Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 12 Documents
Search

Perbandingan Mecfix Support dan Konvensional Terhadap Penyembuhan Luka Pada Anak Post Operasi Posterior Sagittal Anorectoplasty (PSARP) di Ruang Perawatan Lantai 1 Paviliun Ade Irma Suryani Rspad Gatot Soebroto Hamimah Hamimah; Budiman Budiman; Fauziah Rudhiati; Dyna Apriany; Chatarina Suryaningsih
Jurnal Ners Vol. 10 No. 4 (2026): OKTOBER 2026
Publisher : Universitas Pahlawan Tuanku Tambusai

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31004/jn.v10i4.63165

Abstract

Anak pascaoperasi Posterior Sagittal Anorectoplasty (PSARP) memiliki risiko gangguan penyembuhan luka karena lokasi luka berada pada area perineum yang rentan terhadap kontaminasi, kelembapan, gesekan, dan gangguan stabilitas. MECFIX Support dikembangkan sebagai alat fiksasi untuk mempertahankan posisi ekstremitas bawah, mengurangi tarikan mekanik pada luka, serta memberikan perlindungan selama proses penyembuhan. Mengetahui perbandingan MECFIX Support dan perawatan konvensional terhadap penyembuhan luka pada anak post operasi PSARP di Ruang Perawatan Lantai 1 Paviliun Ade Irma Suryani RSPAD Gatot Soebroto. Penelitian menggunakan metode kuantitatif dengan pendekatan quasi experimental with control group design. Sampel penelitian berjumlah 34 responden yang dibagi menjadi kelompok MECFIX Support dan kelompok perawatan konvensional, masing-masing 17 responden. Penyembuhan luka diukur menggunakan instrumen REEDA melalui pengukuran pretest dan posttest. Analisis data menggunakan uji statistik nonparametrik Mann-Whitney. Rata-rata skor penyembuhan luka pada kelompok MECFIX Support mengalami penurunan dari 10,41 (SD 3,280) menjadi 3,12 (SD 1,269). Kelompok konvensional mengalami peningkatan dari 10,41 (SD 2,425) menjadi 12,35 (SD 2,668). Uji pengaruh MECFIX Support menunjukkan hasil signifikan (p=0,000). Uji perbedaan setelah intervensi menunjukkan perbedaan signifikan antara kelompok MECFIX Support dan konvensional (p=0,000), dengan mean rank kelompok MECFIX Support sebesar 9,00 dan kelompok konvensional sebesar 26,00. MECFIX Support berpengaruh signifikan dan memberikan hasil penyembuhan luka yang lebih baik dibandingkan perawatan konvensional pada anak post operasi PSARP di RSPAD Gatot Soebroto. MECFIX Support dapat dipertimbangkan sebagai alternatif metode fiksasi dalam mendukung stabilitas, perlindungan, dan proses penyembuhan luka post operasi PSARP pada anak.
Comparison of Effectiveness Between Buteyko Breathing and Balloon Blowing Technique on Oxygen Saturation, Peak Expiratory Flow, and Respiratory Rate in Children (Aged 6-12 Years) With Asthma Sherly Widianti; Murtiningsih Murtiningsih; Fauziah Rudhiati; Dyna Apriany; Sri Wulandari Novianti
Jurnal Ners Vol. 10 No. 4 (2026): OKTOBER 2026
Publisher : Universitas Pahlawan Tuanku Tambusai

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31004/jn.v10i4.63315

Abstract

Asthma in children can cause airflow obstruction and changes in breathing patterns. Buteyko Breathing and Balloon Blowing can be used as complementary non-pharmacological interventions. This study aimed to determine the effectiveness of Buteyko Breathing and Balloon Blowing on Peak Expiratory Flow (PEF), Respiratory Rate (RR), and Oxygen Saturation (SpO₂), and to compare the effectiveness of both exercises in children with asthma. This study used a quasi-experimental design with a two-group pretest-posttest design. The sample consisted of 70 children aged 6-12 years with asthma, comprising 35 participants in the Buteyko Breathing group and 35 in the Balloon Blowing group, selected using purposive sampling. Buteyko Breathing was administered for 15 minutes twice daily for three days, while Balloon Blowing was administered for 15 minutes once daily for three days. PEF was measured using a peak flow meter, RR was counted for one minute, and SpO₂ was measured using a pulse oximeter. Data were analyzed using the Wilcoxon Signed Rank Test and Mann-Whitney U Test. Both groups showed significant changes in PEF, RR, and SpO₂ (p<0.05). The changes in PEF were 9.43 L/min in the Buteyko Breathing group and 8.57 L/min in the Balloon Blowing group; RR changes were 2.17 and 0.80 breaths/min, respectively; and SpO₂ changes were 0.60% and 0.57%, respectively. A significant difference was found in RR changes between groups (p=0.001), whereas PEF (p=0.755) and SpO₂ (p=0.969) did not differ significantly. Buteyko Breathing was more effective in reducing RR, while both exercises showed comparable effectiveness in changing PEF and SpO₂ in children with asthma.