Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 22 Documents
Search

Media Perceptions on Press Council Regulation of AI in Journalism Practice Oktarinda, Anggi; Maryani, Eni; Yudhapramesti, Pandan; Adiputra, Andika Vinianto
Mediator: Jurnal Komunikasi Vol. 18 No. 2 (2025): Mediator: Jurnal Komunikasi (Sinta 2)
Publisher : UPT Publikasi Ilmiah UNISBA

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.29313/mediator.v18i2.7696

Abstract

Press Council Regulation No. 1 of 2025 concerning Guidelines for the Use of Artificial Intelligence in Journalistic Works marks a significant initial measure in ensuring that technological advancements do not undermine the fundamental journalistic principles in Indonesia. It reflects the nation’s commitment to preserving press integrity and ethical standards in the context of rapid AI adoption. This study examines the digital media’s perceptions and responses towards these guidelines in the early stages of their dissemination. Employing a descriptive qualitative method, the research utilizes case studies of Ayo Media Network—a network-based digital platform—and Bisnis Indonesia—a segmented newspaper expanding into digital media. Data were obtained through interviews, observations, and document analysis. The findings reveal that digital media practitioners accepted the Guidelines, acknowledging their relevance, urgency, and alignment with the ongoing media industry’s digital transformation. In response, media organizations intend to realign their practices with these Guidelines to safeguard journalistic integrity and public trust. The principal challenge lies in the aspect of translating principles into practice, as well as institutional support to strengthen the internalization of ethical values. Strengthened socialization, coaching, and stakeholder collaboration are essential to establish these Guidelines as a foundational framework for responsible AI-driven journalism in Indonesia.
Just a Joke? Audience Interpretations of Sexist Humor in Ludruk Performances Rahmiati, Dyan; Maryani, Eni; Dida, Susanne; Hadisiwi, Purwanti
Communicare : Journal of Communication Studies Vol. 11 No. 2 (2024): Communicare: Journal of Communication Studies
Publisher : Institut Komunikasi dan Bisnis LSPR

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.37535/

Abstract

Sexist humor has emerged as a controversial issue at the intersection of gender, communication, and traditional entertainment. While often dismissed as harmless amusement, such humor can reinforce gender stereotypes and normalize social bias, particularly in local performance contexts. This study explores audience interpretations of sexist humor in ‘Ludruk’, a traditional Indonesian theatre from known for comedy content that incorporates gendered themes. Adopting an Interpretive Phenomenological Analysis (IPA) approach. the research involves six participants who regularly attended Ludruk performances. Through in-depth interviews conducted in the local Javanese dialect, the study examined participants' interpretations, emotional responses, and the cultural and social context shaping their perspective. The findings indicate that participants generally view sexist humor as mere entertainment, rarely considering its broader societal implications. Male participants emphasize humor delivery and comedic timing, while female participants often rationalize their laughter as a means of social conformity, avoiding being perceived as overly critical. The immersive performance environment of Ludruk, combined with its improvisational and participatory nature, fosters social bonds among audience members and between performers and spectators. These cultural dynamics, deeply rooted in Javanese social norms and expectations of group harmony, contributed significantly to the acceptance and normalization of sexist content. This study highlights how humor operates within specific cultural contexts and how social laughter functions as a mechanism of social cohesion, even when problematic. It underscores the importance of critically examining traditional entertainment practices that may perpetuate gendered social norms under the guise of innocuous fun.