Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
3.706
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal International Journal of Evaluation and Research in Education (IJERE) Jurnal Studi Pemerintahan Ilmu Administrasi Publik Jurnal Natapraja : Kajian Ilmu Administrasi Negara Dia: Jurnal Administrasi Publik JAM : Jurnal Aplikasi Manajemen ISLAMICA: Jurnal Studi Keislaman Jurnal Kebijakan dan Administrasi Publik Masyarakat, Kebudayaan dan Politik Syntax Literate: Jurnal Ilmiah Indonesia Journal of Humanities and Social Studies Dinasti International Journal of Education Management and Social Science Jurnal Layanan Masyarakat (Journal of Public Service) BISNIS & BIROKRASI: Jurnal Ilmu Administrasi dan Organisasi Jejaring Administrasi Publik (JAP) Jurnal Politik JKMP (Jurnal Kebijakan dan Manajemen Publik) JKAP (Jurnal Kebijakan dan Administrasi Publik) The Sunan Ampel Review of Political and Social Sciences Jurnal Studi Pemerintahan Journal of Economic Resilience and Sustainable Development
Antun Mardiyanta
Department Of Public Administration, Faculty Of Social And Political Sciences, Universitas Airlangga
Religion Arts Humanities Decision Sciences, Operations Research & Management Economics, Econometrics & Finance Education Environmental Science Languange, Linguistic, Communication & Media Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Public Health Social Sciences Other

Published : 25 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 25 Documents
Search

 1   2   3 
Innovative Leadership-Discresive In Improvement Sustainable Village Participation Suji Suji; Falih Suaedi; Antun Mardiyanta
JHSS (JOURNAL OF HUMANITIES AND SOCIAL STUDIES) Vol 7, No 1 (2023): JHSS (Journal of Humanities and Social Studies)
Publisher : UNIVERSITAS PAKUAN

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.33751/jhss.v7i1.8612

Abstract

Although there has been much research on innovative leadership in both private and public organizations, there is still little empirical evidence showing that innovative leadership at the village level can increase community participation in a sustainable manner. The purpose of this study is to describe and analyze comprehensively the characteristics of the village head's innovative leadership in exploring the innovative leadership of the village head in creating sustainable citizen participation in the village of Mojodeso. This research was conducted using a case study approach. Research subjects were selected purposively, data obtained by in-depth interviews, observation and documentation. The findings in this study are the village head's RT Fund Allocation innovation (radical innovation) followed by providing training in making proposals with RT assistance (innovation adoption) when residents compile and carry out the proposed activities while at the same time compiling the reporting so that the capacity of the residents is created to become more empowered and result in optimizing the participation of villagers in a sustainable manner. In addition, the village head's innovative leadership is accompanied by concern and empathy which creates an aspirational and bottom-up nuanced program, equipped with the courage to make discreet decisions and the ability to manage conflict to become functional (Coser, 1956, Ivancevich, Konopaske and Matteson, 2006). Which actually fosters citizen loyalty to always participate actively (Surbakti, 2010) and be involved (Jung Hyun, 2018) in the process of village development. The implication of these findings, in innovative leadership, it is necessary to emphasize discretive innovative capabilities by providing assistance to citizens and capabilities creating and managing conflict becomes functional to increase as well as maintain the active participation of community members in a sustainable manner.
Best Practice Program Pengelolaan Sampah Terpadu di Kabupaten Lamongan Widy Cahyani Mega Mahardika; Bintoro Wardiyanto; Antun Mardiyanta
Syntax Literate Jurnal Ilmiah Indonesia
Publisher : Syntax Corporation

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

Penelitian ini bertujuan melihat dan menganalisis best practice dalam program pengelolaan sampah terpadu Sampahku Tanggung Jawabku di Kabupaten Lamongan. Permasalahan yang terjadi adalah tingginya volume timbulan sampah dan masa guna Tempat Pembuangan Akhir (TPA) Tambakrigadung Kabupaten Lamongan. Teori yang digunakan adalah best practice dari United Nations Habitat dengan indikator: dampak, kemitraan, keberlanjutan, kepemimpinan dan pemberdayaan masyarakat, inovasi dalam konteks lokal dan dapat di transfer, kesetaraan gender dan pengecualian sosial. Sedangkan metode yang digunakan adalah metode penelitian kualitatif degan tipe penelitian menggunakan deskriptif. Lokasi penelitian ini berada di Kabupaten Lamongan. Informan penelitian ini bersumber dari Dinas Lingkungan Hidup Kabupaten Lamongan, Tempat Pengolahan Sampah Terpadu (TPST) Samtaku Lamongan, dan Tempat Pembuangan Akhir (TPA) Tambakrigadung. Data yang dikumpulkan diperoleh melalui wawancara mendalam, observasi dan studi dokumen. Hasil penelitian ini menunjukan bahwa program pengelolaan sampah terpadu Samtaku Kabupaten Lamongan berjalan dengan baik. Dalam pelaksanaannya program telah memenuhi semua kriteria best practice yaitu dampak, kemitraan, keberlanjutan, kepemimpinan dan pemberdayaan masyarakat, inovasi dalam konteks lokal dan dapat di transfer, kesetaraan gender dan pengecualian sosial.
Strengths and Interests Between Actors in Collaborative Governance: Review of the Riverside Settlement Revitalization Policy in Banjarmasin City Muhammad Noor; Falih Suaedi; Antun Mardiyanta
JKAP (Jurnal Kebijakan dan Administrasi Publik) Vol 27, No 2 (2023): November
Publisher : Magister Ilmu Administrasi Publik

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.22146/jkap.83437

Abstract

This study aims to analyze and identify the strengths and interests of state actors and non-state actors in the revitalization of residents’ houses in the riverside area of Banjarmasin City from the perspective of Collaborative Governance. This study used a qualitative approach by collecting data through observation, in-depth analysis, and document analysis. The findings of this study explain that collaborative governance is an alternative to public policy as an interactive process involving state and non-state actors autonomously who use shared rules and norms carried out collectively to solve societal problems. Collaboration involving actors in power with interests in decision-making might fail during its implementation. This research contributes to the scientific literature on interactions between actors and collaborative governance because the problems faced by the public are fought for, and collaborative governance implementation cannot be separated from the presence of actors involved in advocating for issues of public concern. 
Strengths and Interests Between Actors in Collaborative Governance: Review of the Riverside Settlement Revitalization Policy in Banjarmasin City Noor, Muhammad; Suaedi, Falih; Mardiyanta, Antun
JKAP (Jurnal Kebijakan dan Administrasi Publik) Vol 27, No 2 (2023): November
Publisher : Magister Ilmu Administrasi Publik

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.22146/jkap.83437

Abstract

This study aims to analyze and identify the strengths and interests of state actors and non-state actors in the revitalization of residents’ houses in the riverside area of Banjarmasin City from the perspective of Collaborative Governance. This study used a qualitative approach by collecting data through observation, in-depth analysis, and document analysis. The findings of this study explain that collaborative governance is an alternative to public policy as an interactive process involving state and non-state actors autonomously who use shared rules and norms carried out collectively to solve societal problems. Collaboration involving actors in power with interests in decision-making might fail during its implementation. This research contributes to the scientific literature on interactions between actors and collaborative governance because the problems faced by the public are fought for, and collaborative governance implementation cannot be separated from the presence of actors involved in advocating for issues of public concern. 
YOUTH PEOPLE’S CIVIC AND POLITICAL ENGAGEMENT AT SMAN 1 GIRI, BANYUWANGI REGENCY Keban, Philipus; Irianto, Jusuf; Suaedi, Falih; Supeno, Eko; Wardiyanto, Bintoro; Sunaryo, Sunaryo; Mardiyanta, Antun; Supramudyo, Gitadi Tegas; Triana, Rochyati Wahyuni; Setijaningrum, Erna; Asmorowati, Sulikah; Haryono, Nanang; Ferdian, Putu Aditya; Soegiono, Agie Nugroho; Hariani, Nurul Jamila
Jurnal Layanan Masyarakat (Journal of Public Services) Vol. 8 No. 3 (2024): JURNAL LAYANAN MASYARAKAT
Publisher : Universitas Airlangga

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.20473/jlm.v8i3.2024.313-328

Abstract

This community service activity aims to increase the political and civil literacy of novice voters in preparation for the 2024 Simultaneous Elections in Indonesia. The targets of this community service activity are school students or youth who are at least 17 years old in the year the 2024 Simultaneous Election will be held. Youth were chosen as the main target because they are a group with a large proportion in the 2024 election contestation which will determine the future of democracy. As new voters, they need preparation and a deep understanding of how to participate in the political process effectively to determine the direction and policies of government. For this reason, the Public Administration Department of Universitas Airlangga will partner with the East Java Provincial Education Office which will later provide guidance to the SMAN 1 Giri, Banyuwangi Regency to hold a community service program at the school. Community service activities will involve understanding the political system, democratic processes, political issues, and the importance of active political participation. Activities will be carried out through three main stages: preparation, implementation and evaluation. The preparatory stage involves collecting and compiling relevant political and civic literacy materials. Next, the implementation stage will involve counseling, workshops and group discussions to provide in-depth understanding to novice voters. The evaluation stage will be carried out to measure the effectiveness of the program and obtain feedback from participants. It is hoped that this activity will provide a fundamental contribution in increasing the political and civil literacy of novice voters. With a better understanding of the political system, first-time voters will be able to make good political decisions, participate actively in the political process, and critically evaluate the information they receive.
Using the Advocacy Coalition Framework to Reject the Environmental Permit for Hazardous and Toxic Waste Processing: Resources and Strategy Used by Community of Lakardowo Village Ramaditya Rahardian; Rizky Wijayanti; Antun Mardiyanta
Jurnal Studi Pemerintahan Vol 11, No 1 (2020): February 2020
Publisher : Department of Government Affairs and Administration, Universitas Muhammadiyah Yogyakarta

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.18196/jgp.111110

Abstract

This research aims to see how a set of policy advocacy carried out by a community of Penduduk Lakardowo Bangkit (Pendowo Bangkit) to reject the environtmental permit policy for Hazardous and Toxic Waste treatment in Lakardowo Village and close the waste company, which is considered to pollute the environment. Advocacy Coalition Framework (ACF) theory as the main analysis to observe the reality that occurs in the field that only sees resources in advocacy includes formal legal authorities to make a decision, develop a public opinion, information and data obtained, mobilize forces to carry out the pressure, finance, and the art of leadership. We use a qualitative research method with data collection techniques through in-depth interviews with several informants as well as digging documentation relating to the issue of policy advocacy occurred in Lakardowo Village. The number of informants in the research were four people, determined based on the purposive sampling technique. In checking the validity of the data, we use the triangulation of sources such as data reduction, data presentation, data condensation, drawing conclusions, and verification. The findings show that, in reality, the villagers through the Pendowo Bangkit community had used various resources and strategies in policy advocacy to reject the permit policy for Hazardous And Toxic Waste treatment in Lakardowo Village and demanded the closure of the industry. The results of the policy advocacy carried out have not succeeded in producing positive results in favor of the people of Lakardowo Village.
From Tradition to Rationality: Understanding Voter Behavior in Madura’s Local Elections Holilah, Holilah; Marijan, Kacung; Mardiyanta, Antun
The Sunan Ampel Review of Political and Social Sciences Vol. 3 No. 2 (2024): June
Publisher : UIN Sunan Ampel Surabaya

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.15642/sarpass.2024.3.2.297-213

Abstract

This study offers an in-depth comparative analysis of the voting behavior of the Madurese community in regional head elections, focusing on the differences between traditional voters influenced by kiai (Islamic scholars) and voters who tend to consider rational factors. This case study examines three main groups: the santri (religious students), the educated class, and the general public. The research is rooted in the central role of kiai within Madura's social and political structure, which has traditionally influenced election outcomes. However, recent corruption cases involving kiai who have served as regional heads raise questions about whether their influence remains or if there has been a shift in the community's voting behavior. The research employs a qualitative approach with a case study design, conducted in four regencies: Bangkalan, Sampang, Pamekasan, and Sumenep. Data were gathered through participatory observation, in-depth interviews with key informants from the three community groups, and documentation studies. Informants were selected based on their cultural involvement and experience in the election process. The findings indicate that although kiai continue to wield significant influence, especially among the santri, there is an emerging trend toward more rational voting behavior among the educated class and the general public. Factors such as candidate quality, vision and mission, and proposed programs are increasingly considered, particularly by students. Additionally, corruption cases involving kiai have led to more critical public perceptions of kiai in politics. This study identifies four voter typologies in Madura: rational, critical, traditional, and skeptical, highlighting the complexity of voting behavior in the region
HOW DO BANKERS WORK DEVIANTLY IN THE CREDIT SECTOR? Sawitri, Dewi Khrisna; Mashud, Mustain; Mardiyanta, Antun
Jurnal Aplikasi Manajemen Vol. 19 No. 3 (2021)
Publisher : Universitas Brawijaya, Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.21776/ub.jam.2021.019.03.19

Abstract

This research is implemented in the banking sector. Knowledge about counterproductive behavior that emerged in banking activity is still limited. Bankers, human resources in the banking sector, deal a lot with customers in their day-to-day job activity by assessing the credit proposal of their bank customers. Qualified credit assessment is essential to determine the approval of bank credit. The failure to assess qualified debtors will result in bad credit in which debtors do not repay the credit they receive. To get qualified credit assessment, bankers follow the 5C Principles in assessing credit proposals. Counterproductive work behavior occurs when workers perform indifferently from what the rules and norms of a company have stated. Qualitative research with a phenomenology approach was conducted to determine how these deviances performed while bankers assessed their customers' credit loan proposals under the 5C Principles. Six bankers with different job positions were the subjects of this study and were interviewed to get in-depth information. This research reveals items of behaviors related to production deviances in each principle they assessed. Deviances are reported in each principle then categorized into production ones since these behaviors deal a lot with how they perform their job in the credit sector.
Menakar Kelayakan Desain Penelitian Studi Kasus Untuk Analisis Kebijakan Prasetiyo; Trisnawati, Melinda; Mardiyanta, Antun
Jejaring Administrasi Publik Vol. 17 No. 1 (2025): Jejaring Administrasi Publik
Publisher : Universitas Airlangga

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.20473/jap.v17i1.67827

Abstract

As a research design, case studies have received a lot of criticism from practitioners. The most substantial criticism is the high potential for bias and its ability to generalize research findings. When associated with policy analysis, both things will have a major impact on the policy recommendations that will be produced. As is commonly known, effective, efficient, and applicable policies are the most important part in overcoming public problems. Therefore, choosing the right method in policy analysis is absolutely necessary to produce qualified policy recommendations. This article uses a literature study method to reveal the advantages, disadvantages, and opportunities for case studies to be used as a research design in policy analysis. Despite the criticism, the advantages of case study research design in providing in-depth and contextual insights and its flexibility in using data collection methods make it a valuable tool in policy analysis. With a careful approach and proper validation, case studies can make a significant contribution to the development of evidence-based policies. Keywords: bias, case study, generalization, public policy analysis, public policy
Evaluation of the implementation of the village fund allocation policy Istifazhuddin, Alif Hazmi; Mardiyanta, Antun
Journal of Economic Resilience and Sustainable Development Vol. 2 No. 1: (February) 2025
Publisher : Institute for Advanced Science, Social, and Sustainable Future

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.61511/ersud.v2i1.2025.1779

Abstract

Background: The village fund allocation policy was introduced in Indonesia to enhance village financial capacity and autonomy. However, despite the implementation of Law No. 6/2014 on Villages, many villages, including Nguwok Village, still experience constraints in fully utilizing the village fund allocation funds due to regulatory control from the local government. This research aims to evaluate the implementation process of the village fund allocation in Nguwok Village, focusing on the allocation, utilization, and effectiveness of the funds within the framework of fiscal decentralization and village autonomy. Methods: This study employs a qualitative descriptive approach with purposive sampling to select key informants. Data collection methods include observations, document analysis, and in-depth interviews with stakeholders such as the Lamongan Regency Government, Modo Subdistrict Office, and Nguwok Village Administration. Findings: Out of seven effectiveness criteria, only three (range, frequency, and bias) were met, while access, service precision, program compatibility, and accountability remain ineffective. The village fund allocation implementation process is also found to be inefficient, with budgeting reports lacking transparency and not detailing fund expenditures. Conclusions: While the village fund allocation funds significantly contribute to Nguwok Village’s financial capacity, village autonomy remains constrained by local government regulations. Despite smooth intergovernmental coordination and timely fund disbursement, village-level decision-making power is limited, and public participation is insufficient. Additionally, budget transparency issues persist, with incomplete reporting of fund utilization. To fully realize village autonomy, the Nguwok Village government must take a more proactive role in decision-making rather than merely following district-level guidelines. Novelty/Originality of this Article: This study provides a critical evaluation of the limitations of the village fund allocation policy implementation despite the legal framework supporting fiscal decentralization. By highlighting the gap between policy and practice, this research offers practical recommendations for improving village autonomy, community participation, and financial transparency.
Co-Authors Aji Ramadhan Choirur Rofiansyah Ariawantara, Putu Aditya Ferdian Biandro Wisnuyana Bintoro Wardiyanto Bintoro Wardiyanto, Bintoro Dewi Khrisna Sawitri Donny Ermawan Ekky Fiorentina Asterix Eko Supeno Erna Setijaningrum Falih Suaedi Fendy Suhariadi Ferdian, Putu Aditya Gitadi Tegas Supramudyo Holilah Holilah, Holilah Irianto, Jusuf Ismail, Tuan Nooriani Tuan Istifazhuddin, Alif Hazmi Kacung Marijan Keban, Philipus Mashud, Mustain Maulana Amirul Adha Mohammad Ayub Mirdad Muhammad Noor Muhammad Noor Nanang Haryono Nurabadi, Ahmad Nurul Jamila Hariani Prasetiyo Prasetiyo Prasetiyo Rahardian, Ramaditya Ramaditya Rahardian Rendy Billiyanto Rizky Wijayanti RIZKY WIJAYANTI Rochyati Wahyuni Triana Rofiansyah, Aji Ramadhan Choirur Soegiono, Agie Nugroho Suji Suji Sulikah Asmorowati Sunaryo Haryono Sunaryo Sunaryo Teguh Triwiyanto Trisnawati, Melinda Tuan Nooriani Tuan Ismail Widy Cahyani Mega Mahardika Yuli Eka Fauziah