Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
1.784
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Martabe : Jurnal Pengabdian Kepada Masyarakat JURNAL USM LAW REVIEW Journal Of World Science Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Jurnal Riset Rumpun Ilmu Sosial, Politik dan Humaniora (JURRISH) Indonesian Journal of Multidisciplinary Sciences JURNAL HUKUM STAATRECHTS Melayunesia Law
Yasmirah Mandasari Saragih
Universitas 17 Agustus 1945 Jakarta
Agriculture, Biological Sciences & Forestry Arts Humanities Computer Science & IT Decision Sciences, Operations Research & Management Economics, Econometrics & Finance Education Engineering Environmental Science Health Professions Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Social Sciences

Published : 13 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 13 Documents
Search

 1   2 
Tinjauan Teori Hukum terhadap Tindak Pidana Pencurian yang Dilakukan Remaja Berumur 15 Tahun di Pasar Damun Damun; Yasmirah Mandasari Saragih; Biner Sihotang
Jurnal Riset Rumpun Ilmu Sosial, Politik dan Humaniora Vol. 5 No. 2 (2026): Jurnal Riset Rumpun Ilmu Sosial, Politik dan Humaniora
Publisher : Lembaga Pengembangan Kinerja Dosen

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.55606/jurrish.v5i2.8463

Abstract

This research is motivated by the phenomenon of theft committed by 15-year-old adolescents in market environments, which creates tension between criminal law enforcement and the principle of child protection in the Indonesian legal system. The study aims to analyze the legal regulations of theft under the old Criminal Code (Law No. 1 of 1946), the new Criminal Code (Law No. 1 of 2023), and the Juvenile Criminal Justice System Law; to examine the criminal liability of adolescents from the perspective of criminal law theory; and to review the implementation of restorative justice and diversion. The research method used is normative legal research with statutory, conceptual, and case approaches, particularly reviewing the provisions of Article 591 of the new Criminal Code, the theory of fault, and the principle of proportionality. The results indicate that the criminal liability of children must take into account psychological limitations, maturity levels, and criminogenic factors, including the influence of the social environment. Furthermore, the mens rea element in the phrase "known or reasonably suspected" is difficult to apply in practice to transactions involving small losses, as price reasonableness can obscure indications of malicious intent. This finding affirms that imposing criminal penalties on children in cases of petty theft potentially contradicts the principles of ultimum remedium and proportionality. Therefore, law enforcement should prioritize diversion, mediation, and restorative justice approaches by involving families and communities to achieve substantive justice and prevent excessive criminalization of children.
Problematika Penegakan Hukum Pidana Pemilu dalam Sistem Sentra Gakkumdu dan Rekonstruksinya Berbasis Pendekatan Restorative Justice Cipto Hardoyo; Yasmirah Mandasari Saragih; Biner Sihotang
Jurnal Riset Rumpun Ilmu Sosial, Politik dan Humaniora Vol. 5 No. 2 (2026): Jurnal Riset Rumpun Ilmu Sosial, Politik dan Humaniora
Publisher : Lembaga Pengembangan Kinerja Dosen

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.55606/jurrish.v5i2.8487

Abstract

The enforcement of election criminal law plays a crucial role in safeguarding democratic integrity and upholding the principle of popular sovereignty. Law Number 7 of 2017 establishes the Integrated Law Enforcement Center (Sentra Gakkumdu) as a coordinated mechanism involving the Election Supervisory Body, the Police, and the Prosecution Service in addressing election crimes. However, in practice, the Gakkumdu system has not fully ensured a balanced realization of legal certainty, substantive justice, and legal utility. This study aims to analyze the problems of election criminal law enforcement within the Gakkumdu system, examine the relevance of the Restorative Justice approach in election law, and formulate a reconstruction of election criminal law enforcement based on this approach. This research employs normative legal research using statutory, conceptual, legal philosophy, and legal policy approaches. The findings indicate that the weaknesses in election criminal law enforcement arise from institutional fragmentation, normative ambiguity, and a legal culture dominated by legalistic and sectoral perspectives. The Restorative Justice approach is considered relevant as it prioritizes substantive justice and the restoration of democratic values. Therefore, reconstructing election criminal law enforcement based on Restorative Justice is essential to strengthening democratic legitimacy and public trust in elections in Indonesia.
Kedudukan Hak Tanggungan dalam Perampasan Aset Tindak Pidana Korupsi: Perspektif Keadilan dan Kepastian Hukum: Studi Kasus BPR Perumda Purworejo Gusti Ramadhani; Yasmirah Mandasari Saragih; Tuti Widyaningrum; Heru NurTjahyo
Jurnal Riset Rumpun Ilmu Sosial, Politik dan Humaniora Vol. 5 No. 3 (2026): Jurnal Riset Rumpun Ilmu Sosial, Politik dan Humaniora
Publisher : Lembaga Pengembangan Kinerja Dosen

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.55606/jurrish.v5i3.8532

Abstract

Corruption cases in Indonesia often involve the recovery of state assets, including properties encumbered by mortgages (hak tanggungan). This research conducts a normative legal analysis on how current law treats such pledged assets when they become objects of state confiscation in corruption crimes. We examine Indonesian legislation (especially the Tipikor Act, TPPU Act, and Mortgage Act), judicial practice, and principles of justice and legal certainty. The Bank Perumda BPR Purworejo case is used as an illustrative case study: here fictitious loans and misused collateral led to state losses of hundreds of millions of rupiah, and investigators seized assets (including four mortgaged properties) as evidence. The analysis finds that existing rules inadequately protect good-faith creditors: courts have noted that a corruption verdict does not automatically erase a prior mortgage lien, and that a certified mortgage confers a preferential right equal to a judgment. In practice, however, law enforcement often seizes all assets of the convict without first verifying third-party rights, creating legal uncertainty and perceived injustice. We argue that fair outcomes require stricter safeguards for creditors (e.g. mandatory review of collateral status before seizure) and consideration of equitable principles. In conclusion, we recommend legal reforms or guidelines to balance the state’s recovery goals with protection of bona fide mortgagees, so as to uphold substantive justice while maintaining legal certainty.
Co-Authors Aby Hartanto Alnur Syafrizul Arif Azikri Hidayat Tulloh Biner Sihotang Christiawan, Rio Cipto Hardoyo Damun Damun Duma Hutapea Eka Evriza Gunawan Wdjaja Gusti Ramadhani Heru Nurtjahyo Iwan Sumiarsa Jackson Andre William Jahidin Kuswanto Jeisika Laurens Marini, Yushita Marten Arnoldus Rehabeam Manongga Martono Anggusti Moch Nagieb Muhammad Alvian Putera Mulyono Dwi Purwanto Okky Rachmadi Soekristyanto Riskana Riskana Risnawati, Erna Samsuto Samsuto Tuti Widyaningrum Wagiman . Yasir Riady Yustinus Rurie Wirawan