Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2020 - 2025
5.134
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal DE JURE Syiar Hukum: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Jurnal Dinamika Hukum Hukum Islam Jurnal Cita Hukum Unifikasi: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Jurnal IUS (Kajian Hukum dan Keadilan) Jurnal Hukum IUS QUIA IUSTUM UIR LAW REVIEW Jurnal Selat Bina Hukum Lingkungan Lex Librum: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Awang Long Law Review Jurnal Yudisial PROGRESIF: Jurnal Hukum Pagaruyuang Law Journal Pena Justisia: Media Komunikasi dan Kajian Hukum Borneo Law Review Journal LEGAL BRIEF Journal of Contemporary Governance and Public Policy ARSY : Jurnal Aplikasi Riset kepada Masyarakat Indonesian Community Journal Yuridika Bina Hukum Lingkungan Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Journal of Law, Environmental and Justice Jurnal Hukum dan Pembangunan SASI Lex Scientia Law Review
Suparto Suparto
Fakultas Hukum Universitas Islam Riau
Religion Agriculture, Biological Sciences & Forestry Humanities Computer Science & IT Economics, Econometrics & Finance Environmental Science Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Public Health Social Sciences Other

Published : 52 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 52 Documents
Search

 2   3   4   5   6 
Problematika Pengujian Peraturan Perundang-Undangan Di Mahkamah Agung ( Kajian Terhadap Putusan Mahkamah Agung No. 65 P/HUM/2018) Suparto Suparto
SASI Vol 27, No 1 (2021): Volume 27 Nomor 1, Januari - Maret 2021
Publisher : Faculty of Law, Universitas Pattimura

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.47268/sasi.v27i1.417

Abstract

The Supreme Court (MA) decided that candidates for members of the Regional Representative Council (DPD) from political party administrators for the 2019 Election were still allowed, even though previously the Constitutional Court (MK) had banned it (Decision No. This conflict is due to differences in interpreting the timing of the implementation of the ongoing 2019 Election stage process. The Constitutional Court stated that the decision was enforced since the 2019 Election and this was not retroactive. Because it is still at the Provisional Candidate List (DCS) stage, so it is possible to change regulations. Meanwhile, the Supreme Court considers that the Constitutional Court's decision must be enforced after the 2019 Election or apply in the future (prospective), because the stages have been running, so that changes in requirements can be made The legal implication that occurs is that there is legal uncertainty for the General Election Commission (KPU) to follow which decision. To solve this problem can be used the doctrine of validity (enforceability of norms). The existence of a hierarchy of legal products being tested and a basis for testing certainly has a legal consequence of the existence of a hierarchy of norm validity in the decisions of the Supreme Court and the Constitutional Court. When there is a conflict between the Supreme Court decision and the Constitutional Court, the verdict with the basis and object of examination in the hierarchy of laws and regulations that is higher, namely the Constitutional Court decision, has a higher validity than the Supreme Court decision. So that problems like this do not exist anymore, testing of laws and regulations should only be carried out by one institution, namely the Constitutional Court.
Kontroversi Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Membatalkan Kewenangan Komisi Yudisial Melakukan Rekrutmen Terhadap Hakim Suparto Suparto
SASI Vol 26, No 2 (2020): Volume 26 Nomor 2, April - Juni 2020
Publisher : Faculty of Law, Universitas Pattimura

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.47268/sasi.v26i2.252

Abstract

The Supreme Court conducted a selection of judges without the involvement of the Judiciary Committee. The Judiciary Committee deemed the recruitment was violating the law since it was not involving them in the process. While the Supreme Court viewed that the implementation guidelines for the mutual regulation of the Judiciary Committee and Supreme Court was yet to be existed, while the need for fresh judges was deemed as urgent at that time. Based on that premise, the Supreme Court conducted the recruitment and appointment of judges, several supreme court judges and registrars were conducting a judicial review on the Law No. 49 of 2009, Law No. 50 of 2009, and Law No. 51 of 2009.The Constitutional Court granted their plea with Stipulation No. 43/PUU-XIII/2015.One of the points of considerations of the constitutional judges was the involvement of Judiciary Committee on the recruitment of judges was deemed to disrupt the independency of the Supreme Court. Actually, the involvement of the Judiciary Committee in the selection of judges will not intrude the independency of the judicial power or the judge itself. The independency of judges will be disrupted if the Judiciary Committee is intervening with the technical aspect of judicial power which includescross-examination, trial, and the verdict on a case.
PROBLEMATIKA PEMBENTUKAN PERATURAN DAERAH (PERDA) TENTANG RENCANA TATA RUANG WILAYAH PROVINSI RIAU Suparto Suparto
Bina Hukum Lingkungan Vol. 4 No. 1 (2019): Bina Hukum Lingkungan, Volume 4, Nomor 1, Oktober 2019
Publisher : Asosiasi Pembina Hukum Lingkungan Indonesia (PHLI)

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (134.751 KB)

Abstract

Salah satu Peraturan Daerah (Perda) yang mempunyai fungsi strategis adalah Perda tentang Rencana Tata Ruang Wilayah (RTRW). Akan tetapi penyusunan Perda RTRW ini tidaklah mudah dan berbeda dengan Perda-perda yang lain karena banyak kepentingan yang harus dipertimbangkan. Contohnya adalah dalam penyusunan Perda RTRW Provinsi Riau. Walaupun Perda mengenai RTRW Provinsi Riau telah ditetapkan, penyusunannya memerlukan waktu yang cukup lama dikarenakan banyaknya institusi dan kementerian yang terlibat. Hal ini berbeda dengan penyusunan Perda yang lain. Selain itu, secara teknis di lapangan ada permasalahan yang harus diselesaikan yaitu menyangkut pengosongan areal yang telah menjadi perkebunan kelapa sawit di kawasan hutan. Hal ini bukanlah pekerjaan mudah karena harus menebang pohon kelapa sawit dengan luasan ratusan ribu hektar. Penelitian ini menggunakan metode penelitian hukum normatif dan empiris dengan data sekunder dan primer. Tujuan penelitian ini adalah untuk mengetahui mekanisme dan permasalahan dalam penyusunan RTRW Provinsi Riau.
KEDUDUKAN DAN PROSES PENETAPAN HUTAN ADAT PASCA PUTUSAN MAHKAMAH KONSTITUSI NO. 35/PUU-X/2012 SERTA IMPLEMENTASINYA DI PROVINSI RIAU Suparto Suparto
Bina Hukum Lingkungan Vol. 5 No. 2 (2021): Bina Hukum Lingkungan, Volume 5, Nomor 2, Februari 2021
Publisher : Asosiasi Pembina Hukum Lingkungan Indonesia (PHLI)

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

Berdasarkan Undang-Undang No. 41 Tahun 1999 tentang Kehutanan, hutan adat dimasukkan dalam hutan negara hal ini merugikan masyarakat adat sehingga Undang-undang tersebut diuji ke Mahkamah Konstitusi (MK). Permasalahannya adalah Bagaimana kedudukan dan proses penetapan hutan adat pasca putusan MK No. 35/PUU-X/2012 serta implementasinya di Provinsi Riau. Berdasarkan penelitian diperoleh hasil (1). Kedudukan hutan adat pasca putusan MK No. 35/PUUX/2012, hutan adat tidak lagi Bagian dari hutan negara melainkan menjadi hutan hak. Proses penetapan hutan adat diatur dengan Peraturan Menteri Lingkungan Hidup dan Kehutanan (LHK) No. P.32/Menlhk-Setjen/2015 tentang Hutan Hak. Agar hutan adat menjadi hutan hak, prosesnya melalui dua tahapan yaitu: (a) Pengakuan atas keberadaan masyarakat hukum adat melalui peraturan daerah (Perda). (b) Penetapan oleh Menteri LHK terhadap hutan adat. (2). Sampai saat ini di Provinsi Riau baru ada 2 hutan adat yang telah ditetapkan oleh Menteri LHK yaitu Hutan Adat Kampa dan Hutan Adat Petapahan di Kabupaten Kampar. Oleh karena itu perlu didesak untuk kabupaten lain agar segera membuat Perda tentang masyarakat hukum adat, sebagai syarat untuk penetapan hutan adat oleh Menteri LHK.
POSITION OF CIRCULAR LETTER OF THE SUPREME COURT AS A FOLLOW-UP FROM THE DECISION OF THE CONSTITUTIONAL COURT NUMBER 37/PUU-IX/2011 Suparto; Zulkifli
Awang Long Law Review Vol. 5 No. 1 (2022): Awang Long Law Review
Publisher : Sekolah Tinggi Ilmu Hukum Awang Long

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (395.071 KB) | DOI: 10.56301/awl.v5i1.554

Abstract

Judicial review of Law Number 13 of 2003 concerning Manpower is carried out to the Constitutional Court (MK), one of the reasons is the implementation of Article 155 paragraph (2) has the potential to create legal uncertainty, because there are multiple interpretations related to the term "not yet determined". Constitutional Court Decision No. 37/PUU-IX/2011 granted the petitioners' request, and stated that the phrase "not yet determined" is interpreted as "not yet legally binding" as a result, the wages for the process during the suspension period must be paid until the decision is final and binding. As a follow-up to the Constitutional Court's decision, the Supreme Court (MA) issued a Supreme Court Circular (SEMA) Number 3 of 2015 and one of its contents is that employers pay processing fees for 6 (six) months. This has caused controversy because the content is different from the Constitutional Court's decision. Based on the research, the results show that the Supreme Court does have the authority to issue SEMA but it should only be for the internal judiciary and its contents are not regulatory. If it is regulatory, it should be in the form of PERMA. SEMA is not included in the scope of the Legislation as regulated in Law Number 12 of 2011 concerning the Establishment of Legislation. Regarding the norm of processing wages after the Constitutional Court's Decision Number 37/PUU-IX/2011, the Supreme Court should not need to issue SEMA Number 3 of 2015 regarding processing wages paid for 6 (six) months. The Supreme Court may also not reinterpret the process wages contained in Article 155 paragraph (2) of Law Number 13 of 2003 concerning Manpower which has been decided by the Court until it has permanent legal force. Because the position of the Constitutional Court's decision is equal to the law.
Regional Spatial Regulation in Riau Province: Policy Formation Problems and Solutions Suparto, Suparto; Santos, Jose Gama
Journal of Law, Environmental and Justice Vol. 2 No. 2 (2024): Journal of Law, Environmental and Justice
Publisher : CV. Ius et Ambientis

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.62264/jlej.v2i2.104

Abstract

Regional Regulations (Perda) are statutes enacted by the Regional Head and DPRD that govern the welfare and utility aspects of the region. The Regional Spatial Planning (RTRW) rule is a crucial local ordinance that governs land allocation according to specified functions throughout various regions. The formulation of a Provincial Spatial Planning Regulation is significantly more intricate than other rules, necessitating the consideration and integration of diverse interests and the participation of several institutions, as demonstrated in the development of the Riau Provincial Spatial Planning Regulation. Following an extensive process, the Governor of Riau promulgated Regional Regulation (Perda) No. 10/2018 concerning the Regional Spatial Plan of Riau Province, with the subsequent particulars: 1. Area under cultivation measures 8,067,344 hectares. The protected region encompasses 945,532 hectares of a total expanse of 9,012,876 hectares. Despite the Regional Regulation concerning the Regional Spatial Plan and establishing the Regional Regulation on the Regional Spatial Plan of Riau Province, some concerns persist, specifically the clearance of land allocated for oil palm plantations within forested regions or for reforestation initiatives. This is difficult as it necessitates the deforestation of hundreds of thousands of hectares of oil palm plantations. Consequently, if executed meticulously, this will safeguard the ecosystem, particularly in the lack of legislation governing the restoration of land formerly converted to oil palm farms. The Government should promptly establish an implementing regulation as the legal foundation for oversight, preferably in the form of a presidential regulation
Implikasi Peraturan Pemerintah Nomor 37 Tahun 2021 Tentang Penyelenggaraan Program Jaminan Kehilangan Pekerjaan Terhadap Pemberi Kerja Dan Pekerja Suparto, Suparto; Admiral, Admiral; Susilo, Efendi Ibnu
Lex Librum : Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Vol 11, No 1 (2024): Desember
Publisher : Sekolah Tinggi Ilmu Hukum Sumpah Pemuda

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.46839/lljih.v11i1.1120

Abstract

Government Regulation Number 37 of 2021 on the Implementation of the Job Loss Guarantee Program provides adequate legal protection for workers who lose their jobs, in addition to providing a sense of social security to former workers. It is also in accordance with the mandate of Article 28D of the 1945 Constitution of the Republic of Indonesia, which shows that the state is present in providing legal protection related to severance pay through the job loss guarantee so that workers affected by the termination of employment are still protected for a certain period while they search for new jobs. Because job loss insurance is very important, especially during the pandemic, it is a very good social security measure in Indonesia. Job loss insurance must be implemented properly and continuously monitored to ensure its objectives are achieved without causing problems in the future, and it needs to be socialized to employers and workers. Government Regulation Number 37 of 2021 on the Implementation of the Job Loss Guarantee Program is the government's effort to improve the welfare of the people, especially workers in Indonesia, with the aim of achieving social welfare. The job loss guarantee scheme can help former employees find new jobs more quickly and prevent them from losing the desire to seek new employment.
The Role Of A Dignified Judge Within The Scope Of Judicial Power In Indonesia Efendi Ibnususilo; Suparto Suparto; Aryo Akbar; Faishal Taufiqurrahman
Pena Justisia: Media Komunikasi dan Kajian Hukum Vol. 23 No. 3 (2024): Pena Justisia
Publisher : Faculty of Law, Universitas Pekalongan

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31941/pj.v23i3.4889

Abstract

The supervisory function of the Judicial Commission at that time was met with a lot of resistance from judges, which eventually led to the submission of a judicial review of Law No. 22/2004 on the Judicial Commission to the Constitutional Court, which the Constitutional Court granted. With the granting of the judicial review petition, the Judicial Commission's supervisory function over judges ceased to exist. This raises the question of whether the judges will be able to carry out their duties fairly without external supervision. Purpose Study: Can these judges still carry out their duties fairly without external supervision? If so, then what is the role of these dignified judges within the scope of judicial power in Indonesia? This article uses normative legal research that analyzes relevant secondary data related to the role of dignified judges within the scope of judicial power. This research concludes that a dignified judge is a judge who works professionally based on ethical integrity, moral integrity and intellectual integrity. In order for this to be done, it is necessary to have supervision, both internally and externally. This research shows that there are still many judicial mafias in Indonesia, one of which comes from the judges themselves. this shows that there are still judges who do not work professionally by ignoring ethical and moral values so that many decisions are made that harm justice in society
Strategi Kelompok Tani Desa Mekong Kabupaten Kepulauan Meranti Dalam Peningkatan Ekonomi Masyarakat Desa Zainal Zainal; Ardiansyah Ardiansyah; Suparto Suparto; Halimah Abdul Manaf; Admiral Admiral; Efendi Ibnu Susilo
ARSY : Jurnal Aplikasi Riset kepada Masyarakat Vol. 6 No. 1 (2025): ARSY : Jurnal Aplikasi Riset kepada Masyarakat
Publisher : Lembaga Riset dan Inovasi Al-Matani

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.55583/arsy.v6i1.1255

Abstract

Pemberdayaan masyarakat adalah sebuah proses yang dirancang untuk meningkatkan kemampuan individu dan masyarakat dalam mengelola sumber daya secara mandiri dan berkelanjutan. Kabupaten Kepulauan Meranti, yang terletak di Provinsi Riau, memiliki potensi ekonomi maritim yang cukup besar, terutama dalam industri perikanan. Desa Mekong, yang terletak di wilayah ini, telah menunjukkan berbagai kemajuan dalam keamanan pangan dan meraih kesuksesan dalam kompetisi desa pangan aman tingkat nasional. Nelayan di Desa Mekong menghadapi berbagai masalah, termasuk harga bahan bakar yang tidak stabil, meningkatnya biaya operasional kapal, dan kondisi cuaca buruk yang membatasi aktivitas penangkapan ikan. Selain itu, operasi penambangan timah mengubah habitat perairan, sehingga berdampak pada hasil tangkapan nelayan. Program pengabdian masyarakat ini berupaya memberdayakan masyarakat dengan memberikan dukungan kepada kelompok nelayan di Desa Mekong melalui penyediaan jarring udang. Program ini bertujuan untuk meringankan beban ekonomi para nelayan dan meningkatkan kesejahteraan mereka dengan memfasilitasi akses ke metode produksi yang lebih efisien. Intervensi ini bertujuan untuk meningkatkan daya saing, meningkatkan ketahanan ekonomi, dan membangun paradigma pemberdayaan yang berkelanjutan di sektor perikanan di Kabupaten Kepulauan Meranti.
Analysis of the Synergy of the Penta Helix Model in Handling COVID-19 at the Pekanbaru City Level Ardiansyah Ardiansyah; Suparto Suparto; Wira Atma Hajri; M. Rafi; Pahmi Amri
Journal of Contemporary Governance and Public Policy Vol. 4 No. 1 (2023): (April 2023)
Publisher : Pusat Penelitian Ilmu Sosial dan Humaniora Kontemporer, Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.46507/jcgpp.v4i1.88

Abstract

The government has a crucial role in the management of COVID-19 since it is a leader. However, to speed up breaking the chain of transmission of COVID-19, the government needs various solutions from various stakeholders, considering that the COVID-19 pandemic is a broad problem and all parties are required to work together to achieve this goal. This study aims to explain the influencing factors and implications of the Penta Helix synergy in handling COVID-19 at the Pekanbaru City Level. This study then used a qualitative analysis method with Nvivo 12 Plus as an analytical tool to help visualise data from online media. The findings of this study indicate that the factors that influence the synergy of the Penta Helix model in handling COVID-19 at the Pekanbaru City Level include the role of government, involvement, and equality between actors, joint decision-making processes, formal organization, consensus, and collaboration factors in problem-solving. Then, the synergy of the Penta Helix model in handling COVID-19 in Pekanbaru City has two impacts, namely, the implications for developing the spirit of cooperation and accelerating the handling of the COVID-19 pandemic in Pekanbaru City. The implications of this research provide a reference for the importance of strengthening actor synergy based on a systematic mapping of the balance of roles of each stakeholder to optimally contribute to handling COVID-19 at the Pekanbaru City Level.
Co-Authors A Admiral Admiral Admiral Ardiansyah Ardiansyah Aryo Akbar David Hardiago Dedy Gusniawan Deni Jaya Saputra Despan Heryansyah Efendi Ibnu Susilo Efendi Ibnususilo Ellydar Chaidir Faishal Taufiqurrahman Halimah Abdul Manaf Heni Pujiastuti Kim Hyeonsoo M. Rafi Monika Melina Muhammad Faizal Pahlevi Naurah Dwirengganis Riata Putri Pahmi Amri Puti Mayang Seruni Rani Fadhila Syafrinaldi Riauan, Muhd Ar. Imam Santos, Jose Gama Susilo, Efendi Ibnu Umi Muslikhah Zainal Zulkifli