Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 13 Documents
Search

Keabsahan Hukum Kontrak Kerja Pekerja Migran Indonesia (PMI) dengan Perusahaan Agensi Luar Negeri: Studi Kasus SS Facilities Global SDN BHD Malaysia Aulia Dinda Marsyanda; Rohaini; Agus Triono; Dianne Eka Rusmawati; Nenny Dwi Ariani
Al-Zayn: Jurnal Ilmu Sosial, Hukum & Politik Vol 4 No 3 (2026): 2026
Publisher : Yayasan pendidikan dzurriyatul Quran

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.61104/alz.v4i3.6637

Abstract

Penelitian ini menganalisis keabsahan hukum dalam kontrak kerja antara Pekerja Migran Indonesia (PMI) dengan perusahaan agensi luar negeri, khususnya SS Facilities Global SDN BHD Malaysia. Permasalahan muncul ketika kontrak kerja yang dibuat tidak sepenuhnya memenuhi ketentuan hukum yang berlaku, sehingga menimbulkan perbuatan melawan hukum dan merugikan pihak ketiga. Penelitian ini menggunakan metode penelitian hukum normatif-empiris dengan pendekatan perundang-undangan dan konseptual. Data dikumpulkan melalui studi pustaka dan wawancara langsung dengan Pekerja Migran Indonesia dan instansi terkait. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa kontrak kerja tersebut secara formil tidak memenuhi syarat sah perjanjian menurut Pasal 1320 KUH Perdata. Selain itu, pemberangkatan PMI melalui agensi luar negeri diluar prosedur resmi BP2MI (Badan Perlindungan Pekerja Migran Indonesia) melanggar ketentuan hukum ketenagakerjaan Indonesia. Dalam pelaksanaannya, ditemukan pelanggaran terhadap hak-hak pekerja yang menunjukkan adanya perbuatan melawan hukum oleh pihak agensi, termasuk penahanan paspor, tidak memberikan work permit, dan tidak tercukupinya jaminan sosial. Penyelesaian sengketa perbuatan melawan hukum dapat ditempuh melalui jalur non-litigasi maupun litigasi dengan permohonan Ganti rugi atas perbuatan melawan hukum.
Building Digital Justice: Reinterpreting Ḥifẓ al-ʿIrḍ in Personal Data Protection and Legal Aid for Data Breach Victims in Indonesia Ika Pusparini Anindita Jayasinga; Agus Triono; Muhammad Akib; Elfa Murdiana; Muhimmatul Mukaromah
Justicia Islamica Vol 23 No 2 (2026)
Publisher : Faculty of Sharia UIN Kiai Ageng Muhammad Besari Ponorogo

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.21154/justicia.v23i2.13432

Abstract

This article examines the systemic failure of personal data protection in Indonesia as an issue that goes beyond technical and regulatory shortcomings and touches the very core of human dignity. Although Law No. 27 of 2022 on Personal Data Protection has provided normative consolidation, the legal ecosystem underpinning it remains fragile: a non-independent supervisory body, structurally weak enforcement mechanisms, and systemic inequities in access to justice render data subjects' rights illusory. This article employs a normative-empirical method with three complementary approaches: the legal philosophy approach is used to deconstruct the paradigmatic assumptions underpinning the data protection regime and reconstruct it on the foundation of human dignity; the conceptual approach is used to redefine ʿirḍ from social reputation toward digital identity and data sovereignty; and the maqāṣid al-sharīa approach within Jasser Auda’s framework is used to assess the normative adequacy of the existing regime and to construct an argument that data protection must be classified as ḍarūriyyāt—a primary necessity—because its violation simultaneously threatens ḥifẓ al-nafs, ḥifẓ al-ʿaql, ḥifẓ al-māl, and ḥifẓ al-ʿirḍ. Based on these findings, this article proposes a Maqasid-Oriented Legal Aid (MOLA) model that operates across three dimensions: restorative, preventive-structural, and community-based accessibility. The main contribution of this article is the redefinition of data protection as an active and affirmative mandate of ḥifẓ al-ʿirḍ, while also offering a framework for legal aid that is normatively robust and institutionally realistic in the Indonesian context.
Implementing social security programs for employees in Bandar Lampung: Challenges and recommendations Siti Rahma; Agus Triono; Marlia Eka Putri A.T.
Journal of Governance and Accountability Studies Vol. 3 No. 2 (2023): July
Publisher : Goodwood Publishing

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.35912/jgas.v3i2.1873

Abstract

Purpose: The purpose of this study was to determine the application of the Sosial Security Program/Jaminan Hari Tua (JHT) program and the factors inhibiting the JHT program. Research methodology: This study is a type of Normative Juridical and Empirical Juridical research. Normative jurisdictional research is carried out based on legal materials such as legal theory, legal principles, and legislation related to research. Meanwhile, empirical juridicals were conducted through interviews. A qualitative analysis was performed. Results: The results of this research show that JHT has been implemented in accordance with Government Regulation Number 46 of 2015 concerning the Implementation of the Old Age Security Program. Article 22 states that the JHT can be withdrawn when fulfilling the requirements with a minimum participation period of 10 years. However, in reality, this has generated pros and cons because the JHT can only be cashed out at the age of 56. This can be detrimental to JHT participants who are not yet 56 years old but need to withdraw funds immediately. Limitations: The Social Security Organizing Agency (BPJS) has an Old Age Insurance Program (JHT) that guarantees workers to receive cash when entering retirement, experiencing total disability, and death. However, despite experiencing these conditions, JHT disbursements have obstacles when disbursing money. Contribution: Therefore, the BPJS should improve the JHT system and conduct socialization to overcome the lack of information related to JHT disbursement.