Al-Jabar : Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika
Al-Jabar : Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika, with registered number p-ISSN: 2086-5872 (print), e-ISSN: 2540-7562 (online), is a scientific journal published by Mathematics Education IAIN Raden Intan Lampung. The aim of this journal publication is to disseminate new theories and research results that have been achieved in the area of mathematics education. Al-Jabar: Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika, particularly focuses on the main issues in the development of the sciences of mathematics education, mathematics education, and applied mathematics. Al-Jabar, has been published since 2010, and starting from 2015, has been published online. Al-Jabar: Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika published twice a year, the period from January to June and July to December. This publication is available online via open access.
Articles
355 Documents
<![CDATA[Pengaruh Gaya Belajar Terhadap Prestasi Belajar Mahasiswa Program Studi Pendidikan Matematika (IAIM NU) Metro ]]>
<![CDATA[Widyawati, Santi]]>
<![CDATA[ Al-Jabar: Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika Vol 7 No 1 (2016): Al-Jabar: Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[Universitas Islam Raden Intan Lampung, INDONESIA ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
DOI: 10.24042/ajpm.v7i1.135
<![CDATA[Learning style is one of the factors that allegedly affect the learning achievement (GPA) of Mathematics Education Mathematics Program of Maarif Nahdatul Ulama Institute of Islamic Studies. The purpose of this research is to know "whether there is influence of learning style type (Visual, Auditorial, and kinestetik) to student learning achievement of Mathematics Education Program of Maarif Nahdatul Ulama Islamic Institute of Mathematics”. The type of this research is comparative causal research with 3 × 1 research design. The population in this research is all students of semester IV of Mathematics Education program of Maarif Islamic Institute Nahdatul Ulama Metro academic year 2015/2016. The sample in this study was obtained by using class random technique. The sample in this study consists of 22 students with details of 10 students who have visual learning style, 4 students who have auditorial learning style, and 8 students who have kinesthetic learning style. Instruments used to collect data are questionnaire learning style and transcript of student grades semester IV of Mathematics Education Mathematics course Maarif Nahdatul Ulama Institute of Islamic Studies. Hypothesis testing in this study used a one way variance analysis with unequal cells.The result of this research is the influence of learning style to learning achievement (GPA) of Mathematics Education Mathematics Program of Maarif Nahdatul Ulama Institute of Islamic Studies. Furthermore, after further test using Scheefe 'method, it was found that students with visual learning styles had the same learning achievement with students with auditorial learning style, while both types of learning styles had better learning achievement compared with students with kinesthetic learning style.]]>
<![CDATA[Komunikasi Matematis Siswa Tunarungu dalam Pembelajaran Matematika didasarkan pada Teori Schoenfeld ]]>
<![CDATA[Mujib, Mujib]]>
<![CDATA[ Al-Jabar: Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika Vol 7 No 1 (2016): Al-Jabar: Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[Universitas Islam Raden Intan Lampung, INDONESIA ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
DOI: 10.24042/ajpm.v7i1.136
<![CDATA[This research was conducted at SMALB Dharma Wanita Pertiwi Bandar Lampung. The subjects of this study were 2 students of hearing impaired class XI. Data analysis techniques are performed by: (1) grouping data into 4 categories: (a) analyzing and understanding problems (b) designing and planning solutions (c) exploring solutions to difficult problems (d) verifying solutions, then reducing data that is not Including in the four categories, (2) present data in the form of narrative text, and (3) summarize the students' deaf mathematical communication. The results of this study indicate that (1) In the stage of analyzing and understanding the problem, students receive direct information received from the problem and convert it into the form of images. (2) At the stage of designing and planning solutions, students look at the problem information to solve the problem so that in their thinking is a global idea of the problem. (3) At the stage of exploring solutions to difficult problems, students work on problems using formulas and methods that are designed and planned in advance. (4) In the stage of verifying the solution, the student simply checks the formula that has been written and checks the answer.]]>
<![CDATA[Sebaran Generalized Extreme Value (GEV) Dan Generalized Pareto (GP) untuk Pendugaan Curah Hujan Ekstrim di Wilayah DKI Jakarta ]]>
<![CDATA[Rinaldi, Achi]]>
<![CDATA[ Al-Jabar: Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika Vol 7 No 1 (2016): Al-Jabar: Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[Universitas Islam Raden Intan Lampung, INDONESIA ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
DOI: 10.24042/ajpm.v7i1.137
<![CDATA[Extreme event such as extreme rainfall have been analyzed and most concern for the country all around the world. There are two common distribution for extreme value which are Generalized Extreme Value distribution and Generalized Pareto distribution. These two distribution have shown good performace to estimate the parameter of extreme value. This research was aim to estimate parameter of extreme value using GEV distribution and GP distribution, and also to characterized effect of extreme event such as flood. The rainfall data was taken from BMKG for 5 location in DKI Jakarta. Both of distribution shown a good perfromance. The resut showed that Tanjung Priok station has biggest location parameter for GEV and also the biggest scale parameter for GP, that mean the biggest probability to take flood effect of the extreme rainfall.]]>
<![CDATA[Peningkatan Prestasi Belajar Matematika Melalui Penerapan Lesson Plan Berbasis Multiple Intelligence ]]>
<![CDATA[Kristanto, Vigih Hery]]>
<![CDATA[ Al-Jabar: Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika Vol 8 No 1 (2017): Al-Jabar: Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[Universitas Islam Raden Intan Lampung, INDONESIA ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
DOI: 10.24042/ajpm.v8i1.598
<![CDATA[The purpose of this research is to find out in writing whether the mathematics achievement of students can be improved by the implementation of lesson plan based on Multiple Intelligence. This type of research is the study of literature with five steps, namely (1) collecting the literature and then do a review of some important terms in the study, (2) collecting relevant literature research result, (3) conducting in-depth analysis based on all the literature that has been obtained by the prepared discussion, (4) develop conclusions based on the analysis, (5) making recommendation based on the findings obtained. The conclusion of this research is that a written application of the lesson plan based on Multiple Intelligence has a tendency to increase student’s mathematics achievement.]]>
<![CDATA[Kemampuan Komunikasi Dan Pemahaman Konsep Aljabar Linier Mahasiswa Universitas Putra Indonesia ‘YPTK’ Padang ]]>
<![CDATA[Dewimarni, Syelfia]]>
<![CDATA[ Al-Jabar: Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika Vol 8 No 1 (2017): Al-Jabar: Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[Universitas Islam Raden Intan Lampung, INDONESIA ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
DOI: 10.24042/ajpm.v8i1.763
<![CDATA[This research in a descriptive it was done in academic year 20016/2017. The subject of this research was SI 10 class of UPI YPTK Padang who attended linier algebra class consisted 48 students. Purpose of this research was to give description about students’ ability understanding concept of communication in Liniear algebra class with vector subtopic. Students’ ability and understanding concept of communication was described in a whole, students with high level and student with low level. Research instrumentation was ability and understanding communication concept test. Test result was descripted quantitatively and some of students’ answer was descripted qualitatively. Based on result, for the students’ communication ability 63,58% in a whole, 50,05% in high level and 50% in a low level had ability in a making a presentation with visual or picture to clearer the problem and to facilitate its solution. For students’ understanding in communication concept 65,44% in a whole, 81,34% in high level and 46,29% in low level who understanding concept ability in explain the concept correctly and use the concept in right way.]]>
<![CDATA[Asosiasi Antara Kemampuan Analogi Dengan Komunikasi Matematik Siswa SMP ]]>
<![CDATA[Azmi, Memen Permata]]>
<![CDATA[ Al-Jabar: Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika Vol 8 No 1 (2017): Al-Jabar: Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[Universitas Islam Raden Intan Lampung, INDONESIA ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
DOI: 10.24042/ajpm.v8i1.902
<![CDATA[This research is a quantitative research with cross-sectional design that aims to examine the association between students 'mathematical analogy abilities with students' mathematical communication abilities. The subject of this research is 33 students of class VII in one of Junior High School of Kampar Regency of Riau Province. The instrument used is a essay test about the problem of mathematical analogy and mathematical communication. Data analysis techniques to test the association of both capabilities based on the category of contingency association test (Pearson Chi Square test and contingency coefficient). The results showed that this study was an association between students' mathematical analogy abilities with students' mathematical communication abilities. The degree of association between students 'mathematical analogy abilities with students 'mathematical communication abilities is high.]]>
<![CDATA[Eksperimentasi Model Pembelajaran Kooperatif Tipe Student Team Achievement Divisions (STAD) dan Think Pair Share (TPS) Terhadap Prestasi Belajar Matematika Ditinjau Dari Motivasi Berprestasi ]]>
<![CDATA[Untari, Erny]]>
<![CDATA[ Al-Jabar: Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika Vol 8 No 1 (2017): Al-Jabar: Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[Universitas Islam Raden Intan Lampung, INDONESIA ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
DOI: 10.24042/ajpm.v8i1.952
<![CDATA[The purposes of this study are to determine: (1) which one have a better mathematics achievement, students who taught by cooperative learning model STAD or TPS type. (2) which one have a better mathematics achievement, students who have high, middle, or low achievement motivation. (3) is there any interaction between learning model and achievement motivation towards mathematics achievement. This study is a quasi experimental research with 2x3 factorial design. The population of this study is all students XI Grade SMA N 1 Kwadungan in academic year 2016/2017. Sampling was done by random technique. The total of sample is 28 students, with details of 14 students for class experiment one and 14 students for class experiment two. The instruments used to collect data are test of prior knowledge in mathematics, achievement motivation questionnaire and mathematics achievement test. The trial of test instrument includes content validity, difficulty level, discrimination power, and reliability. The testing of hypothesis uses two-way analysis of variance with unequal cell. The testing of hypothesis concludes that (1) Students who taught by cooperative learning model of TPS type have better mathematics achievement than students who taught by cooperative learning model of STAD type. (2) Students who have high achievement motivation have better mathematics achievement than students who have middle and low achievement motivation, also students who have middle achievement motivation have better mathematics achievement than students who have low achievement motivation. (3) There isn’t interaction between learning model and achievement motivation towards mathematics achievement.]]>
<![CDATA[Analisis Kesalahan Mahasiswa Pendidikan Matematika Dalam Menyelesaikan Soal Pertidaksamaan Pada Mata Kuliah Kalkulus I ]]>
<![CDATA[Rahmawati, Ana]]>
<![CDATA[ Al-Jabar: Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika Vol 8 No 1 (2017): Al-Jabar: Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[Universitas Islam Raden Intan Lampung, INDONESIA ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
DOI: 10.24042/ajpm.v8i1.957
<![CDATA[This research is qualitative descriptive research. This research has purpose to describe student error in resolving matter inequality of calculus I. The subject of this research is taken from student of mathematics education Unipdu semester II academic year 2016/2017. Data collection method used in this research is using test method and interview method. Before the researchers conducted the analysis, the researchers examined the validity of data using time triangulation to obtain valid data. Then from the data that has been validly analyzed new then drawn a conclusion. From result of research got result that 1) Subject A do 9 kind of errors, that is: error in determining condition of a root, mistake in doing process calculation, error determines value x on a number line, mistake determines set of settlement, error in determining sign interval at Line of numbers, errors in determining the completion region on the line of numbers, the error in determining the value of the zero maker on the split points, the error in determining the value of the zero-maker on the number line, the error of not continuing the completion process; 2) Subject B performs 8 types of errors, the type of error is the same as subject A, except error in determining the requirements of a root.]]>
<![CDATA[Kontribusi Penggunaan Model Discovery Learning terhadap Peningkatkan Kemampuan Koneksi dan Komunikasi Matematik pada Mahasiswa Program Studi Pendidikan Matematika Angkatan 2015-2016. ]]>
<![CDATA[Haryani, Yeni]]>
<![CDATA[ Al-Jabar: Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika Vol 8 No 1 (2017): Al-Jabar: Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[Universitas Islam Raden Intan Lampung, INDONESIA ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
DOI: 10.24042/ajpm.v8i1.963
<![CDATA[This study aims to determine the increase in the ability of connection and communication mathematics students better among the following study with the model of Discovery Learningdengan that follow the direct instruction, as well as to know the difference increased capacity connections and communication mathematics student groups of high, medium and low following study with the model Discovery Learning. The population in this study were all students of class 2015-2016. Samples were students of class D and E as an experimental class as the control class. The instrument used in this study includes test questions mathematical abilities and communication connections. Analysis of data using two different test average to better determine the increase between the experimental class and control class and one-way ANOVA with Scheffe test to determine the increase is better between groups of high, medium and low. Based on the research results, it can be concluded that the increase of connection and communication mathematical ability students who attend the learning model of Discovery Learninglebih better than students who attend hands-on learning. Improving the ability of connection and communication mathematics student groups are better than high and low groups that follow the model of learning with Discovery Learning.]]>
<![CDATA[Uji Park Dan Uji Breusch Pagan Godfrey Dalam Pendeteksian Heteroskedastisitas Pada Analisis Regresi ]]>
<![CDATA[Andriani, Siska]]>
<![CDATA[ Al-Jabar: Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika Vol 8 No 1 (2017): Al-Jabar: Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[Universitas Islam Raden Intan Lampung, INDONESIA ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
DOI: 10.24042/ajpm.v8i1.1014
<![CDATA[Homoskedastisitas is one of the conditions are fulfilled classical assumptions in the regression analysis, if not met this means homoskedastisitas error variance is not constant and is said to occur heteroscedasticity problem. Test Park and Pagan Godfrey Breusch test is a statistical test to detect whether there is a problem of heteroscedasticity in the regression equation. The problem is how to test the results of detection heteroskedastisitas Park and Breusch Pagan Godfrey test, which is more effective test.Based on the results of research and discussion can be concluded that the detection of the three cases of data acquired two pieces of data in the test with both test detected heteroskedasticity problems, while one case is detected by the test Breusch heteroskedastisitas Pagan Godfrey Park but the test was not detected. Values mean square error (MSE) test Breusch Pagan Godfrey smaller than the test Park so it can be said Pagan Godfrey Breusch method used more effectively. Thus, in detecting problems hetereoskedastisitas should use Breusch Pagan Godfrey test because they have better accuracy than tests Park.]]>
