Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search
Journal : rechtsvinding

A Legal Analysis of the Challenges in Proving Mens Rea in Corporate Criminal Cases Involving Environmental Crimes Hairul Saleh Satrul
Rechtsvinding Vol. 4 No. 1 (2026)
Publisher : Civiliza Publishing

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.59525/rechtsvinding.1490

Abstract

Corporations have become dominant economic actors in the modern era, yet their activities often trigger systemic environmental degradation. Proving the subjective element of means rea (guilty mind) in corporate entities remains a fundamental challenge in the Indonesian criminal justice system, which traditionally adhere to individual-based fault. Purpose of the Study: This research aims to analyze the juridical obstacles in proving corporate mens rea within environmental crimes and to evaluate the impact of regulatory shifts following the enactment of the Job Creation Law on evidentiary standards. Methods: This study employs a normative juridical method with statutory, conceptual, and case approaches. Results: The findings indicate that proving corporate mens rea is hindered by complex hierarchical structures, information asymmetry, and the "wilful blindness" of directors. Furthermore, redactorial changes in Article 88 of the Environmental Protection and Management Law (UU PPLH) via the Job Creation Law have created ambiguity regarding the principle of strict liability. However, Supreme Court Regulation (Perma) No. 13 of 2016 provides a procedural solution through functional indicators such as corporate profit and systematic failure to prevent violations. Conclusions: Effective environmental law enforcement requires a paradigm shift from psychological-human intent to organizational-corporate intent. The integration of environmental forensic audits and the adoption of aggregation theory are essential strategies to penetrate the corporate veil and achieve ecological justice.
Reconstruction of Criminal Liability for Deepfake Misuse in Defamatory Defenses in Indonesia Hairul Saleh Satrul; Nur Hafizal Hasanah
Rechtsvinding Vol. 4 No. 1 (2026)
Publisher : Civiliza Publishing

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.59525/rechtsvinding.1541

Abstract

The deepfake phenomenon as a product of artificial intelligence (AI) has created a new dimension in the crime of defamation. This research aims to analyze the deepfake phenomenon through criminological and juridical approaches to map the effectiveness of regulations in Indonesia. The method used is normative juridical research with a conceptual and case study approach. The results show that deepfake technology facilitates attacks on honor through highly realistic visual manipulation, where 96% of deepfake content on the internet is non-consensual pornography. Juridically, Article 27A of the ITE Law No. 1 of 2024 and the New Criminal Code provide a basis for enforcement, but there is still a functional legal vacuum regarding the liability of technology developers. The implications of this research emphasize the need for specific regulations (sui generis) and strengthening digital forensics to overcome evidentiary challenges in court.