cover
Contact Name
-
Contact Email
-
Phone
-
Journal Mail Official
-
Editorial Address
-
Location
Kab. ogan ilir,
Sumatera selatan
INDONESIA
Sriwijaya Law Review
Published by Universitas Sriwijaya
ISSN : 25415298     EISSN : 25416464     DOI : 10.28946
Core Subject : Science, Social,
The Sriwijaya Law Review known as the SLRev launched on the 31st January 2017 and inaugurated formally by the Rector of the university is a forum which aims to provide a high-quality research and writing related to law. Areas that relevant to the scope of the journal cover: business law, criminal law, constitutional law, administrative law, and international law
Arjuna Subject : -
Articles 207 Documents
Application of Patent Law to Software in the IoT Context Nabeel Mahdi Althabhawi; Jeong Chun Phuoc; Zinatul Ashiqin Zainol; Zaid Abdi Alkareem Alyasseri
Sriwijaya Law Review Volume 9 Issue 2, July 2025
Publisher : Faculty of Law, Sriwijaya University, Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.28946/slrev.v9i2.3184

Abstract

  The Internet of Things (IoT) is a promising field. It is estimated that around 75.44 billion devices will be connected by 2025. Undeniably, IoT will deeply impact the current intellectual property system. Many issues will be revisited and examined. This article addresses software patent protection in light of IoT. Software patent protection criteria are still embroiled in controversy.  The authors examine the patentability of software in general and in the IoT context in the US, EU, UK, and Malaysian legal systems to determine the appropriate protection mechanism for software that perplexes the idea-expression dichotomy as the main premise of the copyright-patent distinction. The research is a theoretical qualitative study which traces law-related articles on IoT and software patents from multiple databases such as Hein Online and LexisNexis. The study also discussed court cases related to software and computer program patents. Furthermore, it relies on an analytical discussion of statutes and legislations in the US, EU, UK, and Malaysia, concluding that there is a conflation of computer programs and software. If the two terms are interpreted precisely in accordance with their meanings, IoT software inventions will not be at the centre of the controversy about the applicability of patent law.  
Homo Machina: Italian Perspectives on Drone Warfare within International Humanitarian and Human Rights Law Fabio Calzolari; Wipa Phantanaboon
Sriwijaya Law Review Volume 9 Issue 1, January 2025
Publisher : Faculty of Law, Sriwijaya University, Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.28946/slrev.Vol9.Iss1.3199.pp22-48

Abstract

The rise of unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs) poses substantial challenges to international legal frameworks governing armed conflicts, particularly in balancing sovereignty and human rights. This paper examines the influence of military technology on jus ad bellum, focusing on territorial sovereignty under Article 2(4) of the UN Charter and self-defence under Article 51. It also evaluates compliance with jus in bello, or international humanitarian law (IHL), including the principles of distinction, proportionality, and necessity. Moreover, it documents the views of thirty Italians on UAVs through online qualitative interviews. The arguments are based on posthumanism, which helps define a new anthropological view that is decentralised and deconstructed. Precisely, the philosophy recognises the increasingly narrow differences between humans and non-humans, men and machines. Thematic Analysis drives the investigation of patterns within the data set, offering a flexible yet rigorous approach to personal insights. Outcomes reveal that UAVs enable many military achievements but endanger society. Participants viewed their use outside war zones as both illegal and morally indefensible, expressing concerns over the dehumanisation inherent in remote targeting. They argued that engaging with suspected terrorists without judicial oversight might violate due process. Hence, they stressed the importance of more nuanced national and international regulatory mechanisms. 
Constitutional Protection of Cultural Heritage in Indonesia: The Role of Museums in Preserving National Identity and Public Welfare Rosa Ristawati; Radian Salman; Shafyra Amalia Fitriany; Suat Taskesen
Sriwijaya Law Review Volume 9 Issue 1, January 2025
Publisher : Faculty of Law, Sriwijaya University, Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.28946/slrev.Vol9.Iss1.3348.pp49-70

Abstract

Cultural heritage is a fundamental asset in promoting cultural diversity and facilitating access to education, social values, science, technology, and tourism. Museums play a pivotal role in preserving cultural heritage and fulfilling constitutional obligations, as enshrined in the Indonesian Constitution. Protecting cultural heritage is essential for maintaining national identity and upholding citizens' constitutional rights, particularly in education and cultural participation. This study analyses the constitutional framework and government policies related to cultural heritage protection, with a specific focus on museums in Indonesia. Employing a statute-based and comparative approach, the research examines constitutional provisions such as Article 18B(1) of the Indonesian Constitution, which mandates the state’s responsibility to preserve cultural heritage and safeguard indigenous communities' rights. Despite this constitutional obligation, challenges such as limited financial resources, inadequate maintenance, and institutional constraints hinder the effective operation of museums. The findings emphasize that strengthening museums is not only necessary for heritage conservation but also for fostering national and local values that define Indonesia’s constitutional identity. The study argues that the government must implement more comprehensive policies and allocate sufficient resources to enhance museums’ role in cultural preservation, ensuring their sustained contribution to public welfare and national development.
Third-Party Litigation Funding: Legal Feasibility and Insights from Australia, the UK, and the US for Expanding Access to Justice in Indonesia Herliana Herliana
Sriwijaya Law Review Volume 9 Issue 1, January 2025
Publisher : Faculty of Law, Sriwijaya University, Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.28946/slrev.Vol9.Iss1.3444.pp173-193

Abstract

Access to justice is often hindered by financial constraints, preventing plaintiffs from pursuing legal claims. Third-Party Litigation Funding (TPLF) offers a potential solution by allowing external funders to finance litigation in exchange for a share of any awarded damages or settlement. By covering litigation costs, TPLF enables financially disadvantaged plaintiffs to seek legal redress, making it a crucial mechanism for expanding access to justice. However, unregulated TPLF poses risks, including the encouragement of frivolous claims, ethical concerns, and profit-driven motivations that may override legal merit. Indonesia currently lacks specific regulations governing TPLF, raising questions about its legal permissibility and practical implementation. This study examines TPLF frameworks in Australia, the United Kingdom, and the United States to derive insights that may inform the development of TPLF practices in Indonesia. Utilizing a normative legal research methodology based on secondary data, the study explores the opportunities and challenges of introducing TPLF into the Indonesian legal system. The findings indicate that while TPLF can be legally accepted in Indonesia, its application should be restricted to cases with broad public interest, such as environmental and consumer litigation. Furthermore, Indonesia’s ongoing efforts to enhance access to justice and the absence of explicit legal prohibitions present opportunities for the regulated adoption of TPLF. This research contributes to the discourse on litigation funding by providing recommendations for policymakers, legal practitioners, and stakeholders in shaping a fair and regulated TPLF framework in Indonesia.
Justice or Controversy? The Case for Chemical Castration in the Republic of Kosovo’s Legal Framework Alban Kryezi; Vedije Ratkoceri
Sriwijaya Law Review Volume 9 Issue 2, July 2025
Publisher : Faculty of Law, Sriwijaya University, Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.28946/slrev.v9i2.3589

Abstract

This study evaluates a group of citizens’ attitudes in the Republic of Kosovo toward the potential inclusion of chemical castration in the Criminal Code as a punitive measure against child sexual abusers. Although chemical castration is not currently part of the Republic of Kosovo’s legal framework, growing public concern over increasing cases of child sexual abuse has brought this controversial measure into public and legal discourse. Using a survey-based methodology, the research analyses responses from a demographically diverse group, predominantly composed of young and educated individuals. The findings reveal widespread concern regarding the prevalence of sexual abuse against children. There is a high level of awareness and significant public support for chemical castration, with many respondents viewing it as an effective and preventive measure against sexual violence. However, ethical concerns related to human rights and reproductive health were also raised. Although few respondents reported direct knowledge of child victims, the study highlights several barriers to reporting such crimes, including inadequate institutional and familial support, social stigma, and prevailing conservative attitudes. Overall, the study offers valuable insights for Kosovo’s institutions to enhance their strategies in combating child sexual abuse. Understanding public opinion on chemical castration can inform the development of future legal and policy initiatives in this sensitive area.
Mapping Public Participation in EIA in Indonesia: Recommendations for an Ideal Concept Annisa Fianni Sisma; I Gusti Ayu Ketut Rachmi Handayani; Lego Karjoko; Ravi Danendra
Sriwijaya Law Review Volume 9 Issue 2, July 2025
Publisher : Faculty of Law, Sriwijaya University, Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.28946/slrev.v9i2.3607

Abstract

A quality EIA document is directly proportional to the level of public participation that influences the preparation process. However, the EIA level of public participation in Indonesia is still very low , even reduced after being amended by Law No. 32/2009 in conjunction with Law No. 6/2023, which shows that public participation has not been prioritised. Several factors influence this, including the reduction of EIA participation through Law No. 6/2023, as well as the involvement of parties and forms that are not in line with the needs of the community. This research aims to identify the level of public participation in preparing EIA in Indonesia and present ideal concepts and recommendations regarding these three aspects. This legal research uses a statutory and conceptual approach with primary and secondary legal materials (Law No. 32/2009 in Lieu of Law No. 6/2023, Government Regulation No. 22/2021 and relevant scientific works). The level of public participation in the EIA preparation process in Law No. 6/2023 tends to be lower than before because the community cannot influence the final decision; affected parties are limited; forms of participation are limited to providing suggestions, opinions and responses; and the public participation in government institutions is eliminated. Therefore, the ideal concept uses a mapping that includes the parties involved, the form, and the purpose of participation with three rationales, namely normative, substantive, and instrumental, which are briefly related to the community role, the quality of environmental decisions, and the basis of legitimacy. The government needs to develop ideal regulations for public participation in preparation for EIA based on this mapping so that the preparation of EIA is participative, transparent, equitable, and informed.
The Right to Bail in Extradition Proceedings: Malaysia's Criminal Law Perspective Faizul Aswad Masri; Rohaida Nordin; Muhamad Helmi Md Said
Sriwijaya Law Review Volume 9 Issue 1, January 2025
Publisher : Faculty of Law, Sriwijaya University, Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.28946/slrev.Vol9.Iss1.3914.pp1-21

Abstract

This article delves into the issue of bail pending extradition in Malaysia. It adopts a doctrinal legal research methodology, focusing on analysing legislation and court decisions to objectively understand how current laws and practices determine bail applications within the context of Malaysian extradition law. The study reveals that Malaysia's Extradition Act 1992 does not explicitly provide for bail pending extradition, except under limited circumstances. Malaysian courts have utilised section 44 of the Extradition Act 1992 to apply bail provisions from the Criminal Procedure Code. The study finds that Malaysian courts adopt a cautious approach when determining bail applications in extradition cases. However, this judicial approach presents challenges, particularly in extradition cases involving offences governed by specific statutes other than the Criminal Procedure Code. The findings suggest that the reliance on section 44 should be re-evaluated to address these challenges. The article concludes by recommending further research to assess the need for an explicit and comprehensive provision for bail in the Extradition Act 1992 to ensure legal consistency and a uniform application across all types of offences.
Enhancing Consumer Protection in Electronic Transactions in Indonesia Zaidah Nur Rosidah; Lego Karjoko
Sriwijaya Law Review Volume 9 Issue 1, January 2025
Publisher : Faculty of Law, Sriwijaya University, Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.28946/slrev.Vol9.Iss1.3942.pp194-207

Abstract

Technological advancements have significantly facilitated electronic transactions, making business interactions faster and more convenient. However, these developments also introduce risks, especially for consumers, as electronic transactions can lead to significant financial losses if not handled carefully. This study proposes effective legal protections for consumers to prevent such losses and ensure proper compensation in electronic business transactions. This research employs a normative legal methodology, utilizing both a statutory and conceptual approach. The statutory approach analyses laws and regulations governing electronic transactions, while the conceptual approach applies Richard Posner's Economic Analysis of Law theory to assess the efficiency of consumer protection mechanisms. Data was gathered through a literature review of primary and secondary legal sources, and conclusions were drawn using deductive reasoning. The Economic Analysis of Law theory was the major premise, with relevant laws and regulations forming the minor premise. The findings reveal two main conclusions. First, while existing laws such as the Consumer Protection Law, the ITE Law, PP PMSE, PP PSTE, and Regulation of the Minister of Trade Number 31 of 2023 provide basic consumer protection by sanctioning businesses that offer mismatched products, reclaiming consumer rights is not straightforward. Second, to mitigate potential losses in electronic transactions, a validation process for business actors is necessary before they offer products, and Electronic System Trading Providers (PPMSE) must establish an efficient mechanism for compensating consumer losses. This study highlights the need for a more robust and accessible framework to protect consumers in electronic business transactions, ensuring that legal recourse is both efficient and effective.
The Legitimacy Crisis of Customary Villages Under Indonesia’s Village Law Sri Wahyu Kridasakti; Rina Elsa Rizkiana; Purwaningdyah Murti Wahyuni; Ni Made Jaya Senastri; Henny Yuningsih
Sriwijaya Law Review Volume 9 Issue 2, July 2025
Publisher : Faculty of Law, Sriwijaya University, Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.28946/slrev.v9i2.3998

Abstract

The absence of clear institutional linkages between bureaucratic villages (BVs) and customary villages (CVs) raises significant concerns regarding the legitimacy and effectiveness of their governance structures. Understanding the institutional relationship between these entities is therefore essential. This research analyses the legitimacy and legal implications of customary village regulations and investigates the disharmony between these regulations and Law Number 6 of 2014 in relation to the 1945 Constitution of the Republic of Indonesia (UUD 1945). Employing a socio-legal case study approach, this study focuses on five key sites: Gampong-Mukim in Aceh, Tosari-Tengger Village, Kanekes-Baduy, Tenganan Pegringsingan-Karangasem, and Pecatu-Badung. Legal materials were collected through document reviews and focus group discussions related to customary village governance. Findings reveal that Law Number 6 of 2014 concerning Villages fails to align with constitutional principles and shows inconsistencies when compared with regional regulations across the observed areas. Furthermore, the study identifies state intervention in customary village governance through the implementation of Law Number 6 of 2014—an approach deemed inappropriate unless such villages are fully and formally recognised. These regulatory inconsistencies and interventions undermine the legitimacy of Law Number 6 of 2014 in the context of customary village governance and threaten the autonomy and legal standing of Indonesia’s indigenous communities.
Legal Consequences of Designating Cultivation Rights as Abandoned Land in the Context of Credit Collateral Objects Elmadiantini Elmadiantini; Febrian Febrian; Annalisa Yahanan; Firman Muntaqo
Sriwijaya Law Review Volume 9 Issue 1, January 2025
Publisher : Faculty of Law, Sriwijaya University, Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.28946/slrev.Vol9.Iss1.4029.pp157-172

Abstract

Land rights under the Cultivation Rights Title (HGU) can serve as collateral in credit agreements through the imposition of a mortgage right. However, legal challenges arise when the status of HGU land as collateral changes, particularly due to its designation as abandoned land by the Indonesian Ministry of Agrarian Affairs and Spatial Planning/National Land Agency (ATR/BPN). Such status changes have significant legal implications for credit agreements, mortgage rights, and the economic value of collateralized land. This study analyses the legal framework governing the determination of abandoned land status, examining statutory regulations and their impact on credit agreements and collateral objects. Employing a normative legal research methodology, the study utilises statutory analysis, conceptual exploration, and interpretative approaches to assess the legal consequences of such status changes. The findings reveal that the designation of land as abandoned results in the termination of cultivation rights and the extinguishment of mortgage rights. While the credit agreement itself remains legally binding, the loss of economic value in the collateral renders it non-executable, leading to financial losses for both creditors and debtors. To address these legal uncertainties, the study recommends amendments to the regulatory framework governing abandoned land to enhance legal certainty, ensure fairness, and provide adequate protection for both creditors and debtors.