cover
Contact Name
Abdul Hakim Wahid
Contact Email
hakim.wahid@uinjkt.ac.id
Phone
-
Journal Mail Official
jurnalrefleksi@uinjkt.ac.id
Editorial Address
-
Location
Kota tangerang selatan,
Banten
INDONESIA
Refleksi: Jurnal Kajian Agama dan Filsafat
ISSN : 02156253     EISSN : 27146103     DOI : -
Core Subject : Social,
Refleksi (ISSN 0215 6253) is a journal published by the Faculty of Ushuluddin Syarif Hidayatullah State Islamic University, Jakarta. The Journal specializes in Qur'an and Hadith studies, Islamic Philosophy, and Religious studies, and is intended to communicate original researches and current issues on the subject. This journal welcomes contributions from scholars of related disciplines.
Arjuna Subject : -
Articles 766 Documents
Telaah Kritis atas Gagasan Paradigma Islam Kuntowijoyo Nurul Fajri
Refleksi: Jurnal Kajian Agama dan Filsafat Vol 1, No 1 (1998): Refleksi
Publisher : Faculty of Ushuluddin Syarif Hidayatullah State Islamic University

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.15408/ref.v1i1.39117

Abstract

This study critically examines the concept of the Islamic paradigm proposed by Kuntowijoyo, a prominent Indonesian scholar and cultural figure. Kuntowijoyo introduced the Islamic paradigm as an alternative approach to understanding and practicing Islam in the contemporary era, focusing on transformative thinking and social reconstruction. This study highlights the key elements of this paradigm, such as the concepts of historicism, prophetic ethics, and humanization, as well as their implications for Islamic thought and practice in Indonesia. Using textual analysis and a hermeneutic approach, this research evaluates the strengths and weaknesses of Kuntowijoyo's Islamic paradigm, including its relevance in addressing the challenges of modernity and globalization. The findings of this review are expected to contribute to the development of a more dynamic and contextual Islamic discourse in the future.
Tradisonalisme sebagai Kritik terhadap Modernisme: Studi Pemikiran Frithjof Schuon Syamsuri Syamsuri
Refleksi: Jurnal Kajian Agama dan Filsafat Vol 1, No 3 (1999): Refleksi
Publisher : Faculty of Ushuluddin Syarif Hidayatullah State Islamic University

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.15408/ref.v1i3.14296

Abstract

This writing presents one of the prominent figures of Western intellectualism, Frithjof Schuon, who vehemently criticizes Western modernism while advocating traditionalism as a solution. There are several reasons that demonstrate the significance of Schuon's discussion in relation to modernity. Firstly, Schuon is an intellectual who was born, raised, and directly engaged with Western civilization. Therefore, his authority in discussing Western civilization is unquestionable. Secondly, Schuon is a recognized expert in Comparative Religion, known for his proficiency in explaining various religions. This is acknowledged by the adherents of the religions he describes. Due to his expertise, Schuon's thoughts, including traditionalism, are widely listened to and even followed not only by the Islamic community—the religion Schuon eventually chose and adhered to—but also by followers of other religions such as Judaism, Christianity, and others.
Al-Zamakhsari and the Miraculous Nature of Al-Qur'an M. Amin Nurdin
Refleksi: Jurnal Kajian Agama dan Filsafat Vol 1, No 2 (1999): Refleksi
Publisher : Faculty of Ushuluddin Syarif Hidayatullah State Islamic University

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.15408/ref.v1i2.25751

Abstract

Al-Zamakhsari’s description of the Qur’anic exegesis is not only revealing the meaning contained in Al-Qur’an, but also, he disclosed the secrets of the i’jaz of al-Qur’an. The method used by al-Zamakhsari in explaining this by practicing theories given by the earlier ulemas which condensed in the method of nazm. With nazm, word, meaning and axioms of the grammatical rules orderly organized which then manifest themselves in ultimate non-imitative beauty of eloquence, highest composition, perfect style and depth of meanings.
Kontroversi seputar Wacana Mushaf ‘Utsman Hamdani Anwar
Refleksi: Jurnal Kajian Agama dan Filsafat Vol 5, No 1 (2003): Refleksi
Publisher : Faculty of Ushuluddin Syarif Hidayatullah State Islamic University

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.15408/ref.v5i1.40454

Abstract

This article aims to explore various issues surrounding the establishment of the Mushaf ‘Uthmani. This research reveals many intriguing aspects worth highlighting, from the perspectives of the Companions, scholars, and orientalists. The Mushaf ‘Uthmani, the official version of the Qur’an compiled during the caliphate of Uthman ibn Affan, has often been the subject of debate and in-depth study. The Companions of Prophet Muhammad (PBUH), who were direct witnesses to the revelation of the Qur’an, had diverse views on the compilation and writing of this mushaf. Some Companions fully supported this process, while others raised criticisms and concerns. Both classical and contemporary scholars have made significant contributions to interpreting and understanding this codification process. They explore the historical, theological, and philological aspects of the establishment of the Mushaf ‘Uthmani, influencing how Muslims view their sacred text. Additionally, Western orientalists have long been interested in studying this process from a critical and academic perspective. Their approaches often differ from traditional Islamic views, sparking dynamic discussions and debates among academics. This study not only delves into the history of the establishment of the Mushaf ‘Uthmani but also considers its implications for the development of Qur’anic studies, from both the internal perspective of Muslims and the external perspective of orientalists. Through a multidisciplinary approach, this paper offers a comprehensive understanding of the complexities and dynamics surrounding the establishment of the Mushaf ‘Uthmani, while also opening up space for further discussion in the future.
Isyarat dan Simbol dari Al-Aḥrūf Al-Muqaṭṭa’ah dalam Al-Qur’an Hamdani Anwar
Refleksi: Jurnal Kajian Agama dan Filsafat Vol 19, No 2 (2020): Refleksi
Publisher : Faculty of Ushuluddin Syarif Hidayatullah State Islamic University

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.15408/ref.v19i2.16433

Abstract

The main focus of this research is the problem related to signs and symbol of al-Aḥrūf al-Muqaṭṭa’ah that are contained in the Qur’an. The questions formulated are 1). How do sufis understand al-Aḥrūf al-Muqaṭṭa’ah and 2). What signs and symbols do they say from the al-Aḥrūf al-Muqaṭṭa’ah. This research is included in the ‘Ulūm al-Qur’ān study. In the term of orientation, this research is included in an effort to explain elements that are still widely debated and not well understood. The data sources used used in this study cinsited of two types, namely primary data sources and secondary data sources. Those included in the primary data sources are the work of the exegesis of Ḥaqāiq al-Tafsīr written by al-Sulāmī, Laṭāif al-Ishārat written by al-Qushayrī and Tafsīr al-Jaylānī written by Abdul Qadir al-Jaylānī. Meanwhile, included in the scondary data sources are some literture that is directly or not realted to this fresearch. The method used in this data collection is literatur data documentation. There are twoconclusion obtained from this study. First, the sufis prefer the inner meaning of the beginning of each surah which consits of Hijaiyah letters, because the outer meaning is difficult or incomprehensible. Second, the sufis differ when they reveal the signs and symbols from the beginning of the surah. There are those who understand it as a sign of Allah and His attributes, and others consider that the beginning of the surah is a sign of the glory of the Prophet Muhammad peace be upon him, especially those related to the person and duty as the messenger of Allah.
Model Baru Penyusunan Kitab Hadis Ṣaḥīḥ (Kajian Manhaj Ibn Ḥibbān dalam Ṣaḥīḥnya) Rifqi Muhammad Fatkhi
Refleksi: Jurnal Kajian Agama dan Filsafat Vol 8, No 2 (2006): Refleksi
Publisher : Faculty of Ushuluddin Syarif Hidayatullah State Islamic University

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.15408/ref.v8i2.37679

Abstract

In the treasury of Hadith literature from the time of the Companions until today, there are only a few Hadith collections explicitly and clearly stating that they are compilations of authentic Hadiths. Some of them include Ṣaḥīḥ al-Bukhārī and Ṣaḥīḥ Muslim, Ṣaḥīḥ ibn Khuzaymah, Ṣaḥīḥ ibn Ḥibbān, Ṣaḥīḥ ibn Sakan, and Ṣaḥīḥ ibn al-Syarqī. This article will provide information about Ṣaḥīḥ ibn Ḥibbān. This book is considered to have a different model of writing compared to other authentic books. Besides the systematic arrangement, the compiler also sets different criteria for the authenticity of Hadiths, unlike most Hadith scholars.
Eskatologi: Perspektif Agama dan Filsafat Amsal Bakhtiar
Refleksi: Jurnal Kajian Agama dan Filsafat Vol 1, No 3 (1999): Refleksi
Publisher : Faculty of Ushuluddin Syarif Hidayatullah State Islamic University

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.15408/ref.v1i3.14298

Abstract

This passage presents arguments for the existence of an afterlife grounded in rational reasoning and supported by sacred scriptures, aiming to strengthen the faith of religious believers. However, it acknowledges that these arguments may not satisfy adherents of agnosticism and atheism, who often counter them with various reasons. Nevertheless, for the consideration of atheists, the hypothetical scenario is proposed: if there were no Day of Judgment, both religious adherents and atheists would be equally safe, with no loss on either side. Conversely, if the Day of Judgment does indeed occur, believers would be saved while atheists would not, altering the outcome significantly in favor of theism.
Maqāmāt dan Aḥwāl dalam Tasawuf Media Zainul Bahri
Refleksi: Jurnal Kajian Agama dan Filsafat Vol 6, No 1 (2004): Refleksi
Publisher : Faculty of Ushuluddin Syarif Hidayatullah State Islamic University

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.15408/ref.v6i1.37292

Abstract

This writing presents the concepts of “maqāmāt” and “aḥwāl” in Sufism. “Maqāmāt” refers to the creative spiritual path undertaken by Sufis to approach and encounter God. It (maqāmāt) must be strived for (makāsib) with the entirety of one’s soul and body. True to its name, it is fixed and permanent. On the other hand, “aḥwāl” are the mental and spiritual states experienced by Sufis as a result of “maqāmāt.” It is considered a divine gift (mawāhib), cannot be attained through effort, and is subject to change. However, in the view of some Sufi groups, both are considered gifts.
"Muslim Christology": The Islamization of the Gospels in the Muslim Biblical Scholarship Dadi Darmadi
Refleksi: Jurnal Kajian Agama dan Filsafat Vol 1, No 2 (1999): Refleksi
Publisher : Faculty of Ushuluddin Syarif Hidayatullah State Islamic University

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.15408/ref.v1i2.25753

Abstract

This paper tries to discuss the biblical texts and their interpretation in the Islamic tradition. It will essentially explore the specific relations be-tween the Qur’an, and the Bible, and how some Muslim scholars interpret the biblical texts in accordance with the Islamic doctrines. Even though the term “Islamization” of the Gospels has not been widely used in the Muslim scholarship, many Western scholars of Islam have referred to this as one of the major features of the Qur’anic discussion on Jesus and Christian tradition.
Etika Max Scheler: Kritik Atas Formalisme Kant Agus Darmaji
Refleksi: Jurnal Kajian Agama dan Filsafat Vol 6, No 2 (2004): Refleksi
Publisher : Faculty of Ushuluddin Syarif Hidayatullah State Islamic University

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.15408/ref.v6i2.37825

Abstract

This article addresses Max Scheler’s critique of Kant’s formalistic ethics. Through phenomenology, he attempts to reconstruct and develop the problem of values in general, especially ethics. He believes that in this way, ethics can avoid psychological, sociological, and historical relativism. Scheler aims to offer a critical assessment of Kant’s formal ethics and seeks to overcome Kant’s formalism by proposing thoughts on material ethics.

Filter by Year

1998 2025


Filter By Issues
All Issue Vol. 24 No. 2 (2025): Refleksi Vol. 24 No. 1 (2025): Refleksi Vol. 23 No. 2 (2024): Refleksi Vol 23, No 2 (2024): Refleksi Vol 23, No 1 (2024): Refleksi Vol. 23 No. 1 (2024): Refleksi Vol. 22 No. 2 (2023): Refleksi Vol 22, No 2 (2023): Refleksi Vol 22, No 1 (2023): Refleksi Vol. 22 No. 1 (2023): Refleksi Vol. 21 No. 2 (2022): Refleksi Vol 21, No 2 (2022): Refleksi Vol. 21 No. 1 (2022): Refleksi Vol 21, No 1 (2022): Refleksi Vol 7, No 2 (2005): Refleksi Vol 20, No 2 (2021): Refleksi Vol 20, No 2 (2021) Vol. 20 No. 2 (2021): Refleksi Vol 20, No 1 (2021): Refleksi Vol. 20 No. 1 (2021): Refleksi Vol 19, No 2 (2020): Refleksi Vol. 19 No. 2 (2020): Refleksi Vol. 19 No. 1 (2020): Refleksi Vol 19, No 1 (2020): Refleksi Vol 18, No 2 (2019): Refleksi Vol 18, No 1 (2019): Refleksi Vol 17, No 2 (2018): Refleksi Vol 17, No 1 (2018): Refleksi Vol 16, No 2 (2017): Refleksi Vol. 16 No. 1 (2017): Refleksi Vol 16, No 1 (2017): Refleksi Vol 15, No 2 (2016): Refleksi Vol 15, No 1 (2016): Refleksi Vol 14, No 2 (2015): Refleksi Vol 14, No 1 (2015): Refleksi Vol. 13 No. 6 (2014): Refleksi Vol 13, No 6 (2014): Refleksi Vol 13, No 5 (2013): Refleksi Vol. 13 No. 5 (2013): Refleksi Vol 13, No 4 (2013): Refleksi Vol. 13 No. 4 (2013): Refleksi Vol. 13 No. 3 (2012): Refleksi Vol 13, No 3 (2012): Refleksi Vol. 13 No. 2 (2012): Refleksi Vol 13, No 2 (2012): Refleksi Vol 13, No 1 (2011): Refleksi Vol. 13 No. 1 (2011): Refleksi Vol. 11 No. 2 (2009): Refleksi Vol 11, No 2 (2009): Refleksi Vol 11, No 1 (2009): Refleksi Vol. 11 No. 1 (2009): Refleksi Vol. 10 No. 3 (2008): Refleksi Vol 10, No 3 (2008): Refleksi Vol 10, No 2 (2008): Refleksi Vol. 10 No. 2 (2008): Refleksi Vol 10, No 1 (2008): Refleksi Vol. 10 No. 1 (2008): Refleksi Vol. 9 No. 3 (2007): Refleksi Vol 9, No 3 (2007): Refleksi Vol 9, No 2 (2007): Refleksi Vol. 9 No. 2 (2007): Refleksi Vol 9, No 1 (2007): Refleksi Vol. 9 No. 1 (2007): Refleksi Vol 8, No 3 (2006): Refleksi Vol. 8 No. 3 (2006): Refleksi Vol 8, No 2 (2006): Refleksi Vol. 8 No. 2 (2006): Refleksi Vol 8, No 1 (2006): Refleksi Vol. 8 No. 1 (2006): Refleksi Vol. 7 No. 3 (2005): Refleksi Vol 7, No 3 (2005): Refleksi Vol. 7 No. 2 (2005): Refleksi Vol. 7 No. 1 (2005): Refleksi Vol 7, No 1 (2005): Refleksi Vol 6, No 3 (2004): Refleksi Vol. 6 No. 3 (2004): Refleksi Vol 6, No 2 (2004): Refleksi Vol. 6 No. 2 (2004): Refleksi Vol. 6 No. 1 (2004): Refleksi Vol 6, No 1 (2004): Refleksi Vol 5, No 3 (2003): Refleksi Vol 5, No 1 (2003): Refleksi Vol. 5 No. 1 (2003): Refleksi Vol 4, No 3 (2002): Refleksi Vol. 4 No. 3 (2002): Refleksi Vol. 4 No. 2 (2002): Refleksi Vol 4, No 2 (2002): Refleksi Vol 4, No 1 (2002): Refleksi Vol. 4 No. 1 (2002): Refleksi Vol 3, No 3 (2001): Refleksi Vol. 3 No. 3 (2001): Refleksi Vol. 3 No. 2 (2001): Refleksi Vol 3, No 2 (2001): Refleksi Vol. 2 No. 3 (2000): Refleksi Vol 2, No 3 (2000): Refleksi Vol. 2 No. 2 (2000): Refleksi Vol 2, No 2 (2000): Refleksi Vol 2, No 1 (2000): Refleksi Vol. 2 No. 1 (2000): Refleksi Vol 1, No 3 (1999): Refleksi Vol. 1 No. 3 (1999): Refleksi Vol 1, No 2 (1999): Refleksi Vol. 1 No. 2 (1999): Refleksi Vol. 1 No. 1 (1998): Refleksi Vol 1, No 1 (1998): Refleksi More Issue