Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
2.57
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal International Journal of Evaluation and Research in Education (IJERE) Journal of Nonformal Education JPsd ( Jurnal Pendidikan Sekolah Dasar ) Edu Sains: Jurnal Pendidikan Sains dan Matematika JISAE (Journal of Indonesian Student Assesment and Evaluation) Faktor Jurnal Ilmiah Kependidikan RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT JOURNAL OF EDUCATION (RDJE) Motor Bakar : Jurnal Teknik Mesin Jurnal Akrab (Aksara agar Berdaya) Journal of Vocational Education and Automotive Technology Indonesian Journal of Research and Educational Review (IJRER) Jurnal Teknik Mesin Sinergi Educational Technology Journal STATISTIKA
Ikhsanudin, Ikhsanudin
Universitas Sultan Ageng Tirtayasa
Religion Arts Humanities Automotive Engineering Chemical Engineering, Chemistry & Bioengineering Chemistry Decision Sciences, Operations Research & Management Education Energy Engineering Industrial & Manufacturing Engineering Languange, Linguistic, Communication & Media Mathematics Mechanical Engineering Physics Social Sciences Transportation Other

Published : 15 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search
Journal : Educational Technology Journal

 1 
PERBANDINGAN MODEL PEMBELAJARAN STAD, TGT, DAN KOMBINASI STAD-TGT DALAM MENINGKATKAN HASIL BELAJAR SISWA TKR KELAS XI PADA MATA PELAJARAN PKKR Bunga Rahmania; Ikhsanudin; Sulaeman Deni Ramdani
Educational Technology Journal Vol 3 No 2 (2023): Volume 3 Nomor 2, Oktober 2023
Publisher : Universitas Negeri Surabaya

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

This study is aiming to compare learning achievement of the students with the STAD, TGT, and STAD-TGT combination models. This research is quasi-experimental research. The samples used were 3 classes from SMKN 1 Ciruas and SMK PGRI 1 Serang. Data collection using test and observation sheets of student activity. Data analysis techniques used descriptive analysis, normality test and homogeneity test, as well as hypothesis testing. The results of the study were obtained through descriptive analysis with an average learning achievement using the STAD model is 58.33, TGT model is 54.47, and STAD-TGT combination model is 65.29. Descriptively, the learning achievement category in STAD-TGT combination model is higher than two other models. Based on the descriptive analysis it was concluded that the learning outcomes of the STAD-TGT combination model obtained the highest average score. However, this difference was not significant, as evidenced by the Tukey HSD test which resulted in the STAD-TGT combination model with the STAD model (sig. 0.447), while the difference occurs significantly between the STAD-TGT combination model and the TGT model (sig. 0.027). The conclusion in this study is that the STAD-TGT combination model is sequentially better in improving student learning outcomes in class XI TKR. Keywords: experiment; learning acheivement; STAD, TGT, STAD-TGT combination.
THE IMPLEMENTATION OF THE NUMBERED HEAD TOGETHER (NHT) COOPERATIVE LEARNING MODEL TO ENHANCE STUDENT LEARNING OUTCOMES IN THE TOPIC OF MECHANICAL MEASURING INSTRUMENTS AT SMKN 1 TUNJUNG TEJA Triani, Nova; Iman, Atep; Ikhsanudin, Ikhsanudin
Educational Technology Journal Vol 4 No 1 (2024): Volume 4 Nomor 1, April 2024
Publisher : Universitas Negeri Surabaya

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

In this study, the researchers want to find out how much better students learn mechanical measuring instruments when they use the NHT type of joint learning model compared to when they use the traditional model of learning at SMKN 1 Tunjung Teja. A non-equivalent control group approach is used in this kind of study, which is kind of like an experiment. The people who took part in this study were students in class X at TKRO SMKN 1 Tunjung Teja. A learning outcome test was used as a study tool, and the T-test and N-gain test were used to analyze the results. The results showed that the experimental class that used the NHT learning method learned a lot. They got an average score of 22.80 on the pretest and 90.80 on the posttest. The control class had an average score of 21.47 on the pre-test and 49.26 on the post-test for learning results. A significant value of 0.00 ? 0.05 was found when the independent sample t-test test was used to test the claim. The N-gain number for the experimental class was 88.10% with high criteria, while it was 35.71% for the control class with intermediate criteria. This shows that the students learned more. What this means is that using the NHT type group learning model makes learning about mechanical measuring tools much more effective.
Co-Authors Atmojo, Dion Daroe Catoer Bambang Subali Bambang Subali Bunga Rahmania Daddy Darmawan Edi Istiyono Elfajry, Ano Efrian Febnesia, Helleni Hadiyanti, Puji Hamid Abdillah Heri Retnawati Hidayatullah Hidayatullah Iman, Atep Karta Sasmita Memi Almizi Mohammad Ariansyah Sahputra Muhammad Agus Hardiansyah Muhammad Nurtanto Novaliah Novaliah Nulhakim, Lukman Nurlela Nurlela Puji Hadiyanti Rahmat Syah Sasmita, Karta Septi Kurniasih Sri Kuswantono Sulaeman Deni Ramdani Syaiful Syamsuddin triani, nova