Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2020 - 2025
4.328
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal FIAT JUSTISIA: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Fon: Jurnal Pendidikan Bahasa dan Sastra Indonesia Jurnal Pendidikan Bahasa dan Sastra Indonesia Metalingua Journal of Humanities and Social Studies PALAR (Pakuan Law review) NOMOI Law Review Aksara: Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan Bahasa dan Sastra Indonesia Reformasi Hukum Tadabbur: Jurnal Integrasi Keilmuan Jurnal Ilmiah Program Studi Bahasa Sunda
Edi Rohaedi
Fakultas Hukum Universitas Pakuan
Religion Arts Humanities Economics, Econometrics & Finance Education Languange, Linguistic, Communication & Media Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Social Sciences Other

Published : 28 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 1 Documents
Search
Journal : NOMOI Law Review

 1 
CHALLENGES AND IMPLICATIONS OF THE SINGLE BAR SYSTEM ON LEGAL PROTECTION FOR ADVOCATES IN INDONESIA Jevis, Weldy; Hosnah, Asmak; rohaedi, Edi
NOMOI Law Review Vol 6, No 1 (2025): May Edition
Publisher : NOMOI Law Review

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.30596/nomoi.v6i1.24109

Abstract

The large number of advocates in Indonesia requires every advocate to be registered and joined in an association or organization. With the many advocate organizations in Indonesia, PERADI as an organization recognized by the state as a forum for advocate organizations to gather. PERADI is also a manifestation of the adoption of the single bar system in Indonesia. In the context of Indonesian law, advocate organizations must be registered with the Indonesian Advocates Association (PERADI) to obtain legal protection. However, many advocate organizations choose not to join Peradi, thus creating uncertainty regarding legal protection for their members. This study uses a normative juridical approach with a literature study to examine the legal norms governing the advocate profession, especially those related to the legal position of non-Peradi organizations, as well as the single bar system implemented in Indonesia. The research findings show that although non-Peradi organizations have temporary authority to carry out certain functions, their legal status is still ambiguous and affects the legal protection provided to their members. In addition, the implementation of the single bar system in Indonesia provides advantages in terms of supervision and professional development, but also faces major challenges in terms of accessibility of advocates in remote areas to services provided by PERADI.
Co-Authors ., Abid Abid, Abid Asmak UI Hosnah Bambang Heriyanto Dedi Koswara Dwi Andayani Budisetyowati Eka Ardianto Iskandar FAHMI RAKHMAN, FAHMI Faturachman, Fauzan Azima Gandaresmi, Tri Agustini Gandaresmi H. Abid Hasan Basri Henny Nuraeny Herli Antoni Hosnah, Asmak Ira Rahmawati Isep H. Insan Jevis, Weldy Luh Putu Ratna Sundari Mahtama, Reza Resky Majidi, Fathul Nadia Zumaro Nandang Kusnadi Nunuy Nurjanah Nuradi , Nuradi . Retty Isnendes Roby Satya Nugraha RUHALIAH Dr., RUHALIAH Safitri, Rani Suryaningrat1, Abas Teguh Setiadi Yudiarti, Leida Sukma