Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2020 - 2025
5.349
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Lingua Franca: Jurnal Bahasa, Sastra, dan Pengajarannya JP-BSI (Jurnal Pendidikan Bahasa dan Sastra Indonesia) Jurnal SMART Kebidanan Jurnal Abdimas Mahakam Bhamada: Jurnal Ilmu dan Teknologi Kesehatan (E-Journal) Sasando : Jurnal Bahasa, Sastra Indonesia, dan Pengajarannya KRTHA BHAYANGKARA Jurnal Cahaya Mandalika JOURNAL SCIENTIFIC OF MANDALIKA (JSM) JURNAL PENGABDIAN KEPADA MASYARAKAT CAHAYA MANDALIKA (ABDIMANDALIKA) Cakrawala: Jurnal Pendidikan Journal of Innovation Research and Knowledge Journal of Mandalika Literature MULTIPLE: Journal of Global and Multidisciplinary Jurnal Pengabdian Masyarakat dan Riset Pendidikan Bhamada: Jurnal Ilmu dan Teknologi Kesehatan (E-Journal) JABI: Jurnal Abdimas Bhakti Indonesia
Dwi Atmoko
Unknown Affiliation
Religion Arts Humanities Decision Sciences, Operations Research & Management Economics, Econometrics & Finance Education Environmental Science Health Professions Languange, Linguistic, Communication & Media Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Mathematics Medicine & Pharmacology Nursing Public Health Social Sciences Other

Published : 37 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 3 Documents
Search
Journal : JOURNAL SCIENTIFIC OF MANDALIKA (JSM)

 1 
Tinjauan Aspek Hukum Perlindungan Konsumen Pada Pengiriman Paket Barang Melalui Jasa Kurir di Indonesia Dwi Atmoko; Noviriska
Journal Scientific of Mandalika (JSM) e-ISSN 2745-5955 | p-ISSN 2809-0543 Vol. 6 No. 7 (2025)
Publisher : Institut Penelitian dan Pengembangan Mandalika Indonesia (IP2MI)

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.36312/10.36312/vol6iss7pp1804-1811

Abstract

Pada umumnya setiap perusahaan yang didirikan bertujuan untuk mendapatkan laba atau keuntungan semaksimal mungkin dengan menggunakan berbagai sumber-sumber ekonomi yang dimiliki. Salah satu tujuan perusahaan adalah mempertahankan kelangsungan hidup perusahaan dengan meningkatkan pendapatan dan penjualan.Perlindungan konsumen pengguna jasa pengiriman barang dalam terjadinya keterlambatan sampainya barang yang dalam hal ini JNE sebagai pihak ekspedisi pengiriman barang yang saling mengikat dengan konsumen karena adanya perjanjian yang telah diatur dalam Pasal 477 KUHD, telah melakukan pertanggungjawaban sesuai dengan Undang-Undang perlindungan konsumen No 8 Tahun 1999 Tentang Perlindungan Konsumen, Tetapi dengan ketentuan tertentu yang selanjutnya dapat diketahui dari tingkat kesalahan konsumen atau pihak ekspedisi.Peraturan-peraturan telah ditetapkan oleh pelaku usaha jasa pengiriman / jasa kurir dalam dokunen pengiriman. Jika dalam hal terjadi keterlambatan maka itu masuk dalam kategori wanprestasi, maka pelaku usaha harus memberikan ganti rugi akibat wanprestasi dan apabila kesalahan terletak pada konsumen maka pihak perusahaan ekspedisi tidak berhak untuk mengganti kerugian. Hak konsumen dan kewajiban pelaku usaha merupakan kedua hal yang tidak dapat dipisahkan, maka bergantung pada yang membuat kesalahan dengan memperhatikan hak dan kewajiban masing-masing. Pelaksanaan pertanggungjawaban perusahaan dalam perjanjian pengirim barang apabila tidak sesuai waktu estimasi yang telah diperjanjikan dalam hal ini tidak melaksanakan secara mutlak ketika ada complain dari konsumen, pertanggungjawaban dapat dilaksanakan dengan melihat perjanjian itu sendiri. Pada umumnya setiap perusahaan yang didirikan bertujuan untuk mendapatkan laba atau keuntungan semaksimal mungkin dengan menggunakan berbagai sumber-sumber ekonomi yang dimiliki, yang dimana salah satu tujuan perusahaan adalah mempertahankan kelangsungan hidup perusahaan dengan meningkatkan pendapatan dan penjualan.
Tanggung Jawab Hukum Perusahaan Yang Mengalami Pailit Terhadap Kreditur Berbasis Nilai Keadilan Jantarda Mauli Hutagalung; Dwi Atmoko
Journal Scientific of Mandalika (JSM) e-ISSN 2745-5955 | p-ISSN 2809-0543 Vol. 6 No. 7 (2025)
Publisher : Institut Penelitian dan Pengembangan Mandalika Indonesia (IP2MI)

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.36312/10.36312/vol6iss7pp1764-1769

Abstract

A Limited Liability Company (PT) is a legal entity or artificial person that is capable of carrying out legal acts through specific legal mechanism, therefore the company is also an independent legal subject that has rights and obligations in legal relations. If a company has more than one creditor, then except for creditors who have pre-emptive rights, all assets are divided fairly and proportionally among the creditors, according to the amount of receivables each creditor owes to the company. In practice, repayment of the company's obligations to its creditors is very dependent on the company's will and good faith, which in this case is carried out by the Company's Directors. There are times when a creditor gets payment first or gets a payment that is proportionally larger than other creditors. This research uses a normative juridical research method where this research uses legal norms and is supported by an approach related to events that occur in the field, which is done so that the activity process runs smoothly. The responsibilities of the Board of Directors are related to the basis of authority that a company Director has to act for and on behalf of the company. The provisions of Article 97 paragraph (4) Law Number 40 of 2007 concerning Limited Liability Companies in the event that the board of directors consists of 2 (two) or more members of the board of directors, the responsibilities as referred to in paragraph (3) apply jointly and severally to each member of the board of directors. This means that based on the words of Article 97 paragraph (4), it can be concluded that if members of the board of directors are negligent or violate their obligations to manage the company in good faith and with full responsibility, then each member of the board of directors will equally bear joint responsibility for the losses suffered by the company.
Perjanjian Kerjasama Jual Beli melalui Sistem E-commerce dengan Asas Itikad Baik Berdasarkan Undang-Undang No. 7 tahun 2014 Tentang Perdagangan cq PP RI No. 80 Tahun 2019 Tentang Perdagangan Melalui Sistem Elektronik Noviriska; Dwi Atmoko
Journal Scientific of Mandalika (JSM) e-ISSN 2745-5955 | p-ISSN 2809-0543 Vol. 6 No. 7 (2025)
Publisher : Institut Penelitian dan Pengembangan Mandalika Indonesia (IP2MI)

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.36312/10.36312/vol6iss7pp1781-1788

Abstract

The principle of good faith means that agreements made must be carried out with due regard to the norms of propriety and morality. In a buying and selling transaction, there is an obligation that must be fulfilled by the parties not to do anything that does not make sense, that is, does not conflict with the norms of propriety and decency, with the hope of creating justice for the parties and not causing harm to either party. party. Buyers of goods in good faith or otherwise, as opposed to people in bad faith, are in good faith with subjective anarchy. A buyer of goods in good faith is a person who buys goods with full confidence that the seller really owns the goods purchased. He doesn't know at all, if he bought from an unauthorized person, why he would be called an honest buyer, in this case in good faith, honest and clean. An agreement is declared to have arisen when an agreement or agreement is reached between two parties regarding a main matter which is the object of the agreement. Agree here is defined as a conformity of understanding (opinion) and desires between two parties. In this context, there is a meeting of will between two parties to carry out or not carry out an agreement. This also applies to contracts (agreements) that are made electronically. In conventional society, an agreement is simply based on conformity of will. A meeting of wills requires the presence of both parties to agree on what has been agreed. Conformity of wishes can be done verbally or in writing. Then, in modern society which has utilized technology in its business activities, the agreement of wishes does not have to require a face-to-face meeting or the agreement does not have to be made in writing. This means that there is a shift in norms in society in interpreting conformity to will. In conventional society, of course, an agreement (conformity of will) must be made through a direct meeting to express a will. This is not the case in societies that have utilized technology. The emphasis in seeking agreement between the wishes of both parties is based on what one party states, then this statement is approved by the other party.
Co-Authors Adhalia Septia Saputri Agung Tyas Subekti Ahmad Baihaki Aldiwa Pandu Atmoko Amaria Dewi Andrew Kristianto Silalahi Anggit Pratiwi Bramanda Zein Atmoko Desi Sri Rejeki Erna Agustin Sukmandari Fidri Sadri Fiqih Kartika Murti Gayo, Sabela Gomos Jaksana Putra Simandjuntak Haulaeni Sukma Dewi HERU SISWANTO Hirwansyah Ika Dewi Sartika Saimima Juanda Khasbulloh, M. Wahab Lindri Purbowati Lusianti, Septyaning Masturoh Masturoh Muammar Afif Al Qusaeri Muhammad Rofi’Ussya’en Muhammad Wildan Fardian Musrifah Musrifah, Musrifah Muthi’atul Khasanah Natiqotul Fatkhiyah Natiqotul Fatkhiyah Noviriska Para Watiningsih Rara Amalia Cendhayanie Rosmalia Rosmalia Rosmalia Rosmalia Sri Tanjung Rejeki Sugeng Sugiarto Sugiarto SUTIKNO Tangguh Dwi Pramono Triyono Rakhmadi Wiliyanto, Wiliyanto