Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 12 Documents
Search

Pengujian Konstitusionalitas Hak atas Lingkungan Hidup yang Baik dalam Kasus Pencemaran Lintas Batas: Telaah terhadap Prinsip Kedaulatan Negara Rena Zulfaidah; Utang Rosidin
ALADALAH: Jurnal Politik, Sosial, Hukum dan Humaniora Vol. 4 No. 1 (2026): ALADALAH: Jurnal Politik, Sosial, Hukum dan Humaniora
Publisher : Sekolah Tinggi Ilmu Syariah Nurul Qarnain Jember

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.59246/aladalah.v4i1.1748

Abstract

This study examines the constitutional review of the right to a good and healthy environment as guaranteed under Article 28H paragraph (1) of the 1945 Constitution of Indonesia in the context of transboundary environmental pollution, with a focus on the interpretation of state sovereignty. Transboundary pollution raises serious legal challenges due to the limitations of national jurisdiction in protecting citizens’ constitutional rights from environmental harm originating outside state territory. This research employs a normative legal method using statutory, conceptual, and case approaches by analyzing the 1945 Constitution, environmental legislation, and relevant Constitutional Court decisions. The findings indicate that a narrow and territorial interpretation of state sovereignty may undermine the effective protection of environmental rights. Therefore, the Constitutional Court is encouraged to adopt a progressive constitutional interpretation that reconceptualizes sovereignty as a protective constitutional obligation (state obligation) encompassing transnational dimensions, in order to ensure the effective fulfillment of citizens’ environmental rights.
The Effectiveness of Formal and Material Testing in the Constitutional Court's Decision on Law Number 11 of 2020 concerning Job Creation Noval Nur Aditya; Putra Muhammad Zulfa; Rossa Avriliani; Widia Saraswati; Utang Rosidin
Regulate: Jurnal Ilmu Pendidikan, Hukum dan Bisnis Vol. 2 No. 4 (2025)
Publisher : Penerbit Hellow Pustaka

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.61166/regulate.v2i4.73

Abstract

This study examines the effectiveness of formal and material review conducted by the Constitutional Court of Indonesia (Mahkamah Konstitusi/MK) in safeguarding the constitutionality of laws, with a case study on Constitutional Court Decision Number 91/PUU-XVIII/2020 concerning Law Number 11 of 2020 on Job Creation. The research employs a library research method by analyzing relevant literature, academic journals, and court decisions. The findings reveal that the formal review highlighted significant procedural flaws in the legislative process of the Job Creation Law, particularly regarding the principles of transparency, public participation, and discrepancies between the approved and enacted texts. Consequently, the Constitutional Court declared the law conditionally unconstitutional, granting a two-year period for legislative improvements. Meanwhile, in the material review, most petitions were rejected as the contested provisions were considered part of the legislature’s open legal policy, despite concerns over labor rights protection and environmental sustainability. The effectiveness of Constitutional Court decisions in ensuring legal certainty largely depends on their compliance and implementation by lawmakers, as well as the extent of public dissemination. Thus, while the Court plays a vital role as the guardian of the constitution, its decisions still face challenges in practical enforcement.