cover
Article Per Year (5 Year)
All
Home Page
OAI Link
Editorial Team
Contact
Reviewer
Google Scholar
Contact Name
-
Contact Email
-
Phone
-
Journal Mail Official
jpfunimed@unimed.ac.id
Editorial Address
Jurnal Pendidikan Fisika, Publications Unit, The Magister of Physics Education Departement in State University of Medan, Jl. Williem Iskandar, Medan, Indonesia
Location
Kota medan,
Sumatera utara
INDONESIA
Jurnal Pendidikan Fisika
Published by Universitas Negeri Medan
ISSN : 2252732X     EISSN : 23017651     DOI : 10.22611/jpf
Core Subject : Science, Education,
Education Physics
Arjuna Subject : -
Articles 293 Documents
 1   2   3   4   5 
PENGEMBANGAN PERANGKAT PEMBELAJARAN BERBASIS MASALAH UNTUK PENINGKATAN CAPAIAN KOMPETENSI FISIKA UMUM II MAHASISWA PRODI PENDIDIKAN FISIKA FMIPA UNIVERSITAS NEGERI MEDAN Jurubahasa Sinuraya; Sehat Simatupang; Ida Wahyuni
Jurnal Pendidikan Fisika Vol 3, No 1 (2014)
Publisher : Universitas Negeri Medan

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.22611/jpf.v3i1.3272

Abstract

Tujuan utama penelitian ini adalah untuk menghasilkan lembarkegiatan mahasiswa berbasis masalah (LKMBM) Fisika Umum II. Penelitian ini termasuk jenis penelitian R & D, namun untuk menghasilkan perangkat pembelajaran LKMBM digunakan model disain Dick dan Carey. Struktur isi LKMBM Fisika Umum II ini merupakan implementasi dari konsep pembelajaran berbasis masalah, dan konsep strategi pemecahan masalah. Pelaksanaan penelitian ini dibagi atas tiga tahapan yaitu tahap perencanaan, pengembangan, dan evaluasi formatif. Pelaksananaan evaluasi formatif dilaksanakan melalui tiga tahapan, yaitu: uji validasi oleh 3 orang reviewer, uji coba satu satu melibatkan 3 orang mahasiswa, uji coba kelompok kecil melibatkan 15 orang mahasiswa. Berdasarkan hasil analisis data dan pembahasan, hasil penelitian ini adalah: (1) seperangkat lembar kegiatan mahasiswa berbasis masalah (LKMBM) Fisika Umum II yang ditata dalam 10 komponen, yaitu: (a) judul kegiatan, (b) tujuan pembelajaran, (c) permasalahan, (d) hipotesis, (e) pengumpulan data, (f) pembahasan, (g) simpulan, (h) daftar pustaka, (i) lampiran, dan (j) tes kompetensi; 2) hasil uji coba LKMBM beserta perangkat perangkat pendukungnya dengan melibatkan para ahli dan mahasiswa sebagai pengguna LKMBM, secara keseluruhan sudah memberikan penilaian yang baik, layak digunakan dalam perbaikan pembelajaran fisika umum.
DEVELOPMENT OF TEACHING MATERIALS WITH PYROLYSIS TOOLS TO OVERCOME STUDENT'S UNCEPTIONAL MISCEPTIONS IN THE PHYSICS STUDY IN SMA LUBUKLINGGAU CITY Endang Lovisia; Wahyu Arini
Jurnal Pendidikan Fisika Vol 9, No 2 (2020)
Publisher : Universitas Negeri Medan

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.22611/jpf.v9i2.20220

Abstract

This research purposed to develop teaching materials with pyrolysis tools at temperature and heat materials thatare valid, practical and effective. This type of research is R & D with the ADDIE model, the research subjects are 3 schools in SMA Kota Lubuklinggau in the high, medium and low categories. The research sampling technique used purposive sampling technique. From the three schools, a sample of 30 students was obtained, for each school there were 10 students as the sample. The 30 students have high, medium and low abilities. The validation obtained from the three material, language and media expert validators is that 80.49% of the teaching materials are in the very good category. Student response to teaching materials was 82.36% in the category of strongly agree. Student learning outcomes increased after being given a test of 5 questions, seen from tcount = 36.20 and ttable = 2.04 because tcount ≥ t table so it can be said that Ha is accepted and Ho is rejected. Therefore, the average value of the cognitive learning outcomes of students can be said to increase. And also get an n-gain score of 0.76 with high criteria. So that physics teaching materials using pyrolysis tools can be said to be valid, practical and effective.
PENINGKATAN BERPIKIR KREATIF DAN HASIL BELAJAR FISIKA MELALUI PENDEKATAN CREATIVE PROBLEM SOLVING (CPS) Bambang Subakir
Jurnal Pendidikan Fisika Vol 2, No 2 (2013)
Publisher : Universitas Negeri Medan

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.22611/jpf.v2i2.3477

Abstract

The objective in this research to describing implementation oflearning physics using the approach Creative Problem Solving (CPS) toimprove creative thinking skills and students’ achievement in class XI IPA-1SMA Harapan 3 Delitua. The research method applied is Classroom ActionResearch (CAR) through two learning cycles; each cycle consisted byplanning, implementation, observation and reflection. The results showedthat learning physics with CPS approach can improve students’ ability tothink creatively. After learning undertaken by the CPS approach increasedstudents ability to think creatively and achievement. This is evidenced by: (1) Increasing the number of students who pass out of 12 person in the first cycleto 29 person in the second cycle with an average of 77,39 learning outcomes.N-gain in the first cycle of 0.19 is included in the category of low-and N-gainin the second cycle of 0.30 is included in the medium category, (2) Activitygroup average student in the learning process are included in the categoryActivities Fair increased to High Activity category, and (3) The use ofcreative thinking of students in the first cycle an enough increased to a highin the second cycle. Creative thinking ability of students in teaching physicsto provide benefits in solving problems in the community.
THE INFLUENCE OF LEARNING INSTRUMENTS PROBLEM BASED LEARNING MODEL TO IMPROVE PHYSICS LEARNING OUTCOMES IN STATIC FLUID Pretti T. M. Ambarita; Sahyar .; Ridwan A.Sani
Jurnal Pendidikan Fisika Vol 5, No 2 (2016)
Publisher : Universitas Negeri Medan

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.22611/jpf.v5i2.4408

Abstract

The objective of this research were to produce a lesson plans and worksheets learning instrument design that corresponded to problem based learning models and analyze whether it was can improve student learning outcomes. This research development was done in classroom by using development research methods of Analysis Design Development Implementation and Evaluation (ADDIE). ADDIE method was used as a method for designing a lesson plans and worksheets that corresponded to it. Three stages of development of lesson plans and worksheets such as an assessment by a team of experts, small group, and a field test. Assessment by a team of experts based on theree aspects such as format, content, and language. In small group and field test based on a response of students sheet. The student response sheet contains of teacher's ability to teach. Worksheet assessment based on aspects of the format, content, and language. Assessment of student learning outcomes based on pretest and posttest were analyzed by ngain. The results of development of lesson plans and worksheets were validated by a team of experts on aspects of format, content, and language. The result both of development of lesson plans and worksheets in small group and field test produced good categories. There was an increased student learning outcomes of  first to third meeting with categories of low to moderate.
THE EFFECTS OF INQUIRY LEARNING MODEL TRAINING AND CRITICAL THINKING TOWARDS SMA STUDENT LEARNING OUTCOMES Ella Lady Saura; Betty M. Turnip
Jurnal Pendidikan Fisika Vol 3, No 2 (2014)
Publisher : Universitas Negeri Medan

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.22611/jpf.v3i2.3171

Abstract

The purposes of the research are: (1) To determine differences in learning outcomes of students with Inquiry Training models and Direct Instruction teaching models, (2) to determine differences in physics learning outcomes of students who have high critical thinking and low critical thinking, (3) to determine the interaction between learning models with the level of critical thinking in improving student Physics learning outcomes. The sample in this study conducted in a cluster random sampling of two classes, where the first class as a class experiment applied Inquiry Training models as a class and the second class of controls implemented Direct Instruction models. The instrument is used in this study is physics learning outcomes tests in narrative form as many as 7 questions and critical thinking test in narrative form as 7 questions that have been declared valid and reliable. The results were found: (1) there are differences in physical students learning outcomes are taught by Inquiry Training models and Direct Instruction teaching models. Learning outcomes of students who are taught by Inquiry Learning Model Training better than student learning outcomes are taught with Direct Instruction Model Learning. (2) There is a difference in student's learning outcomes that have high critical thinking and low critical thinking. Student learning outcomes that have a high critical thinking better than student learning outcomes that have a low critical thinking. (3) There is interaction between learning and mastery of material Model Physics prerequisite to student learning outcomes. Learning outcomes of students who are taught by the model is influenced also by the Inquiry Training critical thinking, while learning outcomes of students who are taught with Direct Instruction models are not affected by the students' critical thinking.
IMPLEMENTATION INQUIRY LEARNING MODEL TO IMPROVE SKILLS TRAINING PROCESS COST OF DISCUSSION ON SCIENCE IN MOTION STRAIGHT SMA NEGERI 1 NAMORAMBE Suhaila Hasibuan; Purwanto Purwanto
Jurnal Pendidikan Fisika Vol 7, No 2 (2018)
Publisher : Universitas Negeri Medan

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.22611/jpf.v7i2.8841

Abstract

research aims knowing implementation Training Inquiry learning model to improve science process skills on the subject of the motion straight at SMA Negeri 1 Namorambe. This research was quasi experiment. The population empirically are all first semester students of class X SMA Negeri 1 Namorambe. Samples were taken using cluster random sampling technique, which is a class X MIA-2 as the experimental class learning model treated Inquiry Training, and Class X MIA-3 as a control group treated with conventional learning model with each class numbered 36 students. The research instrument is a test description as much as 9 question, and the activity of science process skills. Data were analyzed using normality test, homogeneity, and median equality test (test two parties and one party t-test) and test N-gain. The average value pretest experimental classes and control classes 30.50 and 30.05 respectively. The average value obtained postes both classes respectively 76.3 and 68.4. Both classes have a variation in normal distribution and homogeneous. Results observation science process skills activities experimental class students increased by an average of 5.5% every KPS. The test results test two parties obtained t = 0.233 and t table = 1.997 (t <t table), this suggests that the ability of the same early in the second grade. The test results of the t test obtained t = 4.593 and t table = 1.671 (t> t table), so there is a significant effect of the learning model Inquiry Training to improve science process skills on the subject of the motion straight at SMA Negeri 1 Namorambe.
ANALYSIS LEARNING MODEL OF DISCOVERY AND UNDERSTANDING THE CONCEPT PRELIMINARY TO PHYSICS LEARNING OUTCOMES SMA Sri Rosepda Sebayang; Betty M. Turnip
Jurnal Pendidikan Fisika Vol 4, No 2 (2015)
Publisher : Universitas Negeri Medan

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.22611/jpf.v4i2.3235

Abstract

This study aims: 1) to determine whether the student learning outcomes using discovery learning is better than conventional learning 2) To determine whether the learning outcomes of students who have a high initial concept understanding better then of low initial concept understanding, and 3) to determine the effect of interaction discovery learning and understanding of the initial concept of the learning outcomes of students. The samples in this study was taken by cluster random sampling two classes where class X PIA 3 as a class experiment with applying discovery learning and class X PIA 2 as a control class by applying conventional learning. The instrument used in this study is a test of learning outcomes in the form of multiple-choice comprehension test initial concept description form. The results of research are: 1) learning outcomes of students who were taught with discovery learning is better than the learning outcomes of students who are taught by conventional learning, 2) student learning outcomes with high initial conceptual understanding better than the learning outcomes of students with low initial conceptual understanding, and 3) there was no interaction between discovery learning and understanding of initial concepts for the student learning outcomes.
THE INFLUENCE OF PROBLEM HOTS (HIGH ORDER THINKING SKILL) BASED ON DEDUCTIVE HYPOTHESIS ON BASIC PHYSICS 2 TOWARDS STUDENT LEARNING RESULTS Martin - Martin; Tri Isti Hartini
Jurnal Pendidikan Fisika Vol 9, No 1 (2020)
Publisher : Universitas Negeri Medan

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.22611/jpf.v9i1.14450

Abstract

Research has been conducted on the effect of Giving Hots (High Order Thinking Skill) Based on Deductive Hypothesis on Basic Physics Course 2 on Student Learning Outcomes. The research method uses a mixed method. Where the researchers first developed a product in the form of HOTS questions based on deductive hypotheses in the basic physics course 2, (Research and Development) after the questions were developed and validated, then implemented in learning and assessment (experiment). The validation technique is to ask the expert, in this case as a validator, to check the accuracy and provide an assessment of the appropriateness of the items with the indicators and the editor of the question writing. Based on the results of the validation by the evaluation experts obtained an average percentage assessment of all aspects was 83.33%, the results of the validation by the material experts obtained an average percentage of assessment of the overall aspects was 78.33%. Based on the results of field trials, the average percentage assessment of all aspects was 81.67%. From these results, it shows that the HOTS questions developed are appropriate to be used as an assessment tool in basic physics lectures 2. The influence of HOTS questions based on deductive hypotheses on student learning outcomes can be seen by using the Gain index. In this study, the Gain index value of 0.52, which shows that the effectiveness of giving HOTS questions based on a deductive hypothesis on student learning outcomes in the medium range
THE LEARNING RESULT DIFFERENCE OF STUDENT TEACH BY USING ENHANCEMENT LEARNING MODEL OF STUDENT’S THINKING ABILITY WITH CONVENSIONAL MODEL FOR FORCE AND NEWTON LAWS MATERIAL Derlina .; Bintang Nainggolan
Jurnal Pendidikan Fisika Vol 2, No 1 (2013)
Publisher : Universitas Negeri Medan

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.22611/jpf.v2i1.4340

Abstract

This research was done to observe the difference of learning achievement between student who have been teach by Enhancement Learning Model of Student’s Thinking Ability and Conventional Model. This research was done at SMP Negeri 2 Gebang. Type of this research is quasi experiment. Research population is every student of grade VIII semester 2 SMP Negeri 2 Gebang. Research sample was taken by random sampling around 2 classes as 34 students for experiment class and 34 students for control class. Learning achievement of test objective 20 of multiple choice was done as an instrument. The experiment result of pretest average is 37.94 for experiment class and 36.82 for control class. Treatment was done to each class, post test average score is 73.38 for experiment class and for student who have been teach by conventional learning is 67.05. Hypothetical testing is tcalculate > ttabe i.e 3.459 > 1.66 with significance standard α = 0.05 and dk = 66. It means that Ha was accepted, so it may conclude that there is a difference of learning achievement between Enhancement Learning Model of Student’s Thinking Ability with Conventional Learning Model for Force and Newton Laws on Grade VIII SMP Negeri 2 Gebang Annual Year 2011/2012.
THE EFFECT OF GUIDED INQUIRY LEARNING MODELS TO IMPROVE LEARNING OUTCOMES AND STUDENTS ACTIVITY LEARNING Irma Sari Minalta Tarigan; Rita Juliani; Juli Limbong
Jurnal Pendidikan Fisika Vol 7, No 1 (2018)
Publisher : Universitas Negeri Medan

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.22611/jpf.v7i1.6926

Abstract

The aim of  study is to determine the effect of Guided Inquiry learning  to learning outcomes and students activity learning on Work and Energy material. Research type is quasi experiment and using Control Group Pretest-Posttesr Design method. Research conducted at SMA Swasta katolik Budi Murni 2 Medan in academic year 2016/2017. The population in this research is all students of Class X. The sample of the research is taken with class random sampling technique. In the study, the measurements in the form of pretest to the subject and then treated with Guided Inquiry Models and within a certain time post-test is given. The result of data analysis using t one party test shows that there are significant effect of guided inquiry learning to learning outcomes students on Work and Energy material. 

Page 3 of 30 | Total Record : 293

 1   2   3   4   5 

Filter by Year

2012 2025


Reset
Filter By Issues
All Issue Vol. 14 No. 1 (2025) Vol. 13 No. 2 (2024) Vol 13, No 1 (2024) Vol 12, No 2 (2023) Vol 12, No 1 (2023) Vol 11, No 2 (2022) Vol 11, No 1 (2022) Vol 10, No 2 (2021) Vol 10, No 1 (2021) Vol 9, No 2 (2020) Vol 9, No 1 (2020) Vol 8, No 2 (2019) Vol 8, No 1 (2019) Vol 7, No 2 (2018) Vol 7, No 1 (2018) Vol 6, No 2 (2017) Vol 6, No 1 (2017) Vol 5, No 2 (2016) Vol 5, No 1 (2016) Vol 4, No 2 (2015) Vol 4, No 1 (2015) Vol 3, No 2 (2014) Vol 3, No 1 (2014) Vol 2, No 2 (2013) Vol 2, No 1 (2013) Vol 1, No 2 (2012) Vol 1, No 1 (2012) More Issue