cover
Article Per Year (5 Year)
All
Home Page
OAI Link
Editorial Team
Contact
Reviewer
Google Scholar
Contact Name
Kukuh Tejomurti
Contact Email
kukuhmurtifhuns@staff.uns.ac.id
Phone
+6281225027920
Journal Mail Official
yustisia@mail.uns.ac.id
Editorial Address
Fakultas Hukum Universitas Sebelas Maret Jalan Ir. Sutami No. 36A, Kentingan, Surakarta Kodepos: 57126
Location
Kota surakarta,
Jawa tengah
INDONESIA
Yustisia
Published by Universitas Sebelas Maret
ISSN : 08520941     EISSN : 25490907     DOI : https://doi.org/10.20961/yustisia.v9i3
Core Subject : Social,
Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Social Sciences
The scope of the articles published in Yustisia Jurnal Hukum deal with a broad range of topics in the fields of Civil Law, Criminal Law, International Law, Administrative Law, Islamic Law, Constitutional Law, Environmental Law, Procedural Law, Antropological Law, Health Law, Law and Economic, Sociology of Law and another section related contemporary issues in Law (Social science and Political science). Yustisia Jurnal Hukum is an open access journal which means that all content is freely available without charge to the user or his/her institution. Users are allowed to read, download, copy, distribute, print, search, or link to the full texts of the articles, or use them for any other lawful purpose, without asking prior permission from the publisher or the author.
Arjuna Subject : Ilmu Sosial - Hukum
Articles 389 Documents
 11   12   13   14   15 
ARTI PENTINGNYA KETERANGAN DPR DAN PRESIDEN DALAM PROSES UJI MATERI UNDANG-UNDANG Retno Mawarini Sukmariningsih
Yustisia Vol 2, No 3: December 2013
Publisher : Faculty of Law, Universitas Sebelas Maret

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.20961/yustisia.v2i3.10170

Abstract

AbstractIn judical review, the applicant are Indonesian citizen or legal entity in legal standing.The parliament and president could be present in the court. The parliament and president statement needs in the judicial review process. Because they know about the philosophy of legislation in law making. This fact is to reflection justice, legal certainly, and utility in the Constitutional Court’s decision for all parties. Its legal consequences are: to execute the decision of the constitutional court that binds force legally. The obligation parliament is prescribed on it. Whether the accepted or rejected petition influences to the revision of legislation, based on the amended 1945 constitution, the parliament and president oblige to rivise legislation, in fact the constitutional court had the conditional verdict to declare its decision and to legalize in Indonesian gazette as legal fiction.Keyword: the important of parliament and president’s evidence, judicial review, The constitutional court.AbstrakDalam Uji Materi undang-undang yang dilakukan oleh lembaga kehakiman yang disebut pemohon adalah Warga Negara Indonesia atau Badan Hukum yang memenuhi syarat legal standing. Sedangkan pihak yang dapat hadir dalam persidangan adalah DPR dan Presiden . Keterangan DPR dan Presiden menjadi penting dalam Uji Materi Undang-undang, karena kedual lembaga tersebut dianggap mengetahui filosofi dari pembuatan undang-undang yang sedang diuji tersebut. Keterangannya menjadi pertimbangan dalam putusan MK guna mewujudkan putusan yang mencerminkan adanya keadilan, kepastian hukum serta kemanfaatan bagi semua pihak. Konsekuensi yang harus dilakukan oleh termohon  setelah ada putusan MK adalah melaksanakan putusan MK, karena putusan MK merupakan perintah hukum yang mempunyai kekuatan hukum dan mengikat umum, kewajiban yang harus dilakukan DPR dan Presiden setelah keluarnya putusan MK adalah terlihat dalam amar putusannya tolak atau kabul sehingga akan membawa konsekuensi   termasuk revisi atau tidaknya suatu undang-undang, karena berdasarkan ketentuan UUD 1945 bahwa kewajiban untuk merevisi Undang-undang adalah badan pembuatnya yaitu DPR dan Presiden , selain kewajiban penempatan putusan MK, dan pengundangannya dalam Berita Negara.Kata Kunci : pentingnya keterangan DPR dan Presiden, uji materi, Mahkamah Konstitusi
JAPANESE CORPORATE GOVERNANCE REFORM : WHAT IS REQUIRED FOR EFFECTIVE FUNCTIONING OF OUTSIDE DIRECTORS ? Masaru Suzuki
Yustisia Vol 8, No 1: April 2019
Publisher : Faculty of Law, Universitas Sebelas Maret

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.20961/yustisia.v8i1.29690

Abstract

The topic of outside directors’ functions has been attracting significant attention for many years now, especially in the discussions about corporate governance reform in Japan. Over the last two decades, most listed Japanese companies have voluntarily introduced outside directors into their boardrooms, in line with the gradual change in an overall corporate governance system toward a monitoring board model moving away from the more traditional management board model. It appears the recent trend is for companies to add outside directors to their boards of directors to increase corporate values. In the midst of transforming the management board model into the monitoring board model, closely reexamining the functions of outside directors is necessary. What can be concluded from the lessons learned from recent corporate scandals and the discussions concerning the functions of outside directors is: (1) outside directors should be truly independent from the company’s management; and (2) outside directors need access to the company’s corporate information in order to prevent corporate scandals and to provide appropriate advice to the company’s management.  This paper aims at considering how to make outside directors more effective and their roles more substantial, based on the history of corporate governance reform in Japan.
REFORMULASI PENGUATAN MAJELIS PERMUSYAWARATAN (MPR) DALAM PROSES IMPEACHMENT PRESIDEN DI INDONESIA Mulyanto Mulyanto
Yustisia Vol 1, No 1: April 2012
Publisher : Faculty of Law, Universitas Sebelas Maret

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.20961/yustisia.v1i1.10594

Abstract

Abstract The purpose of this research is to arrange the model of People’s Consultative Assembly’s role strengthening formulation in the impeachment process of President/Vice-president in the Indonesian State Structure System. The model is based on the findings of a comprehensive comparative-study with an evaluative prescriptive approach. The research used an empirical research method with a qualitative approach. The research was conducted for one year. Its data consisted of primary and secondary ones. The data of the research were gathered through in-depth interview, questionnaire, focus discussion group, and library research. The results of the research show that the mechanisms of the impeachment of President/Vice-president in the history of Indonesia’s formerly prevailing Constitutions have differences. The model of Peoples’ Consultative Assembly’s role strengthening formulation in the impeachment process of President/Vice-president is manifested in the reformulation of the impeachment substances by improving the conceptualization of Peoples’ Consultative Assembly as an administrative confirmation institution. In addition, in term of impeachment procedure, the minimum quorum limit should be changed so that to conduct an impeachment of President/Vice-president is not more difficult than to conduct an amendment of the 1945 Constitution. People’s Consultative Assembly’s should implement the rule of law (constitution) rather than political supremacy as happened during this, so that the concept can be applied to State law. As a suggestion the People’s Consultative Assembly’s should make substantive and procedural reformulation of impeachment of President/Vice-president in the state system of Indonesia. 
LEGAL PROTECTION FOR THE LOSS OF THE PASSENGER OF ONLINE TRANSPORTATION Pujiyono Pujiyono; Umi Khaerah Pati
Yustisia Vol 8, No 2: August 2019
Publisher : Faculty of Law, Universitas Sebelas Maret

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.20961/yustisia.v8i2.34156

Abstract

Online transportation shall provide a security, comfort and safety guarantee for service users, however it is not performed in the application. Service users still havenot guaranteed their rights as consumers. In the case the consumer suffers a loss, itis remain undetermined how compensation may be granted, therefore it demandsan equal legal protection. Facing this condition, Law Number 8 of 1999 on TheConsumer Protection has not yet stipulated slear provision regarding this matter,likewise the online transportation service users and service providers are only boundin limited aspects. The research method of this reasearch is normative legal researchonly focusing on the issues raised, discussed and elaborated with applying  the rulesor norms in positive law, using Statutory Approaches and Conceptual Approaches,with primary and secondary legal materials. The data collection technique used isliterature study. The analysis technique used is the deductive method. The resultsshowed that there was an legal relationship between service users and onlinetransportation service providers. Consumers have the right to get protection in theform of responsibility for information, legal responsibility for services providedand responsibility for security and comfort. However, for the losses suffered, legalprotection for losses incurred by passengers in online transportation mode is still poordue to lack of regulations and the undetermined standard regulations specifically inregulating online transportation modes.
CORPORATE SOCIAL RESPONSIBILITY DAN TANGGUNG JAWAB NEGARA TERHADAP HAK EKONOMI, SOSIAL, DAN BUDAYA DI INDONESIA Sefriani Sefriani; Sri Wartini
Yustisia Vol 4, No 2: August 2015
Publisher : Faculty of Law, Universitas Sebelas Maret

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.20961/yustisia.v4i2.8646

Abstract

AbstractIndonesia has enacted the idea of corporate social responsibility (CSR) into the laws as a liability which bears sanctions. It is uncommon practice. The majority of state’s practices are putting CSR as a voluntary issue on the law instead of treating it as a liability which holds sanctions. Such enactment give rise allegation against the state which accusing it for transferring its obligation to fulfill the economic, social and culture rights (ESCR) to the company in the format of CSR. Indonesia has some arguments to justify such enactment such as 75%  environmental destruction and social problems  in Indonesia  caused by company activities; the company is able to violate human rights even worse than other legal subject can do; the law which possess voluntary characteristic was ineffective in Indonesia since the legal culture and the awareness concerning the importance of CSR is still not quite; provide legal certainty and avoid inconstant interpretation upon CSR which might be conducted by company by elevating business ethic become legal norm; and integrate social, moral and law issue since three of them  inseparable. The enactment of CSR as liability which hold sanction by Indonesia is not a form of transferring the state responsibility to corporate,  however it is  a manifestation of Indonesian government seriousness as the primary duty bearer, to perform its obligation concerning ESCR  through effective legislation since the corporates activities  are   directly related to the enjoyment of the rights enshrined in the ICESCR. Allegation on the transfer of state obligation on to the company will be proved if the state is hands off and diverting its entire obligation to fulfill ESCR to company in the format of CSR program. AbstrakIndonesia menormakan tanggung jawab social dan lingkungan   (TJSL/CSR)   dalam perundang- undangannya sebagai suatu kewajiban yang disertai sanksi. Suatu praktek yang tidak lazim  dengan praktek Negara pada umumnya yang menormakannya sebagai kesukarelaan perusahaan bukan kewajiban apalgi disertai sanksi. Hal ini menimbulkan  kecurigaan bahwa Negara hendak mengalihkan tanggung jawab pemenuhan hak ekonomi, social dan budaya (ekosob)-nya kepada perusahaan yang dikemas dalam bentuk kewajiban CSR. Penormaan CSR dalam bentuk kewajiban yang disertai sanksi sesungguhnya merupakan bukti keseriusan Indonesia melaksanakan tanggung jawab hak ekosobnya melalui penglegislasian yang mengikat karena budaya hukum di Indonesia belum memungkinkan untuk membuat aturan yang sifatnya sukarela. Penormaan CSR sebagai suatu kewjaiban disertai sanksi tidak akan menghilangkan karakteristiknya sebagai social responsibility karena hukum tidak bisa dipisahkan dari social dan moral. Masalah kerusakan alam dan masalah social yang ditimbulkan perusahaan sudah sangat besar di Indonesia, dan pengalaman menunjukkan perusahaan mampu melakukan pelanggaran HAM yang jauh lebih hebat dari yang dilakukan subyek hukum lain menjadi justifikasi bahwa penormaan yang sifatnya mengikat sangatlah diperlukan. Kecurigaan adanya modus pengalihkan tanggung jawab ekosob pada perusahaan   akan   terbukti   bila Negara kemudian lepas tangan dan membebankan sepenuhnya tanggung jawab pemenuhan hak ekosob pada perusahaan melalui program CSR. Apabila itu terjadi maka Negara telah melakukan pelanggaran terhadap kewajiban hak ekosobnya mengingat Indonesia telah meratifikasi International Covenant on Economic Social Culture Right sejak tahun 2005 melalui UU No.11 Tahun 2005. 
REVITALIZATION OF REGIONAL-OWNED ENTERPRISE (BUMD) GOVERNANCE THROUGH THE PARTICIPATION IN OIL AND GAS MANAGEMENT BY USING GROSS SPLIT MECHANISM Yudho Taruno Muryanto; Tuhana Tuhana; Anjar Sri Ciptorukmi
Yustisia Jurnal Hukum Vol 9, No 1: April 2020
Publisher : Faculty of Law, Universitas Sebelas Maret

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.20961/yustisia.v9i1.33702

Abstract

The implementation of the gross split scheme in the upstream oil and gas business by revenue sharing contract is a new phase concerning the existence, especially for regional governments related to the insertion of regional assets. The participation of BUMD in the oil and gas management where the BUMD is located is prominent, in the context of increasing revenue and boosting the regional economy. The involvement of BUMD in oil and gas management is mainly related to the gross split mechanism. There are several problems, among others, related to the problematic management of BUMD whose business activities support the upstream oil and gas business to increase local revenue and how to implement the revitalization of BUMD governance that supports the upstream oil and gas business. This article is the result of empirical legal research by using a conceptual approach. Research techniques and data collection using primary and secondary material by analyzing the data through text interpretation (hermeneutics) and the logic of deduction. Based on the research on the revitalization of BUMD governance in the upstream oil and gas business that uses a gross split mechanism, there are several problems in its management, including overlapping sectoral arrangements regarding BUMD between one regulation with other regulations, management issues, human resources issue, supervision and guidance of BUMD, and restructuring of BUMD.
PENEGAKAN HUKUM LINGKUNGAN DALAM BIDANG PENGELOLAAN SAMPAH SEBAGAI PERWUJUDAN PRINSIP GOOD ENVIRONMENTAL GOVERNANCE DI KOTA SURAKARTA Rosita Candrakirana
Yustisia Vol 4, No 3: December 2015
Publisher : Faculty of Law, Universitas Sebelas Maret

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.20961/yustisia.v4i3.8690

Abstract

AbstractWaste management still be a problems which not yet solved. This research aims to study the problems in waste management in Surakarta. It was a doctrinal/normative legal research using the statute approach, which then analyzed qualitatively. There are laws correlated to waste management in Indonesia, they are Law number 18 Year 2008 on Waste Management, Law No. 32 of 2009 on the Protection and Environmental Management, and some more. The law enforcement in waste management refers to as known as legal system i.e. structure, substance, and culture. There are two kinds of waste management law enforcement; preventive and repressive way. The effectiveness on the enforcement refers to the combination of structure, substance, and law cultures of the community. The effective law enforcement on waste management also indicates the commitment of the government, both local and national, in applying the principles of Good Environmental Government in order to build community awareness on good and healthy environment.  AbstrakPengelolaan sampah saat ini masih menjadi permasalahan yang belum terselesaikan. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengkaji permasalahan dalam pengelolaan sampah di Surakarta. Penelitian ini adalah penelitian hukum doktrinal/normatif dengan pendekatan perundang-undangan. Data dikumpulkan dengan studi kepustakaan, kemudian dianalisis secara kualitatif. Terdapat beberapa peraturan perundang-undangan yang mempunyai korelasi dengan pengelolaan sampah di Indonesia yaitu Undang-Undang No. 32 Tahun 2009 tentang Perlindungan dan Pengelolaan Lingkungan Hidup dan beberapa undang-undang lainnya. Penegakan hukum dalam pengelolaan sampah mengacu pada 3 sistem hukum yang merupakan gabungan dari komponen-komponen yaitu struktur, substansi, dan budaya. Selain itu berkaitan dengan penegakan hukum dalam pengelolaan sampah dapat dikaji dari 2 sisi yaitu penegakan hukum secara preventif dan represif. Penegakan hukum dalam pengelolaan sampah juga menjadi sebuah perwujudan pemerintah maupun pemerintah daerah dalam menerapkan prinsip Good Environmental Governance dengan tujuan akan menumbuhkan kesadaran bagi masyarakat akan lingkungan hidup yang
POLITIK HUKUM KETAHANAN PANGAN NASIONAL (KAJIAN SINKRONISASI POLITIK HUKUM UNDANG-UNDANG HAK PVT DAN UNDANG-UNDANG PANGAN) Moch Najib Imanullah
Yustisia Vol 2, No 1: April 2013
Publisher : Faculty of Law, Universitas Sebelas Maret

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.20961/yustisia.v2i1.11076

Abstract

AbstractThe aim of this research is to determine the level of legal synchronization horizontally on legal policy of national food security within Act on Plant Variety Protection and Act on Food. In order to achieve this aim, it was conducted normative legal research which using secondary data which is based on primary and secondary legal materials. Data were analyzed by using a legal grammatical interpretation. Its results are there is a synchronization between Act on Plant Variety Protection and Act on Food and by the legal protection of plant varieties will increase enthusiasm plant breeders to produce new quality seeds crop, including the food crops seeds. It will lead to increasing national food security conditions, which will provide guarantee on quality and sufficient of food for families who receive it.Keywords: legal policy, crop variety, food, national food security.AbstrakPenelitian ini bertujan untuk mengetahui taraf sinkronisasi hukum secara horizontal politik hukum ketahanan pangan nasional dalam Undang-undang Perlindungan Varietas Tanaman dan Undang-undang Pangan. Untuk mencapai tujuan ini maka dilakukan penelitian hukum normatif menggunakan data sekunder yang bersumber pada bahan hukum primer dan sekunder. Data yang diperoleh dianalisis dengan menggunakan penafsiran hukum gramatikal. Dari penelitian ini diperoleh hasil bahwa Undang-undang Perlindungan Varietas Tanaman sinkron  dengan Undang-undang Pangan, yaitu adanya perlindungan hukum terhadap Hak Perlindungan Varietas Tanaman akan meningkatkan gairah para pemulia tanaman untuk menghasilkan benih-benih tanaman baru yang berkualitas, termasuk benih-benih tanaman bahan pangan. Tersedianya benih-benih tanaman bahan pangan yang cukup, akan meningkatkan produksi bahan pangan, sehingga akan tercapai kondisi meningkatnya ketahanan pangan nasional, yang menjamin  sampai pada tingkat keluarga menerima bahan pangan yang cukup dan bermutu.Kata kunci : politik hukum, varietas tanaman, pangan, ketahanan pangan nasional.
THE EXISTENCE OF ADAT LAW COMMUNITY IN PUBLIC-PRIVATE PARTNERSHIP Karina Putri; Sartika Intaning Pradhani; Hendry Julian Noor
Yustisia Jurnal Hukum Vol 9, No 3: December 2020
Publisher : Faculty of Law, Universitas Sebelas Maret

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.20961/yustisia.v9i3.25492

Abstract

This paper aimed to elaborate the participation of Adat Law Community in Public-Private Partnership (PPP) to introduce new approach to replace compensation to more participative and collaborative scheme of infrastructure development in PPP. This article uses the normative legal research with the conceptual, statute, and case approach. This research show that releasing the land used for infrastructure development procurement will abolish the identity of the community. It have shown that failure in recognizing Adat Law Community as rightful party over their land neglects their right to entitle compensation. Furthermore, instead of economically compensating ulayat land of Adat Law Community used for infrastructure development, Adat Law Community’s participation shall be involved in infrastructure development on their land. The active participation of Adat Law Community can be exercised through placing the community as public entity in PPP. For comparison in China, the State does not pay according to market prices to farmers. However, it provides a compensation package that includes employment opportunities for farmers, housing compensation, compensation for crop loss, and / or granting a residence permit in urban areas. This make them eligible for their social welfare such as health insurance, pensions and / or retirement plans, access to high-quality schools and subsidized agricultural goods that were not previously available to farmers
MODEL KAPASITAS BIROKRASI UNTUK PENGEMBANGAN INTEGRITAS PERKUMPULAN PETANI PEMAKAI AIR (P3A) DALAM RANGKA PENCAPAIAN KEDAULATAN DAN KEAMANAN PANGAN LOKAL Isharyanto Isharyanto; Suranto Suranto; Jadmiko Anom Husodo; Adriana Grahani Firdaussy; Andina Elok Puri Maharani
Yustisia Vol 5, No 1: April 2016
Publisher : Faculty of Law, Universitas Sebelas Maret

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.20961/yustisia.v5i1.8722

Abstract

AbstractPerkumpulan Petani Pengguna Air (P3A) coordinate with the users of irrigation water for other purposes through irrigation area coordination forum. Institutional financing irrigation management by irrigation farmers secaa a whole is still very limited ability to provision of funds operation and maintenance of irrigation networks when compared with the needs of maintenance of irrigation networks managed. The results showed that this indicator is quite good, although not all of them are active in every activity P3A. Some farmers feel that once a member but do not know the activities that will be implemented so that the benefits are still lacking at the farm level.Considering the amount of irrigation service charges under the authority of the local government, in this case the local government bureaucracy, we need a model of partnership with farmers. The main elements are dominant in this model is the behavior of (i) the farming community, (ii) participation of irrigation management, (iii) the physical condition of the irrigation network, (iv) of irrigation water services, and (vi) the management of irrigation networks. AbstrakPerkumpulan Petani Pemakai Air (P3A) melakukan koordinasi dengan para pengguna air irigasi untuk keperluan lainnya melalui forum koordinasi daerah irigasi. Pembiayaan pengelolaan   irigasi   oleh kelembagaan   petani  irigasi secaa keseluruhan masih sangat terbatas kemampuan penyediaan dana operasi          dan  pemeliharaan         jaringan irigasi bila  dibandingkan                          dengan kebutuhan pemeliharaan jaringan irigasi yang dikelola.  Hasil penelitian  menunjukkan  bahwa indikator ini cukup baik walaupun belum semuanya aktif dalam setiap kegiatan P3A. Sebagian petani merasa  bahwa  pernah  menjadi anggota tetapi tidak tahu kegiatan yang akan dilaksanakan sehingga manfaatnya masih kurang di tingkat petani. Dengan memperhatikan besaran tuntutan pelayanan irigasi yang menjadi wewenang pemerintah daerah, dalam hal ini birokrasi pemerintahan daerah, maka diperlukan model kemitraan dengan petani. Unsur-unsur utama yang dominan dalam model ini adalah perilaku (i) masyarakat petani, (ii) partisipasi pengelolaan irigasi, (iii) kondisi fisik jaringan irigasi, (iv) pelayanan air irigasi, dan (vi) pengelolaan jaringan irigasi. 

Page 13 of 39 | Total Record : 389

 11   12   13   14   15 

Filter by Year

2012 2024


Reset
Filter By Issues
All Issue Vol 13, No 2: August 2024 Vol 13, No 1: April 2024 Vol 12, No 3: December 2023 Vol 12, No 2: August 2023 Vol 12, No 1: April 2023 Vol 11, No 3: December 2022 Vol 11, No 2: August 2022 Vol 11, No 1: April 2022 Vol 10, No 3: December 2021 Vol 10, No 2: August 2021 Vol 10, No 1: April 2021 Vol 9, No 3: December 2020 Vol 9, No 3: September - December 2020 Vol 9, No 2: August 2020 Vol 9, No 2: May - August 2020 Vol 9, No 1: April 2020 Vol 9, No 1: January - April 2020 Vol 8, No 3: December 2019 Vol 8, No 2: August 2019 Vol 8, No 1: April 2019 Vol 7, No 3: December 2018 Vol 7, No 2: August 2018 Vol 7, No 1: April 2018 Vol 6, No 3: December 2017 Vol 6, No 2: August 2017 Vol 6, No 1: April 2017 Vol 5, No 3: December 2016 Vol 5, No 2: August 2016 Vol 5, No 1: April 2016 Vol 4, No 3: December 2015 Vol 4, No 2: August 2015 Vol 4, No 1: April 2015 Vol 3, No 3: December 2014 Vol 3, No 2: August 2014 Vol 3, No 1: April 2014 Vol 2, No 3: December 2013 Vol 2, No 2: August 2013 Vol 2, No 1: April 2013 Vol 1, No 3: December 2012 Vol 1, No 2 (2012): MEI-AGUSTUS Vol 1, No 2: August 2012 Vol 1, No 1: April 2012 Vol 3, No 3: SEPTEMBER-DECEMBER Vol 3, No 2: MEI-AGUSTUS Vol 3, No 1: JANUARI-APRIL Vol 2, No 3: SEPTEMBER-DESEMBER Vol 2, No 2: MEI-AGUSTUS Vol 2, No 1: JANUARI-APRIL Vol 1, No 1: JANUARI-APRIL More Issue