Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 31 Documents
Search

China's Support for Indonesia's ASEAN Our Eyes Initiative in Countering Cyberterrorism in Southeast Asia Khoirunnisa, Khoirunnisa; Jubaidi, Didi
Jurnal Pertahanan: Media Informasi tentang Kajian dan Strategi Pertahanan yang Mengedepankan Identity, Nasionalism dan Integrity Vol 11, No 1 (2025)
Publisher : The Republic of Indonesia Defense University

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.33172/jp.v11i1.19814

Abstract

The ASEAN Our Eyes Initiative (OEI) was established as a regional intelligence-sharing platform in response to the growing threat of cyberterrorism in Southeast Asia. As the initiator, Indonesia has demonstrated regional leadership in promoting collective security based on ASEAN’s core principles of identity, nationalism, and strategic integrity. China’s increasing involvement in OEI-related activities introduces a complex strategic dynamic. On one hand, China’s technological support and intelligence-sharing capabilities have the potential to enhance ASEAN’s cyber defense. On the other hand, dependence on external actors may undermine ASEAN’s strategic autonomy and weaken its leadership in regional security affairs. This study offers a novel contribution by critically examining the ambivalent role of China in the OEI, an aspect that remains underexplored in current defense literature. Using a qualitative approach through a structured literature review, this research analyzes academic publications, official defense policies, and intelligence-related reports to evaluate both the benefits and risks of China’s participation. The findings indicate that while China’s involvement can significantly enhance ASEAN’s operational capacity in addressing cyberterrorism, it also carries the potential to shift the regional balance of power, thereby threatening ASEAN’s identity and independence as a security actor. This leads to clear policy implications in which ASEAN, particularly Indonesia, must establish transparent and rules-based cooperation frameworks to define the boundaries of external engagement. Strengthening intra-ASEAN collaboration and investing in domestic cyber defense capabilities are essential to safeguarding the sustainability of OEI. By maintaining a careful balance between external support and regional sovereignty, OEI can continue to serve as a credible, ASEAN-driven security mechanism. This study recommends enhancing joint oversight mechanisms, legal safeguards, and internal resilience to ensure that the initiative remains rooted in the region’s foundational values of unity, autonomy, and collective integrity.
OPTIMIZING WORKERS' RIGHTS IN THE DYNAMICS OF WORK FROM HOME: AN OVERVIEW OF THE PRINCIPLES OF EMPLOYMENT DEVELOPMENT IN INDONESIA Khoirunnisa; Didi Jubaidi
Jurnal Humaniora & Sosial Sains Vol 1 No 2 (2024)
Publisher : Pojok Publisher

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

The work from home trend is increasingly popular throughout the world. In Indonesia, the internet has contributed to the development of the work from home trend, because the internet network is very easy. However, various existing regulatory provisions tend to only regulate matters related to office work, while the rights and obligations of employers in the work from home scheme are never specifically regulated. The purpose of this study is to analyze the suitability of the work agreement with the fulfillment of the rights of workers who work remotely from home from the perspective of law and regulations and the principles of employment development. The approach method in this study is a sociological legal approach. The findings of this study indicate that the fulfillment of workers' rights, both those stated in the contract and in their realization are important factors in the fulfillment of workers' rights that are not fully in accordance with the principles that support employment development.
REINTERPRETING ARTICLE 251 KUHD: CASE STUDY OF CONSTITUTIONAL COURT DECISION NO. 83/PUU-XXII/2024 Didi Jubaidi
Jurnal Humaniora & Sosial Sains Vol 2 No 2 (2025)
Publisher : Pojok Publisher

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

Article 251 of the Indonesian Commercial Code (KUHD) grants insurance companies the right to unilaterally annul insurance contracts if the insured party conceals or misrepresents relevant facts, even without malicious intent. While grounded in the doctrine of uberrimae fidei (utmost good faith), this provision raises concerns about legal certainty and the balance of contractual rights. In 2024, the Indonesian Constitutional Court issued Decision No. 83/PUU-XXII/2024, declaring Article 251 conditionally unconstitutional. The Court ruled that insurance contracts cannot be annulled solely by the insurer without mutual agreement or a judicial decision, emphasizing the protection of constitutional principles of fairness and justice. This decision reshapes the legal landscape by limiting insurers' unilateral power and strengthening procedural fairness. It also urges the Financial Services Authority (OJK) to update legal frameworks and annulment procedures, reinforcing the protection of policyholders' rights.
The Barzanji Tradition in The Context of Cultural Studies: Exploring The Debate Between Sunnah and Bid'ah Didi Jubaidi; Khoirunnisa Khoirunnisa
TRANS-KATA: Journal of Language, Literature, Culture and Education Vol. 4 No. 2 (2024): TRANS-KATA: Journal of Language, Literature, Culture, and Education
Publisher : TRANSBAHASA

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.54923/jllce.v4i2.68

Abstract

This article discusses the role of the famous Islamic literary work Barzanji in the context of cultural studies about concepts such as tradition, sunnah, and heresy in Islam. The Barzanji is a work that recounts the life of the Prophet Muhammad (PBUH) with awe and affection and has become an integral part of religious traditions in many Muslim-majority countries. This article also aims to examine the importance of understanding tradition and sunnah in diverse cultural contexts, as well as addressing the potential issue of heresy in religious practices related to the use of Barzanji. This research uses a qualitative method with a cultural studies approach. The cultural studies approach was chosen because this research wants to examine the complex interaction between Barzanji and Muslim society.  Overall, this study concludes that Barzanji plays an important role in upholding and strengthening religious identity in certain Muslim communities, especially through its recitation in religious events. That is the context of religious practice, change or innovation (bid'ah) is acceptable if it conforms to the basic principles of the Sunnah. That is, there are situations where bid'ah can be used to enhance or perfect the understanding and practice of the Sunnah. In this perspective, the concepts of sunnah and bid'ah do not have to be seen separately but can complement each other in the context of religious interpretation and practice.
Populist Parties and Pork-Barrel Politics in Indonesia: The Erosion of Political Morality Didi Jubaidi; Khoirunnisa Khoirunnisa
Soshum: Jurnal Sosial dan Humaniora Vol. 15 No. 2 (2025): July 2025
Publisher : Unit Publikasi Ilmiah, P3M, Politeknik Negeri Bali

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31940/soshum.v15i2.108-116

Abstract

The phenomenon of populist parties and "pork barrel" politics in Indonesia often emerges with promises of radical change and claims to represent the "voice of the people." However, in practice, these parties frequently become entangled in corruption, nepotism, and clientelism, undermining political integrity and public trust. "Pork barrel" politics in Indonesia refers to the strategic and often inequitable distribution of state resources—such as regional development projects or social assistance programs—used to secure political support. This study examines how these practices erode not only political morality and democratic integrity but also the social and psychological underpinnings of public trust in government institutions. Employing a qualitative approach with case studies and document analysis, the research explores corruption cases involving public officials and the broader societal impacts of "pork barrel" politics. The findings reveal that these practices have not only degraded the ethical standards of political actors but have also fostered widespread public cynicism, exacerbating a psychological sense of distrust and disillusionment with the political system. To address these challenges, the study highlights the need for systemic reforms, including greater transparency in budget allocation, robust legal enforcement against corruption, and political education that prioritizes ethical behavior, civic responsibility, and trust-building. These efforts are vital for restoring public confidence, strengthening democratic values, and fostering a more morally grounded political culture in Indonesia.
Legal Disparities in Unregistered Polygamous Marriages from the Perspective of Justice and Child Welfare: A Philosophical Examination Didi Jubaidi; Khoirunnisa Khoirunnisa
JURNAL HUKUM STAATRECHTS Vol 8, No 1 (2025): JURNAL STAATRECHTS
Publisher : Fakultas Hukum

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.52447/sr.v8i1.8226

Abstract

Unregistered polygamous marriages (poligami siri) often give rise to complex legal issues, particularly regarding the protection and rights of children. The disharmony between positive legal norms and social realities creates legal disparities that result in uncertainty over the legal status of children born from such marriages. This situation leads to a central legal inquiry: How can the formulation of legal norms be directed to ensure the protection of children’s rights in the context of unregistered polygamous marriages? This study aims to analyze these legal gaps through a philosophical approach, emphasizing the principles of justice and child welfare. Using a qualitative method through literature review, this paper reflects on the values of substantive justice that should underpin legal formulation and implementation. The findings indicate that the existing legal framework does not fully guarantee the protection of children's rights in the context of unregistered polygamy. Therefore, a reformulation of legal norms is necessary one that is more responsive to social realities and aligned with justice and welfare principles as the philosophical foundation of law.
Islam and human rights in the Muslim World: Essentialist and socio-historical perspectives Didi Jubaidi; Khoirunisa Khoirunnisa
SOSIOHUMANIORA: Jurnal Ilmiah Ilmu Sosial dan Humaniora Vol 11 No 2 (2025): August 2025
Publisher : LP2M Universitas Sarjanawiyata Tamansiswa

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.30738/sosio.v11i2.20313

Abstract

The discourse on human rights in the Muslim world continues to generate significant debate, particularly regarding the interplay between Islamic principles and universal human rights standards. This study explores the implementation of human rights in Muslim-majority countries by examining two essential approaches: the essentialist perspective, which views Islamic teachings as inherently compatible with human rights, and the socio-historical perspective, which emphasizes the contextual interpretation of Islamic values in contemporary settings. The research aims to analyze how these differing approaches influence the realization of human rights in the Muslim world. Using qualitative methods, including literature review and content analysis of key Islamic texts, legal frameworks, and case studies from various Muslim countries, the study identifies patterns and challenges in harmonizing Islamic doctrines with global human rights norms. The findings reveal that while the essentialist approach promotes a timeless and unchanging view of human rights within Islam, the socio-historical perspective offers flexibility, allowing for reinterpretation in response to evolving societal needs. The study concludes that a balanced integration of both approaches is essential for fostering a comprehensive and culturally relevant human rights framework in the Muslim world, emphasizing the importance of dialogue, contextual understanding, and legal reforms.
Neo-Gramscian perspectives on international communication: China’s hegemony and Indonesia’s counter-diplomacy in Southeast Asia Khoirunnisa Khoirunnisa; Arief Subhan; Ridzki Rinanto Sigit; Prasetya Yoga Santoso; Didi Jubaidi
SOSIOHUMANIORA: Jurnal Ilmiah Ilmu Sosial dan Humaniora Vol 12 No 2 (2026): In Progress
Publisher : LP2M Universitas Sarjanawiyata Tamansiswa

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.30738/sosio.v12i2.22127

Abstract

China’s growing influence in Southeast Asia has increasingly been exercised not only through material power, but also through international communication and discursive practices that shape regional norms and perceptions. Existing studies on China’s rise tend to privilege economic and strategic explanations, often overlooking the communicative processes through which hegemony is constructed and legitimized. Addressing this gap, this article examines China’s regional influence from a neo-Gramscian perspective, focusing on international communication as an arena of hegemonic consolidation and contestation. This study aims to analyze how China articulates hegemonic narratives in Southeast Asia and how Indonesia responds through communication-based counter-diplomacy. Using a qualitative case study approach, this study analyzes secondary data consisting of policy documents, diplomatic statements, media coverage, and digital diplomacy materials published between 2014 and 2024. The data are examined through discourse analysis, framing analysis, and qualitative content analysis to identify patterns of hegemonic narratives and counter-narratives. The findings show that China’s hegemony operates through the integration of material initiatives such as the Belt and Road Initiative and the Global Security Initiative—with discursive strategies that normalize Chinese leadership. Indonesia responds through adaptive counter-diplomacy that emphasizes international communication, ASEAN centrality, and inclusive regional norms to preserve narrative autonomy under conditions of asymmetric interdependence. The study demonstrates that counter-hegemonic practices in contemporary regional politics increasingly rely on communicative and symbolic strategies rather than overt confrontation.
BRIDGING REGULATION AND PRACTICE: REGIONAL INSIGHTS ON LOCAL BUDGET CORRUPTION AND GOVERNANCE IN SOUTHEAST ASIA Khoirunnisa Khoirunnisa; Didi Jubaidi
The Indonesian Journal of Public Administration (IJPA) Vol 11, No 2 (2025): THE INDONESIAN JOURNAL OF PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION (IJPA) JULI-DESEMBER 2025
Publisher : Department of Public Administration, Faculty of Social and Political Science, Universitas

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.52447/ijpa.v11i2.8557

Abstract

Corruption in local government budget management remains a persistent threat to the principles of good governance across Southeast Asia. Despite the presence of formal regulatory frameworks aimed at promoting transparency and accountability, their practical implementation often falls short due to structural, institutional, and political constraints. This study investigates how public regulations influence the enforcement of good governance and explores the challenges faced by law enforcement agencies in combating corruption in regional budgets, with a particular focus on Indonesia and comparative insights from other ASEAN countries. Employing a qualitative approach, the study uses case studies of two Indonesian local governments, combining document analysis, in-depth interviews with key stakeholders, and field observations of budgeting practices. The findings reveal that although regulatory frameworks are generally adequate, their enforcement is undermined by limited bureaucratic capacity, political patronage, and institutional fragmentation. Law enforcement is further hampered by overlapping mandates, weak inter-agency coordination, and uneven resource allocation. Comparative analysis highlights that effective anti-corruption strategies require more than robust legal frameworks—they depend on political will, institutional integrity, and active civic participation. This study contributes both theoretically and practically by bridging the gap between policy and enforcement, offering insights for reform strategies tailored to decentralized governance systems.
Ultimum Remedium Principles: Realizing Restorative Justice For Children In Conflict With The Law Wagiman Wagiman; Didi Jubaidi
KRTHA BHAYANGKARA Vol. 18 No. 3 (2024): KRTHA BHAYANGKARA: DECEMBER 2024
Publisher : Fakultas Hukum Universitas Bhayangkara Jakarta Raya

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31599/krtha.v18i3.2984

Abstract

This research analyzes the extent to which the concept of the Ultimum Remedium Principle becomes the principle basis for judges to keep children out of prison. This principle encourages problem-solving efforts involving perpetrators, victims and other parties. The provisions of Law No. 11/2012 are a form of certainty in providing clear guidelines for judges in making decisions that are optimal for the interests of children, in accordance with the principle of the Ultimum Remedium Principle. Nonetheless, some judges still tend to take action based on the theory of retaliation when determining responsibility for the wrongdoing committed by the child. This study aims to determine the extent to which this country has a legal umbrella in protecting children and to determine the optimization of the application of the ultimum remedium principle to crimes committed by children. This research is a normative juridical study. The results showed that the settlement of cases of children in conflict with the law according to Law No. 11/2012 is to prioritize alternative out-of-court settlements which are the basic principles in the legal system governing child protection. This approach is in line with the principles of human rights and the best interests of the child.