cover
Article Per Year (5 Year)
All
Home Page
OAI Link
Editorial Team
Contact
Reviewer
Google Scholar
Contact Name
Andri Putra Kesmawan
Contact Email
andriputrakesmawan@gmail.com
Phone
-
Journal Mail Official
igpa@ugm.ac.id
Editorial Address
-
Location
Kab. sleman,
Daerah istimewa yogyakarta
INDONESIA
Jurnal Kebijakan dan Administrasi Publik
Published by Universitas Gadjah Mada
ISSN : 08529213     EISSN : 24774693     DOI : -
Core Subject : Health, Science, Education, Social,
Decision Sciences, Operations Research & Management Education Public Health Social Sciences
JKAP (Jurnal Kebijakan dan Administrasi Publikasi), dengan nomor p-ISSN: 0852-9213, e-ISSN: 2477-4693, adalah jurnal multidisiplin berskala nasional yang mencakup berbagai pokok persoalan dalam kajian ilmu-ilmu administrasi publik. Secara khusus JKAP menaruh perhatian pada pokok-pokok persoalan tentang perkembangan ilmu kebijakan dan administrasi publik, administrasi pembangunan, otonomi daerah, birokrasi dan aparatur negara, desentralisasi, ilmu ekonomi dan studi pembangunan, manajemen publik, kebijakan dan pemerintahan, serta ilmu sosial lain mencakup ilmu kesehatan masyarakat, politik fiskal, dan perencanaan wilayah.
Arjuna Subject : -
Articles 566 Documents
 53   54   55   56   57 
Enacting Deliberative Governance in Innovation of Labour Protection Policy (Case Study in Banyumas District, Central Java) Tasroh Tasroh; Paulus Israwan Setyoko
JKAP (Jurnal Kebijakan dan Administrasi Publik) Vol 29, No 1 (2025): May
Publisher : Magister Ilmu Administrasi Publik

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.22146/jkap.102906

Abstract

This study aims to enact labor protection policy deliberations as an alternative policy innovation. By using qualitative descriptive research methods and observations of various models of labor protection policy deliberation in Banyumas Regency and a study of labor protection policy documents in the period 2021-2024, with in-depth interviews with 50 key informants, it can be concluded that two models of policy deliberation are founded. They are an elite model held by executive and legislative actors; the other is called private one handled by labour and corporate organization actors. The two models finally unified to improve the labor protection policy design process, encourage the formation of various public discussions and debates, and encourage the authentic participation of citizens, corporations, and workers. By blending them, the degree of consensus and collaboration across interests autonomously develops their potential and authority to jointly realize the target of social security participation programs. However, there are still various obstacles, including the limited budget and minimal awareness of elite actors. It is recognized that the development of more democratic labor policy deliberations shows a positive trend for regional governments in the future as the new capital for regional development. Because of the wider involvement, participation, availability of legitimate public space and wider collaboration have been proven to significantly improve the quality of labor protection policies at a local level. However, supervision and policy guidance must be carried out by all actors to improve the welfare of workers as a whole.
Application of Digital Maturity Framework in Improving the Performance of Public Sector Organizations in Indonesia. Dharayani Eka R. F. Novienty; Achmad Nurmandi; Muhammad Younus
JKAP (Jurnal Kebijakan dan Administrasi Publik) Vol 29, No 1 (2025): May
Publisher : Magister Ilmu Administrasi Publik

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.22146/jkap.104081

Abstract

Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk menerapkan kerangka kerja kematangan digital dalam meningkatkan kinerja organisasi sektor publik di Indonesia. Penelitian ini menggunakan metode kualitatif dengan pendekatan bibliometrik, memanfaatkan data dari basis data Scopus (2019-2024) yang dianalisis menggunakan RStudio dan VOSviewer. Analisis dilakukan terhadap tiga dimensi utama: teknologi, proses, dan sumber daya manusia. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa sektor publik di Indonesia telah menunjukkan kemajuan dalam penerapan infrastruktur digital, seperti komputasi awan dan analisis data. Namun, tantangan seperti interoperabilitas sistem dan rendahnya tingkat otomatisasi masih ada. Pada dimensi proses, penerapan pendekatan berbasis data telah dimulai, namun efisiensi operasional masih memerlukan peningkatan melalui otomatisasi. Sementara itu, kompetensi sumber daya manusia digital masih rendah, sehingga diperlukan pelatihan dan peningkatan kapasitas yang lebih intensif. Kesimpulan penelitian menegaskan bahwa kerangka kerja kematangan digital mampu memberikan panduan sistematis dalam menilai kesiapan organisasi dan merancang strategi transformasi yang efektif. Penerapan teknologi canggih, seperti Internet of Things (IoT), kecerdasan buatan, dan blockchain, memiliki potensi besar untuk meningkatkan kinerja sektor publik, tetapi keberhasilannya bergantung pada tata kelola yang kuat, manajemen risiko, dan integrasi lintas sistem. Untuk memastikan keberlangsungan transformasi digital, diperlukan investasi berkelanjutan dalam infrastruktur, pelatihan, dan regulasi yang lebih kuat. Penelitian ini memberikan wawasan strategi bagi sektor publik untuk mencapai efisiensi, transparansi, dan layanan yang lebih baik di era digital.Kata Kunci: Kematangan Digital , Sektor Publik, Kerangka Kerja
Inefficiency of Social Assistance in Reducing Poverty Rates: Recommendations for Alternative Social Policies for Poverty Alleviation in Indonesia. Wimmy Haliim; Ja'far Muhammad
JKAP (Jurnal Kebijakan dan Administrasi Publik) Vol 29, No 1 (2025): May
Publisher : Magister Ilmu Administrasi Publik

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.22146/jkap.104396

Abstract

This article discusses the dominance of social assistance (bantuan sosial/bansos) policies in poverty alleviation in Indonesia, focusing on the political, social, and economic dynamics that influence their implementation. It is emphasized that social assistance, such as the Family Hope Program (Program Keluarga Harapan/PKH) and Direct Cash Assistance (Bantuan Langsung Tunai/BLT), are often the main instruments for short-term poverty reduction, especially in crises. However, their use is frequently politicized, especially in the run-up to elections, as a tool to strengthen the political legitimacy of those in power. This study also critiques the effectiveness of social assistance in addressing the root causes of poverty, such as access to education, employment, and structural reform. The paradox of increasing the allocation of the social assistance budget compared to the rate of poverty reduction suggests that this approach is less significant in the long term. This article proposes alternative policies, including Universal Basic Income (UBI), local economic empowerment, vocational training, and technology-based distribution reforms to increase transparency. The GEAR (Growth, Empowerment, Adaptive, Rational) social policy model is proposed as a strategic framework to reduce community dependence on social assistance, optimize resource distribution, and ensure the sustainability of socio-economic development.
Local Government Efforts in Control of Inflation in Papua's Highlands Province Syamsul Bahri Abd. Rasyid; Ilham Ilham; Misran Misran
JKAP (Jurnal Kebijakan dan Administrasi Publik) Vol 29, No 2 (2025): November
Publisher : Magister Ilmu Administrasi Publik

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.22146/jkap.105375

Abstract

This research describes the efforts of the Papua’s Highlands Province government in controlling inflation, including policy implications and recommendations that may serve as a reference for future governance. A Qualitative research method was employed using the Miles–Huberman analysis model, supported by NVivo 12 Plus for qualitative coding and VOSviewer for bibliometric analysis. The findings show that inflation is a priority program for the provincial government. Efforts undertaken include restructuring the Regional Inflation Control Team (TPID), establishing a small secretariat team, strengthening the logistics system, improving the Trans Papua Road segment through a Public–Private Partnership (PPP) scheme—particularly the severely damaged Wamena–Jayapura corridor—and promoting local food sovereignty. Special autonomy authority, flexible policy instruments, and adequate development funding are expected to lay a strong foundation for long-term stability and economic sustainability in Papua’s Highlands Province, including maintaining a stable inflation rate.
WHEN RESILIENCE EXCLUDES: GENDERED POWER, INTERSECTIONALITY, AND COMMUNITY-BASED DISASTER RISK REDUCTION IN COASTAL INDONESIA I Putu Yoga Bumi Pradana; Rudi Rohi; Angel Christy Patricia
JKAP (Jurnal Kebijakan dan Administrasi Publik) Vol 29, No 2 (2025): November
Publisher : Magister Ilmu Administrasi Publik

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.22146/jkap.107637

Abstract

This study examines how social, cultural, and institutional configurations shape women’s participation in community-based disaster risk reduction (CBDRR) in coastal Kupang, Indonesia. Despite formal commitments to gender inclusion in disaster governance, women’s participation remains uneven and highly context-dependent. Using a qualitative comparative case study of Kelurahan Lasiana and Kelurahan Oesapa Barat, the research draws on in-depth interviews, focus group discussions, participant observation, and document analysis to explore multi-layered participation dynamics. The findings reveal that entrenched gender norms, time poverty, and hierarchical power relations continue to limit women’s engagement in CBDRR. In both communities, caregiving responsibilities and mobility restrictions reinforce women’s peripheral roles in formal DRR spaces. Cultural configurations act as a double-edged sword: while women’s local knowledge is widely valued informally, patriarchal authority structures and conservative adat and religious narratives constrain their leadership and decision-making influence. Institutionally, a significant gap persists between formal participation mandates and substantive influence. However, Lasiana demonstrates greater progress through supportive leadership, cultural reframing, and participatory innovations such as community mapping and oral histories. In contrast, Oesapa Barat exhibits more rigid cultural scripts and institutional inertia that confine women’s roles to symbolic functions. This study’s novelty lies in its integrative analytical framework and comparative design. It offers new insights into how enabling and constraining dynamics interact across social, cultural, and institutional domains to shape gendered resilience governance
When Bureaucracy Fails Democracy: Explaining the Institutional Barriers to Electoral Inclusion in Remote Island Regions Baharudin Hamzah; Aloysius Liliweri; Laurensius Petrus Sayrani; Rudi Rohi
JKAP (Jurnal Kebijakan dan Administrasi Publik) Vol 29, No 2 (2025): November
Publisher : Magister Ilmu Administrasi Publik

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.22146/jkap.107939

Abstract

Despite extensive democratic reforms and administrative decentralization, Indonesia continues to struggle with persistent voter exclusion in its remote island regions. Existing studies often attribute this issue to technical or logistical limitations, overlooking the bureaucratic and institutional roots of the problem. This study addresses that gap by examining how bureaucratic design and institutional misalignment contribute to the reproduction of electoral exclusion within decentralized yet fragmented administrative systems. Focusing on Flores Timur, an archipelagic district in East Nusa Tenggara, this research employs a qualitative case study approach, utilizing 28 in-depth interviews with election officials, civil registry staff, and local stakeholders, supported by document analysis. Findings reveal that voter exclusion from the Daftar Pemilih Tetap (Final Voter List) is structurally embedded, stemming from the institutional disconnect between the Komisi Pemilihan Umum Daerah (KPUD) and the Dinas Kependudukan dan Pencatatan Sipil (Disdukcapil). The absence of a shared, binding data system has created what this study terms an administrative blind spot. In this zone, no agency fully claims responsibility for data accuracy, resulting in passive but recurring disenfranchisement. The study’s novelty lies in theorizing latent disenfranchisement, a form of exclusion produced not by intent but by bureaucratic rigidity, fragmented accountability, and non-interoperable systems. Extending the concept of bureaucratic disenfranchisement, the study offers new insights and policy recommendations for inclusive, coordinated electoral reform.

Page 57 of 57 | Total Record : 566

 53   54   55   56   57 

Filter by Year

1996 2026


Reset
Filter By Issues
All Issue Vol 30, No 1 (2026): May Vol 29, No 2 (2025): November Vol 29, No 1 (2025): May Vol 28, No 1 (2024): May 2024 Vol 28, No 2 (2024): November Vol 27, No 2 (2023): November Vol 27, No 1 (2023): May Vol 26, No 1 (2022): May 2022 Vol 26, No 2 (2022): November Vol 26, No 1 (2022): May Vol 25, No 1 (2021): May, 2021 Vol 25, No 2 (2021): November Vol 24, No 2 (2020): November Vol 24, No 1 (2020): May Vol 23, No 2 (2019): November Vol 23, No 1 (2019): May Vol 22, No 2 (2018): November Vol 22, No 1 (2018): May Vol 21, No 2 (2017): November Vol 21, No 1 (2017): May Vol 20, No 2 (2016): November Vol 20, No 1 (2016): May 2015: JKAP Volume 19 Nomor 2, November Tahun 2015 2015: JKAP Volume 19 Nomor 1, Mei Tahun 2015 Vol 19, No 2 (2015): November Vol 19, No 1 (2015): May 2014: JKAP Volume 18 Nomor 2, November Tahun 2014 2014: JKAP Volume 18 Nomor 1, Mei Tahun 2014 Vol 18, No 2 (2014): November Vol 18, No 1 (2014): May 2013: JKAP Volume 17 Nomor 2, Tahun 2013 2013: JKAP Volume 17 Nomor 1, Tahun 2013 Vol 17, No 2 (2013): November Vol 17, No 1 (2013): May 2012: JKAP VOLUME 16 NOMOR 2, TAHUN 2012 2012: JKAP VOLUME 16 NOMOR 1, TAHUN 2012 Vol 16, No 2 (2012): November Vol 16, No 1 (2012): May 2011: JKAP VOLUME 15 NOMOR 1, TAHUN 2011 Vol 15, No 1 (2011): May 2010: JKAP VOLUME 14 NOMOR 2, TAHUN 2010 2010: JKAP VOLUME 14 NOMOR 1, TAHUN 2010 Vol 14, No 2 (2010): November Vol 14, No 1 (2010): May 2009: JKAP VOLUME 13 NOMOR 2, TAHUN 2009 2009: JKAP VOLUME 13 NOMOR 1, TAHUN 2009 Vol 13, No 2 (2009): November Vol 13, No 1 (2009): May 2008: JKAP VOLUME 12 NOMOR 2, TAHUN 2008 2008: JKAP VOLUME 12 NOMOR 1, TAHUN 2008 2008: JKAP VOLUME 12 NOMOR 1, TAHUN 2008 Vol 12, No 2 (2008): November Vol 12, No 1 (2008): May 2007: JKAP VOLUME 11 NOMOR 2, TAHUN 2007 2007: JKAP VOLUME 11 NOMOR 2, TAHUN 2007 2007: JKAP VOLUME 11 NOMOR 1, TAHUN 2007 2007: JKAP VOLUME 11 NOMOR 1, TAHUN 2007 2006: JKAP VOLUME 10 NOMOR 2, TAHUN 2006 2006: JKAP VOLUME 10 NOMOR 2, TAHUN 2006 2006: JKAP VOLUME 10 NOMOR 1, TAHUN 2006 2006: JKAP VOLUME 10 NOMOR 1, TAHUN 2006 2005: JKAP VOLUME 9 NOMOR 2, TAHUN 2005 2005: JKAP VOLUME 9 NOMOR 2, TAHUN 2005 2005: JKAP VOLUME 9 NOMOR 1, TAHUN 2005 2005: JKAP VOLUME 9 NOMOR 1, TAHUN 2005 2004: JKAP VOLUME 8 NOMOR 2, TAHUN 2004 2004: JKAP VOLUME 8 NOMOR 2, TAHUN 2004 2004: JKAP VOLUME 8 NOMOR 1, TAHUN 2004 2004: JKAP VOLUME 8 NOMOR 1, TAHUN 2004 2003: JKAP VOLUME 7 NOMOR 2, TAHUN 2003 2003: JKAP VOLUME 7 NOMOR 2, TAHUN 2003 2003: JKAP VOLUME 7 NOMOR 1, TAHUN 2003 2003: JKAP VOLUME 7 NOMOR 1, TAHUN 2003 2002: JKAP VOLUME 6 NOMOR 2, TAHUN 2002 2002: JKAP VOLUME 6 NOMOR 2, TAHUN 2002 2002: JKAP VOLUME 6 NOMOR 1, TAHUN 2002 2002: JKAP VOLUME 6 NOMOR 1, TAHUN 2002 2001: JKAP VOLUME 5 NOMOR 2, TAHUN 2001 2001: JKAP VOLUME 5 NOMOR 2, TAHUN 2001 2001: JKAP VOLUME 5 NOMOR 1, TAHUN 2001 2001: JKAP VOLUME 5 NOMOR 1, TAHUN 2001 2000: JKAP VOLUME 4 NOMOR 2, TAHUN 2000 2000: JKAP VOLUME 4 NOMOR 2, TAHUN 2000 2000: JKAP VOLUME 4 NOMOR 1, TAHUN 2000 2000: JKAP VOLUME 4 NOMOR 1, TAHUN 2000 1999: JKAP VOLUME 3 NOMOR 2, TAHUN 1999 1999: JKAP VOLUME 3 NOMOR 2, TAHUN 1999 1999: JKAP VOLUME 3 NOMOR 1, TAHUN 1999 1999: JKAP VOLUME 3 NOMOR 1, TAHUN 1999 1998: JKAP VOLUME 2 NOMOR 2, TAHUN 1998 1998: JKAP VOLUME 2 NOMOR 2, TAHUN 1998 1998: JKAP VOLUME 2 NOMOR 1, TAHUN 1998 1998: JKAP VOLUME 2 NOMOR 1, TAHUN 1998 1997: JKAP VOLUME 1 NOMOR 2, TAHUN 1997 1997: JKAP VOLUME 1 NOMOR 2, TAHUN 1997 1996: JKAP VOLUME 1 NOMOR 1, TAHUN 1996 1996: JKAP VOLUME 1 NOMOR 1, TAHUN 1996 More Issue