Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2020 - 2025
2.162
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Lex Jurnalica (Ilmu Hukum) Jurnal Pengabdian Masyarakat AbdiMas jle
Azis, Rizka Amelia
Unknown Affiliation
Economics, Econometrics & Finance Education Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice

Published : 12 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 12 Documents
Search

 1   2 
PERTANGGUNGJAWABAN HUKUM ATAS PENOLAKAN PASIEN DI INSTALASI GAWAT DARURAT: ANALISIS BERDASARKAN UU KESEHATAN, UU PRAKTIK KEDOKTERAN, DAN PERATURAN RUMAH SAKIT Azis, Rizka Amelia; Susetio, Wasis; Dwinanto, Rafi Rajendra
Lex Jurnalica Vol 22, No 2 (2025): LEX JURNALICA
Publisher : Lex Jurnalica

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.47007/lj.v22i2.9671

Abstract

ABSTRACTThe refusal of patients in Emergency Departments (EDs) remains a critical issue within Indonesia’s healthcare system. .  Patients still refuse emergency treatment, even though hospitals and doctors are required to do it by laws such the Hospital Law, the Medical Practice Law, and the Health Law.  Utilizing a normative approach and case study analysis, this paper seeks to examine the legal culpability linked to such refusals. Findings reveal that refusals lacking objective medical grounds violate patients' rights to healthcare, contravene human rights principles and consumer protection standards, and may result in criminal, civil, and administrative legal consequences. The study recommends enhancing legal education for both the public and health professionals, and reinforcing regulatory oversight and sanctions for violations. In doing so, emergency healthcare services can operate more equitably and accountably, ensuring better protection of patients’ rights. Keywords: patient refusal, emergency department, legal liability, right to health, medical discretion.  ABSTRAK Di Indonesia, masalah utama dalam sistem layanan kesehatan adalah pasien yang menolak perawatan di unit gawat darurat. Sejumlah undang-undang dan peraturan, termasuk yang berkaitan dengan rumah sakit dan tenaga medis, mewajibkan mereka untuk memberikan bantuan pada saat terjadi keadaan darurat medis, pasien masih sering menolak perawatan. Dengan menggunakan metodologi normatif dan studi kasus, penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengkaji siapa yang bertanggung jawab secara hukum ketika pasien unit gawat darurat menolak perawatan. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa penolakan tanpa dasar medis objektif melanggar hak pasien atas pelayanan kesehatan, bertentangan dengan prinsip hak asasi manusia dan perlindungan konsumen, serta dapat menimbulkan implikasi hukum pidana, perdata, dan administratif. Penelitian ini merekomendasikan peningkatan edukasi hukum bagi masyarakat dan tenaga kesehatan, serta penguatan mekanisme pengawasan dan sanksi hukum terhadap pelanggaran. Dengan demikian, sistem pelayanan kesehatan darurat dapat berjalan lebih adil, akuntabel, dan menjamin perlindungan maksimal terhadap hak-hak pasien. Kata kunci: penolakan pasien, IGD, pertanggungjawaban hukum, hak atas kesehatan, diskresi medis. 
Legal Safeguards for Government Criticism Expression on Social Media Platforms Under the 2016 Information and Electronic Transactions Law (Law No. 19/2016) Bimoribowo, Amadeus Yves; Azis, Rizka Amelia
Journal of Law and Economics Vol. 4 No. 2 (2025): NOVEMBER
Publisher : Yayasan Kawanad

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.56347/jle.v4i2.324

Abstract

Advances in information technology in the digital era have given rise to social media as a new means for people to voice their opinions, including criticizing the government. However, this freedom of expression often conflicts with legal aspects, particularly the provisions of Law Number 11 of 2008 concerning Electronic Information and Transactions (ITE), which was amended by Law Number 19 of 2016, specifically Article 27 paragraph (3) and Article 28 paragraph (2). This research aims to examine how these two articles are implemented in responding to criticism of the government conveyed through social media and the extent to which legal protection is provided to citizens. The focus of the research was directed toward the case of Bima Yudho Saputro, who was reported for criticizing conditions in his home region through TikTok. This research adopts a normative juridical method with an analytical approach to legal and case research. The findings suggest that these articles are often misinterpreted and risk criminalizing legally valid forms of criticism, despite not fulfilling the elements of a crime. Legal protection, both preventive and repressive, remains ineffective due to weak regulations, insufficient understanding among law enforcement officials, and limited public access to legal aid. Therefore, regulatory reform and institutional strengthening are needed to ensure that freedom of expression remains protected within a democratic, rule-of-law system.
Co-Authors Achmad Edi Subiyanto Ade Hari Siswanto Alfiana, Rita Anatomi Muliawan Anna Triningsih, Anna Bertha, Anna Bimoribowo, Amadeus Yves Dwinanto, Rafi Rajendra Ernawati Ernawati Feriza, Gousta Hikmawati, Elok Horadin Saragih I Gede Hartadi Kurniawan Irmanjaya Thaher Ishak, Muhamad Nur Hayati Nurhayani nurhayani Suprajogi, Agus Taher, Irmanjaya Veithzal Rivai Zainal Wasis Susetio Widiatno, Men Wih Zulfikar Judge