Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
7.972
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Ganaya: Jurnal Ilmu Sosial dan Humaniora Bina Hukum Lingkungan Jambura Law Review Pusaka : Jurnal Khazanah Keagamaan Media Keadilan: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Widya Pranata Hukum : Jurnal Kajian dan Penelitian Hukum SUPREMASI Jurnal Hukum RIO LAW JURNAL Jurnal Litigasi Amsir Jurnal Hukum dan Etika Kesehatan (JHEK) CASHFLOW : CURRENT ADVANCED RESEARCH ON SHARIA FINANCE AND ECONOMIC WORLDWIDE Jurnal El-Thawalib Bina Hukum Lingkungan Dewantara: Jurnal Pendidikan Sosial Humaniora Jurnal Penelitian Serambi Hukum Priviet Social Sciences Journal Jurnal Ilmu Sosial, Humaniora dan Seni Jurnal Riset Rumpun Ilmu Sosial, Politik dan Humaniora (JURRISH) Gudang Jurnal Multidisiplin Ilmu Mutiara : Jurnal Ilmiah Multidisiplin Indonesia Eksekusi: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum dan Administrasi Negara Jurnal Sains Student Research JUSTITIABLE - Jurnal Hukum Universitas Bojonegoro Jaksa: Jurnal Kajian Ilmu Hukum Dan Politik Mandub: Jurnal Politik, Sosial, Hukum dan Humaniora Jurnal Media Akademik (JMA) JURNAL MULTIDISIPLIN ILMU AKADEMIK MERDEKA: Jurnal Ilmiah Multidisiplin Hukum Inovatif : Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Sosial dan Humaniora Media Hukum Indonesia (MHI) Jurnal Intelek Dan Cendikiawan Nusantara Jembatan Hukum: Kajian Ilmu Hukum, Sosial dan Administrasi Negara Jurnal Ilmiah Multidisiplin Ilmu Jurnal Intelek Insan Cendikia Presidensial: Jurnal Hukum, Administrasi Negara, Dan Kebijakan Publik Jurnal Padamu Negeri Referendum Aliansi: Jurnal Hukum, Pendidikan dan Sosial Humaniora Terang: Jurnal Kajian Ilmu Sosial, Politik dan Hukum Konsensus: Jurnal Ilmu Pertahanan, Hukum dan Ilmu Komunikasi Jurnal Riset Multidisiplin Edukasi International Journal of Law Analytic Jejak digital: Jurnal Ilmiah Multidisiplin Green Social: International Journal of Law and Civil Affairs Jurnal Ilmu Sosial dan Humaniora Jurnal El-Thawalib Jurnal Ilmu Hukum SciNusa: Jurnal Ilmu Sosial dan Humaniora Jurnal Riset Sosial Humaniora dan Pendidikan ALADALAH: Jurnal Politik, Sosial, Hukum dan Humaniora NETIZEN (JOURNAL OF SOCIETY AND BUSSINESS) Punggawa Law Review Jurnal Hukum dan Sosial Politik
Zul Khaidir Kadir
Fakultas Hukum Universitas Muslim Indonesia
Religion Aerospace Engineering Arts Humanities Civil Engineering, Building, Construction & Architecture Computer Science & IT Control & Systems Engineering Decision Sciences, Operations Research & Management Earth & Planetary Sciences Economics, Econometrics & Finance Education Electrical & Electronics Engineering Energy Environmental Science Industrial & Manufacturing Engineering Languange, Linguistic, Communication & Media Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Library & Information Science Materials Science & Nanotechnology Medicine & Pharmacology Public Health Social Sciences Transportation Other

Published : 66 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 66 Documents
Search

 3   4   5   6   7 
Honor Killing di Diaspora Barat: Konstruksi dan Respons Hukum Pidana di Inggris, Jerman, dan Kanada Zul Khaidir Kadir
Jurnal Riset Multidisiplin Edukasi Vol. 3 No. 4 (2026): Jurnal Riset Multidisiplin Edukasi (April 2026)
Publisher : PT. Hasba Edukasi Mandiri

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.71282/jurmie.v3i4.1802

Abstract

Honor killing in Western diasporas remains a serious concern because migration to host states does not automatically dismantle the logic of honor that ties family reputation to the control of women’s bodies, intimate relations, and life choices. This study examines the relationship between honor, migration, community identity, and patriarchy; identifies the patterns, triggers, and forms of honor-based violence; and analyzes legal responses and prevention strategies in the United Kingdom, Germany, and Canada. The research employs normative legal methodology through statutory, case-based, and comparative approaches. Primary legal materials consist of legislation and judicial decisions, supported by secondary materials on honor, diaspora, gender-based violence, and victim protection. The analysis finds that honor in diaspora settings no longer functions merely as a private family concern, but also as a means of preserving minority community boundaries under pressures of assimilation and intergenerational tension. Violence then develops through an escalating continuum, beginning with surveillance, restrictions on mobility, threats, forced marriage, and social isolation, and in some cases ending in homicide. The United Kingdom and Canada illustrate stronger preventive mechanisms through forced marriage protection and criminal law measures, while Germany demonstrates a firm rejection of honor-based motives through general homicide law. The study argues that effective responses require a combination of legal firmness, accessible early protection, and institutional sensitivity that does not slide into either cultural permissiveness or the stigmatization of minority communities.
Neurocriminology and evidentiary standards in Indonesian courts Zul Khaidir Kadir; Nur Fadhilah Mappaselleng
Priviet Social Sciences Journal Vol. 6 No. 1 (2026): January 2026
Publisher : Privietlab

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.55942/pssj.v6i1.786

Abstract

According to the Indonesian Code of Criminal Procedure, the evidentiary system in criminal law remains grounded in the principle of individual responsibility, which presumes free will. However, the incorporation of neurocriminological approaches into legal practice introduces ontological and epistemological conflicts that have not been systematically addressed by existing legal frameworks. This study aims to examine the tension between the concept of individual criminal liability and the deterministic framework of neuroscience and evaluate the admissibility of neuroscientific evidence within the criminal evidentiary system. This study employs a normative legal method with a conceptual approach. The findings indicate that Indonesia's criminal law lacks a conceptual framework capable of bridging the gap between moral culpability and biological vulnerability, thereby risking a loss of coherence in the attribution of legal responsibility to offenders. Furthermore, the absence of normative and procedural mechanisms for assessing the validity, limits, and relevance of neuroscientific evidence creates epistemic asymmetries and opens the door to bias in judicial proceedings. Under such conditions, integrating neuroscience into the legal system risks generating ambiguity in determining liability and undermining the principle of substantive justice. Accordingly, a normative reconstruction of evidentiary law is required as a foundational step to ensure legal consistency in responding to scientific advances.
Paradigma Kebijakan Kriminal dalam KUHP Nasional Indonesia Zul Khaidir Kadir
ALADALAH: Jurnal Politik, Sosial, Hukum dan Humaniora Vol. 4 No. 1 (2026): ALADALAH: Jurnal Politik, Sosial, Hukum dan Humaniora
Publisher : LP3M INSTITUT KH YAZID KARIMULLAH

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.59246/aladalah.v4i1.1803

Abstract

Indonesia’s new Penal Code (Law No. 1 of 2023) has been promoted as a milestone of legal modernization and decolonial reform, marking a formal break from colonial criminal law. This article critically examines whether such claims correspond to a substantive transformation in criminal policy or merely reflect a reconfiguration of long-standing penal rationalities. Employing normative legal research with statutory and conceptual approaches, the study analyzes the architecture of criminalization and sentencing embedded in the new Code as an integrated system of penal governance. The analysis reveals that although the Penal Code introduces clearer structures, explicit sentencing purposes, and diversified sanctioning mechanisms, these reforms do not substantially alter the state-centered orientation of criminal law. Patterns of expansive criminalization, broad protection of state interests, and flexible sentencing rationales continue to normalize penal intervention as a primary tool of social regulation. Consequently, modernization within the new Penal Code operates largely at the formal and symbolic level, while the underlying paradigm of criminal policy remains oriented toward the consolidation rather than the limitation of punitive state power.
Siri’ Killing dalam Masyarakat Bugis-Makassar: Konstruksi, Pola Pembunuhan, dan Respons Hukum Pidana Zul Khaidir Kadir
MUTIARA: Jurnal Ilmiah Multidisiplin Indonesia Vol. 4 No. 2 (2026): JIMI - APRIL
Publisher : PT. PENERBIT TIGA MUTIARA

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.61404/mutiara.v4i2.493

Abstract

This study examines the phenomenon of siri’ killing in the Bugis-Makassar community, which has received limited attention in global discussions on honor-based killings. The background of this research is rooted in the strong value of siri’ as a system of collective honor that not only regulates social behavior but also has the potential to generate violence as a means of restoring dignity. The research problem focuses on how the construction of siri’ shapes collective honor, how patterns of honor-motivated killings occur, and how Indonesian criminal law responds to this phenomenon without legitimizing violence. This study employs a normative legal method with statutory, case, and conceptual approaches to analyze the relationship between legal norms and cultural values. The findings indicate that siri’ is understood as a collective family identity that significantly influences individual behavior, with women becoming the most vulnerable group due to the unequal distribution of moral burden. Patterns of siri’ killing are generally associated with control over sexuality and marriage and are driven by social pressure and collective moral legitimacy. The response of criminal law tends to be ambivalent, as cultural motives are not justified but are often considered as background factors. The conclusion emphasizes that siri’ killing is a complex phenomenon that cannot be understood merely as a criminal act, but rather as the result of interactions among culture, gender, and law. The novelty of this study lies in the integration of cultural, criminal law, and gender perspectives in explaining siri’ killing as a localized form of honor killing with distinctive characteristics in Indonesia.
Siri’ Killing vis-à-vis Honor Killing: Menimbang Batas Universal dan Kekhasan Lokal Pembunuhan Demi Kehormatan Zul Khaidir Kadir
JOURNAL SAINS STUDENT RESEARCH Vol. 4 No. 2 (2026): April
Publisher : CV. KAMPUS AKADEMIK PUBLISING

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.61722/jssr.v4i2.9447

Abstract

The term honor killing has long been used in global scholarship to describe killings associated with the restoration of family or community honor. Although useful as a general category, the term does not always capture the full social meaning embedded in local experiences. This article examines the relationship between siri’ killing and honor killing by addressing two central questions: whether siri’ killing may be situated as a local form of honor killing, and to what extent it possesses conceptual features that are not fully covered by that global term. This study is a normative legal research employing conceptual and comparative approaches. The materials consist of primary legal sources, secondary legal materials, and relevant non-legal sources, all of which are analyzed qualitatively through library research. The study finds that siri’ killing may still be placed within the broader family of honor killing because both are grounded in the idea of family honor, the social spread of shame, and retaliatory violence understood as restoring dignity. At the same time, siri’ killing cannot be fully explained by the term honor killing because siri’ carries a more specific normative structure, particularly in relation to dignity, the distribution of shame, and the social responsibility to restore family reputation. This article argues that siri’ killing should be positioned as a local form that remains connected to honor killing while also correcting the overbreadth of that global concept. This distinction affects both criminological explanations of violence and criminal law’s effort to maintain a clear boundary between explaining social background and rejecting any justification for killing in the name of honor.
The Lack of Authority in Determining State Losses: A Legal Anomaly in Corruption Cases Nur Fadhilah Mappaselleng; Zul Khaidir Kadir
Widya Pranata Hukum : Jurnal Kajian dan Penelitian Hukum Vol. 8 No. 1 (2026)
Publisher : Fakultas Hukum Universitas Widya Mataram

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.37631/widyapranata.v8i1.2043

Abstract

This study analyzes the legal problems of determining state losses in corruption cases in Indonesia, especially regarding the unclear institution that is legally authorized to determine it. This study was conducted using normative research with a statute approach. The results of the study indicate that there is no explicit norm that establishes the Audit Board of Indonesia (BPK) as the sole institution authorized to determine state losses in criminal cases. This opens up space for investigators and prosecutors to use internal estimates or audits from non-constitutional institutions, which raises the potential for excessive criminalization, inter-institutional conflict, and legal uncertainty. This study recommends harmonization of legislation that integrates BPK investigative audits as the main evidence in corruption criminal proceedings and encourages the reconstruction of inter-institutional procedures to ensure the principle of due process and legal justice.
Narrative Closure in Honor Killing Cases: How Judgments Stabilise Meaning, Eliminate Ambiguity, and Produce Sentencing Certainty Zul Khaidir Kadir
Punggawa Law Review Vol. 1 No. 1 (2026): Punggawa Law Review
Publisher : Punggawa Legacy Center

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

Honour killing judgments were often read as straightforward applications of homicide doctrine, yet the written reasons frequently performed additional work by stabilising contested meanings. This article examined how criminal courts produced narrative closure in honour killing cases by narrowing interpretive possibilities, fixing causal chains, and translating a settled story into sentencing certainty. A qualitative judicial decision analysis was conducted using a structured protocol that segmented judgments into factual narrative, evidentiary assessment, legal qualification, and sentencing reasons, then mapped closure across causal, moral, evidentiary, and sentencing dimensions. The analysis found that judgments commonly elevated a reputational “trigger” into the dominant cause, embedded respectability scripts that redistributed moral weight, and constructed credibility hierarchies that converted honour claims into neutral-seeming facts. These moves frequently enabled mitigation drift, in which honour-based frames softened perceived agency without explicit doctrinal endorsement. The study concluded that relevance boundaries in judicial reason-giving were necessary to prevent honour narratives from operating as implicit excuses while preserving their probative value for planning, coercive control, and collective enforcement.
Mapping Recorded Homicide in Indonesia: An Ecological Criminological Analysis Using BPS Data Zul Khaidir Kadir
Punggawa Law Review Vol. 1 No. 2 (2026): Punggawa Law Review
Publisher : Punggawa Legacy Center

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

This article maps recorded homicide in Indonesia using BPS-based crime statistics and interprets its territorial visibility through ecological criminology. Rather than treating homicide only as an individual criminal act or as a doctrinal problem of criminal law, the article examines how officially recorded lethal violence appears across national, provincial, village-level, and police-region data. The study uses a descriptive ecological criminological design based on Statistik Kriminal 2024/2025. The findings show that recorded homicide declined slightly from 1,129 incidents in 2023 to 1,106 incidents in 2024. Podes-based territorial data show that the percentage of villages or urban villages with homicide incidents in 2024 ranged from 0.18 percent to 1.87 percent, with the highest percentages in DKI Jakarta, Papua Selatan, and Papua Tengah, and the lowest in Aceh, Kalimantan Utara, and Bali. As a supporting comparison, police-region data on crimes against life show the highest burden in Jawa Timur, Sumatera Utara, and Papua. The article argues that these data should be interpreted as indicators of official visibility and territorial burden, not as direct measures of individual criminality or causal explanation. By linking BPS data with ecological criminological theory, the article contributes to Indonesian homicide studies by offering a disciplined descriptive mapping of recorded homicide while clarifying the methodological limits of official statistics.
Teori Labeling dalam Perspektif Kebijakan Kriminal : Strategi Dekriminalisasi untuk Menghentikan Siklus Stigma Sosial Zul Khaidir Kadir
Jurnal Hukum dan Sosial Politik Vol. 3 No. 1 (2025): Februari: Jurnal Hukum dan Sosial Politik
Publisher : International Forum of Researchers and Lecturers

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.59581/jhsp-widyakarya.v3i1.4636

Abstract

Labeling theory provides a critical perspective on the criminal justice system that tends to reinforce criminal identities through formal labeling. Unfortunately, criminal policies that are ideally designed to manage crime and maintain social stability often result in negative impacts such as stigmatization. This study explores the integration of labeling theory and decriminalization as a more inclusive and social justice-based criminal policy approach. The research method used is a qualitative research method with a conceptual approach. The results of the study indicate that decriminalization prevents formal labeling that is the root of the cycle of social stigma. In addition, decriminalization provides opportunities for individuals to remain integrated into society, increases their access to health services and rehabilitation programs, and creates more inclusive social conditions. However, the success of decriminalization depends heavily on the government's ability to overcome various inherent challenges, including cultural resistance, concerns about policy abuse, and limited supporting infrastructure.
Doktrin Provokasi Heat Of Passion Dan Diskresi Pemidanaan Dalam Perkara Pembunuhan Demi Kehormatan (Honor Killing) Zul Khaidir Kadir
SciNusa: Jurnal Ilmu Sosial dan Humaniora Vol. 2 No. 01 (2026): SciNusa: Jurnal Ilmu Sosial dan Humaniora
Publisher : SciNusa: Jurnal Ilmu Sosial dan Humaniora

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

Pengurangan kesalahan melalui provokasi (heat of passion) dirancang sebagai pengecualian yang ketat, sedangkan diskresi pemidanaan seharusnya berjalan melalui alasan yang dapat diuji. Namun, arsitektur doktrin provokasi dan praktik diskresi menyisakan ruang yang memungkinkan pelunakan pidana pada honor killing melalui pembingkaian emosi, rasa malu publik, dan tekanan komunitas sebagai alasan yang tampak manusiawi, sementara struktur kontrol atas korban tertutup oleh narasi tersebut. Penelitian ini bertujuan mengidentifikasi mekanisme “pintu belakang” pelunakan pada tiga elemen provokasi “mendadak”, “kehilangan kontrol”, dan “orang wajar” serta merumuskan batas normatif dan ambang pembuktian agar provokasi tidak berfungsi sebagai kanal pembenaran. Metode penelitian menggunakan penelitian hukum normatif dengan pendekatan konseptual, berbasis studi kepustakaan, dan dianalisis secara kualitatif-doktrinal. Hasil penelitian merumuskan pembedaan operasional antara spontanitas psikologis dan rasionalitas sosial pemulihan reputasi, lalu mengusulkan aturan penyaring yang menolak klaim provokasi bila terdapat perencanaan, rapat keluarga, alokasi peran, persiapan sarana, atau orientasi reputasi publik. Pada pemidanaan, penelitian menggeser pusat penilaian dari intensitas emosi ke kontrol, dominasi, dan kerentanan korban, serta merumuskan desain alasan putusan yang memisahkan motif sebagai latar faktual dari alasan meringankan.
Co-Authors Ahmad, Abd. Kadir Kadir, Nadiah Khaeriah Mappaselleng, Nur Fadhilah Mochammad, Fadhil Hayan Muhammad Basri Muhni, Afif Normiati, Normiati Nur Fadhilah Mappaselleng Nur Fadhilah Mappaselleng Nur Fadhilah Mappaselleng Zulfikar, Muhammad Reza