Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 23 Documents
Search

Bridging Global Norms and Local Action: UN Women’s Transnational Advocacy Networks in Combating Gender-Based Violence in Indonesia Dewi Fadhilatunnisa; Wawan Budi Darmawan; Anggia Utami Dewi
Ilomata International Journal of Social Science Vol. 7 No. 2 (2026): April 2026
Publisher : Yayasan Ilomata

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.61194/ijss.v7i2.2061

Abstract

This research examines the role of UN Women’s Transnational Advocacy Networks (TANs) in addressing gender-based violence (GBV) in Indonesia during the 2020–2024 period, focusing on the 16 Days of Activism Against Gender-Based Violence campaign. GBV remains a persistent concern within Indonesia’s policy landscape, and transnational advocacy has become increasingly influential in shaping national discourses. Drawing on the Transnational Advocacy Networks framework developed by Keck and Sikkink, this research analyzes advocacy strategies operating through information politics, symbolic politics, leverage politics, and accountability politics. By concentrating on a defined temporal scope and a single advocacy initiative, the study provides an empirically grounded examination of UN Women’s advocacy practices in Indonesia. The research employs a qualitative methodology based on document analysis of UN Women publications, campaign materials, legal instruments, and reports produced by national institutions and civil society organizations. The findings indicate that advocacy activities predominantly operate through information and symbolic politics by producing and disseminating gender-related data and aligning campaign narratives with international gender equality norms. Overall, this research demonstrates that UN Women’s transnational advocacy in Indonesia primarily contributes to norm diffusion and policy agenda-setting, while post-legislative accountability remains limited across institutional contexts and enforcement practices at national and local levels contexts.
Malpraktik Pemilu dan Korupsi: Analisis terhadap Proses Penghitungan dan Rekapitulasi pada Pemilu Indonesia 2019 Luthfi Hamzah Husin; Heroik Mutaqin Pratama; Wegik Prasetyo; Hendra Hendra; Wawan Budi Darmawan; Firman Manan; Feri Amsari
Integritas: Jurnal Antikorupsi Vol 7 No 1 (2021): INTEGRITAS: Jurnal Antikorupsi
Publisher : Komisi Pemberantasan Korupsi

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.32697/integritas.v7i1.720

Abstract

This article attempts to examine the relationship between election malpractice and corruption by focusing on analyzing frauds in the vote counting and recapitulation process in the 2019 Indonesian Election, specifically in the legislative election. This study tries to fill in the gaps in literature that examines electoral malpractice in Indonesia which is seen more at the campaign stage rather than the vote counting and recapitulation stages in which the role of election management body is very central. To analyze this, this study analyses more specifically the involvement of the General Election Commission (KPU) as election organizer in electoral malpractice. Using document analysis and case study method, this study found that the vote recapitulation stage, especially at the district level, is the most prone phase to electoral malpractice where the involvement of the ad-hoc election administrator and candidates’ witness play an important role there.
Bridging The Gap Between Theory and Practice in Foreign Policy on Myanmar Crisis: Voices from Policymakers Rifqi Mulya Nauli Siregar; Arry Bainus; Wawan Budi Darmawan
Jurnal Ilmu Sosial Indonesia (JISI) JISI: Vol. 6, No. 2 (2025)
Publisher : Fakultas Ilmu Sosial dan Ilmu Politik (FISIP),UIN Syarif Hidayatullah Jakarta

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.15408/jisi.v6i2.46309

Abstract

Abstract. This research examines the gap between theory and practice in Indonesia's foreign policy toward Myanmar's crisis. Using qualitative methodology through interviews with three informants from Indonesia's Ministry of Foreign Affairs, the study analyzes policymakers' perspectives on the Myanmar situation. Findings of this research showed that Indonesia adopted a pragmatic approach prioritizing operational needs over theoretical frameworks, employing quiet diplomacy and inclusive engagement with all conflict parties. The research identifies significant contrasts between practical and theoretical domains regarding ideological orientation, information access, implementation mechanisms, and success metrics for both quiet diplomacy and ASEAN's Five-Point Consensus. Limitations include reliance on policymakers' perspectives without equal representation from theoretical-domain viewpoints and information access restrictions under quiet diplomacy policy. The study illuminates how foreign policy practitioners translate theoretical concepts when navigating complex diplomatic situations, offering insights to strengthen foundations for more effective foreign policy by recognizing constraints and priorities between both theoretical and practical domains.  Keywords: Theory-practice gap, Indonesia foreign policy, quiet diplomacy, Five-Point Consensus, Myanmar, ASEAN.  Abstrak. Penelitian ini membahas kesenjangan antara teori dan praktik dalam kebijakan luar negeri Indonesia terhadap krisis Myanmar. Menggunakan metodologi kualitatif melalui wawancara dengan tiga informan dari Kementerian Luar Negeri Indonesia, penelitian ini menganalisis perspektif para pembuat kebijakan atas situasi di Myanmar. Temuan ini menunjukkan bahwa Indonesia mengadopsi pendekatan pragmatis yang memprioritaskan kebutuhan operasional di atas kerangka kerja teoritis, menggunakan diplomasi yang tenang dan keterlibatan inklusif dengan semua pihak yang berkonflik. Penelitian ini mengidentifikasi perbedaan yang signifikan antara ranah praktis dan teoretis mengenai orientasi ideologi, akses informasi, mekanisme implementasi, dan ukuran keberhasilan diplomasi damai dan Konsensus Lima Poin ASEAN. Keterbatasan yang ada termasuk ketergantungan pada perspektif pembuat kebijakan tanpa representasi yang setara dari sudut pandang domain teoritis dan pembatasan akses informasi dalam kebijakan diplomasi diam. Studi ini menjelaskan bagaimana praktisi kebijakan luar negeri menerjemahkan konsep-konsep teoretis ketika menghadapi situasi diplomatik yang kompleks, memberikan wawasan untuk memperkuat fondasi kebijakan luar negeri yang lebih efektif dengan mengenali kendala dan prioritas antara ranah teoretis dan praktis. Kata Kunci: Kesenjangan Teori-Praktik, Kebijakan luar negeri Indonesia, quiet diplomacy, Five-Point Consensus, Myanmar, ASEAN.