Articles
The Notary's Responsibility for Defective Legal Sale and Purchase Deeds (A Review of the Decision of the District Court of Wonogiri Number 13/PDT.G/2021/PN WNG)
Hutagalung, Lorraine Anggi Taruli;
Rahaditya, R.
Eduvest - Journal of Universal Studies Vol. 3 No. 10 (2023): Journal Eduvest - Journal of Universal Studies
Publisher : Green Publisher Indonesia
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
DOI: 10.59188/eduvest.v3i10.940
This research discusses the authority of the Land Deed Official (Pejabat Pembuat Akta Tanah or PPAT) to issue authentic deeds, specifically Sale and Purchase Deeds (Akta Jual Beli or AJB), in the process of transferring land rights through sale and purchase, where authentic deeds hold full probative force. The case under consideration involves the misuse of PPAT authority in the execution of their duties. PPAT, in carrying out their responsibilities in creating authentic deeds, must adhere to the principles of caution and precision. The responsibility of the PPAT for a legally defective Sale and Purchase Deed in the Decision of the District Court of Wonogiri Number 13/PDT.G/2021/PN Wng. is discussed. In the judgment, it is explained that the PPAT violated the law due to the failure to meet the legal requirements of the agreement as per Article 1320 of the Indonesian Civil Code. This research is normative juridical, utilizing a qualitative data analysis method. To examine legal issues, primary legal sources, secondary legal sources, and tertiary legal sources are used, and these sources are subsequently analyzed using descriptive analytical techniques.
IMPLEMENTASI PEMBERATAN PEMIDANAAN TERHADAP ANGGOTA TNI YANG MELAKUKAN TINDAK PIDANA ASUSILA
Gabriel Dumais, Alvaro David;
Rahaditya, R.
UNES Law Review Vol. 5 No. 4 (2023)
Publisher : Universitas Ekasakti
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
DOI: 10.31933/unesrev.v5i4.629
Criminal Sexual Violences or Sexual Violences, in fact, do not only occur in the midst of ordinary society, but also within active institutions of the Indonesian National Armed Forces (TNI). In this case it is clear that the TNI members involved have violated the soldier's oath and 8 (eight) TNI conscripts. In this case, every member who of course commits immoral crimes must be held responsible for their actions by receiving sanctions in the form of dismissal and appropriate punishment because they have damaged the good name of the TNI institution. The type of research method used in this writing is the normative legal research method. The method of normative legal research is carried out by studying documents and referring to studies of court decisions, principles, legal principles, legal theories, doctrines, and opinions of experts. The writing specification used is descriptive. It is used to explain various regulations and legal theories that can be correlated and examined in events or cases that occur in related problems by using secondary research data types and statutory approaches (statute approach). Therefore, it is hoped that the implementation of additional punishment in the form of dismissal can be given with the aim of providing a deterrent effect in order to maintain the image and reputation of the TNI.
PENENTUAN PERTANGGUNGJAWABAN PIDANA BAGI TERDAKWA YANG MEMILIKI GANGGUAN JIWA SKIZOFRENIA PARANOID DALAM TINDAK PIDANA PENGANIAYAAN
Ndapabehar, Elyada Umbu;
Rahaditya, R.
UNES Law Review Vol. 5 No. 4 (2023)
Publisher : Universitas Ekasakti
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
DOI: 10.31933/unesrev.v5i4.644
Someone with schizophrenia are considered dangerous by society because of the stigma that creates neglect in care and treatment. A schizophrenic patient will not commit acts of violence if adequate and controlled care and treatment is carried out. This disease is a psychotic disorder with the main signs of disturbance in the sufferer's thoughts, emotions, and disturbed behavior. The thoughts of the sufferer are not logically related, resulting in strange behavior. The case contained in the Namlea District Court Decision Number: 36/Pid.B/2019/PN.Nla. is an example of a crime where the defendant has paranoid schizophrenia based on the results of the examination and the testimony of psychiatrists. The reason for forgiving should be the reason for removing the crime, which is related to this case is that the perpetrator committed a crime but cannot be held accountable because of the mental or psychological condition of the perpetrator who suffers from Paranoid Schizophrenia. The research data is sourced from secondary data. The techniques used in data collection are library research and field research. In the process of punishment, which in this case concerns the perpetrator of a criminal offence who has a mental disorder, the judge must carefully ensure the ability to be responsible for the perpetrator, as well as ensuring that the perpetrator receives appropriate legal protection.
Implementasi Asas Ne Bis In Idem dalam Putusan Hakim yang Berkekuatan Hukum Tetap pada Perkara Pidana
Andrew, Andrew;
Rahaditya, R.
UNES Law Review Vol. 6 No. 1 (2023)
Publisher : Universitas Ekasakti
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
DOI: 10.31933/unesrev.v6i1.996
This study aims to determine the application of the ne bis in idem principle in judge decisions that have permanent legal force in criminal cases. The research method used is a normative juridical approach with qualitative methods. The results of the study stated that the principle of nebis in idem in criminal cases aims to provide protection for the accused so that he does not get a decision for the same case repeatedly. It also aims to maintain respect for the human rights of perpetrators. This principle cannot be applied to decisions 1) Decisions declaring the indictment null and void. 2) Decision declaring the Claims Unacceptable. 3) Decision declaring the Court Not Competent. This principle can be applied if the criminal case has the following elements: 1) it has the same legal basis and reasons as the case that has been decided. 2) the parties involved in the case are the same party. Nevertheless, to implement and guarantee justice for every citizen. The state provides leeway for everyone to conduct a review. This is because judges are human beings who sometimes make mistakes.
Urgensi Pemeriksaan Substantif Sengketa Merek KasoMax dengan Merek Kaso dalam Rangka Perlindungan Hukum Terhadap Merek
Pritama, Natasha;
Rahaditya, R.
UNES Law Review Vol. 6 No. 1 (2023)
Publisher : Universitas Ekasakti
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
DOI: 10.31933/unesrev.v6i1.1107
Trademark registration in Indonesia refers to a constitutive system with the first-to-file principle. First to file is a trademark registration process that is only granted to the party who submits the application for the first time. The state is not permitted to grant registration to other parties who have a mark that contains similarities to a previous mark that was registered earlier. Trademark registration must go through substantive examination stages so as not to violate other people's rights, considering that registration is a process of granting rights, not granting permission. The purpose of this article is to determine the compliance opinion of appeal commission trademark law related to a trademark dispute involving Kasomax and Kaso, and also know the DJKI responsibilities in this dispute. The research method used is normative legal research with data analysis techniques based on deductive reasoning, which analyzes the considerations of the Mark Appeal Commission Council in connection with the provisions contained in Law Number 20 of 2016 concerning marks and geographical indications relating to the purchase of the KasoMax with the Kaso and its form of responsibility for the two brand struggles. Based on the research conducted, it can be concluded that the application of substantive examination in brand assessment has not been fully implemented, and the responsibility given is in the form of the cancellation of the KasoMax as a form of implementation of the Commercial Court decision.
Peran Penting Penasihat Hukum dalam Peradilan Pidana Untuk Pemenuhan Hak Bantuan Hukum Tersangka Atau Terdakwa
Chandra, Kelvin;
Rahaditya, R.
UNES Law Review Vol. 6 No. 1 (2023)
Publisher : Universitas Ekasakti
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
DOI: 10.31933/unesrev.v6i1.1185
This research aims to examine the crucial role of legal advisors in criminal justice systems in ensuring the fulfillment of legal aid rights for suspects or defendants, as prescribed by Article 54 of the Indonesian Criminal Code (KUHAP). Legal advisors play a vital role in guaranteeing that suspects or defendants have access to adequate legal assistance throughout the trial proceedings. The research employs empirical normative methods, collecting data through literature reviews and analyzing relevant case studies. The findings indicate that legal advisors have a significant impact on upholding justice and safeguarding the rights of suspects or defendants. They assist in comprehending legal rights, providing suitable legal counsel, devising defense strategies, and undertaking other duties pertaining to legal aid. Effectively meeting the requirements of legal aid positively influences the quality of the judicial process and promotes justice for suspects or defendants. Consequently, the study offers recommendations to enhance the role of legal advisors and ensure the fulfillment of legal aid rights, such as increasing financial resources and support for legal aid organizations, implementing educational programs to raise public awareness, and improving accessibility to legal aid for vulnerable groups.
Tinjauan Prinsip Itikad Baik dalam Upaya Perlindungan Hukum Sengketa Merek (Studi Putusan Nomor 3/Pdt.Sus.Hki/Merek/2022/PN Niaga Mdn)
Enjelin Kusuma, Nadya;
Rahaditya, R.
UNES Law Review Vol. 6 No. 2 (2023)
Publisher : Universitas Ekasakti
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
DOI: 10.31933/unesrev.v6i2.1218
Merek adalah tanda pengenal yang digunakan untuk membedakan barang atau jasa yang diproduksi oleh orang dalam kegiatan perdagangan barang atau jasa. Merek merupakan hal yang sangat penting karena peran merek digunakan sebagai identitas yang dapat memberikan perbedaan terhadap asal-usul suatu barang atau jasa. Namun di Indonesia sering terjadi kasus sengketa merek, padahal hak atas adalah hak eksklusif yang diberikan oleh negara kepada pemilik merrk yang terdaftar. Namun masih banyak terdapat sengketa merek, salah satunya sengketa merek antara “Indorent” dan “Indorental”. Kedua merek tersebut terlibat sengketa merek. Oleh dimana penyelesaian persengketaan merek dagang “Indorent” dan “Indorental” ditempuh melalui jalur litigasi. Metode yang digunakan dalam penelitian ini adalah yuridis normatif dan berpendekatan perundang-undangan. Hasil dari penelitian ini adalah penyelesaian sengketa ini dilakukan di Pengadilan Niaga. Gugatan penggugat di pengadilan ditolak oleh majelis hakim dengan alasan bahwa tidak terdapat kesamaan merek karena nama merek bersifat umum dan unsur itikad tidak baik tidak terpenuhi karena merek “Indorent” telah dilakukan pemererikasaan oleh turut tergugat. First to file system dan implementasi itikad baik merupakan suatu bentuk perlindungan hukum bagi perlindungan merek.
Urgensi Rehabilitasi Sosial Terhadap Narapidana Pecandu Narkotika Di Lingkungan Lembaga Pemasyarakatan
Pangestu, Raden Mas Dimas;
Rahaditya, R.
UNES Law Review Vol. 6 No. 2 (2023)
Publisher : Universitas Ekasakti
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
DOI: 10.31933/unesrev.v6i2.1412
This article explores the urgency of social rehabilitation for drug-addicted inmates within the confines of correctional facilities. Substance abuse has become a serious issue affecting various segments of society, including those ensnared within the criminal justice system. Social rehabilitation within correctional institutions is crucial in addressing this problem. Through a rehabilitative approach, drug-addicted inmates can receive guidance, support, and the necessary skills to reintegrate into society as productive individuals. This article underscores the importance of social rehabilitation as an integral part of efforts to rehabilitate drug-addicted inmates, with the hope that these measures will have a significant positive impact on behavioral change and their overall recovery.
Sanksi Pidana Terhadap Anggota TNI dalam Perspektif Keadilan Berdasarkan Pasal 363 Ayat (1) KUHP (Studi Putusan No.126-K/PM.II-08/AD/VII/2020)
Husni, Rahmadani;
Rahaditya, R.
UNES Law Review Vol. 6 No. 2 (2023)
Publisher : Universitas Ekasakti
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
DOI: 10.31933/unesrev.v6i2.1436
Criminal acts of theft that occur in Indonesia are not only committed by the general public, there are also thefts committed by several elements of the state apparatus, such as theft committed by members of the Indonesian National Army (TNI). If during the term of office a member of the TNI carries out activities against the law or this is related to a criminal act, the Military Police have the authority to carry out the inquiry and investigation process in accordance with the applicable rules and SOPs in the Criminal Procedure Code (KUHAP) and the Law. -Law Number 31 of 1997 concerning Military Justice. In Article 69 paragraph (1) of Law no. 31 of 1997. Normative research is used by the author because it applies legal theories and positive legal regulations in analyzing legal criminal sanctions. Meanwhile, the results obtained from this writing are that the main criminal sanction is imprisonment, and additional criminal sanctions are in the form of dismissal.
PEMBENTUKAN LEMBAGA PERADILAN KHUSUS DEMI MEMPERKUAT LEGITIMASI DEMOKRASI DALAM PEMILIHAN KEPALA DAERAH (PILKADA)
Darmawan, Stephanie Priscilla;
Ismantara, Stefany;
Natanael, Natanael;
Rahaditya, R.
Jurnal Review Pendidikan dan Pengajaran Vol. 7 No. 2 (2024): Volume 7 No. 2 Tahun 2024
Publisher : LPPM Universitas Pahlawan Tuanku Tambusai
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
DOI: 10.31004/jrpp.v7i2.27565
Pemilihan kepala daerah merupakan salah satu pilar demokrasi di Indonesia yang diatur dalam Pasal 18 ayat (4) UUD 1945. Penyelesaian sengketa pemilu saat ini menjadi kewenangan Mahkamah Konstitusi. Namun dalam implementasinya, muncul berbagai tantangan terkait efektivitas dan efisiensi dalam menciptakan iklim demokrasi yang sehat. Hal ini mendorong gagasan untuk membentuk pengadilan khusus pemilu yang diharapkan dapat mengatasi tantangan-tantangan ini. Tujuan penelitian ini adalah untuk mengkaji urgensi dan legalitas pembentukan pengadilan khusus Pemilu beserta sistem dan bentuknya. Metode penelitian yang digunakan dalam penelitian ini adalah metode penelitian hukum yuridis normatif dengan memanfaatkan data sekunder dan pendekatan perundang-undangan. Penyelesaian sengketa pemilu di Indonesia telah menunjukkan inkonsistensi dalam penegakan hukum. Pembentukan lembaga peradilan khusus pemilu telah diamanatkan dalam Undang-Undang Nomor 8 Tahun 2015, namun amanat tersebut dibatalkan melalui Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Nomor 85/PUU-XX/2022 karena tidak adanya tindakan nyata untuk membentuk lembaga tersebut. Namun penyelesaian sengketa oleh Mahkamah Konstitusi dinilai inkonstitusional dan cacat karena tidak sesuai dengan UUD 1945 dan tidak memenuhi kebutuhan geografis Indonesia. Oleh karena itu, perlu dibentuk pengadilan khusus Pemilu sebagai satu-satunya pengadilan yang berwenang menangani sengketa pemilu, yang terdiri dari hakim ad hoc.