Articles
15 Documents
Search results for
, issue
"Vol 8 No 01 (2023)"
:
15 Documents
clear
<![CDATA[Kepastian Hukum Kewajiban Saksi Instrumenter Dalam Menjaga Kerahasiaan Akta Autentik dan Akibat Hukumnya Terhadap Notaris ]]>
<![CDATA[I Dewa Gede Agung Putra Diatmika]]>;
<![CDATA[Ayu Putu Laksmi Danyathi]]>
<![CDATA[ Acta Comitas Vol 8 No 01 (2023) ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[Universitas Udayana ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
DOI: 10.24843/AC.2023.v08.i01.p11
<![CDATA[This research aims to examine the legal consequences of the non-regulation of the obligation of instrumental witnesses to maintain the confidentiality of authentic deeds against a notary and examine the formulation of arrangements for instrumental witness obligations in maintaining the confidentiality of the authentic deeds. This research uses normative legal research methods that use statutory and legal concept analysis approaches based on primary, secondary, and tertiary legal material sources, with the snowball method, as well as using descriptive analysis techniques and argumentative techniques. The results show that legal consequences of non-regulation of the obligation of instrumental witnesses to maintain the secrecy of authentic deeds to notaries is that notaries have the potential to be dragged into and subject to administrative sanctions, civil sanctions, and criminal sanctions due to the actions of instrumental witnesses who disclose secret deeds. Arrangements regarding the obligation of instrumental witnesses to maintain the confidentiality of the authentic deeds are important for legal certainty, provide protection to the parties involved in the deed and provide a sense of security to the notary. It is necessary to add arrangements for the obligations of deed witnesses/instrumental witnesses to maintain the confidentiality of the authentic deeds in the Explanation of Article 16 paragraph (1) letter f UUJN-P, as well as add to the understanding of deed witnesses/instrumental witnesses in the General Provisions Article 1 UUJN-P.]]>
<![CDATA[Keabsahan Akta Autentik Dalam Pembacaan Akta RUPS Apabila Para Pihak Tidak Mengaktifkan Kamera/Tidak Saling Melihat ]]>
<![CDATA[Komang Utista Cahya Otiana]]>;
<![CDATA[I Gede Pasek Eka Wisanjaya]]>
<![CDATA[ Acta Comitas Vol 8 No 01 (2023) ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[Universitas Udayana ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
DOI: 10.24843/AC.2023.v08.i01.p1
<![CDATA[In this research, the main objective is to find out the validity of the authentic deed in reading the deed of the General Meeting of Shareholders (GMS) if the parties do not activate the camera or do not see each other. The author uses the application of normative research with a statutory and conceptual approach, the sources of legal materials for this research are primary and secondary sources of legal materials. The author gets the result that the validity of the deed is authentic in the reading of the GMS deed if the parties do not activate the camera or do not see each other. That Article 77 Paragraph (1) of Law of the Republic of Indonesia Number 40 of 2007 which states "besides organizing a GMS as referred to in Article 76, a GMS can also be conducted via teleconference media, video conferences, or other electronic media facilities that allow all GMS participants to see each other and listen directly to and participate in meetings”. Whereas with this matter the implementation of the GMS can be carried out through electronic media such as video conferencing, but if during the implementation there are parties who do not activate the camera due to signal constraints or other matters then this will not cause legal consequences as long as the parties can still hear, see, understand and understand the contents of the deed and the deed is considered as an authentic deed.]]>
<![CDATA[Terjadinya Force Majeure Dalam Penyimpanan Minuta Akta Notaris ]]>
<![CDATA[Ida Bagus Putra Prawira]]>;
<![CDATA[Ketut Rai Setiabudhi]]>;
<![CDATA[Dewa Gde Rudy]]>
<![CDATA[ Acta Comitas Vol 8 No 01 (2023) ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[Universitas Udayana ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
DOI: 10.24843/AC.2023.v08.i01.p7
<![CDATA[This study aims to be able to provide an understanding related to the position of notary deed minuta storage in the event of force majeure and efforts to prevent damage to notary deed minuta caused by force majeure. The writer's method of writing uses normative law departing from the void of norms. The research study of the vacuum of this norm is due to the non-regulation of damage or loss to the storage of minutes of deeds by a Notary which is an obligation in carrying out his position. This research contains primary legal sources that examine the Notary Office Act and secondary legal sources by reviewing several scientific journal literature. Through this research, using the approach refers to laws and regulations regarding the issue of depositing minuta deed referring to the Notary Office Law. The results of the author's research show that the Notary Office Law does not specifically regulate the electronic storage of minutes of deeds. Juridically, safeguarding the minuta deed is not stated in the Notary Office Law and only states that the storage is part of the Notary's protocol. Force majeure is a situation that cannot be predicted by humans, let alone natural disasters. The urgency of updating for the storage of minutes of deeds that are protected from coercive circumstances or beyond human control force majeure is by making electronic fillings with the concept of Cyber Notary.]]>
<![CDATA[Urgensi Pembentukan Aturan Cyber Notary Berkaitan Dengan Penggunaan Sidik Jari Elektronik ]]>
<![CDATA[Dian Barry Wahyudi]]>;
<![CDATA[Gde Made Swardhana]]>
<![CDATA[ Acta Comitas Vol 8 No 01 (2023) ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[Universitas Udayana ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
DOI: 10.24843/AC.2023.v08.i01.p12
<![CDATA[The absence of regulations regarding the attachment of fingerprints electronically will create a norm vacuum. The Amendment UUJN has required the appearers to attach their fingerprints so that there is not only a signature in the minutes of the deed. Therefore, the aim of this study is to examine the solicitation of the cyber notary in relation to the use of electronic fingerprints in making deeds, so the effectiveness of the implementation of cyber notary within the scope of the notary's duties. This research uses normative research that focuses on positive legal rules, and uses statutory as well as conceptual approaches. The application of cyber notary relating to the use of electronic fingerprints in making the deed cannot be carried out because there are no arrangements related to electronic fingerprints. The implementation of Cyber ??Notary within the Scope of the Notary Position has not been running properly or is not effective because the implementing regulations related to cyber notary have not been issued.]]>
<![CDATA[Peran Notaris Dalam Pendirian Perseroan untuk Usaha Mikro Dan Kecil ]]>
<![CDATA[Andi Nilam Cahya Zulfikar]]>;
<![CDATA[I Ketut Sudantra]]>
<![CDATA[ Acta Comitas Vol 8 No 01 (2023) ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[Universitas Udayana ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
DOI: 10.24843/AC.2023.v08.i01.p2
<![CDATA[The purpose of this study is to analyze the company for micro and small businesses in terms of the Job Creation Act and the Limited Liability Company Act and analyze the role of a notary in establishing a company for micro and small businesses. This research is a type of normative research, using a statutory approach and a comparative approach. The results of this study are that there are very significant differences and there are still many legal loopholes contained in the Employment Creation Act regulations regarding companies for micro and small businesses, and that the process of establishing companies for micro and small businesses does not require a notarial deed in accordance with the provisions of the Act. - Law Number 11 of 2020 concerning Job Creation where the establishment process is carried out by registering it electronically at the Ministry of Law and Human Rights without the need for a notary deed.]]>
<![CDATA[Pengaturan Peran Notaris dan Metode Penyimpanan Minuta Akta Notariil Digital di Era Industri 4.0 ]]>
<![CDATA[Tjokorda Istri Agung Adintya Devi]]>;
<![CDATA[I Made Marta Wijaya]]>;
<![CDATA[Anak Agung Istri Ari Atu Dewi]]>
<![CDATA[ Acta Comitas Vol 8 No 01 (2023) ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[Universitas Udayana ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
DOI: 10.24843/AC.2023.v08.i01.p8
<![CDATA[The purposes of this research are to identify and deciphere the Notary’s obligations and responsibilities to maintain the party’s information and data that contained in the Minutes of Deed pursuant to Amandement Notary Position Act and to analyze and elaborate th further method of storing the Minutes of Deed digitally based on the applicable laws. This study is used normative legal research that combined with several approaches namely legal concept analysis and statutory approach, also this study used qualitative analysis techniques through with several steps, namely systematization, description, and explanation. The research finds out that the Notary’s obligations and responsibilities to maintain the party’s information and data that contained in the Minutes of Deed as regulated in Article 16 paragraph (1) letter b and letter f. The method for storing Minutes of Deed digitally in the future is in accordance with the provisions of GR Number 28 of 2012, the ITE Law, and the Amendment Notary Position Act by Notaries to digitize the Minutes of Deed as part of the Notary Protocol is by transferring media as regulated in GR Number 28 of 2012 with stages, namely scanning or scanning of Minutes of Deed, authentication of digital Minutes of Deed, and storage of digital Minutes of Deed in physical storage media or cloud computing.]]>
<![CDATA[Pertanggungjawaban Hukum dan Perlindungan Hukum Notaris Terhadap Kewenangannya Membuat Party Acte ]]>
<![CDATA[I Gusti Ngurah Md Rama Andika]]>;
<![CDATA[Cokorda Dalem Dahana]]>
<![CDATA[ Acta Comitas Vol 8 No 01 (2023) ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[Universitas Udayana ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
DOI: 10.24843/AC.2023.v08.i01.p13
<![CDATA[This research has purpose to inform about law protection and responsibilities Notary for party acte they have made. This research is studied using normative methodthat based on the theory of responsibility and protection that help to emphasize the scope of both, so that the legal responsibilities and protections for Notaries can be identified in making a party act. The results of this study conclude that there are three (3) forms of legal responsibility of a Notary in making a party act, namely first legal responsibility for the UUJN and applicable laws and regulations, second legal responsibility based on sanctions, namely administrative, criminal and civil, third absolute legal responsibility and based on error. Legal protection for a Notary is provided by laws and regulations through the rights/obligations of a Notary and based on an institution, is given by the Notary Honorary Council. The position of a Notary who is noble and dignified must be carried out with full responsibility and protected by law from parties who want to degrade the position of a Notary.]]>
<![CDATA[Penerapan Tata Cara Pendaftaran Tanah di Indonesia Berdasarkan Peraturan Pemerintah No. 18 Tahun 2021 ]]>
<![CDATA[Putu Reza Aditya Tirandika]]>;
<![CDATA[Made Gde Subha Karma Resen]]>
<![CDATA[ Acta Comitas Vol 8 No 01 (2023) ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[Universitas Udayana ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
DOI: 10.24843/AC.2023.v08.i01.p3
<![CDATA[The purpose of this study is to find and analyze the legal system governing land registration with respect to administrative power, land rights, housing units and land registration under Decree No. 18 of 2021 and to identify Decree No. 24 of 1997. to analyze. Identifying the legal impact of the administrative power, land rights, housing units and land registry on land registration by Decree No. 18 of 2021 and amendments to Decree No. 24 of 1997 after the enforcement of Decree No. 18 of 1997 and analysis effective 2021. This study is a normative legal study. The method used in this study is normative juridical with research specifications is descriptive analytical and data collection techniques using literature study with qualitative data analysis methods. To conclude, based on the findings of the investigation, that the Decree which is the legal basis for Decree No. 18 of 2021 on Land Rights, Housing and Management of Land Registry Units is still being implemented without government intervention. I can. Statutes that are canceled in advance. Decree No. 24 of 1997 on Land Registry. This differs in the notice period between the two decrees.]]>
<![CDATA[Pengaturan Penggunaan Frasa Menghadap Dan Berhadapan Dalam Pembuatan Akta Notaris ]]>
<![CDATA[Firhan Umar Bagazi]]>;
<![CDATA[I Gede Artha]]>
<![CDATA[ Acta Comitas Vol 8 No 01 (2023) ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[Universitas Udayana ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
DOI: 10.24843/AC.2023.v08.i01.p9
<![CDATA[The writing of this article aims for reveal and analyze the arrangement of the phrase facing and dealing in legislation, especially the Notarian Law and which phrase is more appropriate to use in the case of making an authentic deed by a notary. This article discusses legal issues, namely empty norms using normative legal research methods as well as statute and conceptual approaches, the legal source materials in this article come from fundamental, second to third legal materials. This study reflect that there are no rules governing the use of the phrase facing or facing in the making of a notary deed, in the regulation and definition of the UUJN (P) there is zero definition regarding the use of the phrase. This phrase is very important because each phrase places the notary in a different position where in the opposite phrase the notary is assumed to be able to face each other not within his area of ??office, while the phrase facing indicates that the notary is passive in that it is the appearers who come to meet the notary in the area of ??his office. So that clarity regarding the use of this phrase is very necessary considering the role of the notary who must be passive and the arrangement of this phrase can also protect the notary from possible involvement or problems in the deed he made.]]>
<![CDATA[Penyusunan Akta Perjanjian Di Bidang Hak Kekayaan Intelektual : Peranan Notaris dan Konsultan Kekayaan Intelektual ]]>
<![CDATA[Shuhei Kamada]]>;
<![CDATA[Dewa Ayu Dian Sawitri]]>
<![CDATA[ Acta Comitas Vol 8 No 01 (2023) ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[Universitas Udayana ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
<![CDATA[Studi ini bertujuan untuk mengetahui dan menganalisis peranan notaris dan konsultan kekayaan intelektual dalam penyusunan akta perjanjian di bidang hak kekayaan intelektual serta mengetahui dan menganalisis hal-hal yang perlu diperhatikan oleh notaris dan konsultan kekayaan intelektual dalam pembuatan perjanjian di bidang hak kekayaan intelektual. Penelitian ini menggunakan metode penelitian hukum normatif dengan pendekatan perundang-undangan dan pendekatan konseptual. Hasil dari penelitian ini menjelaskan bahwa Peranan notaris dan konsultan kekayaan intelektual dalam penyusunan akta hak kekayaan intelektual adalah notaris sesuai ketentuan Pasal 15 UUJN memiliki kewenangan untuk membuat akta autentik mengenai semua perbuatan maupun perjanjian termasuk juga peralihan atas hak kekayaan intelektual tersebut. Sementara, konsultan kekayaan intelektual memiliki peran sesuai dengan ketentuan dalam Pasal 13 PP No. 100/2021 sebagai konsultan yang dibutuhkan perannya dalam konsultasi terkait adanya peralihan hak atas kekayaan intelektual tersebut. Hal-hal yang perlu diperhatikan oleh notaris dan konsultan kekayaan intelektual dalam penyusunan akta di bidang hak kekayaan intelektual adalah objek kekayaan intelektual, nama pemilik hak kekayaan intelektual, pengecekan adanya pengalihan terhadap objek hak kekayaan intelektual, pengecekan adanya sengketa terhadap objek kekayaan intelektual, serta mengecek pencatatan atas objek kekayaan intelektual di Ditjen KI.]]>
