Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
2.757
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Jurnal Dinamika Hukum Jurnal Media Hukum Jurnal Hukum IUS QUIA IUSTUM Jurnal Ilmiah Hukum LEGALITY Jurnal Moral Kemasyarakatan Jurnal Ilmiah Penegakan Hukum Kosmik Hukum UMPurwokerto Law Review KADARKUM: Jurnal Pengabdian Kepada Masyarakat Collegium Studiosum Journal Proceedings Series on Social Sciences & Humanities Jurnal Hukum dan Peradilan Prosiding University Research Colloquium Jurnal Penelitian Serambi Hukum Neoclassical Legal Review: Journal of Law and Contemporary Issues Jurnal Sakato Ekasakti Law Review JILS (Journal of Indonesian Legal Studies)
Indriati Amarini
Universitas Muhammadiyah Purwokerto
Humanities Computer Science & IT Economics, Econometrics & Finance Education Environmental Science Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Medicine & Pharmacology Social Sciences

Published : 31 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 31 Documents
Search

 1   2   3   4 
Implikasi Restorative Justice dalam Tindak Pidana Pencurian terhadap Over Kapasitas Lembaga Pemasyarakatan Dwi Lulu Afsan Saputra; Yusuf Saefudin; Selamat Widodo; Indriati Amarini
Jurnal Ilmiah Penegakan Hukum Vol. 13 No. 1 (2026): JURNAL ILMIAH PENEGAKAN HUKUM JUNI
Publisher : Universitas Medan Area

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31289/jiph.v13i1.17959

Abstract

Criminal justice practices in Indonesia are still dominated by imprisonment, including in theft cases, which contributes to the overcapacity of correctional institutions and is not fully oriented towards redressing victims' losses. This study aims to analyze the application of restorative justice in theft cases based on the Indonesian criminal law framework, examine its relevance from a progressive legal perspective, and examine its implications for efforts to reduce correctional overcapacity. The study uses a normative legal method with a statutory approach and a conceptual approach through literature review. The results show that restorative justice has normative legitimacy in the Indonesian criminal law system through the new Criminal Code and various implementing regulations that emphasize redressing victims' losses, perpetrator responsibility, and peaceful conflict resolution. The application of restorative justice is also in line with progressive legal theory because it positions law as an instrument for realizing substantive justice and social benefits. The novelty of this study lies in the analysis of the relationship between restorative justice in theft cases, a progressive legal perspective, and its contribution to overcoming correctional overcapacity as part of the reform of the criminal system in Indonesia.
Moral Considerations of Students in Taking Online Loans: Between Needs and Desires Ratna Kartika Wati; Ani Kusbandiah; Indriati Amarini
Jurnal Moral Kemasyarakatan Vol 10 No 2 (2025): Volume 10, Nomor 2 - Desember 2025
Publisher : Universitas PGRI Kanjuruhan Malang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.21067/jmk.v10i1.11857

Abstract

This study examines students' morality in decision-making regarding online loans. The purpose of this study is to identify factors that influence students' decisions to take online loans and analyze the role of morality in this process. This study uses a combination of qualitative and quantitative methodologies, aiming to provide deeper insights into the social and economic impacts of online loans on students. Data collection techniques include surveys, in-depth interviews, and case study analysis. In the context of the increasingly widespread phenomenon of online loans, especially among students, this study identifies several factors that influence their decisions to borrow. This study also links its findings to the Theory of Planned Behavior (TPB) and Moral Theory. Individual and collective morality play an important role in decision-making regarding online loans. Collective morality, which includes the norms and values ​​of social groups, also influences online loan decisions. Students' involvement with online loans has a significant impact. In the short-term, students often experience stress and anxiety due to debt pressure. In the long-term, it can disrupt education and create a cycle of poverty.
Court-Connected Mediation: Resolution of Civil Disputes Based on The Principle of Deliberation Indriati Amarini; Noor Kholifah Hidayati; Izzatul Muna
Jurnal Hukum dan Peradilan Vol 15 No 2 (2026)
Publisher : Pusat Strategi Kebijakan Hukum dan Peradilan Mahkamah Agung RI

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.25216/jhp.15.2.2026.347-364

Abstract

Mediation is a method for peacefully resolving disputes. In Indonesia, mediation has been part of the court dispute resolution process since the introduction of the Dutch East Indies court procedural law. The Supreme Court has since reinforced mediation through regulations to facilitate early dispute resolution. However, the practical application of mediation in courts has not reached its full potential. This research examines the court mediation model in light of Pancasila values. The study employs doctrinal research methods and analyzes secondary data, including laws, regulations, books, research findings, and academic journals, through qualitative analysis. Findings indicate that disputes are ideally resolved through deliberation, with court proceedings a last resort. Mediation aligns with Pancasila's philosophical foundations, emphasizing consensus-building through deliberation. This principle is crucial for national life and governance and is grounded in the Pancasila value of democracy guided by wise deliberation and representation. Court mediation, reflecting Pancasila values, involves a neutral third party, typically a judge, to facilitate a fair resolution, aiming not only for agreement but also for harmony, unity, and justice among the conflicting parties.
Analisis Yuridis Terhadap Putusan Yang Telah Berkekuatan Hukum Tetap (Inkracht Van Gewijsde) Studi Kasus Silfester Matutina Lilis Sugiati; Indriati Amarini
JURNAL PENELITIAN SERAMBI HUKUM Vol 19 No 02 (2026): Jurnal Penelitian Serambi Hukum Vol 19 No 02 Tahun 2026 (Februari-Juli)
Publisher : Fakultas Hukum Universitas Islam Batik Surakarta

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.59582/sh.v19i02.1534

Abstract

The enforcement of criminal court decisions that have obtained final and binding legal force (inkracht van gewijsde) in Indonesia is frequently delayed, thereby undermining public trust in law enforcement and the principle of legal certainty. This study aims to provide a juridical analysis of the regulation and implementation of the execution of such decisions through a case study of Silfester Matutina, who was sentenced to 1.6 years imprisonment for defamation against Jusuf Kalla, but whose sentence remained unenforced for more than six years. This research employs a normative juridical method, drawing on statutory and conceptual approaches, and drawing on legal frameworks such as the Kitab Undang-Undang Hukum Acara Pidana (KUHAP) or the Indonesian Code of Criminal Procedure, the Kitab Undang-Undang Hukum Pidana (KUHP) or the Indonesian Penal Code, and the Undang-Undang Kejaksaan or the Law on the Public Prosecution Service, as well as relevant court decisions. The findings indicate that the public prosecutor, as the sole executor of criminal judgments, bears full responsibility through the issuance of an execution warrant. However, in the case of Silfester Matutina, the execution of a final and binding decision was hindered by inter-agency coordination failures, prolonged delays, and alleged external intervention, all of which contravene the stipulated execution timeframe of seven days. Accordingly, this study underscores the need to strengthen prosecutorial independence, develop integratedinformation systems, and implement rigorous oversight mechanisms to ensure the timely and transparentexecution of final court decisions.
Analisis Penerapan Kode Etik dan Pedoman Perilaku Hakim : Studi Pelanggaran Prinsip Berdisiplin Tinggi Ersa Julia Azahra; Ika Ariani Kartini; Indriati Amarini; Marsitiningsih
Jurnal Sakato Ekasakti Law Review Vol. 5 No. 2 (2026): Jurnal Sakato Ekasakti Law Review
Publisher : LPPM Universitas Ekasakti

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31933/krh93f71

Abstract

Penelitian ini mengkaji penerapan prinsip “Berdisiplin Tinggi” dalam Kode Etik dan Pedoman Perilaku Hakim (KEPPH) di Indonesia, khusunya terkait pelanggaran kedisiplinan hakim. Prinsip ini mengatur kewajiban hakim untuk melaksanakan tugas sebagai bagian dari integritas dan profesionalitas hakim dalam menegakkan kekuasaan kehakiman yang independen dan akuntabel. Metode penelitian yang digunakan adalah penelitian hukum yuridis normatif dengan pendekatan perundang-undangan dan analisis deskriptif terhadap dokumen hukum dan literatur terkait. Data yang digunakan berupa data sekunder yang diperoleh melalui studi kepustakaan terhadap peraturan perundang-undangan, dokumen resmi, buku, dan jurnal ilmiah yang relevan. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa prinsip berdisiplin tinggi merupakan instrumen etik yang berfungsi menjaga integritas, profesionalitas, dan akuntabilitas hakim. Penegakannya dilakukan melalui pengawasan internal oleh Mahkamah Agung dan pengawasan eksternal oleh Komisi Yudisial. Pelanggaran terhadap prinsip ini dapat dikenakan sanksi mulai dari teguran hingga pemberhentian tetap. Oleh karena itu, penegakan disiplin yang konsisten diperlukan untuk menjaga kehormatan lembaga peradilan dan meningkatkan kepercayaan masyarakat terhadap sistem peradilan di Indonesia.
IMPLEMENTATION OF JUDICIAL ACTIVISM IN JUDGE’S DECISION Indriati Amarini
Jurnal Hukum dan Peradilan Vol 8 No 1 (2019)
Publisher : Pusat Strategi Kebijakan Hukum dan Peradilan Mahkamah Agung RI

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.25216/jhp.8.1.2019.21-38

Abstract

The task of the judge in realizing justice is inseparable from the decisions that are made. A qualified judge's decision is obtained through the judge's thought process through a choice of judges that reflects judicial activism. The problem in this research is how judicial activism is used by judges in issuing decisions and how the implementation of judicial activism in decision making. Judicial Activism is the choice of decision making by judges in order to realize justice. Judicial activism in the Indonesian judicial system is regulated in Article 5 paragraph (1) of Law Number 48 of 2009 concerning Judicial Power. The law requires judges to explore the law and sense of justice that lives in society. The implementation of judicial activism is carried out by judges through means of legal discovery. Through means of legal discovery, judges play an active role in realizing justice as a law that lives in a dynamically developing society.
The Relevance of the Una Via Principle in the Enforcement of Election Criminal Law in Indonesia in Case Number 233/Pid.Sus/2024/PT Mam at the West Sulawesi High Court: Relevansi Prinsip Una Via dalam Penegakan Hukum Pidana Pemilu di Indonesia pada Perkara Nomor 233/Pid.Sus/2024/PT. Mam di Pengadilan Tinggi Sulawesi Barat Slamet Suwaryo; Soediro; Indriati Amarini; Selamat Widodo
Neoclassical Legal Review: Journal of Law and Contemporary Issues Vol. 5 No. 1 (2026): In-Press - Neoclassical Legal Review: Journal of Law and Contemporary Issues
Publisher : Talenta Publisher

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.32734/nlr-jolci.v5i1.26408

Abstract

This research aims to determine the relevance of handling violations of the Election Law through the application of the Una Via Principle in the decision of the West Sulawesi High Court in case number 233/Pid.Sus/2024/PT.Mam, as well as to examine the relevance of the Una Via Principle in the enforcement of election criminal law in Indonesia. This research is normative legal research; therefore, the materials examined are library materials or secondary data obtained through literature study. The data that have been obtained are then analyzed qualitatively, so that the data are presented in a descriptive-prescriptive manner, and the method of drawing conclusions is carried out deductively. This research reaches two conclusions. First, in Decision Number 233/Pid.Sus/2024/PT Mam, the Una Via Principle is highly relevant to be applied because, although administrative sanctions are formally not criminal in nature, substantively they produce a second punitive effect (quasi punitive effect). This inconsistency directly undermines the principles of proportionality and legal certainty (Article 28D paragraph 1 of the 1945 Constitution). Through this reconstruction, election law enforcement is no longer sectoral in nature, but becomes an integrated system based on the Una Via Principle in order to guarantee legal certainty, justice, and the effectiveness of handling campaign violations. Second, the Una Via Principle is relevant because it is able to overcome the problem of fragmented authority, which has long been a major obstacle in election law enforcement. Through this principle, every campaign violation is processed within one coordinated handling pathway, thereby avoiding overlapping authority and accelerating case resolution, as well as preventing excessive punishment.
Penyelesaian Sengketa yang Efektif dan Efisien Melalui Optimalisasi Mediasi di Pengadilan Indriati Amarini
Kosmik Hukum Vol. 16 No. 2 (2016)
Publisher : Universitas Muhammadiyah Purwokerto

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.30595/kosmikhukum.v16i2.1954

Abstract

Lembaga peradilan merupakan suatu mekanisme yang disediakan oleh negara untuk menyelesaikan sengketa. Salah satu gagasan Mahkamah Agung yang progresif dalam rangka mewujudkan peradilan efektif dan efisien antara lain membentuk lembaga mediasi di Pengadilan (court connected mediation) untuk perkara-perkara perdata. Namun nampaknya upaya lembaga Mahkamah Agung tersebut perlu lebih disempurnakan melalui peningkatan kualitas serta kuantitas sumber daya manusia, peningkatan sarana prasarana yang mendukung dan lembaga ini  konsisten untuk dilaksanakan.Kata Kunci : Mediasi di Pengadilan, Peradilan efektif dan efisien 
Evaluasi Aktualisasi Pancasila Melalui Harmonisasi Hukum Indriati Amarini
Kosmik Hukum Vol. 17 No. 2 (2017)
Publisher : Universitas Muhammadiyah Purwokerto

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.30595/kosmikhukum.v17i2.2326

Abstract

Tulisan ini didasari perlunya revitalisasi Pancasila sebagai dasar negara dan pandangan hidup berbangsa dan bernegara. Pancasila sebagai cita hukum (rechtsidee) harus dijadilan dasar dan tujuan setiap hukum di Indonesia. Evaluasi aktualisasi Pancasila dalam perumusan peraturan perundang-undangan dapat dilakukan melalui harmonisasi hukum sebagai upaya atau proses untuk merealisasi keselarasan, kesesuaian, keserasian, kecocokan, keseimbangan diantara norma-norma hukum di dalam peraturan perundang-undangan sebagai sistem hukum dalam satu kesatuan kerangka sistem hukum nasional. Apabila ada dugaan pelanggaran oleh dan di dalam sebuah Peraturan Daerah (Perda) maka harus diuji dan diawasi sesuai dengan instrumen hukum yang tersedia seperti pembatalan oleh pemerintah, judicial review, legislative review dan instrumen hukum lain yang menyangkut seleksi perencanaan yaitu Prolegnas dan Prolegda. Kata kunci: Revitalisasi, Pancasila, Harmonisasi Hukum
Pencegahan Dampak Negatif Perkembangan Teknologi Informasi Terhadap Pengguna Internet Indriati Amarini
Kosmik Hukum Vol. 18 No. 1 (2018)
Publisher : Universitas Muhammadiyah Purwokerto

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.30595/kosmikhukum.v18i1.2340

Abstract

Tulisan ini menguraikan perkembangannya teknologi yang mendasari suatu tipe baru sistem budaya yang mengatur kembali keseluruhan dunia sosial sebagai objek kontrol. Teknologi bukan sekedar bermakna akan tetapi telah menjadi suatu lingkungan dan suatu jalan hidup dan ini merupakan dampak yang substantif (substantif impact). Internet merupakan simbol material embrio masyarakat global yang menawarkan ruang baru yaitu cyberspace realitas baru yaitu realitas virtual, komunitas baru yaitu virtual community. Dalam rangka mencegah cyber crime tidak cukup hanya melalui pengaturan melalui undang-undang. Hal ini dikarenakan penggunaan hukum pidana dalam penanggulangan kejahatan hanya merupakan kurieren am symptom. Hal ini dikarenakan hukum pidana hanya merupakan pengobatan simptomatik dan bukan pengobatan kausatif. Berkaitan dengan perkembangan ilmu pengetahuan dan teknologi yang menimbulkan permasalahan di bidang hukum, aparat penegak hukum yaitu hakim dapat menggunakan kekuasaan yang luas sebagai judge made law. Kata kunci: Dampak Negatif; Teknologi Informasi, Pengguna Internet
Co-Authors Aditya Singgih Raharjo Aeni, Nikmah Amin, Muhamad Sodikul Ani Kusbandiah Attamimi, Zeehan Fuad Dian Widyaningtyas, Raden Rara Dwi Lulu Afsan Saputra Elza Suryawan Martioso Ersa Julia Azahra Haikal, M. Surya Hidayah, Astika Nurul Ismail, Noorfajri Izzatul Muna Kartini, Ika Ariani Lilis Sugiati Marsitiningsih Marsitiningsih Marsitiningsih, Marsitiningsih Mukarromah, Safitri Nico Setiadi Nikmah Fitriah Noor Kholifah Hidayati Noorfajri Ismail Putri, Shafira Rizqyta Amalia Rahtami Susanti Ratna Kartika Wati Ratna Kartikawati Saefudin, Yusuf Samhudi, Gamalel Rifqi Slamet Suwaryo Soediro Soraya, Thalia Firda Tegar Eris Pambudi Widodo, Selamat