Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 12 Documents
Search

Restore Public Trust Through Deliberative Public Policy Formulation Mardiyanta, Antun
BISNIS & BIROKRASI: Jurnal Ilmu Administrasi dan Organisasi Vol. 20, No. 1
Publisher : UI Scholars Hub

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

Public trust is a very essential and fundamental element to the legitimacy of public administration. Moreover, the local government is obliged to serve the community. Without public trust, many policies may have serious problems. Therefore, it is necessary to maintain and enhance public trust. A highly committed public trust will allow public administrators to receive good judgment, which is, necessary in the policy-making process. This paper is carefully seeing through some findings of a deliberative public policy formulation, especially in the planning and budgeting areas. The qualitative study was conducted in the Probolinggo regency from 2008 to early 2011. Data were collected through participant and non-participant observation, focus group discussions, in-depth interviews, as well as search of relevant documents. The findings of this study indicate the existence of change in public which in the current situation requires a commitment of local political elite to open public places. Commitment to the use of public places, in the application of the transparency principles, participation and accountability in public policy formulation process, will bring back public trust to the local government; especially if the local society feels and believes that the deliberative public participation will significantly affect the final result of the policy formulation.
The Discourse of Capitalist Class and Public Policy in the Handling of COVID-19 Pandemic in Indonesia Bahar, Adam Amin; Marijan, Kacung; Mardiyanta, Antun
Jurnal Politik Vol. 7, No. 2
Publisher : UI Scholars Hub

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

In the early period of handling the COVID-19 pandemic in Indonesia, the Indonesian government prioritized the economy and health sectors. This study argues that these government actions and policies are heavily influenced by discourse from the capitalist class. This study aims to discuss the articulation of several different discursive elements of the capitalist class in the early period of handling the COVID-19 pandemic in Indonesia and its impact on public policy. This study focuses on two capitalist classes, namely medical and non-medical capitalists. This study found that the discursive elements from the government on these two significant issues had in common with the discursive elements of these two capitalist classes. The discourse of public discipline over the use of medical products from medical capitalists had the same discursive elements as that of government discourse. Both of them articulated this discourse with the aim of public health, but theoretically, this is important to increase the accumulation of capital in the health industry in the future. Another group of capitalists, however, generally see this pandemic as a disaster and an obstacle to continue their capital accumulation. Therefore, the central discourse that was raised by this group was the economic impact of this pandemic. Although these two discourses are different, this study found that they are not contradictory but rather complementary. The discourse spread by the two capitalist classes influenced state policy in dealing with COVID-19 in Indonesia significantly. This study emphasizes the importance of the discourse articulation of the capitalist class in the politics of policymaking, especially in Indonesia.
Strengths and Interests Between Actors in Collaborative Governance: Review of the Riverside Settlement Revitalization Policy in Banjarmasin City Noor, Muhammad; Suaedi, Falih; Mardiyanta, Antun
JKAP (Jurnal Kebijakan dan Administrasi Publik) Vol 27, No 2 (2023): November
Publisher : Magister Ilmu Administrasi Publik

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.22146/jkap.83437

Abstract

This study aims to analyze and identify the strengths and interests of state actors and non-state actors in the revitalization of residents’ houses in the riverside area of Banjarmasin City from the perspective of Collaborative Governance. This study used a qualitative approach by collecting data through observation, in-depth analysis, and document analysis. The findings of this study explain that collaborative governance is an alternative to public policy as an interactive process involving state and non-state actors autonomously who use shared rules and norms carried out collectively to solve societal problems. Collaboration involving actors in power with interests in decision-making might fail during its implementation. This research contributes to the scientific literature on interactions between actors and collaborative governance because the problems faced by the public are fought for, and collaborative governance implementation cannot be separated from the presence of actors involved in advocating for issues of public concern. 
YOUTH PEOPLE’S CIVIC AND POLITICAL ENGAGEMENT AT SMAN 1 GIRI, BANYUWANGI REGENCY Keban, Philipus; Irianto, Jusuf; Suaedi, Falih; Supeno, Eko; Wardiyanto, Bintoro; Sunaryo, Sunaryo; Mardiyanta, Antun; Supramudyo, Gitadi Tegas; Triana, Rochyati Wahyuni; Setijaningrum, Erna; Asmorowati, Sulikah; Haryono, Nanang; Ferdian, Putu Aditya; Soegiono, Agie Nugroho; Hariani, Nurul Jamila
Jurnal Layanan Masyarakat (Journal of Public Services) Vol. 8 No. 3 (2024): JURNAL LAYANAN MASYARAKAT
Publisher : Universitas Airlangga

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.20473/jlm.v8i3.2024.313-328

Abstract

This community service activity aims to increase the political and civil literacy of novice voters in preparation for the 2024 Simultaneous Elections in Indonesia. The targets of this community service activity are school students or youth who are at least 17 years old in the year the 2024 Simultaneous Election will be held. Youth were chosen as the main target because they are a group with a large proportion in the 2024 election contestation which will determine the future of democracy. As new voters, they need preparation and a deep understanding of how to participate in the political process effectively to determine the direction and policies of government. For this reason, the Public Administration Department of Universitas Airlangga will partner with the East Java Provincial Education Office which will later provide guidance to the SMAN 1 Giri, Banyuwangi Regency to hold a community service program at the school. Community service activities will involve understanding the political system, democratic processes, political issues, and the importance of active political participation. Activities will be carried out through three main stages: preparation, implementation and evaluation. The preparatory stage involves collecting and compiling relevant political and civic literacy materials. Next, the implementation stage will involve counseling, workshops and group discussions to provide in-depth understanding to novice voters. The evaluation stage will be carried out to measure the effectiveness of the program and obtain feedback from participants. It is hoped that this activity will provide a fundamental contribution in increasing the political and civil literacy of novice voters. With a better understanding of the political system, first-time voters will be able to make good political decisions, participate actively in the political process, and critically evaluate the information they receive.
From Tradition to Rationality: Understanding Voter Behavior in Madura’s Local Elections Holilah, Holilah; Marijan, Kacung; Mardiyanta, Antun
The Sunan Ampel Review of Political and Social Sciences Vol. 3 No. 2 (2024): June
Publisher : UIN Sunan Ampel Surabaya

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.15642/sarpass.2024.3.2.297-213

Abstract

This study offers an in-depth comparative analysis of the voting behavior of the Madurese community in regional head elections, focusing on the differences between traditional voters influenced by kiai (Islamic scholars) and voters who tend to consider rational factors. This case study examines three main groups: the santri (religious students), the educated class, and the general public. The research is rooted in the central role of kiai within Madura's social and political structure, which has traditionally influenced election outcomes. However, recent corruption cases involving kiai who have served as regional heads raise questions about whether their influence remains or if there has been a shift in the community's voting behavior. The research employs a qualitative approach with a case study design, conducted in four regencies: Bangkalan, Sampang, Pamekasan, and Sumenep. Data were gathered through participatory observation, in-depth interviews with key informants from the three community groups, and documentation studies. Informants were selected based on their cultural involvement and experience in the election process. The findings indicate that although kiai continue to wield significant influence, especially among the santri, there is an emerging trend toward more rational voting behavior among the educated class and the general public. Factors such as candidate quality, vision and mission, and proposed programs are increasingly considered, particularly by students. Additionally, corruption cases involving kiai have led to more critical public perceptions of kiai in politics. This study identifies four voter typologies in Madura: rational, critical, traditional, and skeptical, highlighting the complexity of voting behavior in the region
HOW DO BANKERS WORK DEVIANTLY IN THE CREDIT SECTOR? Sawitri, Dewi Khrisna; Mashud, Mustain; Mardiyanta, Antun
Jurnal Aplikasi Manajemen Vol. 19 No. 3 (2021)
Publisher : Universitas Brawijaya, Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.21776/ub.jam.2021.019.03.19

Abstract

This research is implemented in the banking sector. Knowledge about counterproductive behavior that emerged in banking activity is still limited. Bankers, human resources in the banking sector, deal a lot with customers in their day-to-day job activity by assessing the credit proposal of their bank customers. Qualified credit assessment is essential to determine the approval of bank credit. The failure to assess qualified debtors will result in bad credit in which debtors do not repay the credit they receive. To get qualified credit assessment, bankers follow the 5C Principles in assessing credit proposals. Counterproductive work behavior occurs when workers perform indifferently from what the rules and norms of a company have stated. Qualitative research with a phenomenology approach was conducted to determine how these deviances performed while bankers assessed their customers' credit loan proposals under the 5C Principles. Six bankers with different job positions were the subjects of this study and were interviewed to get in-depth information. This research reveals items of behaviors related to production deviances in each principle they assessed. Deviances are reported in each principle then categorized into production ones since these behaviors deal a lot with how they perform their job in the credit sector.
Menakar Kelayakan Desain Penelitian Studi Kasus Untuk Analisis Kebijakan Prasetiyo; Trisnawati, Melinda; Mardiyanta, Antun
Jejaring Administrasi Publik Vol. 17 No. 1 (2025): Jejaring Administrasi Publik
Publisher : Universitas Airlangga

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.20473/jap.v17i1.67827

Abstract

As a research design, case studies have received a lot of criticism from practitioners. The most substantial criticism is the high potential for bias and its ability to generalize research findings. When associated with policy analysis, both things will have a major impact on the policy recommendations that will be produced. As is commonly known, effective, efficient, and applicable policies are the most important part in overcoming public problems. Therefore, choosing the right method in policy analysis is absolutely necessary to produce qualified policy recommendations. This article uses a literature study method to reveal the advantages, disadvantages, and opportunities for case studies to be used as a research design in policy analysis. Despite the criticism, the advantages of case study research design in providing in-depth and contextual insights and its flexibility in using data collection methods make it a valuable tool in policy analysis. With a careful approach and proper validation, case studies can make a significant contribution to the development of evidence-based policies. Keywords: bias, case study, generalization, public policy analysis, public policy
Evaluation of the implementation of the village fund allocation policy Istifazhuddin, Alif Hazmi; Mardiyanta, Antun
Journal of Economic Resilience and Sustainable Development Vol. 2 No. 1: (February) 2025
Publisher : Institute for Advanced Science, Social, and Sustainable Future

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.61511/ersud.v2i1.2025.1779

Abstract

Background: The village fund allocation policy was introduced in Indonesia to enhance village financial capacity and autonomy. However, despite the implementation of Law No. 6/2014 on Villages, many villages, including Nguwok Village, still experience constraints in fully utilizing the village fund allocation funds due to regulatory control from the local government. This research aims to evaluate the implementation process of the village fund allocation in Nguwok Village, focusing on the allocation, utilization, and effectiveness of the funds within the framework of fiscal decentralization and village autonomy. Methods: This study employs a qualitative descriptive approach with purposive sampling to select key informants. Data collection methods include observations, document analysis, and in-depth interviews with stakeholders such as the Lamongan Regency Government, Modo Subdistrict Office, and Nguwok Village Administration. Findings: Out of seven effectiveness criteria, only three (range, frequency, and bias) were met, while access, service precision, program compatibility, and accountability remain ineffective. The village fund allocation implementation process is also found to be inefficient, with budgeting reports lacking transparency and not detailing fund expenditures. Conclusions: While the village fund allocation funds significantly contribute to Nguwok Village’s financial capacity, village autonomy remains constrained by local government regulations. Despite smooth intergovernmental coordination and timely fund disbursement, village-level decision-making power is limited, and public participation is insufficient. Additionally, budget transparency issues persist, with incomplete reporting of fund utilization. To fully realize village autonomy, the Nguwok Village government must take a more proactive role in decision-making rather than merely following district-level guidelines. Novelty/Originality of this Article: This study provides a critical evaluation of the limitations of the village fund allocation policy implementation despite the legal framework supporting fiscal decentralization. By highlighting the gap between policy and practice, this research offers practical recommendations for improving village autonomy, community participation, and financial transparency.
The Discourse on the Role of NGOs in Indonesia’s Public Policy Process Bahar, Adam Amin; Mardiyanta, Antun; Mirdad, Mohammad Ayub; Wisnuyana, Biandro
JKMP (Jurnal Kebijakan dan Manajemen Publik) Vol 13 No 1 (2025): April
Publisher : Universitas Muhammadiyah Sidoarjo

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.21070/jkmp.v13i1.1822

Abstract

This study aims to analyze the discourse surrounding the role of Non-Governmental Organizations (NGOs) in the public policy process in Indonesia. After the collapse of the New Order regime, the role of NGOs has become increasingly prominent in various stages of the policy process, from advocacy, formulation, implementation, to policy monitoring. However, the dominant discourse in Indonesia tends to reduce the political role of NGOs to only two main domains: community development and empowerment and humanitarian assistance. Using a post-structuralist approach and reflective document analysis, this study identifies distinctive characteristics in the discourse on the role of NGOs in Indonesia. Although the role of NGOs in the public policy process is very significant, their political dimensions are often not widely recognized, both by the general public and public policy academics in Indonesia. This condition actually opens up opportunities for NGOs to maneuver more flexibly in institutional and social spaces, influencing policy decisions while maintaining an image of neutrality in the wider political real.
ANALYZE DOMINANT FACTORS IN THE IMPLEMENTATION OF VILLAGE FUND POLICY IN KEDIRI REGENCY Prasetiyo, Prasetiyo; Asmorowati, Sulikah; Mardiyanta, Antun
Natapraja Vol. 13 No. 1 (2025): Governance Studies
Publisher : Universitas Negeri Yogyakarta

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.21831/natapraja.v13i1.85001

Abstract

Village funds remain the primary driving force in village development in Kediri, as 44.93% of village revenue in Kediri Regency comes from village funds. However, there are still obstacles in the implementation of the village fund policy in Kediri Regency, which could potentially affect the achievement of policy objectives. In response to this situation, this study aims to analyze the factors influencing the implementation of the village fund policy in Kediri Regency. Referring to Edwards III's Direct and Indirect Impact on Implementation Model and using quantitative methods, it was found that Resources, Attitude, and Bureaucratic Structure have a significant influence on the implementation of village fund policy in Kediri Regency. In contrast, Communication does not have a significant influence. Meanwhile, when the four variables were tested together, the results showed that Communication, Resources, Attitude, and Bureaucratic Structure have a significant influence on the implementation of village fund policy in Kediri Regency, simultaneously. This study recommends that the government prioritise attention to the quality of Standard Operating Procedures, the distribution of roles among implementers, the consistency of implementers' perspectives and attitudes, the quality of human resources, and the provision of adequate authority and facilities.