Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
2.012
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal International Journal of Evaluation and Research in Education (IJERE) Jurnal Studi Pemerintahan Ilmu Administrasi Publik Dia: Jurnal Administrasi Publik Masyarakat, Kebudayaan dan Politik Syntax Literate: Jurnal Ilmiah Indonesia Journal of Humanities and Social Studies Dinasti International Journal of Education Management and Social Science Jurnal Layanan Masyarakat (Journal of Public Service) JKAP (Jurnal Kebijakan dan Administrasi Publik) Jurnal Studi Pemerintahan
Antun Mardiyanta
Department Of Public Administration, Faculty Of Social And Political Sciences, Universitas Airlangga
Arts Humanities Decision Sciences, Operations Research & Management Economics, Econometrics & Finance Education Environmental Science Languange, Linguistic, Communication & Media Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Social Sciences Other

Published : 13 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 13 Documents
Search

 1   2 
Strengths and Interests Between Actors in Collaborative Governance: Review of the Riverside Settlement Revitalization Policy in Banjarmasin City Muhammad Noor; Falih Suaedi; Antun Mardiyanta
JKAP (Jurnal Kebijakan dan Administrasi Publik) Vol 27, No 2 (2023): November
Publisher : Magister Ilmu Administrasi Publik

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.22146/jkap.83437

Abstract

This study aims to analyze and identify the strengths and interests of state actors and non-state actors in the revitalization of residents’ houses in the riverside area of Banjarmasin City from the perspective of Collaborative Governance. This study used a qualitative approach by collecting data through observation, in-depth analysis, and document analysis. The findings of this study explain that collaborative governance is an alternative to public policy as an interactive process involving state and non-state actors autonomously who use shared rules and norms carried out collectively to solve societal problems. Collaboration involving actors in power with interests in decision-making might fail during its implementation. This research contributes to the scientific literature on interactions between actors and collaborative governance because the problems faced by the public are fought for, and collaborative governance implementation cannot be separated from the presence of actors involved in advocating for issues of public concern. 
Using the Advocacy Coalition Framework to Reject the Environmental Permit for Hazardous and Toxic Waste Processing: Resources and Strategy Used by Community of Lakardowo Village Ramaditya Rahardian; Rizky Wijayanti; Antun Mardiyanta
Jurnal Studi Pemerintahan Vol 11, No 1 (2020): February 2020
Publisher : Department of Government Affairs and Administration, Universitas Muhammadiyah Yogyakarta

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.18196/jgp.111110

Abstract

This research aims to see how a set of policy advocacy carried out by a community of Penduduk Lakardowo Bangkit (Pendowo Bangkit) to reject the environtmental permit policy for Hazardous and Toxic Waste treatment in Lakardowo Village and close the waste company, which is considered to pollute the environment. Advocacy Coalition Framework (ACF) theory as the main analysis to observe the reality that occurs in the field that only sees resources in advocacy includes formal legal authorities to make a decision, develop a public opinion, information and data obtained, mobilize forces to carry out the pressure, finance, and the art of leadership. We use a qualitative research method with data collection techniques through in-depth interviews with several informants as well as digging documentation relating to the issue of policy advocacy occurred in Lakardowo Village. The number of informants in the research were four people, determined based on the purposive sampling technique. In checking the validity of the data, we use the triangulation of sources such as data reduction, data presentation, data condensation, drawing conclusions, and verification. The findings show that, in reality, the villagers through the Pendowo Bangkit community had used various resources and strategies in policy advocacy to reject the permit policy for Hazardous And Toxic Waste treatment in Lakardowo Village and demanded the closure of the industry. The results of the policy advocacy carried out have not succeeded in producing positive results in favor of the people of Lakardowo Village.
Impact Evaluation of The Legal Aid Program fo The Poor Community in Malang Regency, East Java Province Aji Ramadhan Choirur Rofiansyah; Antun Mardiyanta; Tuan Nooriani Tuan Ismail
Dinasti International Journal of Education Management And Social Science Vol. 6 No. 5 (2025): Dinasti International Journal of Education Management and Social Science (June
Publisher : Dinasti Publisher

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.38035/dijemss.v6i5.4717

Abstract

Access to justice is a fundamental principle in a democratic legal system, reflecting the right of every individual to obtain equal legal protection regardless of social or economic background. In Malang Regency, the provision of legal aid for the poor and vulnerable groups is regulated by Malang Regent Regulation No. 31 of 2023, which aims to ensure that these rights are respected. However, challenges in implementation remain, including the absence of empirical evaluation regarding the program’s impact on local communities. This study adopts a qualitative approach with an interpretivist epistemological stance to evaluate the impact of the legal aid program in Malang Regency. Through in-depth interviews and contextual analysis, the research explores community experiences in accessing legal services and the socio-cultural challenges that influence them. Findings indicate that limited access to information, education, resources, and legal assistance hinders the empowerment of vulnerable groups in realizing their fundamental rights. The study emphasizes the importance of expanding the criteria for legal aid beneficiaries beyond economic factors to include other vulnerable groups, such as persons with disabilities, women and children survivors of violence, and street children. Using the theoretical frameworks of Public Policy Analysis and Program Evaluation, this study argues that effective legal aid provision requires not only procedural mechanisms but also community-based empowerment strategies and the integration of local cultural values. Policy recommendations include strengthening the institutional capacity of legal aid organizations, expanding public legal education, increasing budget allocations, and fostering collaboration between government agencies, community leaders, the private sector, and universities. This study contributes to public policy discourse by asserting the need for inclusive and socially just access to legal protection.
Co-Authors Aji Ramadhan Choirur Rofiansyah Ariawantara, Putu Aditya Ferdian Asmorowati, Sulikah Bintoro Wardiyanto Donny Ermawan Ekky Fiorentina Asterix Eko Supeno Erna Setijaningrum Falih Suaedi Fendy Suhariadi Gitadi Tegas Supramudyo Irianto, Jusuf Kacung Marijan Keban, Philipus Maulana Amirul Adha Muhammad Noor Nanang Haryono Nurabadi, Ahmad Rahardian, Ramaditya Ramaditya Rahardian Rendy Billiyanto Rizky Wijayanti RIZKY WIJAYANTI Rochyati Wahyuni Triana Soegiono, Agie Nugroho Suji Suji Sunaryo Haryono Teguh Triwiyanto Tuan Nooriani Tuan Ismail Widy Cahyani Mega Mahardika Yuli Eka Fauziah