Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
2.459
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Jurnal Moral Kemasyarakatan Jurnal Ilmu Hukum KYADIREN Jurnal Analisis Hukum Jurnal Hukum Saraswati International Journal of Applied Science and Sustainable Development (IJASSD) JUMAHA YUSTHIMA Mawaddah: Jurnal Hukum Keluarga Islam
I Made Kariyasa
Universitas Mahasaraswati Denpasar
Religion Agriculture, Biological Sciences & Forestry Humanities Civil Engineering, Building, Construction & Architecture Education Engineering Languange, Linguistic, Communication & Media Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Social Sciences

Published : 13 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 1 Documents
Search
Journal : YUSTHIMA

 1 
Analisis Yuridis Keterangan Saksi Testimonium De Auditu dalam Surat Pernyataan Sporadik Penguasaan Tanah Perspektif Kepastian Hukum I Gede Ngurah Budi Eka Prayusa; Yogi Yasa Wedha; I Made Kariyasa
Jurnal Yusthima Vol. 6 No. 01 (2026): YUSTHIMA : Jurnal Prodi Magister Hukum FH Unmas Denpasar
Publisher : Fakultas Hukum, Universitas Mahasaraswati Denpasar

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

Land registration through the substantiation of prior rights may be conducted on the basis of physical possession for 20 years or more, as evidenced by a sporadic statement letter and witnessed by at least two witnesses. However, this provision creates an opportunity for the use of testimonium de auditu, namely testimony based on hearsay that cannot be materially verified. In practice, the assessment of proof of prior rights as regulated under Article 24 paragraph (1) of Government Regulation Number 24 of 1997 concerning Land Registration contains the phrases “degree of truth” and “deemed sufficient” without clear parameters, thereby giving rise to legal uncertainty. This normative juridical research employs the theory of legal certainty and the theory of evidence to analyze two principal issues: the regulation of land registration in Indonesia and the evidentiary strength of de auditu testimony. The findings indicate that de auditu testimony does not meet the criteria of valid witness evidence and fails to provide legal certainty, while the ambiguity of the norm necessitates further regulatory clarification.
Co-Authors Amiruddin Anak Agung Adi Lestari Asri, Ni Kadek Sindhu Atmiprihartini, Marta Dwi Dewi, Ni Komang Ratih Kumala Dewi, Putu Putri Pradnyani I Gede Ngurah Budi Eka Prayusa I Gusti Bagus Hengki I Gusti Ngurah Anom Ida Ayu Prami Judijanto, Loso Kamri, Andi Khaedhir Lamsir, Seno Made Emy Andayani Citra Marta Dwi Atmiprihartini Muhammad Husni Abdulah Pakarti NAUFAL, NAUFAL Ni Komang Ratih Kumala Dewi Noorhidayah Noorhidayah, Noorhidayah Prami, Ida Ayu Pratama, I Dewa Gede Bayu Randy Vallentino Neonbeni Sang Ayu Made Pipit Miranti Sistyawan, Dwanda Julisa Yogi Yasa Wedha