Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 23 Documents
Search

Perbuatan Penyidik Dalam Menghalangi Proses Peradilan Pidana (Obstruction Of Justice) Khoirunnisa, Nabila; Dewi, Erna; Putri, Ria Wierma; Maroni, Maroni; Siswanto, Heri
JUSTICIA SAINS - Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Vol 10, No 2 (2025): JUSTICIA SAINS: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum
Publisher : Universitas Sang Bumi Ruwa Jurai

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.24967/jcs.v10i2.4271

Abstract

Investigators as law enforcement officers in carrying out their duties, namely law enforcement officers, guards, protectors, and public servants play an important role in the efforts of the state government to maintain order and public safety in good performance. Obstruction of justice is an action that can be interpreted as an act that tries to obstruct the legal process or 'criminal act of obstructing the legal process'. The purpose of this writing is to find out the legal arrangements regarding obstruction of justice in Indonesia and the elements that can be said that the actions of investigators that can be classified as criminal acts obstruct the legal process or obstruction of justice. The research method used in this article is normative juridical. The results of the study show that obstruction of justice is generally regulated in the Criminal Code, including; Article 221 paragraph (1), Article 231 and Article 233. Regarding the regulations, it is clearly spelled out in the provisions of the legislation clearly regarding obstruction of justice so that this cannot be separated from the philosophical foundation of the principle of legality in criminal law, no criminal act, no there is a crime without a previous criminal law. Regarding the elements that can be said that the investigator who committed an obstruction of justice, namely: 1) The action caused a delay in the legal process (2) The perpetrator knew his actions or was aware of his actions; (3) The perpetrator committed or attempted a deviant act with the aim of interfering with the legal process. So for investigators who meet these elements can be said to meet the elements of the crime of obstruction of justice and can be given sanctions according to the applicable laws and regulations.
Intervensi Gizi dan Edukasi Kesehatan Ibu Balita sebagai Strategi Penanggulangan Stunting di Desa Kembangarum Rahmatika, Alfina; Mahardika, Abhista Narra; Pratama, Havivi Rizki; Ulfa, Sintya; Mutiara, Marita; Istiariani, Irma; Khoirunnisa, Nabila; Hakim, M. Randy Maulana
Jurnal Pengabdian Masyarakat (ABDIRA) Vol 6, No 2 (2026): Abdira
Publisher : Universitas Pahlawan Tuanku Tambusai

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31004/abdira.v6i2.1712

Abstract

Stunting remains a major health problem in Indonesia because it impacts child growth and the quality of human resources. Kembangarum Village, Mranggen District, Demak Regency, is an area with a relatively high prevalence of stunting. This community service activity aims to assess nutritional interventions and health education for mothers of toddlers as a strategy to overcome stunting. The community service method was carried out through collaboration between KKN UIN Walisongo Semarang students and Posyandu cadres, including the Provision of Supplementary Feeding (PMT) and balanced nutrition education through direct practice and interactive discussions. The results of the activity showed increased maternal involvement in managing nutrition and child development, as well as changes in healthier eating behaviors during the first 1,000 days of life. This intervention also strengthened social support between cadres, students, and the community. This community service activity is important as a cross-sectoral collaborative effort to reduce stunting and improve children's quality of life.
The Use of Swearing Words Differences Between Men and Women Communication in University Dewi, Mutiara Sintya; Khoirunnisa, Nabila; Claradista, Nadia Deba; Sarosa, Teguh
PRASASTI: Journal of Linguistics Vol 10, No 2 (2025)
Publisher : Universitas Sebelas Maret

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.20961/prasasti.v10i2.96405

Abstract

This research investigates gender-based differences in the use of swear words among university students, exploring whether significant variations exist in their daily communication. Adopting a descriptive qualitative approach, data were collected through questionnaires distributed to 48 participants, focusing on their perceptions, attitudes, and experiences with swearing. The findings reveal notable distinctions between male and female swearing behavior. Men were observed to use swear words more frequently and openly, often as a means of expressing camaraderie, asserting dominance, or emphasizing their emotions in social interactions. In contrast, women tended to use swear words more selectively and situationally, primarily in private settings or emotionally charged moments, reflecting societal expectations of politeness and decorum. These differences highlight the impact of gender norms, personality traits, and social contexts on linguistic choices, with women facing greater stigma for using profanity than men. Additionally, the study underscores the evolving role of swearing as a multifaceted linguistic tool for expressing emotions, asserting identity, and navigating social relationships. By shedding light on these dynamics, the research contributes to a deeper understanding of gendered communication and emphasizes the importance of addressing stereotypes to foster more inclusive and effective interactions within academic and social environments.