Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
6.534
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Ganaya: Jurnal Ilmu Sosial dan Humaniora Jambura Law Review Pusaka : Jurnal Khazanah Keagamaan Media Keadilan: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum SUPREMASI Jurnal Hukum RIO LAW JURNAL Jurnal Litigasi Amsir Jurnal Hukum dan Etika Kesehatan (JHEK) CASHFLOW : CURRENT ADVANCED RESEARCH ON SHARIA FINANCE AND ECONOMIC WORLDWIDE Jurnal El-Thawalib Dewantara: Jurnal Pendidikan Sosial Humaniora Jurnal Penelitian Serambi Hukum Priviet Social Sciences Journal Jurnal Ilmu Sosial, Humaniora dan Seni Jurnal Riset Rumpun Ilmu Sosial, Politik dan Humaniora (JURRISH) Gudang Jurnal Multidisiplin Ilmu Eksekusi: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum dan Administrasi Negara Aladalah: Jurnal Politik, Sosial, Hukum dan Humaniora Jurnal Sains Student Research JUSTITIABLE - Jurnal Hukum Universitas Bojonegoro Jaksa: Jurnal Kajian Ilmu Hukum Dan Politik Mandub: Jurnal Politik, Sosial, Hukum dan Humaniora Jurnal Media Akademik (JMA) JURNAL MULTIDISIPLIN ILMU AKADEMIK Hukum Inovatif : Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Sosial dan Humaniora Jurnal Intelek Dan Cendikiawan Nusantara Jembatan Hukum: Kajian Ilmu Hukum, Sosial dan Administrasi Negara Jurnal Ilmiah Multidisiplin Ilmu Jurnal Intelek Insan Cendikia Presidensial: Jurnal Hukum, Administrasi Negara, Dan Kebijakan Publik Jurnal Padamu Negeri Referendum Aliansi: Jurnal Hukum, Pendidikan dan Sosial Humaniora Terang: Jurnal Kajian Ilmu Sosial, Politik dan Hukum Konsensus: Jurnal Ilmu Pertahanan, Hukum dan Ilmu Komunikasi Jurnal Riset Multidisiplin Edukasi International Journal of Law Analytic Green Social: International Journal of Law and Civil Affairs Jurnal Ilmu Sosial dan Humaniora Jurnal El-Thawalib Jurnal Ilmu Hukum SciNusa: Jurnal Ilmu Sosial dan Humaniora Jurnal Riset Sosial Humaniora dan Pendidikan
Zul Khaidir Kadir
Fakultas Hukum Universitas Muslim Indonesia
Religion Aerospace Engineering Arts Humanities Civil Engineering, Building, Construction & Architecture Computer Science & IT Control & Systems Engineering Decision Sciences, Operations Research & Management Earth & Planetary Sciences Economics, Econometrics & Finance Education Electrical & Electronics Engineering Energy Environmental Science Industrial & Manufacturing Engineering Languange, Linguistic, Communication & Media Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Library & Information Science Materials Science & Nanotechnology Medicine & Pharmacology Public Health Social Sciences Transportation Other

Published : 54 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 54 Documents
Search

 2   3   4   5   6 
Pertanggungjawaban Pidana dalam Honor Killing: Pendekatan Atribusi Peran Pelaku Zul Khaidir Kadir
Konsensus : Jurnal Ilmu Pertahanan, Hukum dan Ilmu Komunikasi Vol. 3 No. 1 (2026): Februari: Konsensus : Jurnal Ilmu Pertahanan, Hukum dan Ilmu Komunikasi
Publisher : Asosiasi Peneliti Dan Pengajar Ilmu Sosial Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.62383/konsensus.v3i1.1515

Abstract

Honor killing cases often involve a distributed structure of perpetrators between decision-makers, providers of means, and implementers. This collective pattern raises the problem of role attribution in criminal law enforcement, which often shifts toward two problematic tendencies: centralizing responsibility on the executor or expanding criminal responsibility based on family ties. This article aims to formulate a tested role attribution model so that criminal responsibility does not stop at the direct perpetrator and does not develop into association-based punishment. This research uses a normative legal research method with a conceptual approach. Data collection methods were collected using literature studies, then analyzed qualitatively and presented descriptively. The research results formulate a role map of instigator, facilitator, and executor, operationalized through group role attribution based on two axes: causal contribution and normative contribution. The instigator is understood as the driver who shapes the will and locks the decision, the facilitator is understood as an assistant who deliberately provides the opportunity, means, or information. Meanwhile, the executor is someone who carries out the material act, although in terms of position, their actions are not automatically identical to the dominance of the decision. This division of roles is complemented by evidentiary indicators covering communication, financing, provision of facilities, field control, and post-incident intimidation, along with negative criteria to prevent inferences based on blood relations or passive presence. This model provides a more measurable standard of attribution for investigation, prosecution, and sentencing in collective honor killing cases.
Honor Killing di Timur Tengah: Konstruksi dan Respons Hukum Pidana di Yordania, Lebanon, dan Palestina Zul Khaidir Kadir
JURNAL MULTIDISIPLIN ILMU AKADEMIK Vol. 3 No. 2 (2026): JURNAL MULTIDISIPLIN ILMU AKADEMIK (JMIA)  April 2026
Publisher : CV. KAMPUS AKADEMIK PUBLISHING

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.61722/jmia.v3i2.9417

Abstract

This article examines honor killing in the Middle East as a form of gender-based killing rooted in the close relationship between family honor, sexual morality, and patriarchal control over women. Honor killing cannot be reduced to ordinary domestic homicide, because it operates through the belief that a woman’s body, conduct, and life choices are directly tied to the collective reputation of her family. The analysis is structured around three objectives. First, it explains how honor and family morality shape gender control. Second, it identifies the patterns, triggers, and forms of honor killing. Third, it analyzes legal responses and prevention strategies through a comparison of Jordan, Lebanon, and Palestine. This study employs a normative legal method, combining statutory, case-based, and comparative approaches. Its primary legal materials include the relevant criminal provisions in the three jurisdictions, notably Articles 340, 98, and 99 of the Jordanian Penal Code, Article 562 of the Lebanese Penal Code before its repeal in 2011, and Palestine’s Decree-Law No. 7 of 2011. The findings show that honor killing is not triggered only by proven sexual misconduct. In many cases, violence emerges from allegations, suspicion, rumor, refusal of family-arranged choices, or conduct by women considered damaging to the family’s collective reputation. Women remain the principal victims, while perpetrators are most often close family members. Legal reforms in the three jurisdictions mark an important normative shift, yet their practical effect remains constrained by general mitigating excuses, institutional bias, family pressure, and weak victim protection. These findings show that honor killing persists because social legitimacy and legal leniency continue to reinforce one another. Addressing this crime therefore requires more than formal amendment of criminal provisions. It also demands stricter sentencing policy, rights-based victim protection, and sustained transformation of the social norms that continue to legitimize killing in the name of honor.
Honor Killing di Diaspora Barat: Konstruksi dan Respons Hukum Pidana di Inggris, Jerman, dan Kanada Zul Khaidir Kadir
Jurnal Riset Multidisiplin Edukasi Vol. 3 No. 4 (2026): Jurnal Riset Multidisiplin Edukasi (April 2026)
Publisher : PT. Hasba Edukasi Mandiri

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.71282/jurmie.v3i4.1802

Abstract

Honor killing in Western diasporas remains a serious concern because migration to host states does not automatically dismantle the logic of honor that ties family reputation to the control of women’s bodies, intimate relations, and life choices. This study examines the relationship between honor, migration, community identity, and patriarchy; identifies the patterns, triggers, and forms of honor-based violence; and analyzes legal responses and prevention strategies in the United Kingdom, Germany, and Canada. The research employs normative legal methodology through statutory, case-based, and comparative approaches. Primary legal materials consist of legislation and judicial decisions, supported by secondary materials on honor, diaspora, gender-based violence, and victim protection. The analysis finds that honor in diaspora settings no longer functions merely as a private family concern, but also as a means of preserving minority community boundaries under pressures of assimilation and intergenerational tension. Violence then develops through an escalating continuum, beginning with surveillance, restrictions on mobility, threats, forced marriage, and social isolation, and in some cases ending in homicide. The United Kingdom and Canada illustrate stronger preventive mechanisms through forced marriage protection and criminal law measures, while Germany demonstrates a firm rejection of honor-based motives through general homicide law. The study argues that effective responses require a combination of legal firmness, accessible early protection, and institutional sensitivity that does not slide into either cultural permissiveness or the stigmatization of minority communities.
Siri’ Killing vis-à-vis Honor Killing: Menimbang Batas Universal dan Kekhasan Lokal Pembunuhan Demi Kehormatan Zul Khaidir Kadir
JOURNAL SAINS STUDENT RESEARCH Vol. 4 No. 2 (2026): April
Publisher : CV. KAMPUS AKADEMIK PUBLISING

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.61722/jssr.v4i2.9447

Abstract

The term honor killing has long been used in global scholarship to describe killings associated with the restoration of family or community honor. Although useful as a general category, the term does not always capture the full social meaning embedded in local experiences. This article examines the relationship between siri’ killing and honor killing by addressing two central questions: whether siri’ killing may be situated as a local form of honor killing, and to what extent it possesses conceptual features that are not fully covered by that global term. This study is a normative legal research employing conceptual and comparative approaches. The materials consist of primary legal sources, secondary legal materials, and relevant non-legal sources, all of which are analyzed qualitatively through library research. The study finds that siri’ killing may still be placed within the broader family of honor killing because both are grounded in the idea of family honor, the social spread of shame, and retaliatory violence understood as restoring dignity. At the same time, siri’ killing cannot be fully explained by the term honor killing because siri’ carries a more specific normative structure, particularly in relation to dignity, the distribution of shame, and the social responsibility to restore family reputation. This article argues that siri’ killing should be positioned as a local form that remains connected to honor killing while also correcting the overbreadth of that global concept. This distinction affects both criminological explanations of violence and criminal law’s effort to maintain a clear boundary between explaining social background and rejecting any justification for killing in the name of honor.
Co-Authors Ahmad, Abd. Kadir Kadir, Nadiah Khaeriah Mappaselleng, Nur Fadhilah Mochammad, Fadhil Hayan Muhammad Basri Muhni, Afif Normiati, Normiati Nur Fadhilah Mappaselleng Zulfikar, Muhammad Reza