Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
1.642
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Teknisia APTEK Jurnal Ilmiah Al-Mu'ashirah: Media Kajian Al-Qur'an dan Al-Hadits Multi Perspektif Journal of Multidisciplinary Science: MIKAILALSYS Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika JURNAL PENDIDIKAN BAHASA International Journal of Humanities, Education, and Social Sciences Advances In Education Journal
Jafar
Unknown Affiliation
Religion Agriculture, Biological Sciences & Forestry Humanities Chemical Engineering, Chemistry & Bioengineering Education Engineering Environmental Science Languange, Linguistic, Communication & Media Mathematics Physics Social Sciences Other

Published : 11 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 11 Documents
Search

 1   2 
Generative AI Use in Indonesian Language Learning: A Descriptive Survey of University Students Jafar
International Journal of Humanities, Education, and Social Sciences Vol 4 No 3 (2026): International Journal of Humanities, Education, and Social Sciences
Publisher : Darul Yasin Al Sys

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

Despite considerable research attention to generative artificial intelligence (GenAI) in higher education, empirical evidence on its use in Indonesian language courses remains limited, particularly studies integrating usage, perceptions, opportunities, challenges, AI literacy, and ethics. This study aimed to describe these six dimensions among first-year university students. A quantitative descriptive survey involved 69 students from two parallel classes. Data were collected using a 30-item questionnaire (Cronbach’s α = .752–.873) and analyzed using descriptive statistics, categorical interpretation, and supplementary nonparametric comparisons. The findings showed that 87.0% of students had used GenAI, primarily Gemini and ChatGPT. Perceptions (M = 3.79), opportunities (M = 3.70), and ethical awareness (M = 3.82) were high, whereas challenges (M = 3.37), AI literacy (M = 3.27), and usage intensity (M = 2.88) were moderate. Users scored higher than non-users on perceptions, opportunities, and AI literacy; however, among users, AI literacy was not associated with frequency or duration of use. These findings suggest that students’ acceptance of GenAI exceeds their AI literacy, identifying a potential acceptance–competence gap in GenAI adoption. The study contributes a conceptual perspective on this gap and highlights the need for lecturers and institutions to integrate structured AI literacy and ethics instruction into Indonesian language courses. Further research should examine this gap using larger samples and performance-based measures.
Co-Authors Aswan, Rifki Fadhil Fitra, Akhmad Aidil Hafizh Jamaaluddin, Kisna hilma Latifah Idi Warsah Iriany, Rosary Japarudin Kodirun Lalu Makrup Livia Maharani Dagi Saputri Mochamad Teguh Muhdar, Andi Nilna fadilata Reza Liana Saputri, Wa Ode Yuliana Sari, Yuni Purnama Wati, Jenny Ratna Ika Setia Wisnu Erlangga