Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
1.881
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Al-Risalah : Jurnal Imu Syariah dan Hukum Rechtsidee Jurnal Daulat Hukum Widya Yuridika Literasi Hukum Notaire KRTHA BHAYANGKARA JURNAL USM LAW REVIEW Journal of Law, Poliitic and Humanities Jurnal Legislasi Indonesia
Hutabarat, Sylvana Murni Deborah
Unknown Affiliation
Religion Arts Humanities Education Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Social Sciences

Published : 11 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 11 Documents
Search

 1   2 
Responsibility of Marketplaces and Business Actors for the Sale of Fake Herbal Medicines from the Perspective of Consumer Protection Hidayat, Muhammad Rahmadzani; Hutabarat, Sylvana Murni Deborah
Al-Risalah VOLUME 26 NO 1, MAY (2026)
Publisher : Universitas Islam Negeri Alauddin Makassar

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.24252/al-risalah.vi.67012

Abstract

The rapid expansion of e-commerce has significantly increased the distribution of herbal medicines, yet it has simultaneously facilitated the circulation of counterfeit products that jeopardize consumer safety and lack mandatory health permits. This phenomenon highlights a critical legal gap where the ease of marketplace transactions allows sub-standard and hazardous medicines to bypass rigorous safety standards, necessitating a clear definition of liability for both sellers and platform providers. This research employs a normative juridical method utilizing statutory and case study approaches to analyze existing legal frameworks, specifically Law Number 8 of 1999 on Consumer Protection and BPSK Decision Number 001/PNTP/BPSK-DKI/I/2025. The study reveals that marketplaces, alongside business actors, bear shared legal liability under the principle of strict liability, as platforms derive economic benefit from these transactions and are obligated as electronic system providers to ensure the security of the managed trading system. Furthermore, while the Consumer Dispute Resolution Board (BPSK) provides a mechanism for redress, its current considerations focus primarily on achieving consensus through mediation rather than conducting deep normative testing or enforcing strict sanctions for violations of consumer protection laws.
Co-Authors Akmal, Khalif Ardiana, Oktavia Dwi Azzahra, Dinda Cahyani, Nadzira Arrum Febriani, Risma Dwi Firdaus, Muhammad Bintang Hidayat, Muhammad Rahmadzani Himawan, Chairunnas Latri, Akhdan Adityo Nugroho, Andriyanti Adhi Rahmawitri, Mita Rizkianti, Wardani Supardi, Reisha Rizkia Sabila Taupiqqurrahman Tesalonika, Beatrice