Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2020 - 2025
1.116
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Ahkam: Jurnal Ilmu Syariah AL-ATHFAL : JURNAL PENDIDIKAN ANAK Jurnal At-Tibyan: Jurnal Ilmu Alqur’an dan Tafsir Jurnal Studi Ilmu-ilmu Al-Qur'an dan Hadis Journal of Islamic Law Jurnal Lektur Keagamaan
Herlambang, Saifuddin
Unknown Affiliation
Religion Arts Humanities Economics, Econometrics & Finance Education Languange, Linguistic, Communication & Media Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Social Sciences Other

Published : 7 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 7 Documents
Search

 1 
Menggugat Tafsir Tekstual Juliandi, Budi; Herlambang, Saifuddin
At-Tibyan: Jurnal Ilmu Alqur'an dan Tafsir Vol 1 No 1 (2016): Volume 1 Nomor 1 Januari - Juni 2016
Publisher : Department of Alquran Science and Interpretation of the Faculty of Ushuluddin, Adab, and Da'wah of IAIN Langsa

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

In this paper, some methodologies were identified that have traditionally been used by the Muslims to read the Al-Qur?an. Then, it is shown how the methodology that led to mix between the Koran and secondary religious texts, as well as resulting in the marginalization of the Koran in Muslim religious discourse, whereas the Al-Qur?an itself has a unique status as the holy book of Islam. In analyzing about textuality, studied two conceptualizations of the relationship, ie, between the word of God and the times, and the conservative approach and progressive approach, the following impact on the interpretation of the Koran. Finally, we review some of the historical trend in the formation of knowledge, methods, and religious significance, to highlight the role of the state and the entire community in the process of interpretation.
THE TRANSLATION OF THE QUR’AN IN SAMBAS SCRIPT: A STUDI ON JAWI AND LATIN SCRIPT BY MUHAMMAD BASIUNI IMRAN Herlambang, Saifuddin; Kadir Naffati, Abdel; Nurmansyah, Ihsan; Kurnia Oktaviana, Sherli
Jurnal Lektur Keagamaan Vol 21 No 2 (2023): Jurnal Lektur Keagamaan Vol. 21 No. 2 Tahun 2023
Publisher : Center for Research and Development of Religious Literature and Heritage, Agency for Research and Development and Training, Ministry of Religious Affairs of the Republic of Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31291/jlka.v21i2.1117

Abstract

ABSTRACT This article presents a study examining the use of Jawi and Latin scripts in Muhammad Basiuni Imran's Quran tafseer (commentary) in Sambas. The study employed historical research, where the data was collected through literature study. The results of this study suggest that the use of Jawi and Latin script was related to the different backgrounds of reader segmenta­tion as well as Muhammad Basiuni Imran's stance towards Dutch colonialism. In practical terms, Tafsir Tujuh Surah and Ayat as-Siyam, written in Jawi script, were explicitly written for the Malay community in the Sambas Sultanate, who were only able to read Jawi. On the other hand, al-Ibanatoe wal Inshafoe, written in Latin script, was intended for a wider Indonesian audience, who were able to read Latin script. The choice of script also influenced the thematic content of Muhammad Basiuni Imran's Quranic tafseer. The Tafsir Tujuh Surah and Ayat as-Siyam, composed in Jawi script, were primarily characterized by explanations of well-known verses and surahs that are routinely recited during prayers, thereby necessitating their comprehension by the Malay community within the Sambas Sultanate. On the other hand, al-Ibanatoe wal Inshafoe, written in Latin script, predominantly contained explana­tions on the contemporary conflicts and debates within the Malay and Indonesian Muslim communities over religious issues. This was designed to facilitate a wider comprehension among the general populace, thereby fostering unity within the Muslim community. From an academic perspective, the utilization of these two scripts indicates Muhammad Basiuni Imran's moderate stance, embodying a symbolic form of resistance against Dutch colonialism. This study further reinforces the concept of religious moderation in Indonesia, specifically via the usage of Jawi and Latin script in Muhammad Basiuni Imran's tafseer in Sambas. Keywords: Jawi script, Latin script, Quranic Commentary, Muhammad Basiuni Imran   ABSTRAK Tujuan penulisan artikel ini adalah untuk mengkaji penggunaan aksara Jawi dan Latin dalam karya tafsir Muhammad Basiuni Imran di Sambas. Metode penelitian yang digunakan adalah metode penelitian sejarah, dengan teknik pengumpulan data yang digunakan adalah studi pustaka. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa penggunaan aksara Jawi dan Latin berkaitan erat dengan konteks segmentasi pembaca yang berbeda serta sikap Muhammad Basiuni Imran terhadap kolonial Belanda. Secara praktis, TafsirTujuh Surah dan Ayat as-Siyam ditulis untuk masyarakat Melayu di Kesultanan Sambas yang umumnya hanya mampu membaca aksara Jawi, sedangkan al-Ibanatoe wal Inshafoe ditulis untuk masyarakat Indonesia secara lebih luas yang mampu membaca aksara Latin. Penggunaan kedua aksara tersebut berimplikasi pada perbedaan substansi penafsiran Muhammad Basiuni Imran terhadap ayat al-Qur’an. Tafsir Tujuh Surah dan Ayat as-Siyam yang beraksara Jawi lebih dominan berisi penjelasan tentang ayat dan surah yang sudah familiar dan selalu dibaca dalam shalat, sehingga harus dihayati dan dipahami oleh masyarakat Melayu di Kesultanan Sambas. Sementara itu, al-Ibanatoe wal Inshafoe yang beraksara Latin didominasi penjelasan tentang masyarakat Muslim di tanah Melayu dan Indonesia yang sedang berselisih dan berbantah-bantahan dalam perkara agama sehingga harus dipahami oleh masyarakat secara umum untuk mendorong persatuan umat Islam. Secara akademis, penggunaan kedua aksara tersebut sebagai bentuk sikap moderat Muhammad Basiuni Imran dalam upaya perlawanan simbolis terhadap kolonial Belanda. Kajian ini memperkuat moderasi beragama di Indonesia, khususnya melalui penggunaan aksara Jawi dan Latin dalam karya tafsir Muhammad Basiuni Imran di Sambas.  Kata kunci: Aksara Jawi, Aksara Latin, Tafsir al-Qur’an, Muhammad Basiuni Imran
The Role of Javanese Women in Domestic and Public Spheres: Challenges, Trade Motives, and Parenting Practices Herlambang, Saifuddin; Suratman, Bayu; Kadir Naffati, Abdel
Al-Athfal: Jurnal Pendidikan Anak Vol. 9 No. 2 (2023)
Publisher : Islamic Early Childhood Education Study Program, Faculty of Tarbiyah and Education, UIN Sunan Kalijaga Yogyakarta

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.14421/al-athfal.2023.92-07

Abstract

Purpose –  This study aims to explore the dual role of Javanese women who engage in trade at traditional markets and their role as mothers in parenting practices. Design/methods/approach – Employing qualitative research with an ethnographic approach, this study gathered primary data from interviews with Javanese women traders at the Karangawen traditional market, who have children aged 0–8 years. Data collection methods included semi-structured interviews, observations, and documentation. This was followed by a descriptive analysis of the findings. Findings – The study identifies three main motives for Javanese women trading in traditional markets: self-actualization, economic needs, and the pursuit of independence. Additionally, the study reveals various aspects of parenting practices among Javanese women. These include practices such as bancaan weton lair, weton lair fasting, and infant massage. Research implications/limitations – The research is constrained to a descriptive analysis, focusing on a limited data set regarding the roles of Javanese women as traders in the public sphere and as mothers in the domestic sphere. Practical implications – The study highlights the dual role of rural women, who are active in both the public sphere (through trading) and the domestic sphere (through parenting). This dual engagement reflects the multifaceted nature of their daily lives. Originality/value – The study underscores how culture, economy, and social environment shape parenting practices among Javanese women. Paper type Research paper
Ḥusn al-Jawāb ‘an Ithbāt al-Ahillah bi al-Ḥisāb: Basyūnī ‘Imrān’s Method for Standardising the Determination of the Qamariyah Month in the Sultanate of Sambas (1913-1976) Herlambang, Saifuddin; Rizqina, Aulia Laily; Ridwansyah, Ridwansyah; Muslih, Moh.; Naffati, Abdel Kadir
Journal of Islamic Law Vol. 5 No. 2 (2024): Journal of Islamic Law
Publisher : Institut Agama Islam Negeri (IAIN) Pontianak

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.24260/jil.v5i2.2775

Abstract

This article analyses the responses of Basyūnī ‘Imrān (1885-1976), a muftī (jurisconsult) and qādhī (judge) with the title Mahārāja Imām (highest religious official) in the Sambas Sultanate, to the debates surrounding the determination of the beginning of Ramaḍān and Eid al-Fitr at the turn of the twentieth century. The differences arose from conflicting claims of accuracy between two methods, ḥisāb (astronomical calculations) and ruʾyah (physical sighting of the moon), in determining the start of the lunar month among Muslims. Concerned about these issues, Basyūnī ‘Imrān addressed them in his manuscript written in Arabic-Malay (known as Aksara Jawī), titled Ḥusn al-Jawāb ‘an Ithbāt al-Ahillah bi al-Ḥisāb (1933). By employing a historical approach and content analysis of the manuscript, the authors find that Basyūnī ‘Imrān favoured the ḥisāb method for determining the start of the lunar month. In addition to referencing Sūrah al-Raḥmān verse 5, Sūrah Yūnus verse 5, and a hadith narrated by Imām Mālik, Basyūnī ‘Imrān also considered the geographical and social conditions of Muslims to standardise the observance of fasting and Islamic festivals in the Sultanate of Sambas and its surroundings. He argued that differences in determining the start of the lunar month should not lead to divisions among Muslims, as both methods are grounded in the same theological principles. This finding contributes to the history of Islamic legal thought in Indonesia by providing evidence of scholarly efforts to standardise the determination of the lunar month during his tenure as Mahārāja Imām in the Sultanate of Sambas from 1913 to 1976. [Artikel ini menganalisis respons Basyūnī ‘Imrān (1885-1976), muftī dan qādhī yang bergelar Mahārāja Imām di Kesultanan Sambas, terhadap polemik perbedaan dalam penentuan awal puasa Ramadhan dan hari raya Idul Fitri pada awal abad kedua puluh. Perbedaan tersebut disebabkan saling klaim kebenaran metode, antara ḥisāb dan ruʾyah, dalam penentuan awal bulan Qomariyah di kalangan umat Islam. Prihatin terhadap peristiwa tersebut, Basyūnī ‘Imrān meresponsnya sebagaimana yang tertuang dalam manuskrip berbahasa Arab-Melayu (dikenal sebagai Aksara Jawī) yang berjudul, Ḥusn al-Jawāb ‘an Ithbāt al-Ahillah bi al-Ḥisāb (1933). Dengan menggunakan pendekatan sejarah dan analisis konten manuskrip, para penulis menemukan bahwa Basyūnī ‘Imrān cenderung menggunakan metode ḥisāb dalam penentuan awal bulan Qomariyah. Selain merujuk pada Sūrah al-Raḥmān ayat 5, Sūrah Yūnus ayat 5, dan sebuah hadis yang diriwayatkan oleh Imām Mālik, Basyūnī ‘Imrān juga mempertimbangkan kondisi geografis dan sosial umat Islam untuk menyeragamkan pelaksanaan ibadah puasa dan hari raya Islam di Kesultanan Sambas dan sekitarnya. Menurutnya, perbedaan dalam penentuan awal bulan tersebut tidak boleh menimbulkan perpecahan di antara umat Islam, karena kedua metode tersebut berlandaskan pada dasar teologi yang sama. Temuan ini berkontribusi terhadap sejarah pemikiran hukum Islam di Indonesia dengan memberikan bukti adanya pemikiran ulama yang berupaya menyeragamkan penentuan awal bulan Qomariyah yang diterapkannya ketika menjabat sebagai Mahārāja Imām di Kesultanan Sambas pada tahun 1913 sampai 1976.]
Paradigm Shifts in the Interpretation of Heaven Illustration Among Indonesian Mufassir: A Comparative Analysis of As-Singkili, Hamka, and M. Quraish Herlambang, Saifuddin; Parwanto , Wendi
Jurnal Studi Ilmu-ilmu Al-Qur'an dan Hadis Vol. 24 No. 1 (2023): Januari
Publisher : UIN Sunan Kalijaga Yogyakarta

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.14421/qh.v24i1.4454

Abstract

This article examines the changes in the interpretation of the illustration of heaven among Indonesian mufassirin (interpreters), including As-Singkili, Hamka, and M. Quraish Shihab, using Thomas Kuhn's paradigm shift theory. The study reveals a shift in the meaning of the illustration of heaven in each generation of interpreters in Indonesia, particularly in the areas of the width of heaven, the river that flows beneath heaven, fruits in heaven, spouses and houris (heavenly virgins) in heaven, and the color green and adornment for humans in heaven. The article concludes that As-Singkili's interpretation is considered normal science as it remains literal, whereas Hamka and M. Quraish Shihab's interpretations are categorized under scientific revolution due to the rationalization and development of their interpretations still based on normal science or literal texts. This study contributes to a deeper understanding of the evolution of interpretation of Islamic texts in Indonesia.
Public Chaos: Alleged Fatwa on Boycotting and the Fear of Missing Out on Israeli Products in Indonesia Husna, Nurul; Juliandi, Budi; Herlambang, Saifuddin; Fadhlunasyifa, Fadhlunasyifa; Irfan, Andi Farahdhiba
AHKAM : Jurnal Ilmu Syariah Vol 25, No 1 (2025)
Publisher : Universitas Islam Negeri Jakarta

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.15408/ajis.v25i1.41588

Abstract

The following text presents a synopsis of the abstract. As the conflict between Israel and Palestine intensifies, the Indonesian Ulama Council (MUI) has issued a fatwa that has generated controversy in various mass media, particularly on social media platforms. The objective of this study is to examine whether the "fatwa" issued by the Indonesian Ulama Council (MUI) constitutes a legitimate threat against Israeli products or a misinterpretation of the fatwa within the community. The research method employed is qualitative, with a descriptive-analytical approach. The secondary data set comprises social media platforms, including Instagram, Twitter, and YouTube, as well as websites relevant to the author's research. The primary data was obtained through interviews with various stakeholders, including consumers, MUI members, pro-Palestinian activists, and digital communication experts. The results indicated that misinterpretations of the fatwa led to public disorder, characterized by ambiguity in public perception, social pressures encouraging boycott conformity, and exacerbated consumer confusion due to digital misinformation. This research highlights the importance of religious literacy and the need to establish information authority within the digital landscape.AbstrakSeiring memanasnya konflik antara Israel dan Palestina, Majelis Ulama Indonesia (MUI) mengeluarkan fatwa yang menuai kontroversi di berbagai media massa, khususnya media sosial. Tujuan penelitian ini adalah untuk mengkaji apakah fatwa yang dikeluarkan oleh Majelis Ulama Indonesia (MUI) tersebut hanya sekadar ancaman bebas terhadap produk Israel atau merupakan kesalahpahaman terhadap fatwa tersebut di tengah masyarakat. Metode penelitian yang digunakan adalah kualitatif dengan pendekatan deskriptif-analitis; data sekunder meliputi media sosial seperti Instagram, Twitter, YouTube, dan situs web yang terkait dengan penelitian penulis; dan data primer diperoleh melalui wawancara dengan berbagai pemangku kepentingan, meliputi konsumen, anggota MUI, aktivis pro-Palestina, dan pakar komunikasi digital. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa terjadi kesalahpahaman mengenai fatwa yang menimbulkan kekacauan di ruang publik, yang berujung pada ambiguitas persepsi publik terhadap fatwa tersebut, tekanan sosial yang mendorong konformitas dalam aksi boikot, serta peran misinformasi digital yang memperparah kebingungan konsumen. Penelitian ini menyoroti pentingnya literasi agama dan penguatan otoritas informasi dalam konteks digital.
Public Chaos: Alleged Fatwa on Boycotting and the Fear of Missing Out on Israeli Products in Indonesia Husna, Nurul; Irfan, Andi Farahdhiba; Juliandi, Budi; Herlambang, Saifuddin; Fadhlunasyifa, Fadhlunasyifa
AHKAM : Jurnal Ilmu Syariah Vol. 25 No. 1 (2025)
Publisher : Universitas Islam Negeri Jakarta

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.15408/ajis.v25i1.41588

Abstract

The following text presents a synopsis of the abstract. As the conflict between Israel and Palestine intensifies, the Indonesian Ulama Council (MUI) has issued a fatwa that has generated controversy in various mass media, particularly on social media platforms. The objective of this study is to examine whether the "fatwa" issued by the Indonesian Ulama Council (MUI) constitutes a legitimate threat against Israeli products or a misinterpretation of the fatwa within the community. The research method employed is qualitative, with a descriptive-analytical approach. The secondary data set comprises social media platforms, including Instagram, Twitter, and YouTube, as well as websites relevant to the author's research. The primary data was obtained through interviews with various stakeholders, including consumers, MUI members, pro-Palestinian activists, and digital communication experts. The results indicated that misinterpretations of the fatwa led to public disorder, characterized by ambiguity in public perception, social pressures encouraging boycott conformity, and exacerbated consumer confusion due to digital misinformation. This research highlights the importance of religious literacy and the need to establish information authority within the digital landscape. Abstrak Seiring memanasnya konflik antara Israel dan Palestina, Majelis Ulama Indonesia (MUI) mengeluarkan fatwa yang menuai kontroversi di berbagai media massa, khususnya media sosial. Tujuan penelitian ini adalah untuk mengkaji apakah fatwa yang dikeluarkan oleh Majelis Ulama Indonesia (MUI) tersebut hanya sekadar ancaman bebas terhadap produk Israel atau merupakan kesalahpahaman terhadap fatwa tersebut di tengah masyarakat. Metode penelitian yang digunakan adalah kualitatif dengan pendekatan deskriptif-analitis; data sekunder meliputi media sosial seperti Instagram, Twitter, YouTube, dan situs web yang terkait dengan penelitian penulis; dan data primer diperoleh melalui wawancara dengan berbagai pemangku kepentingan, meliputi konsumen, anggota MUI, aktivis pro-Palestina, dan pakar komunikasi digital. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa terjadi kesalahpahaman mengenai fatwa yang menimbulkan kekacauan di ruang publik, yang berujung pada ambiguitas persepsi publik terhadap fatwa tersebut, tekanan sosial yang mendorong konformitas dalam aksi boikot, serta peran misinformasi digital yang memperparah kebingungan konsumen. Penelitian ini menyoroti pentingnya literasi agama dan penguatan otoritas informasi dalam konteks digital.  
Co-Authors Budi Juliandi, Budi Fadhlunasyifa, Fadhlunasyifa Irfan, Andi Farahdhiba Kadir Naffati, Abdel Kurnia Oktaviana, Sherli Moh. Muslih Naffati, Abdel Kadir Nurmansyah, Ihsan Nurul Husna Parwanto , Wendi Ridwansyah Ridwansyah RIZQINA, AULIA LAILY Suratman, Bayu