cover
Article Per Year (5 Year)
All
Home Page
OAI Link
Editorial Team
Contact
Reviewer
Google Scholar
Contact Name
-
Contact Email
-
Phone
-
Journal Mail Official
-
Editorial Address
-
Location
Kota denpasar,
Bali
INDONESIA
Jurnal Pendidikan Bahasa Inggris
Published by Universitas Pendidikan Ganesha
ISSN : -     EISSN : -     DOI : -
Core Subject : Education,
Education Languange, Linguistic, Communication & Media
Arjuna Subject : -
Articles 1,873 Documents
 117   118   119   120   121 
An Analysis Of Classroom Interaction In Teaching EFL Of Students With Dissabilities (Autism) At SLB C Singaraja ., Ni Luh Ika Ayu Pertiwi; ., Prof. Dr. Putu Kerti Nitiasih, MA; ., I Putu Ngurah Wage M, S.Pd.
Jurnal Pendidikan Bahasa Inggris undiksha Vol. 1 No. 1 (2013): May
Publisher : Universitas Pendidikan Ganesha

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.23887/jpbi.v1i1.6607

Abstract

Tujuan dari penelitian ini adalah untuk mendeskripsikan 1) Tipe interaksi kelas apa yang digunakan oleh guru dan siswa selama proses belajar dan mengajar di SLB C Singaraja, 2) Kategori interaksi kelas yang mana yang paling sering dilakukan di kelas saat belajar bahasa inggris untuk siswa yang berkebutuhan khusus (autis) di SLB C Singaraja. Penelitian ini menggunakan rancangan qualitative dalam bentuk study kasus. Instrument yang digunakan dalam mengumpulkan data adalah peneliti, kamera, lembar observasi, panduan wawancara. Hasil dari analisis menunjukkan ada 8 tipe Flanders Interaction Analysis Category teori yang terjadi selama interaksi di kelas. Masing-masing presentase keseluruhan pertemuan adalah . Praising or Encouraging 15%, Asking Question 13,9%, Lecturing 7,3%, Giving Direction 30,5% , Criticizing or Justifying Authority 0,004% , Students’- Talk Response 26,7%, Students’ Talk Initiation 2,5% , Silence or Confusion 3,6%. Tipe yang paling banyak ditemukan adalah Giving Direction, sedangkan Criticizing or Justifying Authority adalah tipe yang terjadi paling rendah selama proses belajar dan mengajar.Kata Kunci : Interaksi kelas, Kategori analisis interaksi Flanders teori, Autis This study is aimed at describing (1) types of classroom interaction used by English teacher and students during teaching and learning process in SLB C Singaraja, (2) which category of classroom interaction is most frequently occurs during teaching and learning EFL for students with disabilities (autism) in SLB C Singaraja. The subjects of the study were the teachers and students in grade IX of SLB C Singaraja. This study was qualitative in the form of case study. The instruments used in collecting the data were: the reseacher herself, video camera, observation sheet, and interview guide. The result of the analysis showed that there were eight types of Flanders Interaction Analysis Category theory occurred during the interaction in the class. Respectively, the percentages from the whole meeting were as follows. Praising or Encouraging was 15.02%, Asking Question was 14.25%, Lecturing was 7.38%, Giving Direction was 30.28% , Criticizing or Justifying Authority was 0.51% , Students’- Talk Response was 26.46%, Students’ Talk Initiation was 2.54% , Silence or Confusion was 3.56%. The type of Giving Direction was the most frequently occurred, while Criticizing or Justifying Authority was the lowest frequently occurred during the teaching and learning process. keyword : Classroom interaction, Flanders Interaction Analysis Category theory, Autism
AN ANALYSIS OF TEACHER AND STUDENT TALK IN CLASSROOM INTERACTION BY USING FOREIGN LANGUAGE INTERACTION ANALYSIS SYSTEM IN ACADEMIC YEAR 2015/2016 ., A.A.A. Ngr. Lusia Widanti; ., Prof. Dr. Putu Kerti Nitiasih, MA; ., Dr.Sudirman, M.L.S
Jurnal Pendidikan Bahasa Inggris undiksha Vol. 1 No. 1 (2013): May
Publisher : Universitas Pendidikan Ganesha

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.23887/jpbi.v1i1.6643

Abstract

Tujuan dari penelitian ini adalah untuk menggambarkan interaksi antara guru dan siswa, untuk mengidentifikasikan kategori dari interaksi di dalam kelas yang paling sering dan paling jarang terjadi, untuk menemukan alasan dari interaksi yang terjadi selama proses belajar-mengajar di kelas XI di SMA Pariwisata Kertha Wisata. Penelitian ini dirancang dalam bentuk penelitian kualitatif. Instrumen yang digunakan dalam pengumpulan data adalah kamera video, lembar observasi, dan wawancara. Data yang terkumpul diperoleh dengan merekam interaksi di dalam kelas selama proses belajar-mengajar, mentranskripsikan, dan mengkategorikannya berdasarkan pada sistem analisis FLINT. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa pembicaraan guru mengambil partisipasi lebih banyak di dalam kelas dengan persentase frekuensi yang diucapkan sebesar 50,1%, sedangkan pembicaraan siswa menghasilkan 49,9%. Kategori FLINT yang paling sering terjadi adalah kategori menanyakan pertanyaan dengan persentase sebesar 19,4%, sedangkan yang paling jarang terjadi adalah kategori tertawa yaitu sebesar 0,3% dari 975 ucapan-ucapan yang dihasilkan oleh guru dan siswa. Guru harus membuat perbaikan agar pelajaran menjadi lebih menyenangkan tapi bermakna, dan siswa harus mengambil lebih banyak partisipasi dalam kelas sehingga tujuan pembelajaran dapat dicapai.Kata Kunci : FLINT, frekuensi, interaksi. The purposes of this study were to describe the interaction between the teacher and students, to identify categories of classroom interaction which the most and least frequently occurred, to discover the reasons of the interaction during the teaching–learning process in class XI at SMA Pariwisata Kertha Wisata. This study was designed in form of qualitative research. The instruments used in gathering data were video camera, observation sheet, and interview guide. The collected data gained by recording the classroom interaction during teaching-learning process, transcribing, and categorized it based on FLINT analysis system. The result showed that teacher talk took more participation in the classroom with percentage of frequency uttered was 50.1%, while the students talk produced 49.9%. The FLINT categories which most frequently occurred was asks question category in percentage of 19.4%, whereas the least frequently occurred was laughter category which was 0.3% from 975 utterances produced by the teacher and the students. The teacher should make improvement in making the lesson become joyful but meaningful, and the students should take more participation in the class so the learning goal could be achieved.keyword : FLINT, frequency, interaction.
AN ANALYSIS OF CLASSROOM CHARACTER EDUCATION IN ENGLISH LESSONS BASED ON THE 2013 CURRICULUM ., Ida Ayu Made Ratih; ., Prof. Dr. Anak Agung Istri Ngr. Marha; ., I Nyoman Pasek Hadi Saputra, S.Pd., M.Pd
Jurnal Pendidikan Bahasa Inggris undiksha Vol. 1 No. 1 (2013): May
Publisher : Universitas Pendidikan Ganesha

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.23887/jpbi.v1i1.6644

Abstract

Penelitian kualitatif ini dilakukan untuk menganalisa pelaksanaan pendidikan karakter dalam pelajaran bahasa Inggris di SMP Negeri 1 Banjar. Subyek penelitian ini adalah siswa kelas 8 dan guru bahasa Inggris. Peneliti menganalisis RPP dan pelaksanaan untuk menyelidiki bagaimana karakter pendidikan dimasukkan dalam pengajaran empat keterampilan dasar dalam bahasa Inggris yang telah terintegrasi dalam proses belajar mengajar dalam kurikulum 2013. Instrumen dalam penelitian ini terdiri dari panduan wawancara, perekam, checklist analisis RPP, dan checklist pengamatan. Analisis penelitian menunjukkan bahwa guru memasukkan nilai-nilai karakter dalam indikator, materi pembelajaran, langkah-langkah pembelajaran, dan instrumen penilaian dalam rencana pelajaran. Dalam kegiatan belajar mengajar, nilai-nilai karakter juga dilaksanakan. Namun, nilai-nilai karakter yang dimasukkan dalam kegiatan belajar berbeda dari satu dengan yang lain. Hal ini tergantung pada topik dan indikator yang akan dicapai. Dalam evaluasi, strategi yang digunakan oleh guru dalam bentuk saran dan rubrik penilaian untuk menilai pendidikan karakter dalam proses belajar mengajar. Kata Kunci : Pendidikan karakter, pelajaran bahasa Inggris This qualitative research was conducted in order to analyze the implementation of character education in the English lessons at SMP Negeri 1 Banjar. The subjects of the research were the eighth grade students and the English teacher. The researcher analyzed the lesson plans and the implementation to investigate how character educations were inserted in the teaching of the four basic skills in English which has been integrated in the process of teaching and learning in 2013 curriculum. The instruments in this study consisted of interview guide, recorder, lesson plan analysis checklist, and observation checklist. The analysis of the study indicates that the teacher inserts the character values in indicators, learning materials, learning steps, and assessment instrument in lesson plans. In teaching and learning activities, character values are also implemented. However, the character values which are inserted in learning activities are different from one with another. It depends on the topic and indicators that will be achieved. In the evaluation, the strategies which were used by the teacher were in the form of advice and scoring rubric to assess character education in the process of teaching and learning. keyword : Character education, English lessons
An Analysis of Students’ Grammatical Error in Writing Descriptive Texts of Second Grade Students at SMP Negeri 2 Seririt ., M. Joko Purnomo; ., Ni Wayan Surya Mahayanti, S.Pd, M.Pd; ., Dr.Sudirman, M.L.S
Jurnal Pendidikan Bahasa Inggris undiksha Vol. 1 No. 1 (2013): May
Publisher : Universitas Pendidikan Ganesha

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.23887/jpbi.v1i1.6647

Abstract

The objectives of the research entitled “An Analysis of Students’ Grammatical Error In Writing Descriptive Text made by the Second Grade Students at SMP Negeri 2 Seririt” were: 1) to find out the grammatical error which are made by students in writing descriptive text, 2) to know the cause of grammatical errors which are made by students in writing descriptive text. The subjects of this study were all students in VIIIE at SMP Negeri 2 Seririt Academic Year 2015/2016. The data were obtained from collecting students’ writing task. The data were analyzed descriptively based on Dulay, Burt, Krashen’s theory. The result of this study shows that: 1) the total amount of error made by students in their writing were 420 errors. The types of students’ error included omission type with 228 errors (54.28%), the second is errors in misformation with 107 errors (25.47%), the third is errors in addition with 60 errors (14.28%), and the last error in misordering with 25 errors (5.95%).Kata Kunci : grammatical error, descriptive analysis, cause of students’ errors The objectives of the research entitled “An Analysis of Students’ Grammatical Error In Writing Descriptive Text made by the Second Grade Students at SMP Negeri 2 Seririt” were: 1) to find out the grammatical error which are made by students in writing descriptive text, 2) to know the cause of grammatical errors which are made by students in writing descriptive text. The subjects of this study were all students in VIIIE at SMP Negeri 2 Seririt Academic Year 2015/2016. The data were obtained from collecting students’ writing task. The data were analyzed descriptively based on Dulay, Burt, Krashen’s theory. The result of this study shows that: 1) the total amount of error made by students in their writing were 420 errors. The types of students’ error included omission type with 228 errors (54.28%), the second is errors in misformation with 107 errors (25.47%), the third is errors in addition with 60 errors (14.28%), and the last error in misordering with 25 errors (5.95%).keyword : grammatical error, descriptive analysis, cause of students’ errors
AFFIXATION OF PAYANGAN DIALECT: A DESCRIPTIVE STUDY ., Agus Yogi Pranata; ., Dr. I Gede Budasi,M.Ed,Dip.App.Lin; ., Dewa Ayu Eka Agustini, S.Pd., M.S.
Jurnal Pendidikan Bahasa Inggris undiksha Vol. 1 No. 1 (2013): May
Publisher : Universitas Pendidikan Ganesha

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.23887/jpbi.v1i1.6665

Abstract

Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mendeskripsikan awalan dan akhiran dari Dialek Melinggih, Payangan yang memiliki proses derivasi dan infleksi. Jenis penelitian ini yaitu penelitian deskriptif kualitatif. Dua narasumber dari desa Melinggih, Payangan dipilih sesuai dengan sejumlah kriteria yang ditetapkan. Data dikumpulkan dengan menggunakan tiga teknik yaitu teknik observasi, teknik rekaman, dan teknik wawancara (mendengarkan dan mencatat). Hasil dari penelitian ini menemukan ada lima awalan dan empat akhiran yang ada di Dialek Melinggih, Payangan. Awalannya meliputi {ma-}, {n-}, {ŋ-}, {ñ-}, and {ə-}. Akhirannya meliputi {-Λŋ}, {-in}, {-ɔ}, and {-an}. Awalan dan akhiran yang mengalami proses derivasi antara lain: awalan {mə-} dan {ŋ-} dan akhiran {-Λŋ}, {-in}, dan {-an}. Awalan dan akhiran yang mengalami proses infleksi yaitu: awalan {ma-}, {n-}, {ŋ-}, dan {ə-} dan akhiran {-Λŋ}, {-in}, {-ɔ}, dan {-an}.Kata Kunci : imbuhan, dialek Payangan, proses derivasi dan infleksi. This study aimed at describing the number of prefixes and suffixes existed in Melinggih_Payangan Dialect and its types of inflectional and derivational. This study is a descriptive qualitative research. Two informant samples of Melinggih_Payangan Dialect were chosen based on a set of criteria. The data were collected based on three techniques, namely: observation, recording technique, and interview (listening and noting) technique. The results of the study show that there were five prefixes and four suffixes existing in Payangan Dialect. The prefixes were {ma-}, {n-}, {ŋ-}, {ñ-}, and {ə-}. The suffixes were {-Λŋ}, {-in}, {-ɔ}, and {-an}. The prefixes and suffixes that belong to derivation are: prefix {mə-} and {ŋ-} and suffix {-Λŋ}, {-in}, and {-an}.The prefixes and suffixes that belong to inflection are: prefixes {ma-}, {n-}, {ŋ-}, and {ə-} and suffix {-Λŋ}, {-in}, {-ɔ}, and {-an}.keyword : affixation, Payangan Dialect, derivational and inflectional process.
AN ANALYSIS OF LEXICO – GRAMMATICAL ERRORS IN SPOKEN ENGLISH COMMITTED BY ENGLISH SPEAKING TOURIST GUIDES IN BALI ., I Gede Bryan Permana Yasa; ., Drs. I Wayan Suarnajaya,MA., Ph.D.; ., Putu Eka Dambayana S., S.Pd.
Jurnal Pendidikan Bahasa Inggris undiksha Vol. 1 No. 1 (2013): May
Publisher : Universitas Pendidikan Ganesha

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.23887/jpbi.v1i1.6756

Abstract

Studi ini dimaksudkan untuk (1) mengklasifikasikan kesalahan yang dilakukan oleh pemandu wisata Bahasa Inggris dalam penggunaan Bahasa Inggris lisan di Bali dan (2) Menginvestigasi asal kesalahan yang dilakukan oleh lima pemandu wisata Bahasa Inggris di Bali. Studi ini didesain secara kualitatif. Subyek dari studi ini adalah lima pemandu wisata Bahasa Inggris di Bali. Data dari studi ini adalah kesalahan yang dilakukan oleh lima pemandu wisata Bahasa Inggris di Bali. Data-data dianalisis berdasarkan teori Dulay and Krashen (1982) kesalahan yang dilakukan pemandu wisata diklasifikasikan menjadi empat; peniadaan, pengadaan, kesalahan formasi, dan kesalahan penempatan. Lebih lanjut, asal kesalahan pemandu wisata dikategorikan sebagai interlingual dan intralingual.Kata Kunci : kesalahan, analisa kesalahan, Bahasa Inggris lisan The present study aimed at (1) classifying the errors in spoken English committed by the English speaking tourist guides in Bali and (2) investigating the sources of errors in spoken English committed by the English speaking tourist guides in Bali. This study used qualitative research design. The subjects of the study were the English speaking tourist guides in Bali. The data of the study were the errors made by the guides in spoken descriptive. The data were analyzed based on Dulay and Krashen (1982) the guides’ errors in spoken English were classified into four namely; omission, addition, misformation, and misordering. Further, the sources of the guides’ errors were categorized as interlingual and intralingual sources.keyword : error, error analysis, spoken English
LINGUISTIC FEATURES THAT UNITE AND DIFFERENTIATE DENBANTAS DIALECT AND BANYUASRI DIALECT ., I Gede Bagus Wisnu Bayu Temaja; ., Dr. I Gede Budasi,M.Ed,Dip.App.Lin; ., Dewa Ayu Eka Agustini, S.Pd., M.S.
Jurnal Pendidikan Bahasa Inggris undiksha Vol. 1 No. 1 (2013): May
Publisher : Universitas Pendidikan Ganesha

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.23887/jpbi.v1i1.6992

Abstract

Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk menemukan fitur linguistik yang menyatukan dan membedakan Dialek Denbantas (DD) dan Banyuasri Dialek (BD) secara fonologis dan leksikal. Subjek dari penelitian ini adalah penutur DD dan BD. Penelitian ini merupakan sebuah penelitian secara kualitatif. Data dikumpulkan menggunakan daftar kata Swadesh dan Nothofer dengan cara observasi, wawancara, mendengarkan, dicatat, dan direkam. Data itu kemudian diolah dan dianalisis secara deskriptif. Hasil dari penelitian ini menunjukkan bahwa DD dan BD memiliki persamaan dan perbedaan secara fonologis dan leksikal. Hasil dari penelitian ini menemukan bahwa terdapat 44 fonem yang menyatukan DD dan BD secara fonologis. Fonem-fonem tersebut adalah: 6 vokal: /ʌ/, /I/, /ʊ/, /ɛ/, /∂/, and /ɔ/; 7 diftong: /ʌʊ/, /Iʌ/, /Iʊ/, /ʌɔ/, /ʌ∂/, /ʊʌ/, and /ʌɛ/; 19 konsonan: /b/, /c/, /d/, /g/, /h/, /ʔ/, /j/, /k/, /l/, /m/, /n/, /p/, /r/, /s/, /t/, /w/, /y/, /ñ/, and /ŋ/; dan 12 kluster: /mb/, /nd/, /sg/, /ŋg/, /jl/, /nj/, /ŋk/, /kr/, /mp/, /ms/, /nt/, and /rn/. Di sisi lain, ditemukan 16 fonem yang membedakan DD dan BD secara fonologis. Fonem tersebut adalah: 6 diftong: /∂ʊ/ dan /Iɔ/ ditemukan di DD, namun tidak terdapat di BD, sedangkan diftong /ʌI/, /I∂/, /ɔʌ/, and /ʊ∂/ hanya ditemukan di BD; 10 kluster: /rb/, /nc/, /tg/, /gr/, /gl/, dan /kp/ ditemukan di DD, namun tidak ditemukan di BD, sedangkan diftong /pl/, /gl/, /ŋl/, and /rs/ hanya ditemukan di BD; tetapi tidak ditemukan vokal dan konsonan yang berbeda di antara kedua dialek. Berdasarkan dua macam daftar kata yang digunakan yang terdiri dari 658 leksikon, 457 leksikon ditemukan sebagai penyatu DD dan BD secara leksikal. Leksikon tersebut diklasifikasikan menjadi: 371 leksikon yang sama dan 86 leksikon yang serupa. Di sisi lain, 158 leksikon ditemukan sebagai bukti yang membedakan DD dan BD secara leksikal.Kata Kunci : fitur linguistik, fitur fonologis, fitur leksikal, dialek The study aimed at finding out the linguistic features that unite and differentiate Denbantas Dialect (DD) and Banyuasri Dialect (BD) in terms of phonological and lexical features. The subjects of this study were the speakers of those dialects. This research employed qualitative design. The data of the study were collected based on Swadesh and Nothofer Wordlists using observation, interview, listening, note-taking, and recording techniques. The obtained data were transcribed and analyzed descriptively. The results of the study show that DD and BD actually have similarities and differences in term of phonological and lexical features. The results of the study show that there are 44 phonemes that unite DD and BD in term of phonological features. Those phonemes include 6 vowels: /ʌ/, /I/, /ʊ/, /ɛ/, /∂/, and /ɔ/; 7 diphthongs: /ʌʊ/, /Iʌ/, /Iʊ/, /ʌɔ/, /ʌ∂/, /ʊʌ/, and /ʌɛ/; 19 consonants: /b/, /c/, /d/, /g/, /h/, /ʔ/, /j/, /k/, /l/, /m/, /n/, /p/, /r/, /s/, /t/, /w/, /y/, /ñ/, and /ŋ/; and 12 consonant clusters: /mb/, /nd/, /sg/, /ŋg/, /jl/, /nj/, /ŋk/, /kr/, /mp/, /ms/, /nt/, and /rn/. Meanwhile, there are 16 phonemes that differentiate DD and BD in term of phonological features. Those phonemes include: 6 diphthongs: /∂ʊ/ and /Iɔ/ are found in DD, but in BD the phonemes do not exist, while diphthongs /ʌI/, /I∂/, /ɔʌ/, and /ʊ∂/ are only found in BD; 10 consonant clusters: /rb/, /nc/, /tg/, /gr/, /gl/, and /kp/ are only found in DD, while diphthongs /pl/, /gl/, /ŋl/, and /rs/ are found in BD only; but there are no different vowels and consonants found in both dialects. From the two wordlists which contain 658 lexicons, 457 lexicons are found uniting DD and BD in term of lexical features. Those lexicons can be classified into: 371 exactly the same forms of lexicons and 86 similar form of lexicons. On the other hand, 158 lexicons are found as the evidence that differentiate DD and BD in term of lexical features.keyword : linguistic features, phonological features, lexical features, dialect
Prefix In Pedawa Dialect: A Descriptive Study ., Anak Agung Inten Sakanti; ., Dr. I Gede Budasi,M.Ed,Dip.App.Lin; ., Nyoman Karina Wedhanti, S.Pd., M.Pd
Jurnal Pendidikan Bahasa Inggris undiksha Vol. 1 No. 1 (2013): May
Publisher : Universitas Pendidikan Ganesha

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.23887/jpbi.v1i1.7217

Abstract

Penelitian deskriptif qualitatif ini bertujuan untuk mendeskripsikan jumlah prefik di Dialek Pedawa dan jenisnya dari infleksi dan derivasi. Dua sampel informan dari Dialek Pedawa dipilih berdasarkan seperangkat kriteria. Data dikumpulkan menggunakan 3 tehnik, yakni: tehnik observasi, merekam, dan wawancara (mencatat dan mendengarkan). Hasil penelitian menunjukan bahwa ada dua jenis prefik di Dialek Pedawa. Prefik tersebut yakni prefik {N-}, {m∂-}. Jenis prefik yang tergolong derivasi adalah prefik {m∂-}, {ŋə-} and {ŋ-}. Jenis prefik infleksi adalah prefik {ŋ-}, {n-}, {ñ-} and {m∂-}.Kata Kunci : prefiks derivasi, prefiks infleksi, dan Dialek Pedawa This descriptive qualitative research aimed at describing the number of prefixes in Pedawa Dialect and its types of inflectional and derivational morphemes. Two informant samples of Pedawa Dialect were chosen based on set a criteria. The data were collected based on three techniques, namely: observation, recording, and interview (listening and noting). The results of the study show that there are two prefixes: {N-}, {m∂-} in Pedawa Dialect. The prefixes that belong to derivation morpheme are: prefix {m∂-}, {ŋə-} and {ŋ-}. The prefixes that belong to inflection morpheme are: prefixes {ŋ-}, {n-}, {ñ-} and {m∂-}.keyword : derivational prefixes, inflectional prefixes, and Pedawa Dialect
DERIVATIONAL AND INFLECTIONAL MOPRHEMES OF MACANG DUALECT: A DESCRIPTIVE STUDY ., Md Arini Purnamasari; ., Dr. I Gede Budasi,M.Ed,Dip.App.Lin; ., Dewa Ayu Eka Agustini, S.Pd., M.S.
Jurnal Pendidikan Bahasa Inggris undiksha Vol. 1 No. 1 (2013): May
Publisher : Universitas Pendidikan Ganesha

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.23887/jpbi.v1i1.7302

Abstract

Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mendeskripsikan awalan dan akhiran khususnya dialek Macang yang termasuk morfem derivasi dan infleksi. Penerilitain ini merupakan penelitian deskriptif kualitatif. Kedua sampel informan dipilih berdasarkan serangkaian kriteria. Data yang telah dikumpulkan berdasarkan penggunaan tiga jenis teknik, yaitu: observasi, teknik merekam, dan tanya jawab (teknik mendengarkan dan mencatat). Hasil dari penelitian ini menunjukan bahwa terdapat enam jenis awalan pada dialek Macang; {Λ-}, {mɅ-}, {n-}, {ŋ-}, {ñ-}, {mә-} dan terdapat empat jenis akhiran: {-Ʌŋ}, {-In}, {-Ʌn} and {-ǝ}. Terdapat lima jenis awalan: {mɅ-}, {n-}, {ŋ-}, {ñ-}, {mә-} dan terdapat empat jenis akhiran {-Ʌŋ}, {-In}, {-Ʌn} and {-ǝ} yang termasuk dalam morfem derivasi. Terdapat lima jenis awalan: {mɅ-}, {n-}, {ŋ-}, {ñ-}, {Λ-}, {mǝ-} dan terdapat empat jenis akhiran {-ē}, {- Ʌŋ}, {-In} and {-Ʌn} yang termasuk dalam morfem infleksi.Kata Kunci : Morfem Derivasi, Morfem Infleksi, Dialek Macang This study aimed at describing the prefixes and suffixes in Macang Dialect (MD) which belong to derivational and inflectional morphemes. This research was a descriptive qualitative research. Two informants sample of Macang village were chosen based on a set of criteria. The data were collected based on three techniques, namely: observation, recording technique, and interview (listening and noting technique). The results of the study showed that there were six kinds of prefixes that found in MD; {Λ-}, {mɅ-}, {n-}, {ŋ-}, {ñ-}, {mә-} and there were four kinds of suffixes: {-Ʌŋ}, {-In}, {-Ʌn} and {-ǝ}. There were five kinds of prefixes: {mɅ-}, {n-}, {ŋ-}, {ñ-}, {mә-} and there were four kinds of suffixes {-Ʌŋ}, {-In}, {-Ʌn} and {-ǝ} that belongs to derivational morphemes. There were six kinds of prefixes: {mɅ-}, {n-}, {ŋ-}, {ñ-}, {Λ-}, {mǝ-} and there were four kinds of suffixes {-ē}, {- Ʌŋ}, {-In} and {-Ʌn} that belongs to inflectional morphemes. keyword : Derivational Morpheme, Inflectional Morpheme, Macang Dialect
IMPROVING THE VOCABULARY MASTERY THROUGH NUMBERED HEADS TOGETHER TECHNIQUE OF THE SEVENTH GRADE STUDENTS OF SMP N 5 BATURITI IN ACADEMIC YEARS 2015/2016 ., I Dewa Made Adhi Wira Sanjaya; ., Dr.Sudirman, M.L.S; ., Nyoman Karina Wedhanti, S.Pd., M.Pd
Jurnal Pendidikan Bahasa Inggris undiksha Vol. 1 No. 1 (2013): May
Publisher : Universitas Pendidikan Ganesha

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.23887/jpbi.v1i1.7303

Abstract

Penelitian ini merupakan penelitian tindakan berdasarkan kelas yang bertujuan: (1) untuk mengetahui apakah Numbered Heads Together teknik dapat meningkatkan siswa penguasaan kosakata, (2) untuk mengetahui respon siswa terhadap pelaksanaan strategi. Penelitian ini dilakukan dalam dua siklus yang terdiri dari tiga sesi pada setiap siklus. Ada dua jenis data (kualitatif dan data kuantitatif) yang dikumpulkan melalui tes, kuesioner, dan buku harian penulis. Hasil tes menunjukkan bahwa penguasaan kosakata ditingkatkan pada setiap siklus. skor rata-rata siswa adalah 4,63% di pre test, 6.2 di post test 1, dan peningkatan menjadi 7.97 di post test 2. Hal ini dapat juga dilihat pada jumlah siswa lulus ujian. Tidak ada siswa lulus dalam pre test, 2 siswa dalam post test 1, dan 18 siswa di post test 2. Hasil diary penulis dan kuesioner juga menunjukkan bahwa siswa memberikan respon positif terhadap strategi. Hasil kuesioner menunjukkan bahwa 18 (90%) dari siswa mengakui bahwa mereka benar-benar seperti pelaksanaan Numbered Heads Together teknik. Selain itu, 17 (85%) dari siswa mengaku bahwa mereka termotivasi dalam belajar bahasa Inggris menggunakan Numbered Heads Together teknik Kata Kunci : Numbered Heads Together teknik, Penguasaan kosa kata This study was a classroom based action research which aimed: (1) to find out whether Numbered Heads Together technique can improve students’ vocabulary mastery, (2)to find out the response of the students toward the implementation of the strategies. This study was conducted in two cycles consisting of three sessions in each cycle. There were two kinds of data (qualitative and quantitative data) which were collected through tests, questionnaire, and writer’s diary. The result of the tests showed that the students’ vocabulary mastery was improved in each cycle. The students’ mean score was 4.63% in pre test, 6.2 in post test 1, and improved became 7.97 in post test 2. It can be also seen on the number of students passing the test. There were no students passed in the pre test, 2 students in the post test 1, and 18 students in the post test 2. The result of writer’s diary and questionnaire also showed that the students gave positive response toward the strategies. The results of the questionnaires showed that 18 (90%) of the students admitted that they really like the implementation of Numbered Heads Together technique. Moreover, 17 (85%) of the students admitted that they were motivated in learning English using Numbered Heads Together technique. keyword : Numbered Heads Together Technique, Vocabulary Mastery

Page 119 of 188 | Total Record : 1873

 117   118   119   120   121 

Filter by Year

2013 2025


Reset
Filter By Issues
All Issue Vol. 13 No. 2 (2025): August Vol. 13 No. 1 (2025): May Vol. 12 No. 3 (2024): December Vol. 12 No. 2 (2024): August Vol. 12 No. 1 (2024): May Vol. 11 No. 3 (2023): December Vol. 11 No. 2 (2023): August Vol. 11 No. 1 (2023): May Vol. 10 No. 3 (2022): December Vol. 10 No. 2 (2022): August Vol. 10 No. 1 (2022): May Vol 9, No 3 (2021): Desember Vol. 9 No. 3 (2021): Desember Vol 9, No 2 (2021): August Vol. 9 No. 2 (2021): August Vol. 9 No. 1 (2021): May Vol 9, No 1 (2021): May Vol. 8 No. 2 (2020): November Vol 8, No 2 (2020): November Vol. 8 No. 1 (2020): May Vol 8, No 1 (2020): May Vol 7, No 2 (2019) Vol. 7 No. 2 (2019): November Vol 7, No 2 (2019): November Vol. 7 No. 1 (2019): May Vol 7, No 1 (2019): May Vol 7, No 1 (2019) Vol 6, No 2 (2018): November Vol 6, No 2 (2018) Vol. 6 No. 2 (2018): November Vol 6, No 1 (2018) Vol. 6 No. 1 (2018): May Vol 6, No 1 (2018): May Vol 5, No 2 (2017): November Vol 5, No 2 (2017) Vol. 5 No. 2 (2017): November Vol 4, No 2 (2017): Vol 4, No 2 (2016): November Vol. 4 No. 2 (2016): November Vol 4, No 2 (2016) Vol 4, No 1 (2016): May Vol 4, No 1 (2016) Vol. 4 No. 1 (2016): May Vol 3, No 3 (2016): Vol 2, No 2 (2016): Vol 1, No 1 (2013) Vol. 1 No. 1 (2013): May Vol 1, No 1 (2013): May Vol 1, No 1 (2013) More Issue