Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 15 Documents
Search

KEBIJAKAN FORMULASI GRATIFIKASI SEKSUAL TERHADAP PENYELENGGARA NEGARA Handrawan Handrawan; Deity Yuningsih; Ahmad Firman Tarta
Lakidende Law Review Vol. 1 No. 1 (2022): DELAREV (APRIL)
Publisher : Fakultas Hukum Universitas Lakidende

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (318.792 KB) | DOI: 10.47353/delarev.v1i1.1

Abstract

Sexual gratification in Indonesia can be punished because the practice of sexual gratification can be equated with the practice of corruption because it is classified as a latent crime even though it is difficult to prove but as long as the elements of the perpetrator are people who give bribes to officials and their sexual servants as well as during transactions and services. If the sexual relationship has a connection or has something to do with the authority and position given to an official or state administrator, that person can be charged with regulations related to how the facts of the trial are developed. In addition, the phrase element in Article 12B regarding "other facilities" can be interpreted with a systematic and authentic interpretation which can be interpreted as sexual. In addition, in several countries such as Singapore and America, perpetrators of sexual gratification can be criminally charged because there is already a law that regulates it. Therefore, even Indonesia can apply this concept clearly in its laws.
PENYULUHAN HUKUM PENYELESAIAN SENGKETA KEPEMILIKAN HAK ATAS TANAH DI DESA ONEMBUTE Hasima, Rahman; Herman, Herman; Heryanti, Heryanti; Yuningsih, Deity; Sulihin, La Ode M.; Yusuf, Haris; Suciati, St. Muslimah
Anoa : Jurnal Pengabdian Masyarakat Sosial, Politik, Budaya, Hukum, Ekonomi Vol 5, No 1 (2024):
Publisher : Universitas Halu Oleo

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.52423/anoa.v5i1.48867

Abstract

The purpose of this community service activity is to improve the community's legal understanding of the procedures for resolving disputes over land ownership both litigation and nonlitigation in Onembute Village, Besulutu District, Konawe Regency so as to provide legal certainty and legal protection of land ownership for the community. The methods used during the process of community service activities include (a) lecture method to provide direct explanation to the community (b) question and answer method to explore community knowledge of the material provided. Legal counseling in the form of lectures is organized to provide an explanation of legal material related to the settlement of land rights ownership disputes. The stages of the activity were carried out as follows: First, the preparation stage, which included location surveys, determination of locations and targets, coordination with the Head of Onembute Village, identification of problems or legal issues of concern to the community, and preparation of materials related to the settlement of land ownership disputes. Second, the Implementation Stage, namely conducting legal counseling by providing material explanations that focus on providing explanations regarding the procedures for resolving disputes over land ownership both litigation and non-litigation as a form of education to the Onembute Village community. The results achieved in this service activity are the community's understanding of the settlement of land ownership disputes before and after the implementation of legal counseling activities shows an increase in community knowledge and understanding of 80%, meaning that the service activities carried out have an impact on increasing the legal knowledge and understanding of the Onembute Village community in resolving land ownership disputes.
Perlindungan Hukum Pembeli dalam Perjanjian Jual Beli Tanah yang Belum Bersertifikat terhadap Ahli Waris Junianto, Arif; Yuningsih, Deity; Anggriyani, Rima; Umar, Wahyudi
JURNAL RECHTENS Vol. 14 No. 1 (2025): Juni
Publisher : Fakultas Hukum Universitas Islam Jember

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.56013/rechtens.v14i1.4221

Abstract

The purpose of this study is to analyze and explain the legal protection available to buyers of uncertified land in situations where the seller dies before the certification process is completed, especially against heirs' claims in civil law and to identify and explain the legal consequences arising from an uncertified land sale and purchase agreement on the legal protection of buyers from heirs' claims. The method used is the normative legal method with a statutory approach and a conceptual approach. The results of the study are that 1. Legal protection for buyers of uncertified land, in the context of civil law, can refer to several articles of the Civil Code. Articles 832 and 833 of the Civil Code emphasize that heirs inherit the rights and obligations of the testator, including obligations from agreements that have not been fulfilled. If the heirs are negligent in fulfilling these obligations, for example the certification process, the buyer can file a lawsuit for breach of contract based on Article 1243 of the Civil Code to claim compensation. 2. The legal consequences of an uncertified land sale and purchase agreement on the legal protection of buyers from heirs' claims are very vulnerable and high risk. An uncertified land sale and purchase agreement, especially if it is only a private agreement, does not provide a guarantee of legal ownership to the buyer. This opens up a gap for heirs to claim inheritance rights to the land, and the buyer has the potential to lose his rights to the land he has purchased. ABSTRAK Tujuan Penelitian ini untuk menganalisis dan menjelaskan perlindungan hukum yang tersedia bagi pembeli tanah yang belum bersertifikat dalam situasi di mana penjual meninggal dunia sebelum proses sertifikasi selesai, khususnya terhadap tuntutan ahli waris dalam hukum perdata dan untuk mengidentifikasi dan menjelaskan akibat hukum yang timbul dari perjanjian jual beli tanah yang belum bersertifikat terhadap perlindungan hukum pembeli dari tuntutan ahli waris. Metode yang digunakan adalah metode hukum normatif dengan pendekatan perundang-undangan dan pendekatan konseptual. Hasil penelitian bahwa 1. Perlindungan hukum pembeli tanah yang belum bersertifikat, dalam konteks hukum perdata, dapat merujuk pada beberapa pasal KUHPerdata. Pasal 832 dan 833 KUHPerdata menegaskan bahwa ahli waris mewarisi hak dan kewajiban pewaris, termasuk kewajiban dari perjanjian yang belum terpenuhi. Jika ahli waris lalai dalam memenuhi kewajiban tersebut, misalnya proses sertifikasi, pembeli dapat mengajukan gugatan wanprestasi berdasarkan Pasal 1243 KUHPerdata untuk menuntut ganti rugi. 2. Akibat hukum perjanjian jual beli tanah yang belum bersertifikat terhadap perlindungan hukum pembeli dari tuntutan ahli waris adalah sangat rentan dan berisiko tinggi. Perjanjian jual beli tanah yang belum bersertifikat, terutama jika hanya berupa perjanjian di bawah tangan, tidak memberikan jaminan kepemilikan yang sah kepada pembeli. Hal ini membuka celah bagi ahli waris untuk menuntut hak waris atas tanah tersebut, dan pembeli berpotensi besar kehilangan haknya atas tanah yang telah dibelinya.  Kata Kunci: Perlindungan Hukum, Perjanjian, Jual-Beli Tanah    
Penyuluhan Hukum Tentang Dampak Pergaulan Bebas Ditinjau Dari Aspek Hukum Perdata Di Kelurahan Punggaluku Kecamatan Laeya Kabupaten Konawe Selatan Sulawesi Tenggara Yuningsih, Deity; Zahrowati, Zahrowati; Saleh Saputra, La Ode Muhammad
Jurnal Pengabdian Kepada Masyarakat Multi Disiplin Vol. 2 No. 4 (2025): JUPENGEN - November
Publisher : CV. SINAR HOWUHOWU

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.70134/jupengen.v2i4.911

Abstract

This Community Service Program is entitled The Legal Ramifications of Permissive Social Behavior. The objective of this program is to enhance public legal awareness and understanding, particularly among adolescents, regarding the consequences of permissive social behavior.The methodology employed in this community service activity comprises lectures and discussions, conducted through direct, in-person engagement with the community, specifically adolescents.Numerous factors contribute to adolescents engaging in permissive social behavior. These factors also elucidate the facility with which they adopt such behavior, often exhibiting a lack of inhibition or shame, whether publicly or among their peers.Specific regulations governing permissive social behavior are not explicitly stipulated in Indonesian Public Law. However, such behavior, when undertaken by adolescents, constitutes a form of deviant behavior that contravenes prevailing moral and religious norms.The factors influencing adolescent engagement in permissive social behavior are categorized as internal and external. Internal factors include age, familial circumstances, deficient self-control, religious adherence, and a diminished sense of shame. External factors encompass the peer group environment, the school environment, economic conditions, as well as the influence of technology and social media.
HARMONIZING INDONESIA'S GEOGRAPHICAL INDICATION PROTECTION WITH EU LEGAL FRAMEWORK THROUGH REGULATORY REFORM Zuliarti, Wa Ode; Yuningsih, Deity; Deschika Gaby Justicia; Isnayanti; Faisal, Fitriah
JIPRO: Journal of Intellectual Property JIPRO, Vol. 9, No.1, 2026
Publisher : Fakultas Hukum Universitas Islam Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.20885/jipro.vol9.iss1.art4

Abstract

Indonesia’s GI protection under Law Number 20 of 2016 integrates with trademarks, creating ownership ambiguity that disadvantages small producers and limits EU recognition. Employing a doctrinal legal method combined with a comparative approach, this study systematically analyses statutory texts, regulatory documents, and academic literature from both jurisdictions. Comparing with EU’s sui generis system, this study identifies three challenges: conceptual conflation of collective/private rights, administrative overlap, and governance allowing holder control. Despite 209 registered GIs across 34 provinces, only four have EU recognition, revealing systemic barriers. The EU model treats GIs as community entitlements open to all qualifying producers with representative governance. The study recommends targeted reforms: clarifying GI rights as non-transferable collective entitlements, functionally separating GI from trademark administration within Directorate General of Intellectual Property (DGIP), and establishing conflict rules for geographical names. These reforms would enhance rural development and international market access.