cover
Contact Name
Hasbi Arijal
Contact Email
hasbiarijal@unida.gontor.ac.id
Phone
+6281216642043
Journal Mail Official
kalimah@unida.gontor.ac.id
Editorial Address
Gedung Terpadu Universitas Darussalam (UNIDA) Gontor, lantai 2, Jln. Raya Siman KM 6, ‎Siman, Demangan, Ponorogo, Jawa Timur, 63471, Indonesia, Telp: +62 352 3574562
Location
Kab. ponorogo,
Jawa timur
INDONESIA
Kalimah Jurnal Studi Agama dan Pemikiran Islam
ISSN : 14129590     EISSN : 24770396     DOI : ‎10.21111‎
Kalimah is journal of Religious Studies and Islamic Thought published by Faculty of Ushuluddin, University of Darussalam (UNIDA) Gontor, Indonesia. Kalimah is a semi annual journal published in March and September for the developing the scientific ethos. Editors accept scientific articles and result of research in accordance with its nature is a journal of Religious Studies and Islamic Thought.
Articles 193 Documents
Kritik atas Pemahaman Kaum Feminis terhadap Otoritas Mufasir Laki-laki Taufik Apandi
Kalimah: Jurnal Studi Agama dan Pemikiran Islam Vol 13, No 1 (2015)
Publisher : Universitas Darussalam Gontor

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.21111/klm.v13i1.276

Abstract

The spread of the feminist movement in the West has forced women to rebel against a system that is considered culturally and structurally discredit their existence. When feminism entered into Islam, this movement has a significant impact and tends to destructive. Through feminist theology, teachings that have been established but it is considered contrary to the spirit of equality will be sued. Feminist theologians questioned some of the teachings of Islam that has been established, such as the interpretation of the Qur’an made by the mufasir because of potential gender bias. The reason is, when the man interprets the Qur’an, the women feeling excluded and the more dominant maleness is the nature and importance. Strangely, they do not mind at all when there are feminist activists from among men. View suspicious of mufasir is certainly wrong. Because the interpretation procedure under consideration is not sex but a quality of faith and science commentators. In addition, the tradition of criticism, will narrow the emergence of interpretations are oriented to personal interests and discredit women. Whereas the interpretations results of mufassir actually much glory to women. Therefore efforts feminist theologians sue mufassir actually is not a scientific claim usually done in a scientific study, but an attempt of shari’ah deconstruction for Muslim women who want to follow in the footsteps of West women.
Fenomena Kekerasan Bermotif Agama di Indonesia Yuangga Kurnia Y
Kalimah: Jurnal Studi Agama dan Pemikiran Islam Vol 15, No 2 (2017)
Publisher : Universitas Darussalam Gontor

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.21111/klm.v15i2.1494

Abstract

Makalah ini akan mengkaji tentang landasan kekerasan atas nama agama. Banyaknya kekerasan yang dialamatkan “atas nama agama” membuat wajah agama menjadi keji dan menakutkan. Agama yang diplot sebagai suatu institusi yang menenangkan dan menyatukan umat manusia justru dianggap berpotensi memecah belah umat dengan berbagai doktrin dan dogma yang “haus darah”. Kekerasan atas nama agama cenderung melahirkan tuduhan terhadap kaum ekstrimis, fundamentalis dan radikalis tanpa mempertimbangkan definisi terhadap kata-kata tersebut secara tepat dan benar. Melalui kajian pustaka yang bersumber pada data dari dokumen dan literatur, penulis berusaha memaparkan konsep ajaran kasih sayang dalam agama-agama besar dunia seperti Islam, Kristen, Hindu dan Buddha sebagai landasan penolakan terhadap penggunaan kekerasan yang mengatasnamakan agama. Kesimpulan yang didapat adalah adanya politisasi agama oleh pihak-pihak yang tidak bertanggungjawab yang melihat besarnya potensi agama untuk meraup keuntungan pribadi. Mereka berbicara sebagai “perwakilan” Tuhan dan menggunakan ayat-ayatNya demi kepentingan golongan tertentu. Untuk menanggulanginya, perlu pengajaran yang tepat terhadap pemahaman ajaran agama, terutama ayat-ayat suci yang seringkali dijadikan sebagai dasar pijakan dalam rangka melancarkan aksi kekerasan atas nama agama. Disamping itu, penghapusan fanatisme buta, pendidikan agama sejak dini yang mengenalkan adanya dialog antar agama dan budaya juga dibutuhkan. Pendidikan agama bukan sekadar mengajarkan ajaran agama yang diimani, tapi juga mengenalkan tradisi agama lain dalam rangka saling menghargai antar penganut agama. Saling menghargai di sini bukan dalam artian menyamaratakan Tuhan dan kepercayaan sebagaimana yang digaungkan oleh pendukung paham pluralisme agama
تحريف تطبيق الوصايا العشر لليهودية Muhammad Hudaya; Novi Hidayat
Kalimah: Jurnal Studi Agama dan Pemikiran Islam Vol 17, No 2 (2019)
Publisher : Universitas Darussalam Gontor

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.21111/klm.v17i2.3428

Abstract

Among the sharia in Judaism is the ten commandments of God. Where the commandment has a high place in the Jewish religion. The Commandement is a life guideline in socializing with the community, whether in religious or social affairs. But Jews were not practicing the commandments. They believed more of the teachings brought by the Rabbis (Jewish ministers) compared to the ones listed in the Torah and the commandments. Consequently, many misappropriation, violence, and murder are caused by it. Based on this fact researchers want to further examine what the actual meaning of the commandment is and how does the distortion occur in it? The result of this research is 10 commandments that contain a very meaningful value. The deviation originated from the rewriting of the Torah after the death of the Prophet Moses. Besides, there is a reinterpretation of the Torah. The interpretation is the result of the thought of the Jewish priests who merely appetites to lust.
Kesatuan Transenden Agama-Agama dalam Perspektif Tasawuf (Kritik atas Pemikiran Frithjof Schuon) Abdullah Muslich Rizal Maulana
Kalimah: Jurnal Studi Agama dan Pemikiran Islam Vol 12, No 2 (2014)
Publisher : Universitas Darussalam Gontor

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.21111/klm.v12i2.236

Abstract

As one of the many themes that get a lot of attention on contemporary issues of Sufism is transcendent unity of religion from perspective of perennial philosophy. Perennial philosophy believes a universal and eternal unity of religion rest on its esoteric dimension. Esoteric dimension has it different concept with exoteric dimension, whereas esoteric dimension is inner dimension that spiritual, exoteric dimension is outer dimension of religions in the form of ritual, or other branches of the secondary nature of religions. This view would then imply the understanding of the validity of religious pluralism in the form of Sufism legitimacy. One of the figures was quite inspiring teachings perennial philosophy is Frithjof Schuon. Schuon, became one of the initiators of the transcendent unity of religions in the Sufism legitimacy that in its development and has a very strong relationship to the development of religious pluralism that is modern as are held by Chittick, Hick, or WC Smith. This paper will tries to analyze critically the origin of the transcendent unity of religions in the perspective of Sufism by arguing Frithjof Schuon.
al-Imam Ibnu Taymiyah wa Arauhu fi al-Qadaya al-’Aqaidiyyah Syamsul Hadi Untung; Nofriyanto Nofriyanto
Kalimah: Jurnal Studi Agama dan Pemikiran Islam Vol 14, No 1 (2016)
Publisher : Universitas Darussalam Gontor

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.21111/klm.v14i1.364

Abstract

Ibnu Taimiyyah is one of the famous Muslim Scholars in Islamic history. He was also a theologian who supported the salafi movement. His Kalam thoughts are fascinating to be analyzed. Therefore, this paper will discuss Ibnu Taimiyyah’s thoughts relating to several themes on Kalam in one sides: Iman, Tawhid, Allah’s attributes, major sins, seeing Allah, al-Qur’an as His Kalam, and human actions in the world. From this simple research it comes to conclusion that Ibnu Taimiyyah agreed with Salafi scholars in the classification of Tawhid which divided into three: Tawh}i>d Rubu>biyyah, Tawh}i>d Ulu>hiyyah, Tawh}i>d asma>’ wa s}ifa>t. On another side, the discussion will be in regards to Iman, Ibnu Taimiyyah considered as iman connected to words and actions, sometimes may increase while other times it may decrease; people who have comitted major sins, Ibnu Taimiyyah saw it as a matter of judgement solely up to Allah. This idea differs from that of the Khawarij, Mu’tazilah and Murji’ah. In matter of human actions of Ibnu Taimiyyah, a human cannot be forced or coerced (laysa bi majbu>r) and also cannot freely decide independence from God, but there is the will of God within. This is different from the Jabariyah and Qadariyah view. The next aspect of the discussion covers the ability or chance to see Allah. According to Ibnu Taimiyyah, every single Mu’min will see Allah in the day of judgment which differs from the Rafidhah, Jahmiyah and Mu’tazilah view. Finally this paper will discuss the al-Qur’an as the kalam of Allah and that the al-Qur’an is not created by man.
Dampak Liberalisasi Pemikiran Islam terhadap Kehidupan Sosial Mujahid Imaduddin
Kalimah: Jurnal Studi Agama dan Pemikiran Islam Vol 15, No 1 (2017)
Publisher : Universitas Darussalam Gontor

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.21111/klm.v15i1.837

Abstract

This paper will research the meaning of the liberalization of religious thought which can not be separated from the history of modern Western civilization and postmodern. Trends of liberalism has begun from individual liberation efforts in economics and politics, then spread to the individual liberation in intellectuality, religious field, and many other fields. Liberalization of thought goes into Islam through several methods and approaches. Some of them are relativism of truth, reinterpretation of the Koran, and deconstruction of Syariah. Through the program, pluralism ultimately has a negative impact on social life. The impact can be seen in Syariah field like allowing interfaith marriage. While in aqidah it is like acknowledging the right faith of other religions, and in morals it is like relativization of good and bad standard in people by ignoring the role of religion. It is becoming worse when the program is not only propagated by the orientalists, but also spread by some Indonesian Muslim scholars. As a result, it is not a surprise if some scientific studies in Indonesia, that can be found in books, magazines or journals which carried articles supporting liberalism movement of Islamic thought. Looking at the urgency of liberalization of Islamic thought issue, this theme should be researched comprehensively. This paper will focus on a discussion of researching programs of liberalization of religious thought, which could affect people social life. The impact has been devastating in a small institution of society, the family.
Jejak Pragmatisme dalam Politik di Indonesia (Era 2009 – 2017) Miftah Faried Hadinatha
Kalimah: Jurnal Studi Agama dan Pemikiran Islam Vol 16, No 2 (2018)
Publisher : Universitas Darussalam Gontor

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.21111/klm.v16i2.2872

Abstract

This paper will analyze pragmatism in the political world in Indonesia. Pragmatism is a modern philosophical movement, it was initiated in United States, by C.S. Pierce who was inspired by Immanuel Kant. Pragmatism developed through the thoughts of some figures such as John Locke, Gorge Berkley, David Hume, William James and John Dewey. Pragmatism assumes that truth, meaning and the value of an idea must be based on practical aspects. Based on this assumption, the author has a hypothesis that what happens in the political world in Indonesia is full of pragmatism. At least this condition can be found in several important aspects such as; the attitude of those politicians that looks massively toward the elections, the party coalitions, while serving in government and the culture of political dynasties. This phenomenon describe that politics in Indonesia is in degradation of ethical values, even from the state of  ideology (Pancasila), norms of life and especially from the religious side. This pragmatic attitude is allegedly close to hedonism. The paper was completed with a literature review, by referring to the news about politics in Indonesia since 2009 until 2017. After reviewing an authoritative reference, the authors conclud that pragmatism was ingrained in the practice of political life in Indonesia. Indeed the practice of pragmatic politics is not hesitant to do by who has an interest in politics. Surely this will damage the order of life, and certainly also in the contrary to the values of religiosity, especially Islam as the teachings adopted by the majority of pragmatic political actors.  
Penolakan Ibnu Arabi terhadap Pluralisme Agama Kholid Karomi
Kalimah: Jurnal Studi Agama dan Pemikiran Islam Vol 12, No 1 (2014)
Publisher : Universitas Darussalam Gontor

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.21111/klm.v12i1.218

Abstract

Paham pluralisme agama yang berkembang akhir-akhir ini banyak mengambil legitimasinya dari para sufi. Dari situ, mereka beranggapan bahwa pemikiran pluralisme agama memang telah ada dalam tradisi intelektual Islam dan tentunya berdasarkan ajaran Islam. Padahal, legitimasi tersebut hanya merupakan hasil comot yang tidak mendasar. Salah seorang sufi yang paling sering menjadi objek kajian yang dituduh sebagai penyebar paham pluralisme agama ini adalah Ibnu Arabi. Dikatakan, Ibnu Arabi memiliki konsep wah}dat al-adyan yang merupakan cerminan paham pluralisme agama saat ini. Padahal, makna wah}dat al-wujud yang dipahami oleh para sufi yang sahih sebenarnya bukan dalam konteks agama atau dalam konteks panteisme, tapi dalam konteks hirarki wujud, di mana Allah dipahami sebagai Wujud Akhir yang Absolut (al Wujud al-Akhir al-Mutlaq) dan selain-Nya adalah wujud yang nisbi. Artikel ini ingin mengkritisi sikap para pluralis yang mendistorsi pemikiran Ibnu Arabi tentang pluralisme agama. Hal ini dipandang penting guna mengembangkan sikap kritis bagi para sarjana Muslim agar tidak asal comot dan menerima begitu saja pemikiran para pluralis yang terpengaruh para orientalis.
Relasi Akal dan Hati menurut al-Ghazali Ahmad Arisatul Cholik
Kalimah: Jurnal Studi Agama dan Pemikiran Islam Vol 13, No 2 (2015)
Publisher : Universitas Darussalam Gontor

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.21111/klm.v13i2.290

Abstract

In Western intellectual tradition, ratio has been seen all this time not only as the source of knowledge but also human behavior. This tradition formed the view toward knowledge which raised rationalism and number of Western school of thought up that become the principle of Western civilization up to now. This view is certainly different with Islamic tradition, when ratio could not be separated from heart as a substance knowing rational problems, empiric, or metaphysics. It means that in the view of Islam, truth is not limited in the physical realm but in metaphysic as well. Therefore, knowledge produced from ratio should be related carefully to heart. According to al-Ghazali, ratio and heart could not be separated each other as these substance could not be separated from another substances. The relation between ratio and heart actually led human to the truth. Al-Ghazali’s statement about this relation in fact begun from his view about dimension of soul, that became the source of physical dimension of human in psychological context, motored by ‘aql and qalb. In this paper, writer concluded that: first, ‘aql and qalb are smooth and soft; second, ‘aql is only limited to the issue of intelligence, when qalb also able to reach truth in spiritual matters as well; the heart’s capability to reach a metaphysical realm is always supported by rational knowledge, but this knowledge is not enough to avoid qalb from mistakes except by accepting religious knowledge that came from the prophets.
Modernisasi dan Perubahan Sosial dalam Lintasan Sejarah Islam Syamsul Bakri
Kalimah: Jurnal Studi Agama dan Pemikiran Islam Vol 14, No 2 (2016)
Publisher : Universitas Darussalam Gontor

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.21111/klm.v14i2.611

Abstract

This paper describes about the modernization of Islam in the history. Modernization is the inevitable cosmic necessity, so that the Islamic world is forced by history to be able to response and to adapt to the dynamics of modernity. As a real impact, the process has created intellectuals and activists of Islam that involve in the acts of social movements. They tried to face the challenges of the modernity. Islam is not moving in the empty space. However, Islam appears in the middle of the people who need answers to the modernity that increases progressively. This fact is clearly the starting point of the importance of the dynamic religious understanding. In this context, ijtihad will be the only way to keep the conservation doctrine, and at the same time is able to follow the rhythm of modernity. The role of thinkers and activists of Islamic reform is very significant in making products of ijtihad to bring the Muslims facing social change as a result of modernization. Islam is a spirit of change, and then it creates social change while still having roots of theology and Islamic traditions. The modernization which is born from the womb of Western civilization has awakened the Muslims to aware the importance of Islam as a part of the social system. Islam has a strength and a great potential to build the nation. Therefore, Muslims should be agents of change to have social mobility.

Page 9 of 20 | Total Record : 193