Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
1.066
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Masalah-Masalah Hukum LAW REFORM Diponegoro Law Journal Pandecta Jurnal Daulat Hukum Gema Keadilan Law, Development and Justice Review Notaire SIGn Jurnal Hukum Jurnal Suara Hukum
Ery Agus Priyono
University Of Diponegoro - Faculty Of Law
Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Social Sciences

Published : 37 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 37 Documents
Search

 1   2   3   4 
Kewenangan Notaris Dalam Pembuatan Surat Tanda Bukti Sebagai Ahli Waris Tiffany Agave Christiantirta; Ery Agus Priyono
Notaire Vol. 5 No. 3 (2022): NOTAIRE
Publisher : Fakultas Hukum Universitas Airlangga

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.20473/ntr.v5i3.38800

Abstract

AbstractThis research aims to find out and analyze the authority of a Notary public in making letter of evidence as heirs based on Ministerial Regulation of ATR/BPN Number 16 of 2021. This research is a legal research using a statutory approach and conceptual approach. The data that used in this research is secondary data consisting of primary legal materials, secondary legal materials and tertiary legal materials which are analyzed using qualitative analysis method. As a general public who has an authorized to make an authentic deed, Notary public also has another powers such as making letter of evidence as heirs. In practice, Notaries in Indonesia are used to making Certificates of Inheritance (SKW in Bahasa) even though this authority has never been contained in the Law on Notary which is the legal basis for granting authority to Notaries. As far as the author searches, making of SKW by a Notaries is only a habit and doesn’t have a clear legal basis. If we seen at the provisions of Article 111 paragraph (1) letter c Ministerial Regulation of ATR/BPN Number 16 of 2021, the SKW is a letter of evidence as heirs issued by the Balai Harta Peninggalan, not a Notary public. In this provision, the evidence as an heirs made by a Notary is a deed of inheritance rights.Keywords: Authority; Notary Public; Heirs. AbstrakPenelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengetahui dan menganalisis kewenangan Notaris dalam membuat surat tanda bukti sebagai ahli waris berdasarkan Permen ATR/BPN No. 16 Tahun 2021. Penelitian ini merupakan penelitian hukum dengan menggunakan pendekatan perundang-undangan dan pendekatan konseptual. Data yang digunakan dalam penelitian ini adalah data sekunder yang terdiri dari bahan hukum primer, bahan hukum sekunder dan bahan hukum tersier yang kemudian dianalisis dengan menggunakan metode analisis kualitatif. Sebagai pejabat umum yang berwenang untuk membuat akta autentik, Notaris juga mempunyai kewenangan lain seperti membuat surat tanda bukti ahli waris. Dalam praktiknya, Notaris di Indonesia telah terbiasa membuat Surat Keterangan Waris (SKW) sekalipun kewenangan tersebut tidak pernah dimuat dalam Undang-Undang Jabatan Notaris yang menjadi dasar hukum pemberian kewenangan terhadap Notaris. Sejauh penelusuran penulis, selama ini pembuatan SKW oleh Notaris hanya sebatas kebiasaan dan tidak memiliki dasar hukum yang jelas. Jika dilihat pada ketentuan Pasal 111 ayat (1) huruf c Permen ATR/BPN No. 16 Tahun 2021, SKW merupakan surat tanda bukti sebagai ahli waris yang dikeluarkan oleh Balai Harta Peninggalan, bukan Notaris. Dalam ketentuan tersebut bukti sebagai ahli waris yang dibuat oleh Notaris adalah akta keterangan hak mewaris.Kata Kunci: Kewenangan; Notaris; Ahli Waris.
Akibat Hukum bagi PPAT yang Mengungkapkan Data Pribadi Pihak yang Bertransaksi: Studi Perlindungan Hukum Miranda Damayanti; Ery Agus Priyono
SIGn Jurnal Hukum Vol 4 No 2: Oktober 2022 - Maret 2023
Publisher : CV. Social Politic Genius (SIGn)

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.37276/sjh.v4i2.217

Abstract

This study will examine and analyze the legal consequences for LDMO disclosing the personal data of transacting parties. In addition, this study also aims to determine the legal protection for parties who suffer losses due to violations committed by the LDMO. This study uses a normative juridical method. The collection of primary, secondary, and tertiary legal materials is carried out using literature study techniques. The collected legal material is then analyzed using qualitative data analysis methods with a statute approach. The results show that LDMO will get a sanction of dishonorable dismissal, payment of compensation, imprisonment for a maximum of four years, and or a fine for a maximum of four billion rupiahs. In this case, if the LDMO is legally and convincingly proven to have violated the oath of office and caused loss to several parties by disclosure of personal data. At the same time, forming the LDMO Guiders and Supervisors Council is a form of legal protection for all parties who commit legal acts before LDMO. In this case, any party that suffers a loss can complain about the alleged violation committed by LDMO to the Guiders and Supervisors Council. In addition, any party that suffers a loss also gets compensation from LDMO as regulated in laws and regulations. Therefore, it is recommended that LDMO uphold the oath of office as a moral code regulated in the Code of Ethics and Head of the NLA Regulation. In this case, to maintain their profession’s dignity and public trust in their noble role (officium nobile).
The Dispute Settlement through International Arbitration between PT. Karaha Bodas Company against PT. Pertamina and PLN Rahma Yunita Soviani; Ery Agus Priyono
Jurnal Daulat Hukum Vol 5, No 3 (2022): September 2022
Publisher : Magister of Law, Faculty of Law, Universitas Islam Sultan Agung

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.30659/jdh.v5i3.23922

Abstract

Arbitration is a dispute resolution institution that uses an adversarial approach with the result that win lose chosen as an alternative by business people. Alternative dispute resolution that is currently in demand is through arbitration because it is in line with the increase in commercial transactions in the business sector both nationally and internationally. Dispute resolution through arbitration provides benefits for the disputing parties. These advantages include the confidentiality of the disputing parties, relatively cheaper costs, a fast, efficient dispute resolution process and provide flexibility for the disputing parties. International arbitration dispute resolution has a uniqueness which adheres to the principle of final and binding (last resort and binding). An international arbitral award that has been decided abroad if it is brought to Indonesia, there are two possibilities, i.e. the International arbitral award asks to be enforced or annulled. Based on the dispute between PT. Pertamina against Karaha Bodas Company that Pertamina cannot cancel the arbitration award that has been handed down by the Swiss Arbitration Board. The reasons for rejection and cancellation are as stated in the New York Convention and the UNCITRAL Model Law.
ASPEK KEADILAN DALAM KONTRAK BISNIS DI INDONESIA (Kajian pada Perjanjian Waralaba ) Ery Agus Priyono
LAW REFORM Vol 14, No 1 (2018)
Publisher : PROGRAM STUDI MAGISTER ILMU HUKUM FAKULTAS HUKUM UNIVERSITAS DIPONEGORO SEMARANG

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (102.703 KB) | DOI: 10.14710/lr.v14i1.20233

Abstract

Perjanjian, esensinya adalah kesepakatan, disifati dengan bertemunya kehendak (meeting of mind, mutual assent ) para pihak untuk mencapai suatu tujuan yang telah disepakati guna memberikan kemanfaatan semaksimal mungkin bagi para pihak. Perjanjian layaknya sebuah dokumen hukum sudah sepantasnya memenuhi minimal tiga unsur sebagaimana dikatakan oleh Gustav Radbruch, yakni keadilan, kemanfaatan dan kepastian hukum, akan tetapi faktanya aspek kepastian hukum (dhi asas Pacta Sunservanda) paling menonjol bahkan kadang mengabaikan keadilan.Tulisan ini bertujuan untuk mengungkap mengapa hal tersebut terjadi, apa sebabnya dan bagaiamana solusinya.Pendekatan penelitian normatif filosofis digunakan untuk menganalisis dokumen kontrak mengacu pada peraturan yang terkait dan asas asas perjanjian. Sebagai kesimpulan tidak tercapainya keadilan bagi para pihak khususnya penerima waralaba, dikarenakan posisi tawar pemberi waralaba (franchisor) yang sangat kuat,  tidak seimbang jika dibandingkan dengan posisi tawar penerima waralaba (franchisee) yang lemah. Hal ini berimbas pada isi kontrak yang sepenuhnya dibuat oleh pemberi waralaba (franchisor), yang tentunya cenderung memberikan manfaat sebesarbesarnya bagi pemberi waralaba (franchisor).
Analisis Putusan No. 88/Pdt.G/2021/PN Jember Tentang Kewajiban Tergugat Terhadap Perbuatan Melawan Hukum Pada Penggunaan Tanah Bersertifikat Ganda Andhini Septiana; Ery Agus Priyono; Mira Novana Ardani; islamiyati islamiyati
Law, Development and Justice Review Vol 6, No 1 (2023): Law, Development & Justice Review
Publisher : Faculty of Law, Diponegoro University

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.14710/ldjr.v6i1.18742

Abstract

Land dispute cases often occur in the community, one of which is the issuance of double land certificates, namely a state where a piece of land has been registered into two or more certificates by BPN Jambi, one of which occurred in the case in decision No. 88 / Pdt.G / 2021 / PN Jember. The research was conducted to determine and analyze the defendant's liability for unlawful acts against the use of double-certified land. The research was conducted using normative and doctrinal juridical methods with descriptive analysis. The results showed that the issuance of multiple land certificates caused losses to overlapping rights to a land so that it became a loss of certainty of the rights and freedoms of one of the aggrieved parties to exercise control and to all control over the land that actually belonged to him. For such losses, then in accordance with Article 1365 of the Civil Code, ordered the defendant to return all double certificates to the Jambi City Land Agency and return the land owned by the plaintiff by legally purchasing the land owned by the plaintiff.
Implementasi Asas Kebebasan Berkontrak Dalam Praktek Pembuatan Perjanjian Kerja Perancangan Ery Agus Priyono; Katya Nabila Saka Birauti
Law, Development and Justice Review Vol 5, No 1 (2022): Law, Development & Justice Review
Publisher : Faculty of Law, Diponegoro University

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.14710/ldjr.v5i1.15003

Abstract

The aim of this research is to implement the principle of freedom of contract in the practice of making a design work agreement. The research method used in writing this law is a normative juridical approach. The normative juridical approach is research that uses secondary data sources/data obtained through library materials. The results showed that the process of the design work agreement between the Architecture and the Service User was in accordance with the formulation of Article 1320 of the Civil Code. Then related to the implementation of the principle of freedom of contract in the work agreement design work based on Article 1338 paragraph (1) of the Civil Code, that all agreements made legally and valid as law for those who make them. Keywords: Freedom of Contract, Employment Agreement, Design Abstrak Penelitian bertujuan untuk Implementasi Asas Kebebasan Berkontrak Dalam Praktek Pembuatan Perjanjian Kerja Perancangan. Metode penelitian yang digunakan dalam penulisan hukum ini adalah pendekatan yuridis normatif. Pendekatan yuridis normatif adalah penelitian yang menggunakan sumber data sekunder / data yang diperoleh melalui bahan kepustakaan. Hasil penelitian menunjukan bahwa Proses terjadinya perjanjian kerja pekerjaan perancangan antara Arsitektur dengan Pengguna Jasa telah sesuai dengan rumusan Pasal 1320 KUH Perdata. Kemudian terkait dengan implementasi Asas Kebebasan Berkontrak di Perjanjian Kerja Pekerjaan Perancangan didasarkan pada Pasal 1338 ayat (1) KUH Perdata, bahwa semua perjanjian yang dibuat secara sah dan berlaku sebagai undang-undang bagi mereka yang membuatnya. Kata Kunci:  Asas kebebas Berkontrak, Perjanjian Kerja, Perancangan
Efektifitas Pengaturan dan Pengawasan Bisnis Financial Technology (Peer to Peer Lending) di Indonesia Kornelius Benuf; Ery Agus Priyono; Siti Mahmudah; Siti Malikhatun Badriyah; Bagus Rahmanda; Amiek Soemarmi
Pandecta Research Law Journal Vol 15, No 2 (2020): December
Publisher : Universitas Negeri Semarang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.15294/pandecta.v15i2.21777

Abstract

In the industrial era 4.0 as it is now, the ease and speed of getting something are highly sought after, including the ease and speed of obtaining financial services. Financial Technology (Fintech) is a digital commercial service that offers and provides convenience and speed of financial services. The emergence of Fintech certainly makes it easy for people to get financial assistance. But as a state of law, Indonesia must regulate Fintech's business practices. Including the implementation of Fintech's business, it must be controlled and monitored by existing laws in Indonesia, not just stopping the formation of the rules, but also must be ensured that the rules apply effectively. This study aims to describe the basis for Fintech's business arrangements in Indonesia and will explain the effectiveness of the regulation in society. The writing method used is normative juridical, with a statutory approach, using secondary data by analyzing primary, secondary, and tertiary legal materials. Based on the research results, it is known that in Indonesia, Fintech's business is regulated by three institutions, namely the Ministry of Communication and Information, Bank Indonesia, and the Financial Services Authority. Regarding the effectiveness of the rules regarding the implementation of Fintech in Indonesia has not been going well because there are still shortages both in terms of legal structure, a legal substance, and legal culture.
Co-Authors Achmad Arief Budiman Amiek Soemarmi Andhini Septiana Andi Sunarto Bagus Rahmanda Bambang Eko Turisno Dewi Hendrawati Dharu Triasih Dharu Triasih Heni Ristiana Herni Widanarti IGA Gangga Santi Dewi Islamiyati Islamiyati Katya Nabila Saka Birauti Kornelius Benuf Kornelius Benuf Kornelius Benuf Mira Novana Ardani Miranda Damayanti Muhamad Azhar R. Suharto Rahma Yunita Soviani Siti Mahmudah Siti Malikhatun Badriyah, Siti Slamet Hariyono Suradi Suradi Tiffany Agave Christiantirta