Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 3 Documents
Search

Sila Ketiga Pancasila Sebagai Kerangka Evaluatif Untuk Memulihkan Demokrasi Indonesia Di Era Jokowi felix sugar; Charlos Mario Y.B. Makung; Aloysius Alo Pehang Making; Alfonsius Liqori Tius; Alfonsius Lulus Nifu; Januario Petrus Dhena; Virgilius Saor
JIPSI Jurnal Ilmu Politik dan Komunikasi Vol 16 No 1 (2026): JIPSi : Jurnal Ilmu Politik dan Komunikasi
Publisher : Fakultas Ilmu Sosial dan Ilmu Politik, Universitas Komputer Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.34010/jipsi.v16i1.18586

Abstract

 Penurunan kualitas demokrasi Indonesia dalam satu dekade terakhir telah menjadi sorotan utama berbagai lembaga internasional, seperti Fredom House, The Economist Intelligence Unit, dan Indeks Demokrasi Indonesia. Kemunduran ini tercermin melalui lemahnya kebebasan sipil, meningkatnya polarisasi politik, menguatnya politik identitas, serta munculnya respons negara yang tidak konsisten terhadap gerakan radikal. Artikel ini bertujuan menawarkan kerangka analitis berbasis sila ketiga Pancasila "Persatuan Indonesia" sebagai pedoman normatif untuk mengevaluasi dan mengarahkan praktik demokrasi pada masa kepemimpinan Joko Widodo. Menggunakan metode penelitian kualitatif dengan studi pustaka, artikel ini menelah perjalanan demokrasi Indonesia, dinamika politik era Jokowi, dan tantangan fundamental yang menghambat tercapainya demokrasi yang inklusif. Hasil penelitian menunjukan bahwa kemunduran demokrasi tidak hanya dipicu oleh faktor struktural, tetapi juga oleh lemahnya orientasi kepemimpinan terhadap nilai-nilai Pancasila, terutama sila ketiga. Sila Ketiga memiliki tiga fungsi strategis: (1) sebagai pengontrol psikologis pemimpin dalam membaca situasi konflik dan menjaga keutuhan demokrasi; (2) sebagai media pemersatu yang melawan polarisasi dan politik identitas; dan (3) sebagai pilar pembangunan demokrasi inklusif yang memastikan partisipasi dan representasi seluruh warga negara.  Kesimpulan penelitian menegaskan bahwa sila ketiga tidak hanya relevan sebagai simbol persatuan, tetapi juga sebagai instrumen etis-politis yang mampu memandu kebijakan publik agar berorientasi pada keadilan, kemanusiaan, dan kepentingan kolektif. Dengan demikian, revitalisasi nilai Persatuan Indonesia merupakan prasyarat penting dalam memulihkan kualitas demokrasi modern Indonesia. Kata kunci: Joko Widodo, Pancasila, Demokrasi, Persatuan Indonesia
Manusia sebagai Homo Socius di Era Digital: Kajian Filsafat Teknologi Martin Heidegger tentang Pengaruh Teknologi terhadap Relasi Sosial Manusia Karolus Isak Bani; Valentino Dae; Juan Fransiskus Leba Tukan; Mateus A. Wolo Tana; Alfonsius Lulus Nifu; Kasimirus Rape Baluk; Heribertus Torino Kato; Marianus Liwu Kelen; Nikodemus Rafael; Yosef Jemai
Populer: Jurnal Penelitian Mahasiswa Vol. 5 No. 1 (2026): Maret: Jurnal Penelitian Mahasiswa
Publisher : Universitas Maritim AMNI Semarang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.58192/populer.v5i1.5454

Abstract

The development of digital technology has brought significant changes in the way humans communicate, interact, and understand their existence as social beings. Human beings, who are essentially homo socius or beings who live together with others, are now experiencing changes in social relationships due to the dominance of digital technology. This research aims to analyze the relationship between the nature of humans as social beings and technological development from the perspective of Martin Heidegger’s philosophy of technology. The research method employed is qualitative research using a library research approach through the analysis of various philosophical works, studies on human philosophy, technological philosophy, and research on digital society. Heidegger’s concepts of techne, aletheia, Gestell (enframing), and standing-reserve (Bestand) are used as an analytical framework to understand how technology shapes the way humans perceive the world and themselves. The study shows that technology does not merely function as a communication tool but also influences the formation of human identity, social relationships, and the understanding of existence. The dominance of technology may shift essential human social values such as openness, responsibility, solidarity, trust, and justice when humans lose their critical awareness toward technology. Therefore, technology must be understood and used wisely so that it remains a means of strengthening human relationships rather than replacing the social dimension of human existence. Heidegger’s thought provides an important reflection that humans must remain conscious subjects in facing technological development.
Kohabitasi (Kumpul Kebo) dalam Perspektif Relasi Aku-Engkau Martin Buber: Sebuah Kajian Filsafat Dialog Maria Claudia Lodan; Felix Riondi Sugar; Yulius Argenio Eko; Heribertus Harsoyo; Fransisco G. N. Nggajo; Champideli A. Jalni; Alfeus Alfian Nenat; Simon Oktafianus Nailiu; Antonius Sunarno Sam; Alfonsius Lulus Nifu
Dewantara : Jurnal Pendidikan Sosial Humaniora Vol. 5 No. 1 (2026): Maret: Dewantara : Jurnal Pendidikan Sosial Humaniora
Publisher : Universitas 45 Surabaya

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.30640/dewantara.v5i1.7694

Abstract

The phenomenon of cohabitation or living together without a legally recognized marriage has become one of the social issues developing in modern society. Changes in values, cultural development, economic factors, and shifting understandings of commitment and marriage have contributed to the increasing practice of cohabitation. In the Indonesian context, this phenomenon generates debate because it encounters legal, religious, and cultural norms that consider marriage as an important institution in human life. This study aims to analyze the phenomenon of cohabitation through Martin Buber’s dialogical philosophy, particularly the concepts of the I-It and I-Thou relations. This research employs a qualitative method with a library research approach by analyzing Martin Buber’s works and various literature related to cohabitation, marriage, and human relations. The findings indicate that cohabitation cannot merely be understood as a legal or moral issue but also as a philosophical issue concerning the quality of human relationships. From Buber’s perspective, relationships oriented only toward personal needs, comfort, or specific interests tend to become I-It relations because the other person is reduced to an object. Conversely, the I-Thou relation emphasizes respect for personal dignity, openness, responsibility, and authentic encounters between individuals. Therefore, Martin Buber’s thought provides a critical reflection that human relationships should be built upon dialogue, responsibility, and respect for others as complete and valuable persons.