Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 12 Documents
Search

Strengths and Interests Between Actors in Collaborative Governance: Review of the Riverside Settlement Revitalization Policy in Banjarmasin City Muhammad Noor; Falih Suaedi; Antun Mardiyanta
JKAP (Jurnal Kebijakan dan Administrasi Publik) Vol 27, No 2 (2023): November
Publisher : Magister Ilmu Administrasi Publik

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.22146/jkap.83437

Abstract

This study aims to analyze and identify the strengths and interests of state actors and non-state actors in the revitalization of residents’ houses in the riverside area of Banjarmasin City from the perspective of Collaborative Governance. This study used a qualitative approach by collecting data through observation, in-depth analysis, and document analysis. The findings of this study explain that collaborative governance is an alternative to public policy as an interactive process involving state and non-state actors autonomously who use shared rules and norms carried out collectively to solve societal problems. Collaboration involving actors in power with interests in decision-making might fail during its implementation. This research contributes to the scientific literature on interactions between actors and collaborative governance because the problems faced by the public are fought for, and collaborative governance implementation cannot be separated from the presence of actors involved in advocating for issues of public concern. 
Using the Advocacy Coalition Framework to Reject the Environmental Permit for Hazardous and Toxic Waste Processing: Resources and Strategy Used by Community of Lakardowo Village Ramaditya Rahardian; Rizky Wijayanti; Antun Mardiyanta
Jurnal Studi Pemerintahan Vol 11, No 1 (2020): February 2020
Publisher : Department of Government Affairs and Administration, Universitas Muhammadiyah Yogyakarta

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.18196/jgp.111110

Abstract

This research aims to see how a set of policy advocacy carried out by a community of Penduduk Lakardowo Bangkit (Pendowo Bangkit) to reject the environtmental permit policy for Hazardous and Toxic Waste treatment in Lakardowo Village and close the waste company, which is considered to pollute the environment. Advocacy Coalition Framework (ACF) theory as the main analysis to observe the reality that occurs in the field that only sees resources in advocacy includes formal legal authorities to make a decision, develop a public opinion, information and data obtained, mobilize forces to carry out the pressure, finance, and the art of leadership. We use a qualitative research method with data collection techniques through in-depth interviews with several informants as well as digging documentation relating to the issue of policy advocacy occurred in Lakardowo Village. The number of informants in the research were four people, determined based on the purposive sampling technique. In checking the validity of the data, we use the triangulation of sources such as data reduction, data presentation, data condensation, drawing conclusions, and verification. The findings show that, in reality, the villagers through the Pendowo Bangkit community had used various resources and strategies in policy advocacy to reject the permit policy for Hazardous And Toxic Waste treatment in Lakardowo Village and demanded the closure of the industry. The results of the policy advocacy carried out have not succeeded in producing positive results in favor of the people of Lakardowo Village.