Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
5.2
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Jurnal Hukum Progresif DE LEGA LATA: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Morality :Jurnal Ilmu Hukum NUSANTARA : Jurnal Ilmu Pengetahuan Sosial JURNAL PENDIDIKAN TAMBUSAI Legal Standing : Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Ekspose: Jurnal Penelitian Hukum dan Pendidikan JUSTISI Jurnal Ilmu Hukum KYADIREN Al-Muamalat: Jurnal Hukum dan Ekonomi Syari'ah Electoral Governance : Jurnal Tata Kelola Pemilu Indonesia Journal of Law, Administration, and Social Science Law Development Journal USRAH: Jurnal Hukum Keluarga Islam Jurnal Ilmu Hukum, Humaniora dan Politik (JIHHP) Jurnal Bawaslu Provinsi Kepulauan Riau Journal of Artificial Intelligence and Digital Business Cerdika: Jurnal Ilmiah Indonesia Eduvest - Journal of Universal Studies Journal of Business, Management and Social Studies Journal of Mutidisciplinary Issues Journal of Accounting Law Communication and Technology Federalisme : Jurnal Kajian Hukum Dan Ilmu Komunikasi Majelis: Jurnal Hukum Indonesia
Silalahi, Wilma
Unknown Affiliation
Religion Aerospace Engineering Agriculture, Biological Sciences & Forestry Humanities Computer Science & IT Decision Sciences, Operations Research & Management Economics, Econometrics & Finance Education Electrical & Electronics Engineering Engineering Environmental Science Health Professions Industrial & Manufacturing Engineering Languange, Linguistic, Communication & Media Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Library & Information Science Mathematics Neuroscience Public Health Social Sciences Other

Published : 46 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 46 Documents
Search

 1   2   3   4   5 
The Existence of The Indigenous People of Passo in The Perspective of Positive Law in Indonesia Satriyo Mandiri, Muhammad; Silalahi, Wilma
Eduvest - Journal of Universal Studies Vol. 4 No. 11 (2024): Journal Eduvest - Journal of Universal Studies
Publisher : Green Publisher Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.59188/eduvest.v4i11.1403

Abstract

The Indonesian state is a state of law as stipulated in Article 1 paragraph (3) of the 1945 Constitution, meaning that as a state of law, all and every action of state administrators and citizens must follow and comply with any applicable regulations or laws. In the concept of a state of law, what is used as the commander in state life is the law itself. As a state of law, Indonesia highly upholds and recognizes the protection of human rights. Protection of human rights means that every citizen and/or community group must be seen as equal. In addition, certain groups that have special needs or vulnerabilities such as indigenous peoples, where the fulfillment of their rights must be treated very extra. This is clearly stated in Article 18B paragraph (2) of the 1945 Constitution. However, empirically, there are rights of indigenous groups that are often violated, such as the indigenous people in Negeri Passo, where their traditional rights in the form of Upulatu or king titles for generations are about to be revoked by parties who are supposed to protect and guarantee their customary legal rights. However, in reality, they actually tried to take away the traditional rights of the indigenous people in Negeri Passo by making new local regulations using their power/office, which resulted in losses to the indigenous people themselves. As a result, these indigenous groups find it difficult to obtain legal certainty as indigenous peoples.
Tanggung jawab negara menurut UUD 1945 terhadap ancaman siber dan perang hibrida Silalahi, Wilma; Adeputri, Gesta Subysesa Maharwani
Journal of Law, Administration, and Social Science Vol 5 No 4 (2025)
Publisher : PT WIM Solusi Prima

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.54957/jolas.v5i4.1830

Abstract

Perkembangan teknologi digital dan dinamika geopolitik global telah melahirkan ancaman baru berupa serangan siber dan perang hibrida yang menguji ketahanan nasional Indonesia. Ancaman ini tidak hanya bersifat militer, tetapi juga non-militer melalui kebocoran data, serangan ransomware, serta disinformasi politik. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk menganalisis bentuk tanggung jawab negara menurut UUD 1945 dalam menghadapi ancaman siber dan perang hibrida, sekaligus menilai kecukupan kerangka hukum nasional yang berlaku. Metode penelitian yang digunakan adalah penelitian hukum normatif dengan pendekatan perundang-undangan dan konseptual. Hasil kajian menunjukkan bahwa Pasal 30 UUD 1945 menegaskan negara sebagai aktor utama dalam menjamin pertahanan dan keamanan nasional, namun regulasi positif di Indonesia, seperti UU No. 3 Tahun 2002 tentang Pertahanan Negara, UU No. 34 Tahun 2004 tentang TNI, dan UU ITE, masih lebih berorientasi pada ancaman konvensional. Hal ini menimbulkan celah hukum dalam menghadapi kompleksitas ancaman hibrida. Oleh karena itu, diperlukan pembaruan kebijakan pertahanan siber nasional yang lebih adaptif, integratif, dan sesuai dengan dinamika ancaman kontemporer.
Perlindungan Hukum terhadap Pelanggaran Hak Cipta Buku; Tinjauan Hak Ekonomi dan Hak Moral Menurut Undang-Undang No. 28 Tahun 2014 Fadhli, Rifqi Naufal; Silalahi, Wilma
Al-Muamalat Jurnal Hukum dan Ekonomi Syariah Vol 10 No 1 (2025): Al-Muamalat: Jurnal Hukum Dan Ekonomi Syari'ah
Publisher : IAIN Langsa

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.32505/muamalat.v10i1.11379

Abstract

This study aims to analyze the forms of legal protection against book copyright infringement, particularly in terms of economic rights and moral rights as regulated in Law No. 28 of 2014 on Copyright. The main contribution of this research is to provide a deeper understanding of the legal protection mechanisms available to book authors, as well as the role of the government and society in upholding respect for intellectual works. This article falls under the category of normative juridical research with a qualitative approach, analyzed through a literature review of statutory regulations, legal literature, and related documents. The findings of the study conclude that although the law provides a strong legal framework, the implementation of protection for the economic and moral rights of book authors remains suboptimal due to weak law enforcement and low public awareness of the importance of copyright.
Tantangan Regulasi Kecerdasan Buatan (AI) dalam Perspektif Hukum Perlindungan Data Pribadi di Indonesia Kirana, Kimmy Baby; Silalahi, Wilma
Cerdika: Jurnal Ilmiah Indonesia Vol. 5 No. 6 (2025): Cerdika: Jurnal Ilmiah Indonesia
Publisher : Publikasi Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.59141/cerdika.v5i6.2711

Abstract

Advances in artificial intelligence (AI) technology have had a wide and significant impact on various sectors of life, ranging from public services, finance, health, education, to law enforcement. These technologies enable process automation, service efficiency, and fast, data-driven decision-making. However, behind its benefits, the use of AI brings serious challenges to the protection of the right to privacy and personal data. AI works by collecting, processing, and analyzing data at scale, including personal and sensitive data, thereby creating a risk of abuse and violation of the fundamental rights of individuals. In Indonesia, even though Law Number 27 of 2022 concerning Personal Data Protection (PDP Law) has been passed as an important milestone in the protection of digital rights, its application and regulation of the use of AI is still not comprehensive and detailed. Existing regulations do not explicitly regulate the principles of algorithm transparency, supervision of the decision-making automation process, and legal accountability mechanisms in the event of losses due to AI system decisions. Therefore, this article aims to analyze these regulatory challenges through a normative juridical approach based on legislative studies and academic literature in order to provide constructive recommendations for strengthening personal data protection in the era of artificial intelligence.
The Lawfulness of Using Copyrighted Works for Generative AI Training : A Case Study of a US Lawsuit against OpenAI and Perplexity AI Ismantara, Stefany; Silalahi, Wilma
JUSTISI Vol. 11 No. 1 (2025): JUSTISI
Publisher : Fakultas Hukum Universitas Muhammadiyah Sorong

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.33506/js.v11i1.3871

Abstract

Copyright protection in Indonesia is governed by Law No. 28 of 2014 (Law 28/2014), encompassing moral and economic rights. This law imposes limitations on the use of works for education, law enforcement, or technological development as long as such use does not harm the legitimate interests of the rightholder. The development of generative AI (GAI) poses challenges in determining the legality of using copyrighted works for GAI training. This study examines copyright regulations concerning GAI through normative, conceptual, and comparative legal approaches, including case studies on lawsuits against OpenAI and Perplexity AI. The findings indicate that the legality of using copyrighted works depends on the data input process and output (responses). Data scraping is considered an economic right of the rightholder, classified as reproduction under Article 9 of Law 28/2014. If such acts are conducted without the rightholder’s consent and for commercial purposes, they are deemed unlawful under Indonesia’s current copyright law. GAI outputs may also infringe copyright if: (1) the source is not cited, violating Article 7 on copyright management information; (2) substantial portions of the work are reproduced, violating the rightholder's economic rights under Article 9; or (3) the work is distorted in a way that harms the rightholder’s honor, infringing on moral rights under Article 5. To accommodate AI development, specific regulations integrating AI transparency principles outlined in SE Kominfo 9/2023 are required. These regulations could include obligations for AI companies to release summaries of training datasets, include Uni EropaLAs that define the responsibilities of AI developers and users, and provide disclaimers regarding AI's limitations. Regarding the fulfillment of rightholders’ economic rights, a non-exclusive blanket license through Collective Management Organizations (CMOs) as stipulated in Permenkumham 15/2024 is necessary. These regulations should be synchronized with related policies to establish legal certainty that adapts to technological advancements.
Pembatasan Hak Ekslusif terhadap Penggunaan Kata Umum dalam Sebuah Merek Sanjaya, Aqila Herdiyanto; Silalahi, Wilma
Legal Standing : Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Vol. 9 No. 2 (2025): Mei-Agustus
Publisher : Universitas Muhammadiyah Ponorogo

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.24269/ls.v9i2.11773

Abstract

Technological advances drive the importance of brands as trade identities. Based on Law No. 20 of 2016, brands with generic words are prohibited, but the lack of clarity in the rules creates legal uncertainty. This study examines the legal issue and evaluates the regulations to support fair trademark law in Indonesia. This study applies a normative legal approach method with analytical descriptive research specifications. This approach aims to explain and describe the events that are the focus of the study, which are then analyzed by referring to primary, secondary, and tertiary legal materials. The results of this study are the Restriction of exclusive rights to generic words in brands, as regulated in Article 16 letter f of the Permenkumham Merek 12/2021, preventing monopoly of widely known terms to protect the public interest and support business competition. However, the lack of a clear classification in Law No. 20 of 2016 creates the potential for legal conflicts. Distinctive power remains a key element, which can be obtained through fantasy words, generic words unrelated to the product, or secondary meanings. Clearer guidelines and evaluation of the mechanism of distinctive power are needed for fair and effective application of the law.
EFEKTIVITAS LEGISLATIVE, EXECUTIVE, DAN JUDICIAL REVIEW DALAM MENJAGA SUPREMASI KONSTITUSI DAN HAK WARGA DI ERA DIGITAL Naomy Christian Yulianty Simanjuntak1, Indah; Silalahi, Wilma
NUSANTARA : Jurnal Ilmu Pengetahuan Sosial Vol 12, No 11 (2025): NUSANTARA : JURNAL ILMU PENGETAHUAN SOSIAL
Publisher : Universitas Muhammadiyah Tapanuli Selatan

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31604/jips.v12i11.2025.4313-4327

Abstract

Supremasi konstitusi merupakan prinsip utama negara hukum yang menjamin seluruh tindakan penyelenggara negara tunduk pada norma konstitusional, namun perkembangan teknologi digital telah memunculkan tantangan baru terhadap efektivitas mekanisme pengujian peraturan perundang-undangan. Transformasi digital menimbulkan kompleksitas hukum yang memperluas ruang potensi pelanggaran hak warga negara serta memperlemah fungsi kontrol lembaga-lembaga konstitusional. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk menganalisis efektivitas legislative review, executive review, dan judicial review dalam menjaga supremasi konstitusi dan hak konstitusional warga negara di era digital. Metode yang digunakan adalah penelitian yuridis normatif dengan pendekatan perundang-undangan, konseptual, dan komparatif. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa legislative review kerap terdistorsi oleh kepentingan politik dan kurang menerapkan mekanisme constitutional pre-screening dalam proses legislasi. Sementara itu, executive review kehilangan daya efektivitas akibat lemahnya koordinasi dan tumpang tindih kewenangan antarinstansi dalam mengoreksi kebijakan administratif yang inkonstitusional. Di sisi lain, judicial review memiliki kekuatan korektif, namun akses publik yang terbatas dan pelaksanaan putusan yang belum optimal menghambat peran Mahkamah Konstitusi sebagai penjaga konstitusi. Fragmentasi ketiga mekanisme tersebut mengakibatkan lemahnya sinergi kelembagaan dan menciptakan constitutional gap dalam perlindungan hak warga di ruang digital. Oleh karena itu, dibutuhkan integrasi sistem pengujian norma melalui integrated constitutional control yang menekankan sinergi antara lembaga legislatif, eksekutif, dan yudikatif untuk menjaga supremasi konstitusi yang adaptif dan responsif terhadap perkembangan era digital.
IMPLEMENTASI SELECTIVE POLICY DALAM HUKUM KEIMIGRASIAN INDONESIA TERHADAP MIGRAN ILEGAL JALUR LAUT: PERSPEKTIF HUKUM NASIONAL DAN HUKUM INTERNASIONAL Silalahi, Wilma; Linda Antonio, Michelle
NUSANTARA : Jurnal Ilmu Pengetahuan Sosial Vol 12, No 11 (2025): NUSANTARA : JURNAL ILMU PENGETAHUAN SOSIAL
Publisher : Universitas Muhammadiyah Tapanuli Selatan

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31604/jips.v12i11.2025.4271-4280

Abstract

Fenomena migrasi ilegal melalui jalur laut merupakan salah satu isu global yang menimbulkan tantangan serius bagi negara kepulauan seperti Indonesia. Sebagai negara transit dan tujuan migran, Indonesia menghadapi dilema antara menjaga kedaulatan dan memenuhi kewajiban moral kemanusiaan. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk menganalisis implementasi selective policy dalam hukum keimigrasian Indonesia terhadap migran ilegal jalur laut, baik dari perspektif hukum nasional maupun hukum internasional. Metode penelitian yang digunakan adalah yuridis normatif dengan pendekatan peraturan perundang-undangan, konseptual, dan perbandingan. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa selective policy ditegaskan dalam UU Keimigrasian sebagai prinsip kedaulatan negara untuk hanya menerima orang asing yang memberikan manfaat dan menolak yang berpotensi menimbulkan ancaman. Namun, dalam praktiknya, penerapan kebijakan ini sering menghadapi tekanan internasional, khususnya ketika berhadapan dengan pengungsi Rohingya yang membutuhkan perlindungan darurat. Keterbatasan regulasi nasional terkait status pengungsi membuat Indonesia bergantung pada kerja sama dengan UNHCR dan IOM dalam penanganannya. Di sisi lain, selective policy efektif sebagai instrumen administratif untuk mencegah migrasi ilegal, tetapi menimbulkan potensi pelanggaran prinsip non-refoulement yang telah menjadi norma hukum kebiasaan internasional. Kondisi ini memperlihatkan adanya ketegangan antara kepentingan kedaulatan negara dan pemenuhan kewajiban kemanusiaan global. Oleh karena itu, selective policy perlu diharmonisasikan dengan instrumen perlindungan hak asasi manusia internasional agar tetap relevan dan sejalan dengan komitmen Indonesia di tingkat global.
KONSEP EKSTRATERITORIALITAS KAPAL BERBENDERA INDONESIA DALAM PERSPEKTIF UNCLOS 1982: IMPLIKASI TERHADAP WILAYAH NEGARA, PERTAHANAN, DAN KEIMIGRASIAN Silalahi, Wilma; Putri, Mutiara
NUSANTARA : Jurnal Ilmu Pengetahuan Sosial Vol 12, No 10 (2025): NUSANTARA : JURNAL ILMU PENGETAHUAN SOSIAL
Publisher : Universitas Muhammadiyah Tapanuli Selatan

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31604/jips.v12i10.2025.3927-3937

Abstract

Indonesia sebagai negara kepulauan memiliki wilayah maritim yang luas dan strategis, sehingga memerlukan perangkat hukum yang kuat untuk menjaga kedaulatan, keamanan, dan kepentingan nasional di laut. Salah satu prinsip penting dalam hukum laut internasional adalah konsep ekstrateritorialitas kapal berbendera, yang menegaskan bahwa kapal dipandang sebagai perpanjangan wilayah yurisdiksi negara benderanya. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk menganalisis dasar hukum, implementasi, serta implikasi konsep ekstrateritorialitas kapal berbendera Indonesia dalam perspektif UNCLOS 1982 terhadap aspek wilayah negara, pertahanan, dan keimigrasian. Metode yang digunakan adalah penelitian hukum normatif dengan pendekatan perundang-undangan, konseptual, dan studi kasus. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa hukum nasional Indonesia, khususnya UU Pelayaran dan peraturan turunannya, telah mengadopsi ketentuan UNCLOS 1982 mengenai yurisdiksi negara bendera. Namun, implementasinya masih menghadapi tantangan berupa lemahnya pengawasan, praktik flag of convenience, serta keterbatasan koordinasi antar lembaga maritim. Dari sisi pertahanan dan keamanan, ekstrateritorialitas memberikan legitimasi bagi Indonesia untuk menindak berbagai tindak pidana lintas negara seperti penyelundupan, perikanan ilegal, dan perdagangan orang di atas kapal berbenderanya. Sementara itu, dalam aspek keimigrasian, awak dan penumpang asing di atas kapal berbendera Indonesia tunduk pada hukum nasional, sehingga yurisdiksi negara tetap berlaku meski kapal berada di luar wilayah teritorial. Oleh karena itu, penegakan konsep ekstrateritorialitas yang konsisten merupakan instrumen strategis untuk memperkuat kedaulatan maritim Indonesia sekaligus menjaga kepastian hukum di era globalisasi.
Tanggung Jawab Administrasi Pemerintah dalam Era Digital: Analisis Implementasi Sistem OSS-RBA dalam Penyelenggaraan Perizinan Berbasis Risiko Silalahi, Wilma; Putri, Mutiara
Majelis: Jurnal Hukum Indonesia Vol. 2 No. 4 (2025): November : Majelis : Jurnal Hukum Indonesia
Publisher : Asosiasi Peneliti dan Pengajar Ilmu Hukum Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.62383/majelis.v2i4.1284

Abstract

The digital transformation of public administration in recent decades has reshaped government service delivery, particularly through the adoption of technology as a tool to enhance transparency, efficiency, and accountability. The implementation of the Online Single Submission–Risk Based Approach (OSS-RBA) represents Indonesia’s strategic effort to create an integrated licensing framework aligned with the principles of good governance. This study aims to analyze the forms of administrative responsibility in digital-based licensing services under OSS-RBA and examine the accountability mechanisms applicable when system failures affect legal certainty for business actors. The research employs a normative juridical method using statutory, conceptual, and case approaches through the examination of regulations, doctrines, and administrative court decisions. The findings indicate that digitalization does not alter the core of governmental responsibility, as every decision generated by the system is legally attributed to the competent administrative authority. The implementation of OSS-RBA still faces obstacles such as system errors, data inconsistencies between institutions, and delays in technical verification, all of which directly affect legal certainty and the quality of public services. Furthermore, internal and external oversight mechanisms are not yet fully effective in preventing maladministration, including unreasonable delays and inaccuracies in automated decision-making. The study also shows that business actors require more responsive administrative remedies to prevent technological risks from shifting entirely onto them. Therefore, this research concludes that the effectiveness of OSS-RBA depends on strengthening institutional capacity, harmonizing regulations, and ensuring the consistent application of good governance principles throughout all stages of digital licensing administration.
Co-Authors Adeputri, Gesta Subysesa Maharwani Ahmad Sudiro Akhirudin Antonio, Michelle Linda DAN, Elisabeth Djaja, Benny Djayanti Djayanti, Djayanti Evelina, Shane Fadhli, Rifqi Naufal Fudianto, Mahfudz Hamonangan, Marcellius Kirana Helmi, Teofilus Titus Ismantara, Stefany Jonathan, Michael Kirana, Kimmy Baby Linda Antonio, Michelle Maharwani, Gesta Sebysesa Manurung, Rachel Wahyunita Theodor Marsanti, Aliyah Marsela Berliana Mutiara Putri, Mutiara Naomy Christian Yulianty Simanjuntak1, Indah Natassya, Meily Ngabut, Rupertus Arvinci Permatasari, Yofi Princes, Elfindah Purba, Jeremy Exaudi Ranadi, Gladys Felicia Sanjaya, Aqila Herdiyanto Satriyo Mandiri, Muhammad Sudirman Taufano, Martinus Al Ibrani Giga William Chandra William, Joseph