Integrated approach towards soil erosion inventory for environmental conservation using satellite and agrometeorological data. Asia Pac Rem Sens J 5: 21-28.Saha SK, Kudrat M and Bhan SK.1991. Erosional soil loss prediction using digital satellitee data and USLE. In: S Murai (ed).  Applications of Remote Sensing in Asia and Oceania – Environmental Change Monitoring.  Asian Association of Remote Sensing, pp. 369-372.Salehi MH, Eghbal MK and Khademi H. 2003. Comparison of soil variability in a detailed and a reconnaissance soil map in central Iran. Geoderma 111: 45-56.Soil Survey Staff.  1998.  Keys to Soil Taxonomy. Eighth Edition. United States Department of Agriculture Natural Resources Conservation Service. Washington, D.C.

Filter by Year

2008 2026


Filter By Issues
All Issue Vol. 31 No. 1: January 2026 (In Progress) Vol 30, No 3: September 2025 (in Progress) Vol. 30 No. 3: September 2025 Vol 30, No 2: May 2025 Vol. 30 No. 2: May 2025 Vol. 30 No. 1: January 2025 Vol 30, No 1: January 2025 Vol. 29 No. 3: September 2024 Vol 29, No 3: September 2024 Vol. 29 No. 2: May 2024 Vol 29, No 2: May 2024 Vol 29, No 1: January 2024 Vol. 29 No. 1: January 2024 Vol 28, No 3: September 2023 Vol. 28 No. 3: September 2023 Vol. 28 No. 2: May 2023 Vol 28, No 2: May 2023 Vol 28, No 1: January 2023 Vol. 28 No. 1: January 2023 Vol 27, No 3: September 2022 Vol. 27 No. 3: September 2022 Vol. 27 No. 2: May 2022 Vol 27, No 2: May 2022 Vol 27, No 1: January 2022 Vol. 27 No. 1: January 2022 Vol. 26 No. 3: September 2021 Vol 26, No 3: September 2021 Vol 26, No 2: May 2021 Vol. 26 No. 2: May 2021 Vol. 26 No. 1: January 2021 Vol 26, No 1: January 2021 Vol 25, No 3: September 2020 Vol. 25 No. 3: September 2020 Vol. 25 No. 2: May 2020 Vol 25, No 2: May 2020 Vol. 25 No. 1: January 2020 Vol 25, No 1: January 2020 Vol. 24 No. 3: September 2019 Vol 24, No 3: September 2019 Vol 24, No 2: May 2019 Vol. 24 No. 2: May 2019 Vol 24, No 1: January 2019 Vol. 24 No. 1: January 2019 Vol. 23 No. 3: September 2018 Vol 23, No 3: September 2018 Vol. 23 No. 2: May 2018 Vol 23, No 2: May 2018 Vol. 23 No. 1: January 2018 Vol 23, No 1: January 2018 Vol 22, No 3: September 2017 Vol. 22 No. 3: September 2017 Vol. 22 No. 2: May 2017 Vol 22, No 2: May 2017 Vol 22, No 1: January 2017 Vol. 22 No. 1: January 2017 Vol. 21 No. 3: September 2016 Vol 21, No 3: September 2016 Vol. 21 No. 2: May 2016 Vol 21, No 2: May 2016 Vol 21, No 1: January 2016 Vol. 21 No. 1: January 2016 Vol. 20 No. 3: September 2015 Vol 20, No 3: September 2015 Vol. 20 No. 2: May 2015 Vol 20, No 2: May 2015 Vol. 20 No. 1: January 2015 Vol 20, No 1: January 2015 Vol 19, No 3: September 2014 Vol. 19 No. 3: September 2014 Vol. 19 No. 2: May 2014 Vol 19, No 2: May 2014 Vol 19, No 1: January 2014 Vol. 19 No. 1: January 2014 Vol. 18 No. 3: September 2013 Vol 18, No 3: September 2013 Vol 18, No 2: May 2013 Vol. 18 No. 2: May 2013 Vol 18, No 1: January 2013 Vol. 18 No. 1: January 2013 Vol. 17 No. 3: September 2012 Vol 17, No 3: September 2012 Vol 17, No 2: May 2012 Vol. 17 No. 2: May 2012 Vol. 17 No. 1: Januari 2012 Vol 17, No 1: Januari 2012 Vol 16, No 3: September 2011 Vol. 16 No. 3: September 2011 Vol 16, No 2: May 2011 Vol. 16 No. 2: May 2011 Vol 16, No 1: January 2011 Vol. 16 No. 1: January 2011 Vol. 15 No. 3: September 2010 Vol 15, No 3: September 2010 Vol 15, No 2: May 2010 Vol. 15 No. 2: May 2010 Vol. 15 No. 1: January 2010 Vol 15, No 1: January 2010 Vol 14, No 3: September 2009 Vol. 14 No. 3: September 2009 Vol. 14 No. 2: May 2009 Vol 14, No 2: May 2009 Vol. 14 No. 1: January 2009 Vol 14, No 1: January 2009 Vol 13, No 3: September 2008 Vol. 13 No. 3: September 2008 Vol 13, No 2: May 2008 Vol. 13 No. 2: May 2008 Vol. 13 No. 1: January 2008 Vol 13, No 1: January 2008 More Issue